Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Thread started 17 Mar 2009 (Tuesday) 03:24
Prev/next
Poll"What lens is the best option for newborn babies?"
Canon 100mm f/2.8 macro
7
18.4%
Canon 85mm f/1.2
16
42.1%
Canon 85mm f/1.2 with extension tube
3
7.9%
Canon 24-105 f/4
10
26.3%
Canon 70-200 f/2.8 IS
2
5.3%

38 voters, 38 votes given (1 choice only choices can be voted per member)). VOTING IS FOR MEMBERS ONLY.
BROWSE ALL POLLS
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Best lens for newborn photos

 
SunTsu
Goldmember
SunTsu's Avatar
1,589 posts

Joined Dec 2006

Westcoast, Canada
MORE INFO

Just wondering what lens/combo you think is best for newborn (like one week new) photos. (I'm only including the lenses that I own). I'm inclined to think either the 100mm macro or the 85 f/1.2 with extension tube. I'm specifically referring to use on a full-frame body.

Mar 17, 2009 03:24

Canon 5D Mark II+BG-E6, Canon 5D+BG-E4 | 200-400mmL IS, 85mm F1.2L II, TS-E 17mm F4.0L , 16-35mm F2.8L II, 24-105mmL IS, 70-200mm [COLOR=#000000]F2.8L II IS, 100mm F2.8L Macro IS, 100mm F2.8 Macro, 40mm F2.8, 1.4x II, 2.0x III | EF12+25 II | Canon 600EX-RT (x5) | Gitzo support
Full Gear List

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
joe ­ mama
Senior Member
joe mama's Avatar
666 posts

Joined Oct 2005

Earth
MORE INFO
banned

Were it me (and it was/is), it would be the 24 / 1.4L and 15 / 2.8 FE. For example:

Canon 5D + 24 / 1.4L @ f / 2, 1/60, ISO 1600

http://www.pbase.com/j​oemama/image/92131266 (external link)

IMAGE: http://www.pbase.com/joemama/image/92131266/original.jpg


Canon 5D + 24 / 1.4L @ f / 2.8, 1/50, ISO 400

http://www.pbase.com/j​oemama/image/96627913 (external link)

IMAGE: http://www.pbase.com/joemama/image/96627913/original.jpg



Unfortunately, I didn't get my 15 / 2.8 FE until sometime later:

Canon 5D + 15 / 2.8 FE @ f/2.8, 1/250, ISO 1600

http://www.pbase.com/j​oemama/image/106560765 (external link)

IMAGE: http://www.pbase.com/joemama/image/106560765/original.jpg


Canon 5D + 15 / 2.8 FE @ f / 2.8, 1/100, ISO 3200

http://www.pbase.com/j​oemama/image/109433099 (external link)

IMAGE: http://www.pbase.com/joemama/image/109433099/original.jpg
Mar 17, 2009 03:56

--joe

www.josephjamesphotogr​aphy.comexternal link
www.pbase.com/joemamaexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sleepo
Member
248 posts
Joined Mar 2008
MORE INFO

Nice shots... 24 and 15 aren't normally what spring to mind when people ask about baby portraits, but those shots work well :)

I'd go with the 85mm f/1.2, though I don't have the 1.2 (only the 1.8 ) so I don't know what the MFD's like (and whether you need the extension tube).

Mar 17, 2009 04:04

http://flickr.com/phot​os/stephenhildrey/external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
joe ­ mama
Senior Member
joe mama's Avatar
666 posts

Joined Oct 2005

Earth
MORE INFO
banned

sleepo wrote in post #7539962external link
Nice shots... 24 and 15 aren't normally what spring to mind when people ask about baby portraits, but those shots work well

Thanks! For my tastes and style, the wider AOV and closer perspective that UWAs offer seems more fitting for infants and toddlers than does the more classic framing and perspective used with longer lenses.

Mar 17, 2009 04:09

--joe

www.josephjamesphotogr​aphy.comexternal link
www.pbase.com/joemamaexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
nuffi
Senior Member
926 posts
Joined Nov 2008
MORE INFO

Hey man. I like how you're being encouraging and all, but shouldn't you get your little one something easier to manage than an SLR? At a week old they don't have a lot of strength or coordination.

I'd recommend a g10 while they're developing their eye.

Mar 17, 2009 04:18



LOG IN TO REPLY
viet
Goldmember
1,019 posts
Joined Jul 2007
MORE INFO

None of these options, either a fast 24, 35 or 50. You don't want to flash your newborn too much, nor does the hospital.

Mar 17, 2009 05:48



LOG IN TO REPLY
SunTsu
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
SunTsu's Avatar
1,589 posts

Joined Dec 2006

Westcoast, Canada
MORE INFO

I noticed many people recommended a 24-105 and I'm a bit surprised by it. For those that recommended it, could you please explain?

sleepo wrote in post #7539962external link
Nice shots... 24 and 15 aren't normally what spring to mind when people ask about baby portraits, but those shots work well :)

I'd go with the 85mm f/1.2, though I don't have the 1.2 (only the 1.8 ) so I don't know what the MFD's like (and whether you need the extension tube).

I've tried to use the 85 f/1.2 before and the minimum focus distance has been an issue. That's why I thought that an extension tube would be useful. I also figured that since a flash would not be preferred, a fast lens would be useful.

joe mama wrote in post #7539973external link
Thanks! For my tastes and style, the wider AOV and closer perspective that UWAs offer seems more fitting for infants and toddlers than does the more classic framing and perspective used with longer lenses.

I never even thought of using a wide angle lens, but I love the shots and will try using a wider angle.

nuffi wrote in post #7540001external link
Hey man. I like how you're being encouraging and all, but shouldn't you get your little one something easier to manage than an SLR? At a week old they don't have a lot of strength or coordination.

I'd recommend a g10 while they're developing their eye.

LOL.

Mar 18, 2009 02:27

Canon 5D Mark II+BG-E6, Canon 5D+BG-E4 | 200-400mmL IS, 85mm F1.2L II, TS-E 17mm F4.0L , 16-35mm F2.8L II, 24-105mmL IS, 70-200mm [COLOR=#000000]F2.8L II IS, 100mm F2.8L Macro IS, 100mm F2.8 Macro, 40mm F2.8, 1.4x II, 2.0x III | EF12+25 II | Canon 600EX-RT (x5) | Gitzo support
Full Gear List

LOG IN TO REPLY
KenjiS
Cream of the Crop
KenjiS's Avatar
20,009 posts

Joined Oct 2008

Buffalo, NY
MORE INFO

nuffi wrote in post #7540001external link
Hey man. I like how you're being encouraging and all, but shouldn't you get your little one something easier to manage than an SLR? At a week old they don't have a lot of strength or coordination.

I'd recommend a g10 while they're developing their eye.

No no no, get them a rebel, the larger control surfaces and buttons will make it alot easier for a little one to hold and use...

Mar 18, 2009 02:31

Gear, New and Old! RAW Club Member
Wanted: 5D Mark III, Sigma 35mm f/1.4, Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 OS
Deviantartexternal link
Flickr (This is where my good stuff is!)external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
JelleVerherstraeten
Goldmember
JelleVerherstraeten's Avatar
2,437 posts

Joined Dec 2008

Antwerp, Belgium
MORE INFO

The FE makes beautiful pictures. Nice shots!

Mar 18, 2009 06:08

-Jelle l Gear l Website (external link) l

LOG IN TO REPLY
timnosenzo
Cream of the Crop
8,816 posts
Joined Sep 2005

CT
MORE INFO

For me it would think the 24 & 50.

Mar 18, 2009 06:37

connecticut wedding photographerexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
bohdank
Cream of the Crop
bohdank's Avatar
14,060 posts

Joined Jan 2008

Montreal, Canada
MORE INFO

None of your choices, imo, but if those are the only choices, the 24-105. The other lenses are too long.

An extension tube on those lenses would give you, in some cases, only a few inches of focus range (I asked about tubes on another thread), so that's not an option.

Mar 18, 2009 06:44

Bohdan - I may be, and probably am, completely wrong.
Gear List

Montreal Concert, Event and Portrait Photographerexternal link
Flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
trevstro
Member
trevstro's Avatar
71 posts

Joined Nov 2008

Roswell, GA
MORE INFO

I will be using the 24 1.4 II on Friday for the birth of my daughter. I have a 17-55, but rented the 24 for the next few weeks. I really like the minimum focusing distance of the 24.

Mar 18, 2009 07:30 as a reply to bohdank's post 46 minutes earlier.



LOG IN TO REPLY
egordon99
Cream of the Crop
10,247 posts
Joined Feb 2008

Philly 'burbs
MORE INFO

I shot my son on his "birthday" with my 85 and 30 primes (on my 40D) I didn't start to "flash" him until week #2.

Mar 18, 2009 07:41 as a reply to trevstro's post 11 minutes earlier.



LOG IN TO REPLY
sebr
Goldmember
sebr's Avatar
4,624 posts

Joined Jan 2007

Sweden/France
MORE INFO

I would intuitively go for a set of primes, like 24+85, because of the need to use natural light. However, newer cameras handle ISO noise rather and f/2.8 zooms will certainly work if you are willing to increasing the ISO.

Edit: Joe, I forgot to say that these shots are stunning !

Mar 18, 2009 07:47

Sebastien
5D mkIII ; 17-40L ; 24-105L ; 70-200L II ; 70-300L ; 35L ; Σ85/1.4 ; 135L ; 100macro ; Kenko 1.4x ; 2x mkIII ; 580EXII
M ; 22/2.0 ; EF adapter
Benron Tripod; ThinkTank, Lowepro and Crumpler bags; Fjällräven backpack

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

7,821 views & 0 likes for this thread
Best lens for newborn photos
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses

NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO THE FORUMS
Registered members get all the features: search, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, own reviews...




Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality. We do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browsers' data storage methods.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.33version 1.33
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00191 for 7 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.03s
Latest registered member is HorribleAvatar
752 guests, 673 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 5175, that happened on Jun 16, 2015