Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
Thread started 17 Mar 2009 (Tuesday) 03:24
Search threadPrev/next
POLL: "What lens is the best option for newborn babies?"
Canon 100mm f/2.8 macro
7
18.4%
Canon 85mm f/1.2
16
42.1%
Canon 85mm f/1.2 with extension tube
3
7.9%
Canon 24-105 f/4
10
26.3%
Canon 70-200 f/2.8 IS
2
5.3%

38 voters, 38 votes given (1 choice only choices can be voted per member)). VOTING IS FOR MEMBERS ONLY.
BROWSE ALL POLLS
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Best lens for newborn photos

 
SunTsu
Goldmember
Avatar
1,591 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Westcoast, Canada
     
Mar 17, 2009 03:24 |  #1

Just wondering what lens/combo you think is best for newborn (like one week new) photos. (I'm only including the lenses that I own). I'm inclined to think either the 100mm macro or the 85 f/1.2 with extension tube. I'm specifically referring to use on a full-frame body.


Canon 5D Mark II+BG-E6, Canon 5D+BG-E4 | 200-400mmL IS, 85mm F1.2L II, TS-E 17mm F4.0L , 16-35mm F2.8L II, 24-105mmL IS, 70-200mm [COLOR=#000000]F2.8L II IS, 100mm F2.8L Macro IS, 100mm F2.8 Macro, 40mm F2.8, 1.4x II, 2.0x III | EF12+25 II | Canon 600EX-RT (x5) | Gitzo support
Full Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
joe ­ mama
Senior Member
Avatar
666 posts
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Earth
     
Mar 17, 2009 03:56 |  #2
bannedPermanent ban

Were it me (and it was/is), it would be the 24 / 1.4L and 15 / 2.8 FE. For example:

Canon 5D + 24 / 1.4L @ f / 2, 1/60, ISO 1600

http://www.pbase.com/j​oemama/image/92131266 (external link)

IMAGE: http://www.pbase.com/joemama/image/92131266/original.jpg


Canon 5D + 24 / 1.4L @ f / 2.8, 1/50, ISO 400

http://www.pbase.com/j​oemama/image/96627913 (external link)

IMAGE: http://www.pbase.com/joemama/image/96627913/original.jpg



Unfortunately, I didn't get my 15 / 2.8 FE until sometime later:

Canon 5D + 15 / 2.8 FE @ f/2.8, 1/250, ISO 1600

http://www.pbase.com/j​oemama/image/106560765 (external link)

IMAGE: http://www.pbase.com/joemama/image/106560765/original.jpg


Canon 5D + 15 / 2.8 FE @ f / 2.8, 1/100, ISO 3200

http://www.pbase.com/j​oemama/image/109433099 (external link)

IMAGE: http://www.pbase.com/joemama/image/109433099/original.jpg

--joe

www.josephjamesphotogr​aphy.com (external link)
www.pbase.com/joemama (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sleepo
Member
248 posts
Joined Mar 2008
     
Mar 17, 2009 04:04 |  #3

Nice shots... 24 and 15 aren't normally what spring to mind when people ask about baby portraits, but those shots work well :)

I'd go with the 85mm f/1.2, though I don't have the 1.2 (only the 1.8 ) so I don't know what the MFD's like (and whether you need the extension tube).


http://flickr.com/phot​os/stephenhildrey/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
joe ­ mama
Senior Member
Avatar
666 posts
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Earth
     
Mar 17, 2009 04:09 |  #4
bannedPermanent ban

sleepo wrote in post #7539962 (external link)
Nice shots... 24 and 15 aren't normally what spring to mind when people ask about baby portraits, but those shots work well

Thanks! For my tastes and style, the wider AOV and closer perspective that UWAs offer seems more fitting for infants and toddlers than does the more classic framing and perspective used with longer lenses.


--joe

www.josephjamesphotogr​aphy.com (external link)
www.pbase.com/joemama (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nuffi
Senior Member
926 posts
Joined Nov 2008
     
Mar 17, 2009 04:18 |  #5

Hey man. I like how you're being encouraging and all, but shouldn't you get your little one something easier to manage than an SLR? At a week old they don't have a lot of strength or coordination.

I'd recommend a g10 while they're developing their eye.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
viet
Goldmember
1,019 posts
Joined Jul 2007
     
Mar 17, 2009 05:48 |  #6

None of these options, either a fast 24, 35 or 50. You don't want to flash your newborn too much, nor does the hospital.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SunTsu
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,591 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Westcoast, Canada
     
Mar 18, 2009 02:27 |  #7

I noticed many people recommended a 24-105 and I'm a bit surprised by it. For those that recommended it, could you please explain?

sleepo wrote in post #7539962 (external link)
Nice shots... 24 and 15 aren't normally what spring to mind when people ask about baby portraits, but those shots work well :)

I'd go with the 85mm f/1.2, though I don't have the 1.2 (only the 1.8 ) so I don't know what the MFD's like (and whether you need the extension tube).

I've tried to use the 85 f/1.2 before and the minimum focus distance has been an issue. That's why I thought that an extension tube would be useful. I also figured that since a flash would not be preferred, a fast lens would be useful.

joe mama wrote in post #7539973 (external link)
Thanks! For my tastes and style, the wider AOV and closer perspective that UWAs offer seems more fitting for infants and toddlers than does the more classic framing and perspective used with longer lenses.

I never even thought of using a wide angle lens, but I love the shots and will try using a wider angle.

nuffi wrote in post #7540001 (external link)
Hey man. I like how you're being encouraging and all, but shouldn't you get your little one something easier to manage than an SLR? At a week old they don't have a lot of strength or coordination.

I'd recommend a g10 while they're developing their eye.

LOL.


Canon 5D Mark II+BG-E6, Canon 5D+BG-E4 | 200-400mmL IS, 85mm F1.2L II, TS-E 17mm F4.0L , 16-35mm F2.8L II, 24-105mmL IS, 70-200mm [COLOR=#000000]F2.8L II IS, 100mm F2.8L Macro IS, 100mm F2.8 Macro, 40mm F2.8, 1.4x II, 2.0x III | EF12+25 II | Canon 600EX-RT (x5) | Gitzo support
Full Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KenjiS
"Holy crap its long!"
Avatar
20,981 posts
Gallery: 339 photos
Likes: 1419
Joined Oct 2008
Location: Buffalo, NY
     
Mar 18, 2009 02:31 |  #8

nuffi wrote in post #7540001 (external link)
Hey man. I like how you're being encouraging and all, but shouldn't you get your little one something easier to manage than an SLR? At a week old they don't have a lot of strength or coordination.

I'd recommend a g10 while they're developing their eye.

No no no, get them a rebel, the larger control surfaces and buttons will make it alot easier for a little one to hold and use...


Gear, New and Old! RAW Club Member
Wanted: 70-200. Time and good health
Deviantart (external link)
Flickr (This is where my good stuff is!) (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JelleVerherstraeten
Goldmember
Avatar
2,440 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Antwerp, Belgium
     
Mar 18, 2009 06:08 |  #9

The FE makes beautiful pictures. Nice shots!


-Jelle l Gear l Website (external link) l

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
timnosenzo
Cream of the Crop
8,831 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Sep 2005
Location: CT
     
Mar 18, 2009 06:37 |  #10

For me it would think the 24 & 50.


connecticut wedding photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bohdank
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
14,060 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Montreal, Canada
     
Mar 18, 2009 06:44 |  #11

None of your choices, imo, but if those are the only choices, the 24-105. The other lenses are too long.

An extension tube on those lenses would give you, in some cases, only a few inches of focus range (I asked about tubes on another thread), so that's not an option.


Bohdan - I may be, and probably am, completely wrong.
Gear List

Montreal Concert, Event and Portrait Photographer (external link)
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
trevstro
Member
Avatar
71 posts
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Roswell, GA
     
Mar 18, 2009 07:30 as a reply to  @ bohdank's post |  #12

I will be using the 24 1.4 II on Friday for the birth of my daughter. I have a 17-55, but rented the 24 for the next few weeks. I really like the minimum focusing distance of the 24.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
egordon99
Cream of the Crop
10,247 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Philly 'burbs
     
Mar 18, 2009 07:41 as a reply to  @ trevstro's post |  #13

I shot my son on his "birthday" with my 85 and 30 primes (on my 40D) I didn't start to "flash" him until week #2.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sebr
Goldmember
Avatar
4,628 posts
Likes: 9
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Sweden/France
     
Mar 18, 2009 07:47 |  #14

I would intuitively go for a set of primes, like 24+85, because of the need to use natural light. However, newer cameras handle ISO noise rather and f/2.8 zooms will certainly work if you are willing to increasing the ISO.

Edit: Joe, I forgot to say that these shots are stunning !


Sebastien
5D mkIII ; 17-40L ; 24-105L ; 70-200L II ; 70-300L ; 35L ; Σ85/1.4 ; 135L ; 100macro ; Kenko 1.4x ; 2x mkIII ; 580EXII
M5 ; M1 ; 11-22 ; 18-150 ; 22/2.0 ; EF adapter; Manfrotto LED
Benron Tripod; ThinkTank, Lowepro and Crumpler bags; Fjällräven backpack

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

9,541 views & 0 likes for this thread
Best lens for newborn photos
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.0forum software
version 2.0 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ppahv
771 guests, 314 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.