Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
Thread started 05 Mar 2010 (Friday) 21:06
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Upgrading 75-300 to 55-250 IS worth it?

 
Viva-photography
Goldmember
Avatar
1,442 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Feb 2010
Location: Arkansas
     
Mar 05, 2010 21:06 |  #1

I hate my 75-300. I got if for free when I bought my camera off craigslist.
I shoot under the lights for my school and I end up having to use the pop up flash because the lens is slow. It focuses slower than the grandma in front of me on the way home. (exaggeration of course) But it gets to the point where I could miss the shot all together just because its still doing its little focusing dance.
The only thing this lens has been good for in my use is shooting under complete daylight, then its ok.

I am on a tight budget though, so I wondered if I sold my 75-300 for some $$$ and bought the 55-250mm if I would see a good improvement.
(or at least enough to tide me up until I buy myself some L glass for xmas this year :lol: )

Would it be worth upgrading?

edit:
canon 75-300 that I have
http://www.bestbuy.com …51806943002&sku​Id=2823760 (external link)
canon 55-250 that i ask about
http://www.bestbuy.com …05245979459&sku​Id=8758114 (external link)


jaredholtphoto.com (external link)
Canon 5D Mark II// Canon 85mm f/1.8//Sigma 35mm f/1.4//Canon 70-200 f/4L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
jxs1984
Senior Member
342 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2006
     
Mar 05, 2010 21:23 |  #2

http://www.the-digital-picture.com …omp=0&FLIComp=5​&APIComp=1 (external link)

55-250mm looks ehh to me... just save up till you have money for L



Nikon D810 · Tokina 16-28mm f/2.8 · Sigma 35mm f/1.4 art · Nikon 85mm f/1.8g
flickr (external link), facebook (external link)
, gear & feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JeffreyG
"my bits and pieces are all hard"
Avatar
15,339 posts
Gallery: 39 photos
Likes: 451
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Detroit, MI
     
Mar 05, 2010 21:24 |  #3

The 55-250 IS had two advantages, but don't expect it to solve all of your concerns.

On the plus side, the 55-250 IS is a better lens optically, meaning in situations when everything is perfect (stabile platform, adequate light) the 55-250 can probably deliver a better image.

Along with that, the 55-250 has IS which means it can be used in lower light situations than the 75-300 provided that the subjects are still or very slowly moving.

Now for the bad news.....the 55-250 is just as slow optically as the 75-300 so it will not help you at all with freezing motion in low light.


My personal stuff:http://www.flickr.com/​photos/jngirbach/sets/ (external link)
I use a Canon 5DIII and a Sony A7rIII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
S2K.OGRAPHY
Senior Member
Avatar
494 posts
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Miami
     
Mar 05, 2010 21:25 |  #4

save another 250 and get 70-200f4 used


flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dan ­ C
Senior Member
Avatar
783 posts
Joined Jul 2008
Location: San Diego
     
Mar 05, 2010 22:23 |  #5

IMHO the 55-250 has much better image quality. However, it still focuses rather slowly and isn't much faster (f/5.6).

My advice: buy a used copy now and sell it again when you can afford a 70-200.


5D2 || Σ 50 1.4 || 24-105L || 430EX ||
Gear and Feedback || Smugmug (external link) || I prefer to receive emails instead of PMs; please send me an Email by clicking my username.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dan ­ C
Senior Member
Avatar
783 posts
Joined Jul 2008
Location: San Diego
     
Mar 05, 2010 22:25 |  #6

By the way, bestbuy prices are aweful. Amazon has it for 250 with no tax, and free shipping.

Buy used, you can probably get it for $180-200.


5D2 || Σ 50 1.4 || 24-105L || 430EX ||
Gear and Feedback || Smugmug (external link) || I prefer to receive emails instead of PMs; please send me an Email by clicking my username.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
S2K.OGRAPHY
Senior Member
Avatar
494 posts
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Miami
     
Mar 05, 2010 23:01 |  #7

yea srsly who buys anything from real stores? internet ftw price is cheaper plus no tax and free shipping


flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
booja
Goldmember
1,636 posts
Likes: 86
Joined Jan 2008
Location: houston, tx
     
Mar 05, 2010 23:38 |  #8

S2K.OGRAPHY wrote in post #9738017 (external link)
save another 250 and get 70-200f4 used

if hes having problems with low light in the gym/school with the lens he has now and the pop up flash coming up the 70-200 f/4L wont do that much better (focus speed will be better but still need flash bc of lighting. he needs something faster to pull in more light like a 2.8. or a camera with better iso abilities.

if you dont want to spend too much try getting a sigma 70-200 2.8.

if you dont use the 200 or 300 end that much try an 85 1.8, 100 f/2... wanna spend more 135L or a little less, 200 2.8.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nureality
Goldmember
3,611 posts
Joined Jan 2008
     
Mar 05, 2010 23:54 |  #9

Both lenses are the same speed optically, the 55-250IS will deliver a better image... purely on the grounds that the 75-300 f/4-5.6 III is one of Canon's WORST lenses. Lens speed and focusing speed tho will be similar. If you're missing shots for lack of focus with the turd, you're gonna have the same problem with the 55-250IS.

I'd sell the 75-300, get whatever you can for it, and put it towards a 70-200 f/4L, or if you can swing it, f/4L IS. Both have the same wicked-fast USM motor, FTM, and are solid performers. The f/4L IS is better optically than the non-IS, plus it delivers nicer bokeh thanx to the rounded aperture blades.


Alan "NuReality" Fronshtein
Gear List | PBase |  (external link)flickr (external link)
Lots of Fun, Lots of Laughs, Happy Trigger Finger!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nureality
Goldmember
3,611 posts
Joined Jan 2008
     
Mar 05, 2010 23:56 |  #10

nureality wrote in post #9738660 (external link)
Both lenses are the same speed optically, the 55-250IS will deliver a better image... purely on the grounds that the 75-300 f/4-5.6 III is one of Canon's WORST lenses. Lens speed and focusing speed tho will be similar. If you're missing shots for lack of focus with the turd, you're gonna have the same problem with the 55-250IS.

I'd sell the 75-300, get whatever you can for it, and put it towards a 70-200 f/4L, or if you can swing it, f/4L IS. Both have the same wicked-fast USM motor, FTM, and are solid performers. The f/4L IS is better optically than the non-IS, plus it delivers nicer bokeh thanx to the rounded aperture blades.

Bottom line: don't waste your money on a stop-gap that isn't really solving your problems.

If you're tight on funds, sell the turd, put the money towards an 85/1.8 or 100/2. Each can be hand for less than $400.


Alan "NuReality" Fronshtein
Gear List | PBase |  (external link)flickr (external link)
Lots of Fun, Lots of Laughs, Happy Trigger Finger!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon ­ Foster
is it safe?
Avatar
4,517 posts
Likes: 21
Joined Feb 2005
Location: White Lake, MI
     
Mar 06, 2010 01:21 |  #11

Save your money for the L glass and figure out the best way to use the lens you have. Play around with it a bit more. I've taken lots of usable pictures with my cheap 75-300 IS.

PHOTOBUCKET EMBEDDING IS DISABLED BY THIS MEMBER.
Photobucket sends ads instead of embedding photos from their free galleries.
Click the link (if available) below to see the image in a gallery page.

http://img.photobucket​.com …Concert1.jpg?t=​1267859841 (external link)


Jon.

I shoot with a Little Canon

Check out my photos @ PBase.com (external link) & ModelMayhem.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Deep ­ Pocket
Goldmember
1,329 posts
Joined Feb 2010
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
     
Mar 06, 2010 01:22 |  #12
bannedPermanent ban

Ide save up for the 700-200 f4 .


17 and learning..
Canon Rebel XSI/450D:
Sigma 30 f/1.4, EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS, 18-55 Kit Lens

Deviantart (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lowincash
Member
183 posts
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Los Angeles
     
Mar 06, 2010 01:35 |  #13

I haven't used the 70-300 before but I can only imagine it's just as slow as the 55-250. However, the 55-250 has IS so it helps a bit. I was able to get some decent indoor basketball pics. Had to use ISO1600 most of the time. It's fine at 55mm but once I start zooming in, I can hardly get any usable pics =/ If i use a fast shutter speed then it'll be too dark but if I use a slower one it'll be blurry. I just ordered a 70-200 f/4 IS so I'll see how that works out compared to the 55-250.


RockMon -- 50D -- Canon 24-105mm f/4 IS L -- Canon 28mm f/1.8 -- Canon 85mm f/1.8 -- 270EX w/ OmniBouncer -- RS-80N3 Remote Switch

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

2,054 views & 0 likes for this thread
Upgrading 75-300 to 55-250 IS worth it?
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.0forum software
version 2.0 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Cliodiver
692 guests, 397 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.