![]() |
|
|
#31 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: WPB, FL
Posts: 1,769
|
The fong looks the softest. SMH
__________________
Photographer + Cinematographer Facebook | Website | Wedding Site | | Flickr | Gear | 500px | Tumblr |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#32 | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 | |
|
Goldmember
|
Quote:
agree 100% |
|
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#34 | ||
|
Goldmember
|
Quote:
Quote:
Hard to really tell as the flash exposures are totally different |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Cream of the Crop
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 19,485
|
Two problems with these, they werent particularly reflective so that the return diminished the power of the flash so that it wasnt sufficient. The second was that they were a series of curve arch canopies so there were no constant angles you could depend on.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 | ||
|
Member
|
Quote:
Quote:
I didn't post the bare flash photo but maybe I should have. The Demb Flip-it was the only diffuser that actually intensified the flash exposure. My StoFen and Gary Fong decreased the flash exposure.
__________________
You can call me JT 5D mkIII | 5D mkII |50D | 50 1.8 II | 85 1.8 | 17-55 2.8 | 16-35 2.8L | 24-70 2.8L | 70-200 2.8L | (3) 600EX-RT | (3) 580EX II |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Senior Member
|
I use the ebay version of flip-it and I prefer it over a ABBC because you have more control how much light to bounce to the front. The rouge bender gives you even more flexibility but takes longer to blend (for me).
__________________
Gearlist |
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: upstate ny
Posts: 915
|
and my guess is that the flash was probably maxed out, therefore the underexposure with those bad boys on it in ettl.
which definitely shows the effeciency differences between those options! |
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Member
|
^^ I agree with you. Although I haven't completely given up on the Gary Fong, I am a big fan of the Flip-It now.
__________________
You can call me JT 5D mkIII | 5D mkII |50D | 50 1.8 II | 85 1.8 | 17-55 2.8 | 16-35 2.8L | 24-70 2.8L | 70-200 2.8L | (3) 600EX-RT | (3) 580EX II |
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 3
|
After looking at the comparison results of Stofen, Lightsphere, and Mega Flip-it, I would say that the one done with the Flip-it had the reflector in a forward position. So of course too much shadowing resulted. The instructions indicate that from such a short distance, the correct position would be vertical, or even back toward you a little. Forward position would be good for a group subject at 12 to 15 feet. If I am correct in my assumption, please adjust the reflector and try another test. I would like to see the result. Joe
|
|
|
|
|
|
#41 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: upstate ny
Posts: 915
|
Quote:
therefore if you put the reflector too far back all you are doing is shooting light up into the atmosphere, right? I completely agree that the above is 100% true indoors with a ceiling available. and this is what I do on a regular basis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Member
|
Could those tests be re-done with the flash in manual mode and the camera also in manual mode?
I think that only the Flip-It image looks properly exposed - the other two look under to me. I'm tempted by the Flip-It. In the UK there is a website selling a similar product for £12.95 delivered: www.diffuseit.co.uk (free worldwide shipping). I've a wedding coming up in a barn with a high ceiling and wooden beams. I see using a product like this to bounce off when taking shots at the reception without throwing light to the walls and blinding half of the guests behind / beside me. |
|
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
Member
|
My wife (the model) is away on vacation for awhile. I wouldn't be able to reproduce this again until next week. I'll give it a try as soon as I can.
Doing the same test with the flash in manual would be interesting, as that will eliminate any variable other than the reflector style. However, using on-camera flash in manual mode for real life situations is probably impractical (right?).. Regarding the comment about being too close with the reflector pointed forward; in this situation I was outdoors, as pointed out by another post, so there was nothing to bounce off. These are the situations I was comparing reflectors for.. When you can't bounce and need to use flash. To be fair, the next time I try this I'll take multiple shots with the Demb Flip-It in different positions.
__________________
You can call me JT 5D mkIII | 5D mkII |50D | 50 1.8 II | 85 1.8 | 17-55 2.8 | 16-35 2.8L | 24-70 2.8L | 70-200 2.8L | (3) 600EX-RT | (3) 580EX II |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| ABBC or Demb Flip-it? | itsmejson | Accessories & Storage | 3 | 15th of December 2010 (Wed) 14:40 |
| DIY Demb Flip It | _aravena | Small Flash and Studio Lighting | 11 | 14th of June 2009 (Sun) 07:56 |
| WTB: DEMB flip it | kaitanium | Classifieds: Buy | 0 | 19th of August 2008 (Tue) 21:37 |
| Demb flip-it? | Baddrummerboyy | Small Flash and Studio Lighting | 6 | 25th of October 2007 (Thu) 22:15 |