Poor light, but nice bird!
      | Feb 20, 2018 12:53 | #451 |
      | Feb 20, 2018 16:12 | #452 I will try and get some photos up with the new lens. I can say I now really understand how heat waves can affect things. At 500mm it is hard to get a sharp pic of the neighbors sheep at 300yards, and it's only mid 50's with the sun shining. That is via tripod and live view.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
      | Feb 21, 2018 23:02 | #453 Really going to have to get used to how this lens shoots and environmental conditions having a big impact on photo quality.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
      | I really enjoy my G2... I have found that the longest reliably sharp point for me is 550mm... after that it loses just a bit of sharpness.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
      | Feb 22, 2018 16:03 | #455 Some from today. I think the lens is very capable, I just need to figure out how to best use it. I have a LOT of misses at various focal lengths no matter how I shoot. Again I think it's me, not the lens.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
      | Mar 03, 2018 11:36 | #456 |
      | Mar 03, 2018 11:41 | #457 |
astronotus_2000 Member ![]() More info Post edited 1 month ago by astronotus_2000.       | Mar 04, 2018 05:39 | #458 Been testing a new copy of the Tamron 150-600mm SP G2. Here is what I am finding. The lens does need some serious calibration in order to focus accurately at all focal lengths. That said...in my opinion, if you are not willing to send your camera in to Tamron so they can adjust the lens for you to match your camera, you have to get the Tap-In Console to go with it. It is a lot of work and takes time to really dial down the right numbers. I almost sent the lens back when I first got it. I am including some samples after a week of tweaking and adjusting the lens. No.....the earlier images weren't even close to that and wish I had kept the first set of pictures I took with the lens so I could show the before and after effects of calibration. Jose Rodriguez Gonzalez
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Levina de Ruijter I'm a bloody goody two-shoes! ![]() 17,586 posts Gallery: 256 photos Best ofs: 10 Likes: 5268 Joined Sep 2008 Location: Amsterdam, The Netherlands More info       | Mar 04, 2018 07:28 | #459 astronotus_2000 wrote in post #18577154 ![]() Been testing a new copy of the Tamron 150-600mm SP G2. Here is what I am finding. The lens does need some serious calibration in order to focus accurately at all focal lengths. That said...in my opinion, if you are not willing to send your camera in to Tamron so they can adjust the lens for you to match your camera, you have to get the Tap-In Console to go with it. It is a lot of work and takes time to really dial down the right numbers. I almost sent the lens back when I first got it. I am including some samples after a week of tweaking and adjusting the lens. No.....the earlier images weren't even close to that and which I had kept the first set of pictures I took with the lens so I could show the before and after effects of calibration. I believe the lens is good and when you take into account some of the other features offerred, it is easy to justify going through all the trouble to make the lens work ..... Weight is not an issue compared to the Canon 500 or 600 f4 IS II series, or even the Sigma 150-600mm Sport... Dont forget that In order to get this much reach you would have to spend how much more...? And.... What about the quality of the images? *Yep....the quality of the images coming from this lens is good. I own some quality Canon lenses and no I am not getting rid of them, but considering all the above, this lens at this price point....is a keeper. Hosted photo: posted by astronotus_2000 in ./showthread.php?p=18577154&i=i137487209 forum: Lens Sample Photo Archive Hosted photo: posted by astronotus_2000 in ./showthread.php?p=18577154&i=i148096116 forum: Lens Sample Photo Archive
Levina
LOG IN TO REPLY |
      | Mar 04, 2018 07:49 | #460 I have had this lens for a while, and I finally did send it to Tamron for calibration. I was without my camera and lens for about a week, but the calibration is excellent. I have the Tap-in console, but with a lens this long it really is tricky to get right, and sending it in was much less work and frustration. Digital EOS 7D Mark II Canon: EF 50mm f/1.8 II, EF 50mm f/2.5 Compact Macro, Life-Size Converter EF Tamron: SP 17-50mm f/2.8 DiII, 16-300mm f/3.5-6.3 DiII VC PZD Macro, SP 150-600 f/5-6.3 Di VC USD G2, SP 70-200 f/2.8 Di VC USD, 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5 DiII VC HLD Sigma: 30mm f/1.4 DC Art Rokinon: 8mm f/3.5 AS IF UMC
LOG IN TO REPLY |
      | Mar 04, 2018 17:12 | #461 I think I will be sending mine in too. I have been trying to get it to a better place and certain ranges I am there, but others not so much. Also It seems there is a bit of a difference between my 5d3 and 7d2. Think I will just send them both bodies and the 24-70G2 while I am at it.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
      | One thing to know is that after you send a lens to Tamron for calibration, the console will show all the settings at "0." At first I thought that nothing had been done, but it turns out that the new calibration becomes the "factory default." This would make it easy to return to the calibration they did if one felt the need to mess around with the settings via the console. Digital EOS 7D Mark II Canon: EF 50mm f/1.8 II, EF 50mm f/2.5 Compact Macro, Life-Size Converter EF Tamron: SP 17-50mm f/2.8 DiII, 16-300mm f/3.5-6.3 DiII VC PZD Macro, SP 150-600 f/5-6.3 Di VC USD G2, SP 70-200 f/2.8 Di VC USD, 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5 DiII VC HLD Sigma: 30mm f/1.4 DC Art Rokinon: 8mm f/3.5 AS IF UMC
LOG IN TO REPLY |
      | Mar 05, 2018 01:19 | #463 Curious, how did you go about sending your lens in?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
      | Mar 05, 2018 07:42 | #464 A couple more samples from this past weekend. Jose Rodriguez Gonzalez
LOG IN TO REPLY |
      | Mar 05, 2018 09:29 | #465 |
![]() | x 1600 |
y 1600 |
Log in |
| ||
Latest registered member is Gibby391 755 guests, 463 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017 |