Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography
Thread started 23 Mar 2011 (Wednesday) 14:57
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Unauthorized Use of a Photo for Profit

 
sparkplug
Senior Member
sparkplug's Avatar
289 posts

Joined Sep 2008

North Shore, Louisiana / Golfito, Costa Rica * I release all fish with NOAA tags for research
MORE INFO

This is taken from another forum that I frequent as well:

Okay, REALLY need to see this... Coincidence..?
Tuesday, I was killing some time in-between meetings by strolling through an Old Navy store in El Centro.

They had some cool kids stuff so I was grabbing some shirts for my Son when I happened upon this shirt with a Land Cruiser on it and I could not stop staring.


Here is the shirt

IMAGE: http://i223.photobucket.com/albums/dd186/isaaccruisers/cruisershirt1.jpg

Here is the picture that I took

IMAGE: http://i223.photobucket.com/albums/dd186/isaaccruisers/Santaclara1.jpg


Here is the overlay

IMAGE: http://i223.photobucket.com/albums/dd186/isaaccruisers/interesting.jpg



Well...I wrote a letter, politely asking for monetary compensation AND cease and desist, unless future monetary compensation is forthcoming, blah, blah...

Got a letter back from a Gap attorney and he left a message for me to call him.

Just trying to decide what to tell him when I call him back...


So first off, my friend was told by someone else that he should first register his photo. Is this the correct way to go about seeking compensation from OLD Navy? Furthermore, does he even have legal grounds for compensation and if he does, how much compensation would be fair to ask for?








Mar 23, 2011 14:57

Isaac
Canon 40D, 5DMKII, Canon 100mm, Canon 100mm L series, 580EXII, and some recycled homemade stuff.

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
HansSteinert
Senior Member
419 posts
Joined Feb 2011
MORE INFO

That's pretty epic. Hope they pay you.

Mar 23, 2011 15:00



LOG IN TO REPLY
pxchoi
Goldmember
1,146 posts
Joined Aug 2009
MORE INFO

Whoa... They need to watch out. This is the second incident I've seen of this on this board. But I'm not sure what the outcome was.

If I were you, I would give them a call and just see what they have to say. If it sounds overtly complicated, then contact a lawyer. Or maybe even do that first and have the lawyer contact them.

Mar 23, 2011 15:04

Patrick Choi
Portfolioexternal link | Flickr | Facebookexternal link
EOS 7D | 580EX II | 10-22mm f3.5-f4.5 | 17-55mm f/2.8 IS |70-200mm f/2.8L IS II
For Sale: 17-55mm f/2.8 IS | 10-22mm f3.5-f4.5

LOG IN TO REPLY
Merlin_AZ
Senior Member
Merlin_AZ's Avatar
799 posts

Joined Mar 2010
MORE INFO

Might be sticky enough for a lawyer.
They stole your photo, but is it OK with the car manufacturer that you sell images of their registered vehicles for your own profit?
Just some questions to throw out there.

Mar 23, 2011 15:06



LOG IN TO REPLY
pxchoi
Goldmember
1,146 posts
Joined Aug 2009
MORE INFO

Merlin_AZ wrote in post #12077993external link
Might be sticky enough for a lawyer.
They stole your photo, but is it OK with the car manufacturer that you sell images of their registered vehicles for your own profit?
Just some questions to throw out there.

I was also thinking the same thing... Lawyer would probably the best route.

Mar 23, 2011 15:08

Patrick Choi
Portfolioexternal link | Flickr | Facebookexternal link
EOS 7D | 580EX II | 10-22mm f3.5-f4.5 | 17-55mm f/2.8 IS |70-200mm f/2.8L IS II
For Sale: 17-55mm f/2.8 IS | 10-22mm f3.5-f4.5

LOG IN TO REPLY
P51Mstg
Goldmember
P51Mstg's Avatar
1,333 posts

Joined Feb 2007

Mt. Carmel, TN
MORE INFO

In simple terms, you need to call Carolyn Wright (Photoattorney.com) RIGHT NOW.....

Assuming they used your picture (and it looks like it), its pretty much a $25,000 slam dunk plus attorney fees.

If you do it on your own, you'll be posting here and complaining that you didn't get anything or be proud you got a photo credit or a $50 GAP gift card.

I was a lawyer for 17 years, trust me on this one, Its an easy case.

Mark H

Mar 23, 2011 15:14 as a reply to post 12078000

Too Much Camera Stuff......

LOG IN TO REPLY
silvrg35
Member
190 posts
Joined Feb 2011

Chicago, IL
MORE INFO

Wow, it is hard to believe a large corporation would just blatantly approve these shirts to be sold.

Mar 23, 2011 15:21 as a reply to post 12078000



LOG IN TO REPLY
Philz
Member
Philz's Avatar
248 posts

Joined Feb 2011

Mason-Dixonville
MORE INFO

Wow please let us all know how this ends. Good Luck !

Mar 23, 2011 15:25 as a reply to post 12078000

7D - 50D - G11 - EOS-1 - EOS 630 - Olympus 550WP, Lights, some L - A Sig - Pocket Wizards !

LOG IN TO REPLY
Jimbers
Senior Member
333 posts
Joined Aug 2010
MORE INFO
banned

i would write this guy first, see what he did:

http://www.flickr.com/​photos/cdevers/5402217​217/external link

and then check with your own lawyer.

Mar 23, 2011 15:25 as a reply to post 12078000



LOG IN TO REPLY
Tee ­ Why
"Monkey's uncle"
Tee Why's Avatar
10,595 posts

Joined Feb 2006

Pasadena, CA
MORE INFO

Yup, you think a large corporation like GAP (which also ownes Banana Repulic alon with GAP) would know better and have a process where they ensure not to violate copyright laws.

Sounds like some money is coming your way though. I wish GAP would steal some of my imges as well.
:)

Mar 23, 2011 15:26 as a reply to post 12078000

Gallery: http://tomyi.smugmug.c​om/external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sparkplug
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
sparkplug's Avatar
289 posts

Joined Sep 2008

North Shore, Louisiana / Golfito, Costa Rica * I release all fish with NOAA tags for research
MORE INFO

Maybe I wasn't clear. I was typing in blue and I quoted him from another forum in black. This is my friend that took this picture and it is also his truck. I don't think he is a member here but I am sure he will drop in and take a look.

Mar 23, 2011 15:54 as a reply to post 12078000

Isaac
Canon 40D, 5DMKII, Canon 100mm, Canon 100mm L series, 580EXII, and some recycled homemade stuff.

LOG IN TO REPLY
DetlevCM
Goldmember
DetlevCM's Avatar
3,313 posts

Joined Apr 2010

Europe
MORE INFO

Merlin_AZ wrote in post #12077993external link
Might be sticky enough for a lawyer.
They stole your photo, but is it OK with the car manufacturer that you sell images of their registered vehicles for your own profit?
Just some questions to throw out there.

-> I can't see any visible trademarks on the "used image".
It's the general shape of an off-road vehicle, I could NOT tell it was a Toyota Landcruiser, I only know that because the OP said so.

It is my understanding that you'd need either a trademark or a clearly identifying unique design for an object to be unusable for commercial images.
-> I.e. the three rings on a Montblanc would be protected, but a plain wine glass would not be.
_______________

To the OP:
Laywer is possibly your best bet, unless they are forthcoming, in that case you might save some money if you deal with them directly (-> no lawyer fees, unless you feel that they should give you more)

Mar 23, 2011 16:13

5D MK II AF Satisfaction Poll | Reduced Kit List
A Basic Guide to Photographyexternal link | Websiteexternal link
Flickrexternal link | Artflakesexternal link | Blurbexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
TooManyShots
Cream of the Crop
TooManyShots's Avatar
9,120 posts

Joined Jan 2008

NYC
MORE INFO

Tee Why wrote in post #12078114external link
Yup, you think a large corporation like GAP (which also ownes Banana Repulic alon with GAP) would know better and have a process where they ensure not to violate copyright laws.

Sounds like some money is coming your way though. I wish GAP would steal some of my imges as well.
:)


Hahahaha.......

Mar 23, 2011 16:27

One Imaging Photographyexternal link and my Flickrexternal link
Facebookexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
bolaberlim
Member
90 posts
Joined Jan 2011

Porto- Portugal
MORE INFO

It is my understanding that they can't use your photo. Period. However they altered it significantly. Therefore they are in the clear, as their image was created by them, although it was based on a photo of yours. However, I'm Portuguese. I have a whole different set of laws here...

Mar 23, 2011 16:39



LOG IN TO REPLY
alabama1980
Goldmember
alabama1980's Avatar
1,213 posts

Joined Mar 2008

Gadsden, AL
MORE INFO

Wow....how...blatant. There was a similar case with GAP not too long ago. Same scenario...they ripped off an image of a vehicle and used it on some clothing. As someone pointed out though, it's more likely not the company themselves, but a subcontracted graphic design person that wanted to make a quick dollar with not a lot of work involved.

Mar 23, 2011 16:40 as a reply to post 12078000

Name's Andy! :)
Facebookexternal link
My 500pxexternal link
asheltonphoto.comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

24,687 views & 0 likes for this thread
Unauthorized Use of a Photo for Profit
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography

NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO THE FORUMS
Registered members get all the features: search, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, own reviews...




Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality. We do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browsers' data storage methods.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.33version 1.33
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00167 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.03s
Latest registered member is vermeerr
694 guests, 677 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 5175, that happened on Jun 16, 2015