Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
Thread started 27 Sep 2005 (Tuesday) 12:45
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

STICKY: -=FAQ=- Teleconverter/T-Con Tele extender Discussion

 
gubak1
Member
Avatar
126 posts
Joined Sep 2006
     
Nov 09, 2006 02:26 |  #46
bannedPermanent ban

Very nice topic!

Thanks!


Digital Camera Overview, News, Forums (external link)
Canon EOS 300D / Digital Rebel review (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
48,194 posts
Gallery: 79 photos
Likes: 4340
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
     
Nov 11, 2006 18:46 |  #47

fWord wrote in post #2052912 (external link)
Was reading the first post and there was a mention that there was a complete haul over for the optics of the Canon 2X MKI TC to produce the current MKII version that allows the Canon 1.4X TC to be stacked onto it.

I've got a chance to lay my hands on a Canon 2X MKI TC and I already have a Sigma APO EX 1.4X TC, and I'm contemplating stacking the two onto a 300mm f/4 to see what effect I can achieve. I know this comes with problems such as loss of AF and reduced IQ, but can the TCs physically be stacked together in the first place?

Does anyone know if the 2X MKII is any better optically when compared to the MKI version? Thanks...hope someone can help on this.

I can answer the second part with confidence;
The MkII version of the 2X is better than the Mk1 optically. I own both, and prefer the MkII on the 500mm and 200mm f/1.8 on those lenses which will show the difference.

As for the first part, though I no longer own a Sigma 1.4X, so I can not actually test this and be 100% certain, since the Sigma and Canon 1.4X are physically very similar, I highly doubt that the Sigma 1.4X will stack with the 2X MkI.. in fact I even seem to recall trying it back when I had the Sigma. So I'm like 90% sure.


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
fWord
Goldmember
Avatar
2,637 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Melbourne, Australia
     
Nov 17, 2006 07:49 |  #48

CyberDyneSystems wrote in post #2249443 (external link)
I can answer the second part with confidence;
The MkII version of the @X is better than the MkII optically. I own both, and prefer the MkII on the 500mm and 200mm f/1.8 on those lenses which will show the difference.

As for the first part, though I no longer own a Sigma 1.4X, so I can not actually test this and be 100% certain, since the Sigma and Canon 1.4X are physically very similar, I highly doubt that the Sigma 1.4X will stack with the 2X MkI.. in fact I even seem to recall trying it back when I had the Sigma. So I'm like 90% sure.

Thanks for the info. However I'm a bit confused about the comparison of optical quality between the MKI and MKII. In the first paragraph it seems like you're comparing like with like, but I'm assuming the MKII is better optically.

Also, I've read somewhere that the MKI was made to be mated with older versions of Canon lenses (eg. 600mm f/4 non-IS) and the MKII was made to be mated with newer Canon lenses. How true is this, according to your experience?


LightWorks Portfolio (external link)
Night Photography Tutorial: Basics & Minutiae (external link)
Gear List (Past & Present)
The Art of Composition IS the Art of Photography.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
48,194 posts
Gallery: 79 photos
Likes: 4340
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
     
Nov 21, 2006 13:30 |  #49

Yep,. typing error, the Mk2 is better than the Mk1 .

As to the age of the lens it's used on, I don't think this matters.
It would make sense, as the Mk1 was made prior to the IS long teles, and thus was made to work with an older generation of lenses,. But I do have one of the older lenses (the 200mm f/1.8 ) and again, on that lens, I feel the Mk2 is better.


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Eagle6
Mostly Lurking
11 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Pollock Pines, CA
     
Nov 24, 2006 12:44 |  #50

I hope this is the right thread to ask this question:

I am trying to choose between the Canon 70-200 F/4L USM or the 70-200 F/4L IS USM.

My challenge is that I would like a lens that I can use either the 1.4 Tcon or the 2.0 Tcon.

If I read the sticky correct, it said that "neither" one of Tcon's will work on
these lenses.

Is that correct, or did I mis-read something?

I would really like to get the 70-200 F2.8 USM but do not like the weight of the lens.

Any opinions????

Tks




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
69,628 posts
Likes: 218
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD USA
     
Nov 24, 2006 14:18 |  #51

I think you misread - the 70-200 f/4 classic works with either per that list. Te f/4 IS only just came out; the list hasn't been updated (but then Canon hasn't updated their compatibility list for the TCs either).


Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Eagle6
Mostly Lurking
11 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Pollock Pines, CA
     
Nov 24, 2006 16:21 as a reply to  @ Jon's post |  #52

Tks for the clarification Jon,
Wonder if anybody has experience with the 70-200 4 IS and the 1.4 or 2.0 Tcon?
or if there would be another Tcon that would work...............

I hate to go just by "trial and error"




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Eagle6
Mostly Lurking
11 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Pollock Pines, CA
     
Nov 27, 2006 17:07 as a reply to  @ Eagle6's post |  #53

Updated information that I just received from Canon support.

The Canon EF 1.4X II Tele extender "IS" compatible with the
Canon 20-200 F/4.0 IS USM.

AF is supposed to work with the 1.4 but they have told me that
if I get the 2.0 extender, AF will not work.

I have cancelled my order for a Tamron Tcon and have ordered
the Canon 1.4.

Will provide update after I try it out.

Thanks everyone for your information, tips and suggestions.

This is a great forrum.............




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Eagle6
Mostly Lurking
11 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Pollock Pines, CA
     
Nov 27, 2006 19:03 as a reply to  @ Eagle6's post |  #54

Sorry, typo in the last response,
I meant 70-200 F/4.0 IS USM...............

Cold fingers, it's snowing outside...........




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
stu ­ @ ­ m ­ developments
Member
217 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Blackpool UK
     
Nov 29, 2006 09:41 |  #55

I am on Ebay currently about to purchase a canon 1.4x teleconvertor thanks to this very informative topic, but i have just looked at my Canon lens and it is a:

Canon Zoom Lens. EF 80 – 200mm. 1: 4.5 – 5.6

Will this fit it? There is no mention of it in the listings. :(


Body: Canon EOS 7D With BG-E7 Battery Grip
Lenses: Canon 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM MKII | Canon 17-55 F2.8 IS USM | Canon 50mm f/1.8 (MKII) | Canon 70 - 300mm F4-5.6 IS USM
Extenders: Canon EF 1.4x MKII and EX 2x MKII
Accessories: Canon EX430 Speedlights x2 | Lexar Pro 1000x 16GB UDMA7 CF Cards

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
69,628 posts
Likes: 218
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD USA
     
Nov 29, 2006 11:55 |  #56

If it's not listed, I wouldn't try it. It's been around long enough that if it would work it'd be listed. The lens diagram at the Canon Camera Museum doesn't look like it would, that's for sure.


Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
stu ­ @ ­ m ­ developments
Member
217 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Blackpool UK
     
Dec 01, 2006 05:04 |  #57

Jon wrote in post #2329474 (external link)
If it's not listed, I wouldn't try it. It's been around long enough that if it would work it'd be listed. The lens diagram at the Canon Camera Museum doesn't look like it would, that's for sure.

You were right, ive bought it and it doenst fit either of my lenses. :evil:

Oh well, i guess this is the point where i decide to either:

A) Buy a lens it will fit.
B) Take it back.

:rolleyes: :rolleyes:


Body: Canon EOS 7D With BG-E7 Battery Grip
Lenses: Canon 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM MKII | Canon 17-55 F2.8 IS USM | Canon 50mm f/1.8 (MKII) | Canon 70 - 300mm F4-5.6 IS USM
Extenders: Canon EF 1.4x MKII and EX 2x MKII
Accessories: Canon EX430 Speedlights x2 | Lexar Pro 1000x 16GB UDMA7 CF Cards

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gcogger
Goldmember
2,554 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2003
Location: Southampton, UK
     
Dec 01, 2006 06:31 |  #58

Any lens that will work with that teleconverter will be a lot more expensive than the lens you have now. Of course, you will need to spend a lot more on a lens anyway, if you want decent results with a teleconverter. They don't seem to work too well with cheaper lenses.

If you want to keep costs down, my suggestion would be to buy the Sigma 70-300 f/4-5.6 APO DG macro lens and simply replace your 80-200 with that. I'd expect that to give much better results than your 80-200 with teleconverter (even if you could get the Canon one to fit!), and it would be cheaper.


Graeme
My galleries (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
stu ­ @ ­ m ­ developments
Member
217 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Blackpool UK
     
Dec 02, 2006 11:01 |  #59

gcogger wrote in post #2337733 (external link)
If you want to keep costs down, my suggestion would be to buy the Sigma 70-300 f/4-5.6 APO DG macro lens and simply replace your 80-200 with that. I'd expect that to give much better results than your 80-200 with teleconverter (even if you could get the Canon one to fit!), and it would be cheaper.

I will bear that advice in mind, thanks very much. :D

I am currently fighting the strong urge to keep the 1.4x and buy a canon EF 70-200 F4L USM...

I trust that would be a better decision?


Body: Canon EOS 7D With BG-E7 Battery Grip
Lenses: Canon 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM MKII | Canon 17-55 F2.8 IS USM | Canon 50mm f/1.8 (MKII) | Canon 70 - 300mm F4-5.6 IS USM
Extenders: Canon EF 1.4x MKII and EX 2x MKII
Accessories: Canon EX430 Speedlights x2 | Lexar Pro 1000x 16GB UDMA7 CF Cards

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gcogger
Goldmember
2,554 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2003
Location: Southampton, UK
     
Dec 02, 2006 13:48 |  #60

Yup - that would be a very good combination :)


Graeme
My galleries (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

279,712 views & 1 like for this thread
-=FAQ=- Teleconverter/T-Con Tele extender Discussion
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.0forum software
version 2.0 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Roberto Betta
622 guests, 290 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.