Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Thread started 16 Jul 2009 (Thursday) 14:28
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Canon 18-200 vs. 55-250

 
WT21
Goldmember
1,319 posts
Joined Feb 2008
Jul 16, 2009 14:28 |  #1

I have a Canon 55-250 and really love it. It's my favorite lens (YES I know L glass folks feel it's cr*p, but I love it).

It's my main walk about lens, as I prefer to shoot candids of folks and details, rather than landscapes.

However, I do sometimes miss the wide angle, and especially getting up-close shots with that special wide angle perspective.

So, I'm thinking about the 18-200.

I know I'm giving up on the long end to get wide end, but my question is specific.

Within the realms of the limited IQ of these two lenses, will I miss anything IQ-wise by going to the 18-200 vs. the 55-250. I suppose it's like asking which is better between two point and shoots -- they're both bad compared to a DSLR -- but it's still a valid question.

Has anyone replaced their 55-250 with the 18-200 and either been happy or regretted it?


6D: 50, 85, 28-75, 70-210USM, 430EXii.
EOS-M: 22, 18-55

LOG IN TO REPLY
gabebalazs
Cream of the Crop
gabebalazs's Avatar
Joined Nov 2008
Toledo, OH
Jul 16, 2009 14:30 |  #2

Lightrules had a direct comparo between these lenses, I don't have the link.
You will give up a bit of IQ especially in the corners and edges.


5DIII | 6D | 80D | A7RII | Canon 24-70 2.8L II | 70-200 2.8L IS II | 24-105 f/4L IS | 16-35 f/4L IS | 135 f/2L | 85 1.8 | 50 1.8 STM | 18-135 IS STM | SONY FE 28-70 OSS | Tamron 17-50 2.8 | Tamron 150-600 | Ʃ 35 1.4 ART | Rokinon 14 2.8 | Sigma 1.4x | Metabones IV | 2x Canon 600EX-RT
Gabe Balazs Photo (external link)
Nature Shots Portfolio (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
LightRules
"flat out embarrassing"
LightRules's Avatar
9,908 posts
Joined Jun 2005
Jul 16, 2009 16:24 |  #3

You have a nice lightweight set up in the 1855 IS and 55250IS. I'd stick to that, unless you really want the single lens only route.




LOG IN TO REPLY
WT21
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,319 posts
Joined Feb 2008
Jul 16, 2009 16:37 |  #4

I was thinking single lens, just for travel, etc. I shoot much more at the longer end than shorter end, but it's a pain when you don't have it.

I found this thread http://photography-on-the.net ...hread.php?t=645496&​page=2 and others which speaks to my question. Still, I take any testimonials from anyone who's gone from one to the other.


6D: 50, 85, 28-75, 70-210USM, 430EXii.
EOS-M: 22, 18-55

LOG IN TO REPLY

1,738 views & 0 likes for this thread
Canon 18-200 vs. 55-250
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.0011 for 6 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.01s
Latest registered member is dannyshw
918 guests, 615 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6106, that happened on Jun 09, 2016