![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Cambridgeshire, UK
Posts: 219
|
A friend loaned me his Sigma 50-500 lens and his tripod to have a play with. So I went out into the back garden, set it all up and shot some local wildlife.
![]() The above was taken at 500mm, 400 ISO, 1/350 at f5.6. I find the results slightly soft. Not sure if it's the focus or a less than perfectly solid tripod (the plates were slightly wobbly) or just the nature of the beast. What's interesting, though, is that I threw my 1.4x TC (Kenko) on it and the results were nearly the same quality as without. And that's with manually focussing. But the 50-500 is a beast (for me) at 1850g. I know if I owned it I would probably drop it on more than one occassion. I really like the reach - effectively 800mm without a TC and 1120 with the 1.4x! Oh well, back to the drawing board.
__________________
Sally "I'm the only 'bent in the village" |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Wildlife 300 2.8 or 500 4.0 advice ? | loebas | Canon EF and EF-S Lenses | 48 | 14th of December 2006 (Thu) 15:37 |
| Sigma 50-500 DG or 80-400 OS for wildlife | CanonLaw | Canon EF and EF-S Lenses | 9 | 14th of March 2006 (Tue) 22:44 |
| Bigma 50-500 or 80-400 OS for Avaition & wildlife | Webmonkeyuk | Canon EF and EF-S Lenses | 9 | 26th of May 2005 (Thu) 13:48 |
| Old Canon D30 and Sigma 50-500 ? | abs | Canon EF and EF-S Lenses | 8 | 31st of March 2005 (Thu) 14:50 |
| Sigma 50-500 vs Canon 100-400 IS, RAW for wildlife | Ladyhawke | Canon EOS Digital Cameras | 14 | 13th of July 2004 (Tue) 16:21 |