Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Thread started 14 Mar 2011 (Monday) 17:52
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

How to achieve Bokeh with the 50mm/f1.8

 
syndicate1
Member
159 posts
Joined Nov 2010

Ottawa, Canada
MORE INFO

Just wondering what the distance should be between the following, in order to achieve good bokeh:

1. subject and background

2. subject and myself using the 50mm f1.8 lens

Thanks

Mar 14, 2011 17:52



LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Nightdiver13
Unabashed nerd!
Nightdiver13's Avatar
2,099 posts

Joined May 2010

In the woods
MORE INFO

"Bokeh" will be achieved regardless of what the conditions are. If you're asking how to maximize the apparent background blur, then the closer you are to your subject, and the further the subject is from the background, the better. If you want nice little bokeh-balls (Kai reference!), shoot wide open. The 50 1.8 quickly forms pentagons as you stop down.

Mar 14, 2011 17:58

Neil, with an eye.

LOG IN TO REPLY
JeffreyG
"my bits and pieces are all hard"
JeffreyG's Avatar
14,631 posts
GALLERY: 10 photos

Joined Jan 2007

Detroit, MI
MORE INFO

The aesthetic appearance of the background blur (the bokeh) is not generally very good for this lens, but you can still get nice appearing blur by chosing backgrounds that do not have repeating lines or bright highlight points that will form unsightly doubling or hard edged rings.

The degree of blur is simply a function of the aperture, subect distance and then the distance to the background. Having the subject close to you relative to the background and using a large aperture will create more blur of course. It might no make it look better though.

Mar 14, 2011 18:02

My personal stuff:http://www.flickr.com/​photos/jngirbach/sets/external link
Commercial sports:http://girbach.zenfoli​o.com/external link
I use a Canon 5DIII and 1DIV and a Panasonic GF-1

LOG IN TO REPLY
Jill-of-all-Trades
far from having everything figured out!
Jill-of-all-Trades's Avatar
14,941 posts
GALLERY: 28 photos

Joined Jun 2006

Ontario, Canada
MORE INFO

In my opinion this lens can produce some real nice bokeh. Considering the price of the lens, I'm quite happy.

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://farm5.static.fl​ickr.com ...28736979_50ceaabc79​_z.jpg (external link)
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

Buick (external link) by Horsepower Shutter Bug (external link), on Flickr

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://farm5.static.fl​ickr.com ...28736609_d674688f0a​_z.jpg (external link)
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

Cadillac (external link) by Horsepower Shutter Bug (external link), on Flickr

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://farm5.static.fl​ickr.com ...29346670_3ebb377397​_z.jpg (external link)
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

Lincoln (external link) by Horsepower Shutter Bug (external link), on Flickr
Mar 14, 2011 18:17

Melody

LOG IN TO REPLY
yjt
Senior Member
359 posts
Joined Nov 2010
MORE INFO

Jill-of-all-Trades wrote in post #12020061 (external link)
In my opinion this lens can produce some real nice bokeh. Considering the price of the lens, I'm quite happy.

NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://farm5.static.fl​ickr.com ...28736979_50ceaabc79​_z.jpg (external link)
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

Buick (external link) by Horsepower Shutter Bug (external link), on Flickr

NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://farm5.static.fl​ickr.com ...28736609_d674688f0a​_z.jpg (external link)
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

Cadillac (external link) by Horsepower Shutter Bug (external link), on Flickr

NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://farm5.static.fl​ickr.com ...29346670_3ebb377397​_z.jpg (external link)
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

Lincoln (external link) by Horsepower Shutter Bug (external link), on Flickr



the bokeh is pretty amazing wide open :), but are those purple fringing on the reflections?

Mar 14, 2011 18:34

7D (Gripped) || 24-70 f2.8L || 50 f1.4 || 70-200mm f4L
Flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Jill-of-all-Trades
far from having everything figured out!
Jill-of-all-Trades's Avatar
14,941 posts
GALLERY: 28 photos

Joined Jun 2006

Ontario, Canada
MORE INFO

Yes, there is some CA, but it's a cheap lens.

Mar 14, 2011 18:41

Melody

LOG IN TO REPLY
ilumo
Goldmember
1,641 posts
Joined Oct 2009
MORE INFO

Jill-of-all-Trades wrote in post #12020243external link
Yes, there is some CA, but it's a cheap lens.

The 50l has tons of fringing as well.

Mar 14, 2011 19:47

Body: 5D Mark III
Glass: 50mm f/1.8 | 35mm f/1.4L USM | 17-40 f/4.0L USM | 24-70 f/2.8L II USM | 24-105 f/4.0L IS USM | 70-200 f/2.8L II IS USM | 85mm f/1.2L USM | 100mm f/2.8L IS USM
Accessories: 430 EX II, tripods, umbrellas, and other goodies.

LOG IN TO REPLY
dhilo2
Member
189 posts
Joined Mar 2008

Chicago
MORE INFO

For the price the CA I suppose isn't that big of a deal. As previously stated, the bokeh will be best achieved once the subject is distant from the background while shooting at wideopen. The bigger the distance the better the bokeh so just play around with it til you feel you get the image you were looking for.

Mar 14, 2011 21:55

EOS 5Dc+BG-E4, 35L, 135 L, 24-70L f2.8, 70-200L f2.8 IS

LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
TeamSpeed's Avatar
26,206 posts
GALLERY: 16 photos

Joined May 2002

Northern Indiana
MORE INFO

dhilo2 wrote in post #12021498external link
For the price the CA I suppose isn't that big of a deal. As previously stated, the bokeh will be best achieved once the subject is distant from the background while shooting at wideopen. The bigger the distance the better the bokeh so just play around with it til you feel you get the image you were looking for.

Not bokeh, but rather the amount of background blur. Bokeh is not the amount of blur.

Mar 14, 2011 22:28

Past Equipment | My Galleryexternal link
Resources For Sale: High ISO Denoiser Actionexternal link | Focus Genie

LOG IN TO REPLY
dhilo2
Member
189 posts
Joined Mar 2008

Chicago
MORE INFO

TeamSpeed wrote in post #12021664external link
Not bokeh, but rather the amount of background blur. Bokeh is not the amount of blur.

Hmm interesting. I always thought they were one and the same.

Mar 14, 2011 22:33

EOS 5Dc+BG-E4, 35L, 135 L, 24-70L f2.8, 70-200L f2.8 IS

LOG IN TO REPLY
DreDaze
bit by the Supposed Title Fairy
DreDaze's Avatar
15,604 posts
GALLERY: 7 photos

Joined Mar 2006

S.F. Bay Area
MORE INFO

syndicate1 wrote in post #12019867external link
Just wondering what the distance should be between the following, in order to achieve good bokeh:

1. subject and background

2. subject and myself using the 50mm f1.8 lens

Thanks

do you already have the lens?...if so go take pictures, and experiment with the aperture, and distance...it'll be more useful than any answers here

Mar 14, 2011 22:35

Andre or Dre
gear list
flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
LOKPhotography
Senior Member
290 posts
Joined Aug 2010

Indiana
MORE INFO

Nightdiver13 wrote in post #12019921external link
"Bokeh" will be achieved regardless of what the conditions are. If you're asking how to maximize the apparent background blur, then the closer you are to your subject, and the further the subject is from the background, the better. If you want nice little bokeh-balls (Kai reference!), shoot wide open. The 50 1.8 quickly forms pentagons as you stop down.

Haha Bokehlicious!!!

Mar 15, 2011 00:30

60D Gripped, 1000d Gripped, 70-200L f4 USM, 50mm f1.8 "Nifty Fifty" (R.I.Pieces), Sigma 50mm Macro f2.8, Tokina 12-24 f4, 430EX II, Cactus V5's, PS CS5, Lightroom 3, BR RS7 Strap.

LOG IN TO REPLY
Scatterbrained
Cream of the Crop
Scatterbrained's Avatar
7,055 posts
GALLERY: 27 photos

Joined Jan 2010

Suffolk, Va
MORE INFO

dhilo2 wrote in post #12021688external link
Hmm interesting. I always thought they were one and the same.

Bokeh is supposed to be a reference to the aesthetic qualities of the out of focus elements in an image. Eventually I think everyone will either think bokeh means blurry background or they will think bokeh means orb shaped out-of-focus specular highlights. :rolleyes:
If your up for some reading the guys at luminous landscape are always enlightening..
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/essays/b​okeh.shtmlexternal link :)

Mar 15, 2011 00:38

VanillaImaging.comexternal link"Vacuous images for the Vapid consumer"
500pxexternal link
flickrexternal link
1xexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Airedale1
Cream of the Crop
Airedale1's Avatar
5,718 posts

Joined Jan 2005

Laconia, NH USA
MORE INFO

TeamSpeed wrote in post #12021664 (external link)
Not bokeh, but rather the amount of background blur. Bokeh is not the amount of blur.

Bokeh refers to a blurred background that is aesthetically pleasing. I strive to produce images with a buttery smooth background, to me that is good bokeh (opinions vary). Not all lenses are capable of producing it.

The image below shows the kind of bokeh which I find most pleasing.

Taken with 7D and 400 f/5.6L. I was about 12 feet from the subject and the background which consisted of some nice fall color leaves was about 200 feet away. The 400 f/5.6 is capable of producing gorgeous bokeh.

Av Mode ISO 100 f/5.6 1/500 sec spot metering.

IMAGE: http://i60.photobucket.com/albums/h33/Airedale1/BCC54.jpg
Mar 15, 2011 00:58

Airedale1Photographyexternal link
EOS 7D EOS 40D
EF-400 f/5.6L EF 70-200 f/4.0L IS EF 50 f/1.4 EF 17-40 f/4.0L IS EF-1.4x II 430EX II Speedlite
Paul Merritt

LOG IN TO REPLY
JustinRageth
Senior Member
JustinRageth's Avatar
629 posts

Joined Dec 2010

SE Wisconsin
MORE INFO

Jill-of-all-Trades wrote in post #12020243external link
Yes, there is some CA, but it's a cheap lens.

It is inexpensive, not cheap. This lens takes great pictures and for my purposes it works well enough that I dont think I will need to upgrade it

Mar 15, 2011 01:05

T4i Gripped, Sigma 17-70mm, 70-200 f/4L, 50mm 1.8
Panasonic TZ5
Flickerexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

4,675 views & 0 likes for this thread
How to achieve Bokeh with the 50mm/f1.8
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses

NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO THE FORUMS
Registered members get all the features: search, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, own reviews...




Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality. We do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browsers' data storage methods.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.33version 1.33
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.001 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.04s
Latest registered member is jjanet
617 guests, 559 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 5175, that happened on Jun 16, 2015