LOG IN    OR   REGISTER TO FORUMS


CCD vs CMOS sensors which is better?

FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EOS Digital Cameras
Thread started 10 Mar 2011 (Thursday) 23:13   
LIST NEARBY THREADS
 
boerewors
Goldmember
boerewors's Avatar
Joined Sep 2009
1,942 posts
South African living in Indonesia
[MORE/SHARE]

Im a little confused about this one because both high end and entry level cameras tend to use CCD sensors but all the mid range stuff is CMOS. Why is this? If CCD is more expensive then why use them in entry level cameras like the sony A200?

Post #1, Mar 10, 2011 23:13:07


The most important piece of gear you own, resides in your head and its called your brain.

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
stax
Senior Member
stax's Avatar
Joined Aug 2009
731 posts
Oakland
[MORE/SHARE]

The A200 uses an APS CCD sensor. I don't think that is the same thing as CCD sensor, but I admit that this topic is a bit out of my league.

Post #2, Mar 10, 2011 23:19:18


http://www.flickr.com/​photos/staxnet/external link

http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=865770

LOG IN TO REPLY
krb
Cream of the Crop
krb's Avatar
Joined Jun 2008
8,818 posts
Where southern efficiency and northern charm come together
[MORE/SHARE]

There is no better, there is only better for certain applications.

Post #3, Mar 10, 2011 23:20:29


-- Ken
Comment and critique is always appreciated!
Flickrexternal link
Gear list

LOG IN TO REPLY
shoturtle
Goldmember
shoturtle's Avatar
Joined Oct 2010
1,187 posts
NYC/Frankfurt A.M.
[MORE/SHARE]

CMOS has matured, in the pass cdd was the more developed system so it was better for a while. But as CMOS improved, it has pass CDD in many respects. But most apparent is low light shooting. 1600iso is max for cdd, and it was noisy at 1600. Now with CMOS you have auto iso going to 3200 and 6400 is about the same level of noise where 1600 on cdd.

At lower iso, some say cdd is still nicer in resolving light but that is very hard to tell.

CDD still rules the pns market, but the backlit cmos is starting to gain traction. So the tiny 1/2.23 sensor might actually shoot well at 800iso in the future. Anything above 400iso on those sensor were pretty noise. All that 3200iso hype was just hype with the power shots. Only ones that could shoot well pass 400 iso were the larger g and s digicams with the 1/1.63 sensors.

Post #4, Mar 10, 2011 23:21:28


Traveling is my passion, so I am a major Frequent Flyer.
Canon 60D, T1i/500D, Eos 1, Eos 630, and Olympus epl-1. Current Canon Lenses ef 100 2.8, ef 85 1.8, ef 50 1.4, ef 28 1.8, ef 50 1.8,ef 28-135, ef 70-300, ef-s 18-55, ef-s 55-250, 500D close up lens. Current Olympus lenses oly m4/3 14-42, oly 4/3 35mm 3.5 macro with m4/3 adapter, panasonic 45-200, panasonic 20 1.7. And a Part time Pentax K-X shooter.

LOG IN TO REPLY
xhack
Goldmember
xhack's Avatar
Joined Jul 2007
1,281 posts
Edinburgh, Lothian
[MORE/SHARE]

I'm no expert on sensor technology, but the 4.1mp CCD sensor on my 1Dc has an intangible quality that is just . . . pleasing. Sharp and smooth is the best I can describe. Certainly a much more coherent image quality than the roughly contemporaneous 8mp CMOS 20D. That seems "gritty" by comparison. Of course, my 5D knocks both into a cocked hat!

Post #5, Mar 11, 2011 02:41:20


~ Wallace
Gear List

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
shoturtle
Goldmember
shoturtle's Avatar
Joined Oct 2010
1,187 posts
NYC/Frankfurt A.M.
[MORE/SHARE]

20D was early cmos, there has been couple of generations since then. Case in point the 5d cmos, and the 7d cmos are way better then the 20d.

Post #6, Mar 11, 2011 02:46:59


Traveling is my passion, so I am a major Frequent Flyer.
Canon 60D, T1i/500D, Eos 1, Eos 630, and Olympus epl-1. Current Canon Lenses ef 100 2.8, ef 85 1.8, ef 50 1.4, ef 28 1.8, ef 50 1.8,ef 28-135, ef 70-300, ef-s 18-55, ef-s 55-250, 500D close up lens. Current Olympus lenses oly m4/3 14-42, oly 4/3 35mm 3.5 macro with m4/3 adapter, panasonic 45-200, panasonic 20 1.7. And a Part time Pentax K-X shooter.

LOG IN TO REPLY
DetlevCM
Goldmember
DetlevCM's Avatar
Joined Apr 2010
3,231 posts
Europe
[MORE/SHARE]

-> Unless I am mistaken CCD has a higher energy consumption compared to CMOS.

At least according to Canon.

Post #7, Mar 11, 2011 03:58:22


5D MK II AF Satisfaction Poll | Reduced Kit List
A Basic Guide to Photographyexternal link | Websiteexternal link
Flickrexternal link | Artflakesexternal link | Blurbexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
toxic
Goldmember
Joined Nov 2008
3,498 posts
California
[MORE/SHARE]

CCDs overall are probably the superior technology. Scientific imaging equipment, if I'm not mistaken, all use CCD. CMOS was adopted in DSLRs because it can move the data off the sensor faster and the sensor doesn't get as hot, and for whatever reason CCD sensors simply could not compete with CMOS at high ISO settings.

Post #8, Mar 11, 2011 04:56:43




LOG IN TO REPLY
Sp1207
Goldmember
Joined Nov 2010
1,820 posts
Right Behind You
[MORE/SHARE]

Yep, CCD has higher IQ, and initially higher read-off rates. For some reason high-ISO never developed for CCD the way it did with Cmos. You'll find a lot of super-pro studio cams that shoot at ISO 5 still (at least up until 2 years ago) used CCD for it's colors and 'smoother' quality, as did most government/scientific cams.

Post #9, Mar 11, 2011 05:18:58


Gear
Collectors ruin photography. If you're not using it pass it on.
Why do people bother posting "actual shots from XX"? If anything give me the raws.

LOG IN TO REPLY


LIST NEARBY THREADS
2,447 views & 0 likes for this thread
CCD vs CMOS sensors which is better?
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EOS Digital Cameras



NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO FORUMS

CHANGE BODY TEXT SIZE FOR ALL THREAD PAGES
POWERED BY AMASS 1.0version 1.0
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net


SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF  |  JUMP TO FORUM...  |  FORUM RULES


Spent 0.00082 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
711 guests, 770 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014
Latest registered member is low.key

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality, we do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browser's data storage methods.