Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography 
Thread started 23 Feb 2008 (Saturday) 20:19
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

If you sell prints, do you sign them?

 
imager993
Member
Avatar
113 posts
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
     
Feb 23, 2008 20:19 |  #1

I have a show coming up with 25 prints between 24x36 and 36x48. These prints will be hung for three months at a very nice restaurant that gets lots of wealthy customers. A good thing is that the restaurant does not take any piece of the sale, they only want nice artwork on their walls.

I just took a large chunk of the prints to the framers and realized that I did not sign them. Now, I have a really, well, unrefined signature and it is very inconsistent, so I am hesitant to take a pen to a piece of paper that cost me $85. Odds are that I will mess one of them up no matter how much practice. I can still go back on Monday and sign them if I need.

Do you think that having a signature on a print will help people value it more and be more likely to purchase it? I will be gluing a little informational panel to the back of the board with the print, artist, and contact information. I am not a "known name" of any sorts, but am wondering if adding a signature will elevate the print from decorative art to fine art.

Thanks everybody!

Aaron


Aaron Kupferman (external link) - Electric Reality (external link) - MotorsportLens (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
totalphoto
Senior Member
Avatar
597 posts
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Ottawa Ontario Canada
     
Feb 23, 2008 20:41 |  #2

You could sign the print, sign the matte, make a letter of authenticity and sign that, If it were me, my DNA would be somewhere...
I do not want to know what your framing bill was!!!!
Good luck, can we view them? (pictures of the prints)


www.TotalPhoto.ca (external link)
Canada's Official Nascar Photographer
Obama Book
http://www.blurb.com/b​ookstore/detail/562084 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
imager993
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
113 posts
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
     
Feb 23, 2008 20:49 |  #3

I was actually able to get away with framing everything except for the largest prints (the 36x48s) with pre-made frames from the local chain frame store. I print my photos with a 2" white matte around the photo on the paper, so I don't have to pay for matting. I worked out a deal with another framer to do the ten 36x48s for $140 each. Still cost a load, but hopefully I can at least make my costs back - if not more... :)


Aaron Kupferman (external link) - Electric Reality (external link) - MotorsportLens (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Stime187
Goldmember
1,064 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2006
Location: Some national park...
     
Feb 23, 2008 21:02 |  #4

I sign the matte below the bottom right corner of the print. Title of the image goes below the print's bottom left corner, same size as my signature.

And wow, pretty awesome deal that you're getting a chance to display 25 shots at that size.

Well, I just went back and read your whole post, so never mind my advice above. Honestly, I think printing a 2-inch "matte" around the shot will distract from the value/sale WAY more than worrying about a signature.


Galleries, Workshops, etc - LightOfTheWild.com (external link) | Become a Fan -- Facebook.com/LightOfTh​eWild (external link) | On Twitter -- @LightOfTheWild (external link)


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
imager993
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
113 posts
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
     
Feb 23, 2008 22:41 |  #5

Stime187 wrote in post #4980959 (external link)
Well, I just went back and read your whole post, so never mind my advice above. Honestly, I think printing a 2-inch "matte" around the shot will distract from the value/sale WAY more than worrying about a signature.

Well, not a "matte" per say, but I float the image on the white paper. I used to work at A&I in Hollywood doing digital printing (it is where I got these printed) and most of the museum fine art prints we did were floated in white paper. I think it looks great and don't see how it can take away from the value of the print.


Aaron Kupferman (external link) - Electric Reality (external link) - MotorsportLens (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jim ­ G
I feel thoroughly satisfied
Avatar
12,253 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2005
Location: Australia.
     
Feb 23, 2008 22:49 |  #6

I made up a better looking signature for the prints I sell - the problem now is remembering to do it just right :p

People generally seem to like it being signed better.


Gear Listhttp://www.codastudios​.com.au (external link) Reviews & Hotlinks: Domke F-3x - Pelican 1510/1514 (external link) & 1610/1614 (external link) - DIY Variable Length OC-E3 - Crumpler 6 Million Dollar Home (external link) - FA-100 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Stime187
Goldmember
1,064 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2006
Location: Some national park...
     
Feb 23, 2008 23:19 |  #7

imager993 wrote in post #4981463 (external link)
Well, not a "matte" per say, but I float the image on the white paper. I used to work at A&I in Hollywood doing digital printing (it is where I got these printed) and most of the museum fine art prints we did were floated in white paper. I think it looks great and don't see how it can take away from the value of the print.

Interesting. The way I had it pictured in my head, you were essentially printing a 2-inch wide border on the shots that you added in Photoshop or something.

What exactly does "floating" mean?


Galleries, Workshops, etc - LightOfTheWild.com (external link) | Become a Fan -- Facebook.com/LightOfTh​eWild (external link) | On Twitter -- @LightOfTheWild (external link)


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
HuskyKMA
"Now what?"
Avatar
1,749 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Castle Rock, WA
     
Feb 24, 2008 03:00 |  #8

Stime187 wrote in post #4981654 (external link)
Interesting. The way I had it pictured in my head, you were essentially printing a 2-inch wide border on the shots that you added in Photoshop or something.

What exactly does "floating" mean?

Well, say the image is printed on 25x36 inch paper. On that paper, the image is centered taking up 21x32 inches, providing a 2 inch border all around the image.


Canon 40D w/ BG-E2N Grip| 400mm f/5.6L | 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II | 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS | 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 | Gitzo GT3541LS w/ RRS BH-55

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Box ­ Brownie
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,180 posts
Likes: 19
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Surrey
     
Feb 24, 2008 06:42 |  #9

Interesting thread for two reasons.

Firstly the aspect of 'floating' the image on white paper that is the same size as the frame instead of "matting" it with a bevel cut mount.

Secondly, the question of signature (and title?) ~ others I recall reading said why sign if you are unknown because as I understood the argument a signed image owned is in many cases a status symbol purchase??? And what does it 'give' the buyer to have an unknown artists work on display in the "status symbol" department? A title of course (?) is a aesthetic issue i.e. does it add to the image in some manner.

Overall, I have been looking at getting prints done for sale (methods yet to be attempted/tried) and so far have only considered printing them with a border and digitally titled & signed/copyright noticed in the border but as I was going to matt mount them this would become hidden. My thinking was if the owner takes it out of the frame for copying it will be obvious to any lab that such copying is illegal.

Based on the comments above I am wondering about using the floating method and titling where appropriate but for protection purposes indelibely stamping the back of the print.

I suppose the upshot is is the image more likely to sell is 'floating' or matt mounted & will any such sales potential be negatively impacted by a signature?

:)


That was a great meal ~ you must have a good set of pans :p
Images for a photographic memory (external link) | Flickr (external link) | >>>My 500px<<< (external link)
credit line is vanity, payment is sanity

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
photoguy6405
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,302 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 18
Joined Feb 2008
Location: US Midwest
     
Feb 24, 2008 09:52 |  #10

It wouldn't matter to me if the photographer were Ansel Adams... if I were buying I'd prefer it be left unsigned. Now, a plaque on the matting with a title and/or name I'd be fine with... just nothing on the print itself.


Website: Iowa Landscape Photography (external link) | Blog (external link) | Gear List & Feedback
Equipment For Sale: Canon PowerShot A95

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
danpass
Goldmember
Avatar
2,134 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Miami, FL
     
Feb 24, 2008 10:08 |  #11

photoguy6405 wrote in post #4983640 (external link)
It wouldn't matter to me if the photographer were Ansel Adams... if I were buying I'd prefer it be left unsigned. Now, a plaque on the matting with a title and/or name I'd be fine with... just nothing on the print itself.

I agree







and as a sidenote ... signing ones work is just another way to become "known" ;)

.


Dan
Gallery (external link) | Gear/Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Stime187
Goldmember
1,064 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2006
Location: Some national park...
     
Feb 24, 2008 10:50 |  #12

I always sign the matte of any shot I sell in light pencil in the usual signing area of a matte, I also, usually put the title in the opposite place of my signature. People know my shots by name so I consider that to be part of my business, I want to perpetuate that.

As for signing the print, I'd never touch the actual print.


Galleries, Workshops, etc - LightOfTheWild.com (external link) | Become a Fan -- Facebook.com/LightOfTh​eWild (external link) | On Twitter -- @LightOfTheWild (external link)


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
slappy ­ sam
Goldmember
Avatar
1,452 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Near Plymouth, MA
     
Feb 24, 2008 15:19 |  #13

Since you arent using mats, I probably wouldn't sign it. If you were matting, I'd say you should.


40D|10-20|17-50|70-200|580ex
FS: XT with 2 OEM batteries

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
imager993
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
113 posts
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
     
Feb 24, 2008 22:41 |  #14

Thanks for the great feedback everybody. I think that I will be going with a separate piece of paper attached to the back of the frame in a plastic sleeve that has information and my signature. The print will remain untouched (as I don't want to run the risk of messing up a signature and having to order a new print) and the new owner can keep the card with the print if they decide to reframe it at some point in the future.

And yes, floating it on the paper means basically you have white around the image on the paper. Stime187, how do you see this as taking away from the value of the print?


Aaron Kupferman (external link) - Electric Reality (external link) - MotorsportLens (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Stime187
Goldmember
1,064 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2006
Location: Some national park...
     
Feb 24, 2008 23:26 |  #15

imager993 wrote in post #4988461 (external link)
Stime187, how do you see this as taking away from the value of the print?

Didn't you already ask me that and I already replied above?


Galleries, Workshops, etc - LightOfTheWild.com (external link) | Become a Fan -- Facebook.com/LightOfTh​eWild (external link) | On Twitter -- @LightOfTheWild (external link)


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

4,048 views & 0 likes for this thread
If you sell prints, do you sign them?
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is cabvkam
679 guests, 263 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.