Index  •   • New Posts  •   • RTAT  •   • "Best Of"  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New Posts  •   • RTAT  •   • "Best Of"  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Thread started 16 Jul 2009 (Thursday) 14:28
PREV/NEXT

Canon 18-200 vs. 55-250

 
WT21
Goldmember
1,319 posts
Joined Feb 2008
MORE INFO

I have a Canon 55-250 and really love it. It's my favorite lens (YES I know L glass folks feel it's cr*p, but I love it).

It's my main walk about lens, as I prefer to shoot candids of folks and details, rather than landscapes.

However, I do sometimes miss the wide angle, and especially getting up-close shots with that special wide angle perspective.

So, I'm thinking about the 18-200.

I know I'm giving up on the long end to get wide end, but my question is specific.

Within the realms of the limited IQ of these two lenses, will I miss anything IQ-wise by going to the 18-200 vs. the 55-250. I suppose it's like asking which is better between two point and shoots -- they're both bad compared to a DSLR -- but it's still a valid question.

Has anyone replaced their 55-250 with the 18-200 and either been happy or regretted it?

Jul 16, 2009 14:28

6D: 50, 85, 28-75, 70-210USM, 430EXii.
EOS-M: 22, 18-55

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
gabebalazs
Cream of the Crop
gabebalazs's Avatar
7,066 posts

Joined Nov 2008

Toledo, OH
MORE INFO

Lightrules had a direct comparo between these lenses, I don't have the link.
You will give up a bit of IQ especially in the corners and edges.

Jul 16, 2009 14:30

5DIII | 5Dc | 70D | Ʃ 70-200 2.8 OS | 120-300 2.8 OS | 18-250 OS | Canon 24-70 2.8L II | 24-105 f/4L | 17-40 f4L | 50 1.4 | 85 1.8 | EF-S 10-18 | 18-135 IS STM | Rokinon 14 2.8 | Sigma 1.4x & 2x | Canon 600EX-RT
Gabe Balazs Photoexternal link
Nature Shots Portfolioexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
LightRules
"flat out embarrassing"
LightRules's Avatar
9,908 posts

Joined Jun 2005
MORE INFO

You have a nice lightweight set up in the 1855 IS and 55250IS. I'd stick to that, unless you really want the single lens only route.

Jul 16, 2009 16:24



LOG IN TO REPLY
WT21
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,319 posts
Joined Feb 2008
MORE INFO

I was thinking single lens, just for travel, etc. I shoot much more at the longer end than shorter end, but it's a pain when you don't have it.

I found this thread http://photography-on-the.net ...hread.php?t=645496&​page=2 and others which speaks to my question. Still, I take any testimonials from anyone who's gone from one to the other.

Jul 16, 2009 16:37

6D: 50, 85, 28-75, 70-210USM, 430EXii.
EOS-M: 22, 18-55

LOG IN TO REPLY

1,401 views & 0 likes for this thread
Canon 18-200 vs. 55-250
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses

NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO THE FORUMS
Registered members get all the features: search, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, own reviews...




SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF    •   JUMP TO FORUM    •   FORUM RULES    •   Index    •   New Posts    •   RTAT    •   "Best Of"    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality. We do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browsers' data storage methods.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.1version 1.1
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00084 for 6 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.01s
Latest registered member is Isisunit
931 guests, 531 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014