Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Thread started 05 Mar 2010 (Friday) 21:06
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Upgrading 75-300 to 55-250 IS worth it?

 
Viva-photography
Goldmember
Viva-photography's Avatar
1,442 posts
Joined Feb 2010
Arkansas
Mar 05, 2010 21:06 |  #1

I hate my 75-300. I got if for free when I bought my camera off craigslist.
I shoot under the lights for my school and I end up having to use the pop up flash because the lens is slow. It focuses slower than the grandma in front of me on the way home. (exaggeration of course) But it gets to the point where I could miss the shot all together just because its still doing its little focusing dance.
The only thing this lens has been good for in my use is shooting under complete daylight, then its ok.

I am on a tight budget though, so I wondered if I sold my 75-300 for some $$$ and bought the 55-250mm if I would see a good improvement.
(or at least enough to tide me up until I buy myself some L glass for xmas this year :lol: )

Would it be worth upgrading?

edit:
canon 75-300 that I have
http://www.bestbuy.com ...51806943002&skuId=2​823760external link
canon 55-250 that i ask about
http://www.bestbuy.com ...05245979459&skuId=8​758114external link


jaredholtphoto.comexternal link
Canon 5D Mark II// Canon 85mm f/1.8//Sigma 35mm f/1.4//Canon 70-200 f/4L

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
jxs1984
Senior Member
342 posts
Joined Nov 2006
Mar 05, 2010 21:23 |  #2

http://www.the-digital-picture.com ...omp=0&FLIComp=5&API​Comp=1external link

55-250mm looks ehh to me... just save up till you have money for L



Nikon D810 · Tokina 16-28mm f/2.8 · Sigma 35mm f/1.4 art · Nikon 85mm f/1.8g
flickrexternal link, facebookexternal link
, gear & feedback

LOG IN TO REPLY
JeffreyG
"my bits and pieces are all hard"
JeffreyG's Avatar
15,064 posts
Gallery: 33 photos
Joined Jan 2007
Detroit, MI
Mar 05, 2010 21:24 |  #3

The 55-250 IS had two advantages, but don't expect it to solve all of your concerns.

On the plus side, the 55-250 IS is a better lens optically, meaning in situations when everything is perfect (stabile platform, adequate light) the 55-250 can probably deliver a better image.

Along with that, the 55-250 has IS which means it can be used in lower light situations than the 75-300 provided that the subjects are still or very slowly moving.

Now for the bad news.....the 55-250 is just as slow optically as the 75-300 so it will not help you at all with freezing motion in low light.


My personal stuff:http://www.flickr.com/​photos/jngirbach/sets/ (external link)
I use a Canon 5DIII

LOG IN TO REPLY
S2K.OGRAPHY
Senior Member
S2K.OGRAPHY's Avatar
494 posts
Joined Mar 2009
Miami
Mar 05, 2010 21:25 |  #4

save another 250 and get 70-200f4 used


flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Dan ­ C
Senior Member
Dan C's Avatar
783 posts
Joined Jul 2008
San Diego
Mar 05, 2010 22:23 |  #5

IMHO the 55-250 has much better image quality. However, it still focuses rather slowly and isn't much faster (f/5.6).

My advice: buy a used copy now and sell it again when you can afford a 70-200.


5D2 || Σ 50 1.4 || 24-105L || 430EX ||
Gear and Feedback || Smugmugexternal link || I prefer to receive emails instead of PMs; please send me an Email by clicking my username.

LOG IN TO REPLY
Dan ­ C
Senior Member
Dan C's Avatar
783 posts
Joined Jul 2008
San Diego
Mar 05, 2010 22:25 |  #6

By the way, bestbuy prices are aweful. Amazon has it for 250 with no tax, and free shipping.

Buy used, you can probably get it for $180-200.


5D2 || Σ 50 1.4 || 24-105L || 430EX ||
Gear and Feedback || Smugmugexternal link || I prefer to receive emails instead of PMs; please send me an Email by clicking my username.

LOG IN TO REPLY
S2K.OGRAPHY
Senior Member
S2K.OGRAPHY's Avatar
494 posts
Joined Mar 2009
Miami
Mar 05, 2010 23:01 |  #7

yea srsly who buys anything from real stores? internet ftw price is cheaper plus no tax and free shipping


flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
booja
Goldmember
1,610 posts
Joined Jan 2008
houston, tx
Mar 05, 2010 23:38 |  #8

S2K.OGRAPHY wrote in post #9738017external link
save another 250 and get 70-200f4 used

if hes having problems with low light in the gym/school with the lens he has now and the pop up flash coming up the 70-200 f/4L wont do that much better (focus speed will be better but still need flash bc of lighting. he needs something faster to pull in more light like a 2.8. or a camera with better iso abilities.

if you dont want to spend too much try getting a sigma 70-200 2.8.

if you dont use the 200 or 300 end that much try an 85 1.8, 100 f/2... wanna spend more 135L or a little less, 200 2.8.




LOG IN TO REPLY
nureality
Goldmember
3,611 posts
Joined Jan 2008
Mar 05, 2010 23:54 |  #9

Both lenses are the same speed optically, the 55-250IS will deliver a better image... purely on the grounds that the 75-300 f/4-5.6 III is one of Canon's WORST lenses. Lens speed and focusing speed tho will be similar. If you're missing shots for lack of focus with the turd, you're gonna have the same problem with the 55-250IS.

I'd sell the 75-300, get whatever you can for it, and put it towards a 70-200 f/4L, or if you can swing it, f/4L IS. Both have the same wicked-fast USM motor, FTM, and are solid performers. The f/4L IS is better optically than the non-IS, plus it delivers nicer bokeh thanx to the rounded aperture blades.


Alan "NuReality" Fronshtein
Gear List | PBase | external linkflickrexternal link
Lots of Fun, Lots of Laughs, Happy Trigger Finger!

LOG IN TO REPLY
nureality
Goldmember
3,611 posts
Joined Jan 2008
Mar 05, 2010 23:56 |  #10

nureality wrote in post #9738660external link
Both lenses are the same speed optically, the 55-250IS will deliver a better image... purely on the grounds that the 75-300 f/4-5.6 III is one of Canon's WORST lenses. Lens speed and focusing speed tho will be similar. If you're missing shots for lack of focus with the turd, you're gonna have the same problem with the 55-250IS.

I'd sell the 75-300, get whatever you can for it, and put it towards a 70-200 f/4L, or if you can swing it, f/4L IS. Both have the same wicked-fast USM motor, FTM, and are solid performers. The f/4L IS is better optically than the non-IS, plus it delivers nicer bokeh thanx to the rounded aperture blades.

Bottom line: don't waste your money on a stop-gap that isn't really solving your problems.

If you're tight on funds, sell the turd, put the money towards an 85/1.8 or 100/2. Each can be hand for less than $400.


Alan "NuReality" Fronshtein
Gear List | PBase | external linkflickrexternal link
Lots of Fun, Lots of Laughs, Happy Trigger Finger!

LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon ­ Foster
is it safe?
Jon Foster's Avatar
4,517 posts
Joined Feb 2005
White Lake, MI
Mar 06, 2010 01:21 |  #11

Save your money for the L glass and figure out the best way to use the lens you have. Play around with it a bit more. I've taken lots of usable pictures with my cheap 75-300 IS.

IMAGE: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v601/jfoster48386/Canon%20300D/School%20Events/DublinConcert1.jpg?t=1267859841

Jon.

I shoot with a Little Canon

Check out my photos @ PBase.comexternal link & ModelMayhem.comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Deep ­ Pocket
Goldmember
1,329 posts
Joined Feb 2010
Vancouver, BC, Canada
Mar 06, 2010 01:22 |  #12
banned

Ide save up for the 700-200 f4 .


17 and learning..
Canon Rebel XSI/450D:
Sigma 30 f/1.4, EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS, 18-55 Kit Lens

Deviantartexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
lowincash
Member
183 posts
Joined Dec 2009
Los Angeles
Mar 06, 2010 01:35 |  #13

I haven't used the 70-300 before but I can only imagine it's just as slow as the 55-250. However, the 55-250 has IS so it helps a bit. I was able to get some decent indoor basketball pics. Had to use ISO1600 most of the time. It's fine at 55mm but once I start zooming in, I can hardly get any usable pics =/ If i use a fast shutter speed then it'll be too dark but if I use a slower one it'll be blurry. I just ordered a 70-200 f/4 IS so I'll see how that works out compared to the 55-250.


RockMon -- 50D -- Canon 24-105mm f/4 IS L -- Canon 28mm f/1.8 -- Canon 85mm f/1.8 -- 270EX w/ OmniBouncer -- RS-80N3 Remote Switch

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

1,839 views & 0 likes for this thread
Upgrading 75-300 to 55-250 IS worth it?
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00179 for 6 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
Latest registered member is BlackFlake
887 guests, 611 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6106, that happened on Jun 09, 2016