![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Northeastern USA
Posts: 781
|
Wanted opinions, if possible, from those of you who've tried this: Using a monopod during ceremony shots in dark interiors - as a substitute for IS lenses, like the 70-200 IS.
Completely sane idea? Dream on...weddings are too fast moving? (but not for the ceremony part!) Great idea...the poor photog's Image stabilizer. I know how useful the IS can be...and I intend to get one eventually. But I'd like opinions. I have a monopod that extends and retracts quickly with one hand (manfrotto 3245) with a 486RC2 ballhead. I am of the opinion that it's not such a bad idea. |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| "Echo", "Cleopatra", "Kahn", & "Yeager". | PhotosGuy | Wildlife | 24 | 24th of March 2010 (Wed) 21:16 |
| Petition to divide the "People" forum to "Babies/Kids" and "Adults" | Wildewinds | Forum Talk | 22 | 27th of September 2006 (Wed) 18:09 |
| Do you retain "negatives" from weddings? | hegemon | Weddings and Other Family Events | 8 | 11th of August 2006 (Fri) 23:58 |