Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive 
Thread started 08 May 2007 (Tuesday) 10:28
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Sigma 8mm F/3.5 EX DG Circular Fisheye

 
producerism
Senior Member
Avatar
331 posts
Joined Apr 2007
Location: underground
     
May 08, 2007 10:28 |  #1

please add the this to the lens archive, I noticed the Sigma 8mm was missing, and I would really love to see some examples other than the very few from google. :D


30d | kitLens | sigma10-20 | canon24-105L
canon100mm USM Macro | canon50mm 1.4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
Swift
Goldmember
Avatar
1,225 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Ohio, USA
     
May 12, 2007 11:48 |  #2

I'd love to see some samples with this lens as well.


Canon 550D | Canon 70-200mm f/4L USM | Canon 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM | Canon Speedlight 430EX | Raynox DCR-250 Macro

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ZeroFiveOne
Member
Avatar
138 posts
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Gulf Coast
     
Jun 01, 2007 12:06 as a reply to  @ Swift's post |  #3

Anyone?

I'm in need of some justification to buy this lens! :D


My Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
folville
Goldmember
Avatar
1,022 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: MN
     
Jun 01, 2007 12:30 |  #4

I have this lens. It's pretty nice as far as fisheyes go, but if you're looking to justify your need for it, you'll probably end up disappointed. Like I said, this lens is great for what it does (it has excellent optics, is pretty sharp, and focuses fairly quickly [and close for that matter]), but it's applications are limited.

I'll post samples later.


135mm f/2.8 SF for sale

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
folville
Goldmember
Avatar
1,022 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: MN
     
Jun 01, 2007 22:46 |  #5

Ok, here are some samples. Let me first say that this lens is sharp and extremely good at producing pleasing colors and contrast. None of the following photos has any PP at all other than resizing.

IMAGE: http://img69.imageshack.us/img69/6295/img6137webqu4.th.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://img69.imageshac​k.us …p?image=img6137​webqu4.jpg  (external link)
this is to give you an idea of the sort of bokeh this lens produces

IMAGE: http://img69.imageshack.us/img69/3599/sharpnesstestut0.th.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://img69.imageshac​k.us …mage=sharpnesst​estut0.jpg  (external link)
This should also give you an idea of the sharpness this lens has. It is focused just a bit behind the edge of the surface of the birdbath. It is wide open at f/3.5.

IMAGE: http://img475.imageshack.us/img475/4633/fisheyesky2sh7.th.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://img475.imagesha​ck.us …?image=fisheyes​ky2sh7.jpg  (external link)
Gawk at the colors this lens can reproduce without a c-pol (which would be hard to attach, i suppose).

Also of note is the incredible distance at which this lens can focus. The shot of the birdbath made me put two of my fingers between the birdbath and the lens, and that was it. I do that because I'm afraid of scratching the objective element on something because I'm fairly confident that I would actually hit the object before the lens failed to focus on it. I'll see if I can also find a sample of flare in this lens, which I feel is the best that i've even seen.

135mm f/2.8 SF for sale

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
El ­ Duderino
Goldmember
Avatar
1,921 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Denver, CO
     
Jun 01, 2007 22:55 |  #6

The lens definitely produces a cool effect, but overall I don't see the usefulness of it.

Personally, I would only want to use it in special circumstances.


Nikon D600 | Bower 14mm f/2.8 | Nikon 16-35mm f/4 VR | Nikon 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5 VR | Nikon 50mm f/1.8G | Nikon 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 VR
500px (external link) | flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
folville
Goldmember
Avatar
1,022 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: MN
     
Jun 01, 2007 23:38 |  #7

That's the problem. This lens' usefulness is short lived. I'd say that if somebody is in the market for a fisheye in the canon mount, then this is the lens to buy, but otherwise, it's a pretty big waste of money.


135mm f/2.8 SF for sale

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AirBrontosaurus
Goldmember
Avatar
3,814 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2005
Location: Indianapolis, Indiana
     
Jun 01, 2007 23:44 |  #8

Psh... fisheyes are incredibly versatile with a little photoshop knowhow. The Peleng 8mm fisheye writeup link in my sig details what you can do with a fisheye lens.

I agree that you don't want to use them everywhere, but at the same time I don't think that they are a "novelty" lens. As long as you don't go overboard, the shots fisheyes produce leave a lot of room for creativity.


That being said, I'd buy the Peleng over the sigma. 1/2 of the cost and just as good (no AF, but it isn't necessary because of the extreme DOF).


Chris | My Flickr (external link) | AirBrontosaurus.com (external link) | Peleng 8mm Fisheye writeup (external link)
Body
: Canon 5D
Lenses: Canon 24-105mm f/4 L | Canon MP-E 65mm Macro | Canon 85mm f/1.8 |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
angryhampster
"Got a thick monopod?"
Avatar
3,860 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2006
Location: Iowa
     
Jun 02, 2007 01:15 |  #9

El Duderino wrote in post #3305589 (external link)
The lens definitely produces a cool effect, but overall I don't see the usefulness of it.

Personally, I would only want to use it in special circumstances.



It would be a killer lens for certain sports...especially extreme sports. I want one :)


Steve Lexa
Iowa City Wedding Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ZeroFiveOne
Member
Avatar
138 posts
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Gulf Coast
     
Jun 02, 2007 10:34 |  #10

folville wrote in post #3305556 (external link)
Ok, here are some samples. Let me first say that this lens is sharp and extremely good at producing pleasing colors and contrast. None of the following photos has any PP at all other than resizing.

http://img69.imageshac​k.us …p?image=img6137​webqu4.jpg (external link)
Also of note is the incredible distance at which this lens can focus. The shot of the birdbath made me put two of my fingers between the birdbath and the lens, and that was it. I do that because I'm afraid of scratching the objective element on something because I'm fairly confident that I would actually hit the object before the lens failed to focus on it. I'll see if I can also find a sample of flare in this lens, which I feel is the best that i've even seen.

Thanks for taking the time to post those examples. I was wondering why your fingers were in that shot. Amazing that it will focus that close:eek:


My Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Kickstart
Senior Member
384 posts
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Stafford, UK
     
Jun 02, 2007 17:26 as a reply to  @ ZeroFiveOne's post |  #11

Hi

I bought one but haven't yet had a chance to use it for its intended purpose.

It is quite fun to use. Especially for extremely unflattering portraits.

This was the underside of a bridge (cropped a bit):-

http://www.alfa-pages.co.uk …nds/Bridge%2010​24x768.jpg (external link)

This is of one of our bikes. You can see a fair bit of purple fringing on the left where the light was coming from.

http://www.alfa-pages.co.uk/TempPictur​e/FishEyeFull.JPG (external link)

Down side is that it is very easy to get bits of yourself in the shot.

All the best

Keith


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Kickstart
Senior Member
384 posts
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Stafford, UK
     
Jun 04, 2007 16:03 as a reply to  @ Kickstart's post |  #12

Hi

One thing I have noticed is that it makes cloudy skys far more interesting. Adds more contrast between the clouds and the bits between them.

All the best

Keith


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jcw122
Goldmember
Avatar
1,940 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Location: West Chester, PA
     
Jun 19, 2007 01:00 |  #13

So amazing, though the Peleng is half the price....


"Ill show you."-John Hammond
Gear List
:D "YES! I AM INVINSIBLE!"-Boris

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mophoto
Hatchling
2 posts
Joined Jun 2006
     
Jul 04, 2007 13:31 |  #14

folville wrote in post #3305556 (external link)
Ok, here are some samples. Let me first say that this lens is sharp and extremely good at producing pleasing colors and contrast. None of the following photos has any PP at all other than resizing.

QUOTED IMAGE
IMAGE LINK: http://img69.imageshac​k.us …p?image=img6137​webqu4.jpg  (external link)
this is to give you an idea of the sort of bokeh this lens produces

QUOTED IMAGE
IMAGE LINK: http://img69.imageshac​k.us …mage=sharpnesst​estut0.jpg  (external link)
This should also give you an idea of the sharpness this lens has. It is focused just a bit behind the edge of the surface of the birdbath. It is wide open at f/3.5.

QUOTED IMAGE
IMAGE LINK: http://img475.imagesha​ck.us …?image=fisheyes​ky2sh7.jpg  (external link)
Gawk at the colors this lens can reproduce without a c-pol (which would be hard to attach, i suppose).

Also of note is the incredible distance at which this lens can focus. The shot of the birdbath made me put two of my fingers between the birdbath and the lens, and that was it. I do that because I'm afraid of scratching the objective element on something because I'm fairly confident that I would actually hit the object before the lens failed to focus on it. I'll see if I can also find a sample of flare in this lens, which I feel is the best that i've even seen.

Folville-
I notice your first and third shots have black vignetting in the corners- how do you avoid that? I just bought the 8mm for my canon 20D and noticed the same thing. When I called B&H they said the lens may be defective?? Is that right? I don't want the vignetting and if that's normal, maybe I should try the Tokina 10-17mm--- what do you think?
Thanks!!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wimg
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,592 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Netherlands, EU
     
Jul 04, 2007 14:13 |  #15

mophoto wrote in post #3486265 (external link)
Folville-
I notice your first and third shots have black vignetting in the corners- how do you avoid that? I just bought the 8mm for my canon 20D and noticed the same thing. When I called B&H they said the lens may be defective?? Is that right? I don't want the vignetting and if that's normal, maybe I should try the Tokina 10-17mm--- what do you think?
Thanks!!

I am not Folville, but I can answer your question regardless :).

The guy you spoke to at B&H clearly hasn't got a clue.

Essentially, the Sigma (and Peleng) 8 mm fisheyes are circular fisheyes, for FF. This means they project their image in a circle just fitting within the 24 mm height of a 24 X 36 mm frame. Actually, this circle is about 23 mm in diameter, resulting in a circular image with black all aroun dit for the rest of the frame size.

If you superimpose the APS-C sensor over the centre of this circle, you'll find that the diagonal of the sensor is just a little larger than the image projected, hence resulting in black corners on an APS-C sensor.

So, while the diagonal is still a 180 degree AoV, it does have the side effect of black corners.

If you want the frame to be filled completely, you'll need a 180 degree diagonal fisheye for APS-C, which indeed is the Tokina 10-17 at 10 mm. And it is the only one of its kind, as the Pentax design, the original, is essentially optically the same.

Furthermore, IMO the zoom function is a gimmick, because you'll want to use at 10 mm, 180 degree AoV normally, except for one side benefit: at 12-13 mm it is a 180 degree diagonal fisheye for APS-H, and at 15 mm for FF. 3 lenses for the price of one :).

Anyway, HTH, kind regards, Wim


5D Mk II & EOS 5 (analog) with a gaggle of primes & a solitary zoom, OM-D E-M1 Mk II, Pen-F & Panasonic GM5 with 11 primes, 8 zooms, 3 Metabones adapters/speedboosters​, and an accessory plague

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

64,427 views & 2 likes for this thread
Sigma 8mm F/3.5 EX DG Circular Fisheye
FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.0forum software
version 2.0 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is CanucksFan
632 guests, 263 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.