![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Warminster
Posts: 33
|
Well, here goes nothing! My first time shooting completely in Raw. Lots of fun, but man thats a ton of work converting, saving, etc. Shot with my Rebel XT, 50mm 1.4, 18-55IS, Sigma 70-300mm and 28-135IS. Mainly used the 28-125IS as it "fit" the best.
On to the shoot. Love Park in Philly, then to Pen Ryn mansion. Please let me know how you think I did. I want to get some feedback here before I put the rest up on my website. Thanks 1. ![]() 2. ![]() 3. ![]() 4. ![]() 5. ![]() 6. ![]() Last edited by npompei : 3 Weeks Ago at 18:22. |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Hanover, NH
Posts: 53
|
1 - good
2 - not sharp 3 - whites are overexposed, they look yellow 4 - her arm is awkward at her side and it's too white 5 - not sharp 6 - cashmoney On the whole, great job for your first shoot.
__________________
www.geoffholmanphotography.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 258
|
I like the contrast in three and disagree with the above poster about the whites being blown out.
__________________
Canon 500D, Canon 17-55 f/2.8 IS, Canon 50mm 1.4, Canon 70-200mm f/4 L IS - Canon 270ex - Lowepro Slingshot 100 & 200 AW, Tamrac Velocity 6x |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: SandyEggo, CA.
Posts: 787
|
Some nice captures of a relaxed looking couple. Nice. I think you'd be well served by leaning on your 50mm a bit more so you can open up your aperture and get more separation between your couples and the BG.
__________________
Canon 5D MKII / Canon 5D X2/ Canon 30D / Canon 70-200 F2.8 IS L / Canon 24-70 F2.8L / Canon 85 F1.2L II/ Canon 35 f1.4L / Canon 50 F1.4 / Canon 580 EX X 2 / Canon CP-E3 / AB 800 X2 / AB1600 / PW's / Flip-it! www.defalcophoto.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Warminster
Posts: 33
|
Great! Thanks for all of the comments. I appreciate it. I really like my 50mm. Its a great lens. I was just afraid of missing some good moments without being able to zoom and running back and forth like an idiot!
And thanks again for the comments. Getting sharp images is very hard. I felt like all day I could not focus on their eyes. Should I go manual focus? I just kept re-focusing over and over and could not get it where I wanted. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
|
I personally like manual focus for shots like these, espeically if the movement is limited.
Nice series, beautiful couple. Thanks for sharing!
__________________
Not as Lean, Not as mean, but still a Marine. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
|
Did you use AI Servo for to try and focus quickly. You might want to practice on moving objects like little kids. You might also want to read about how to set your Custom Function on your camera so you can adjust the area or zone where the camera focuses and use your thumb and finger controls to shift the focal point. I use this technique all the time with motorcycles so I rarely have an oof image. If I miss the focus on an image, it's because I was either caught off guard by a moment that I wasn't ready for or I wasn't paying enough attention to camera shake with a slow shutter speed.
I agree that the whites aren't really blown out - the attraction is the people and not necessarily the detail in the water. Exposure of the people is spot on IMHO. Enjoy!
__________________
http://nyobie.smugmug.com Canon EOS 1Ds MkII; Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II; EF 24-70mm f/2.8L; EF 70-200mm f/2.8L; EF 135mm f/2L; EF12 II |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
|
agree with previous poster that you need to shoot more wide open.. this will allow you to increase your shutter speed as well which will help with your focus.. several of these look a bit soft.. the last one is my fav as well..
work on your composition a bit more.. notice on some that you aren't "square" to the couple and the background items.. (i.e. pic #3) work on this.. also work on your framing.. for example the image #2 i see that it says "love" on the statue but you don't notice it unless you think about it.. and its going right out of their heads.. how about a bit more space between you and them.. frame them with tree behind their heads and have the sculpture to the right of them.. also everything is pretty much centered in the frame.. practice the rule of thirds.. it will make your photo's stand out from average snap shots.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Warminster
Posts: 33
|
Thanks Nyobie. I believe I shot in AI Servo. I dont have the camera with so im not sure but I think. Now I know how to move the focul point of focus with the camera, but with my XT, it takes a while. And always changing compositional type shots, that can be a massive pain.
But my question is, can I change the settings or zones of the focal point with my XT? And how? I dont see anything in my manual about that. And Fred Norris (love that), I tried raising up the shutter speed but I was always under exposed. And I didnt want to raise up the ISO but I honestly think that might have helped. here is the rest of my pics from that day... http://npompei.zenfolio.com/f1044698403 |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
|
First is good... i don't like that sign/sculpture behind them. (What is that anyway? I recognize it, it is right on the tip of my tounge what it is/says but I just don't know)
The water shot... It looks like you have some motion blur with them, the water as someone said looks blown out but it doesn't bother me. What bothers me is the extra people in the background.
__________________
NC Wedding Photography I have a couple bodies, some glass, some bulbs, and other miscellaneous crap. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Warminster
Posts: 33
|
Its Love Park in Philadelphia. If you look at the rest of my album, you can see some that are composed a lot better. I just chose 4 that I semi-liked but thought could use some criticism.
http://npompei.zenfolio.com/f1044698403 |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
|
Don't know the park... but thought the sign said "LOVE." Would have loved to see the whole sign in the background off to the side out of focus but readable. Or something like that.
__________________
NC Wedding Photography I have a couple bodies, some glass, some bulbs, and other miscellaneous crap. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
|
Saw the rest... Number 4 is great. Could use some horizon line adjustment.
It looks like it would have been hard to get the shot i was imagining in my head with the surroundings there.
__________________
NC Wedding Photography I have a couple bodies, some glass, some bulbs, and other miscellaneous crap. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Warminster
Posts: 33
|
Yeah it was hard with all the people there. But thanks for the comments!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Member
|
Quote:
anyways.. ok I see you said you mainly used your 28-135IS which has a max aperture of f/3.5 which is a bit slow to be increasing your shutter speed, hence the underexposure you were getting.. perhaps your 50mm would have been better.. you can stop down to like 2.2 or 2.8 on your aperture thus giving you the ability to increase your shutter speed and increase the isolation of your subjects from the background.. an all around winning situation |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Aimee | knight2870 | People | 4 | 13th of October 2009 (Tue) 12:30 |
| Aimee - Senior | mgrover | People | 13 | 11th of September 2008 (Thu) 04:54 |
| Aimee: belly photo session | Bartek | Weddings and Other Family Events | 27 | 8th of July 2008 (Tue) 10:05 |
| My Wife - Aimee | MulesAFpilot | People | 11 | 23rd of November 2007 (Fri) 06:07 |