![]() |
|
|
#10036 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: UK, Manchester
Posts: 42
|
Id agree with you that the technique could potentially cause back focus (ie, focus point at that FL is around the size of her entire head, so it could lock onto something contrasty behind her head) but what I am getting is front focus (consistently at this focal length, but NOT at closer focal length - which doesn't make sense)
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#10037 | |
|
Cream of the Crop
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 19,564
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10038 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: UK, Manchester
Posts: 42
|
What technique would you use to do a full length portrait at f1.4 (or similar), where you want the eyes sharp? Perhaps I am doing something wrong, as it has happened with two lenses - so the common theme is me, not the lens! Would appreciate any tips/suggestions
Thanks |
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#10039 | |
|
Cream of the Crop
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 19,564
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10040 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: UK, Manchester
Posts: 42
|
No, not unless I absolutely cannot help it. I use a 5DmkIII and find that in portrait orientation, the highest row of focus points are right on the subjects eye when doing a full length body portrait - worst case scenario is focus with top row of points, then recompose a few mm. I rarely use the middle focus point and then recompose that much.
|
|
|
|
|
#10041 | |
|
Cream of the Crop
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 19,564
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10042 |
|
Cream of the Crop
|
^^^good tip. thanks...
__________________
My name is Vinz | Mark III | SL1 | 135L | Canon EF70-200 F2.8L | 24-105mm F4L is for sale..link | Canon 40mm Pancake | Canon G12 for sale - link here | MY WEBSITE |
|
|
|
|
#10043 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: UK, Manchester
Posts: 42
|
Thats a great tip - thank you.
Must admit, at full length body portrait crop, the DOF at 1.8 should be sufficient to get a sharp whole head in I would have thought - need to check DOFmaster to confirm Last edited by futureal33 : 28th of March 2013 (Thu) at 10:39. |
|
|
|
|
#10044 |
|
Cream of the Crop
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 19,564
|
DOfmaster will give you the range of acceptable sharpness, but if you are looking for tack sharp eyes you still have to nail the focus. Have you micro adjusted the lens in question?
|
|
|
|
|
#10045 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: UK, Manchester
Posts: 42
|
There lies the issue... at close range focus is fine - it needs no micro adjust... however at longer range I am experiencing problems.
|
|
|
|
|
#10046 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,202
|
![]() Lou by Brian.Buckler, on Flickr ![]() 183/366 - Golden (Week 26 - Weigh-in) - Halfway Point! by Brian.Buckler, on Flickr
__________________
Brian Buckler 5D Mark II | EF 50mm f/1.4 USM | EF 85mm f/1.8 USM Flickr | 500px | Project 366 |
|
|
|
|
#10048 |
|
Member
|
Loving this lens!
__________________
"Learn the rules like a pro, so you can break them like an artist" --Pablo Picasso |
|
|
|
|
#10049 |
|
Moderator
|
==================================================
Moderator's Note: This thread is CLOSED after 10000 posts. Chapter II is here: Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM (II) ================================================== __________________ rafael |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Canon 50mm f/1.4 usm v. 85mm f/1.8 usm | ramblingman | Canon EF and EF-S Lenses | 28 | 12th of November 2009 (Thu) 20:38 |
| Canon EF 28-135mm IS USM & 85mm f/1.8 USM A Good Pair? | DDWD10 | Canon EF and EF-S Lenses | 7 | 5th of May 2008 (Mon) 06:24 |
| Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM or EF-S 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS USM? | beanbag | Canon EF and EF-S Lenses | 16 | 29th of November 2007 (Thu) 14:28 |