Canon Digital Photography Forums  

Go Back   Canon Digital Photography Forums > 'Sharing Knowhow' section > RAW, Post Processing and Printing
Register Rules FAQ Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 6th of April 2011 (Wed)   #1
tvphotog
Cream of the Crop
 
tvphotog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: New York City
Posts: 5,711
Default X-Rite ColorMunki vs ICC

I've got a new Epson R3000, for which Ilford, Hahnemuhle and Innova will soon have ICC codes for their various papers.

Are these enough to produce accurate renditions of my Spyder 3 Pro-calibrated monitor colors, or is the ColorMunki better at accuracy?

It's an expensive gadget which I would get only if the ICC codes don't do the job.

I'm asking because I found that with my Canon ip5200 Pixma, the ICC codes for various papers were fine at reproducing the monitor image.
__________________
Jay
"Ireland in Word and Image" Jay Ben Images 5D III | 5D II | 7D | Powershot S100 | 24-105L | 100-400L | 16-35 f/2.8L II | 24 T/S f /3.5L II | 17 T/S f/4L | 50mm f/1.2L| 35mm f/1.4L | 580 EX II | 600 EX-RT | Feisol 3441T/Markins lever QR | Gitzo 3542L | Gitzo 5561T

Last edited by tvphotog : 6th of April 2011 (Wed) at 14:12.
tvphotog is offline   Reply With Quote
This ad block will go away when you log in as member
Old 6th of April 2011 (Wed)   #2
ChasP505
"brain damaged old guy"
 
ChasP505's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: New Mexico, USA
Posts: 5,566
Default Re: X-Rite ColorMunki vs ICC

Quote:
Originally Posted by tvphotog View Post
Are these enough to produce accurate renditions of my Spyder 3 Pro-calibrated monitor colors, or is the ColorMunki better at accuracy?
First of all, take your monitor out the equation. It has absolutely no affect on the quality of prints. If you print a standardized printer test image on Epson paper, using a canned Epson profile, it will print the same whether your monitor is calibrated or not.

Epson profiles are reputed to be excellent and you may or may not find a difference between a paper manufacturer supplied profile and one created by the ColorMunki.

I'd suggest holding off on investing in a ColorMunki until you do some printing. But always judge from a print of a standard test image, not one of your own.
__________________
Chas P
"It doesn't matter how you get there if you don't know where you're going!"

Last edited by ChasP505 : 6th of April 2011 (Wed) at 15:49.
ChasP505 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th of April 2011 (Wed)   #3
tvphotog
Cream of the Crop
 
tvphotog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: New York City
Posts: 5,711
Default Re: X-Rite ColorMunki vs ICC

Chas,

I have found that for my calibrated monitor, using a Kodak ICC code for their paper on my Canon printer, I was able to reproduce the colors on my monitor exactly. I understand that the printer will print the same each and every time, regardless of whether my monitor is calibrated or not.

I will wait and see how the new ICC codes from each paper company work on each of their papers, using my new Epson printer. I assume that they should reproduce what I see on my calibrated monitor. I'll hold off on the ColorMunki til then.

Thanks.
__________________
Jay
"Ireland in Word and Image" Jay Ben Images 5D III | 5D II | 7D | Powershot S100 | 24-105L | 100-400L | 16-35 f/2.8L II | 24 T/S f /3.5L II | 17 T/S f/4L | 50mm f/1.2L| 35mm f/1.4L | 580 EX II | 600 EX-RT | Feisol 3441T/Markins lever QR | Gitzo 3542L | Gitzo 5561T
tvphotog is offline   Reply With Quote
This ad block will go away when you log in as member
Old 6th of April 2011 (Wed)   #4
bohdank
Cream of the Crop
 
bohdank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 14,060
Default Re: X-Rite ColorMunki vs ICC

Whether the colors will be exactly the same is debatable. If the monitor has a wider color gamut than the printer as does the image, then the "missing" colors will not be the same. Prints also have less contrast than monitors so that will also not be the same. Same for dynamic range and general "brightness". Adjusting the luminance on your monitor to match prints may be necessary.

With all that said, it is amazing how close you can get, if everything is set up properly.
__________________
Bohdan - I may be, and probably am, completely wrong.
Gear List

Montreal Concert, Event and Portrait Photographer
Flickr
bohdank is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th of April 2011 (Thu)   #5
ChasP505
"brain damaged old guy"
 
ChasP505's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: New Mexico, USA
Posts: 5,566
Default Re: X-Rite ColorMunki vs ICC

Quote:
Originally Posted by tvphotog View Post
Chas,

I have found that for my calibrated monitor, using a Kodak ICC code for their paper on my Canon printer, I was able to reproduce the colors on my monitor exactly.
Jay, your print color management thinking is totally backwards. The purpose of a high quality icc printer profile is NOT to make the print match the monitor display but to optimize the output of the specific printer-paper-ink combination. But, the purpose of a well calibrated monitor is to provide a reasonably reliable PREDICTION of how your print output will look.

Right now, when you print a standard test image on a common Epson paper like Premium Lustre, using the icc profile installed with your R3000, do you get a good match between the print and the softproofed display on your monitor? If not, you need to go back and review your entire color managed print workflow, starting from the monitor calibration.
__________________
Chas P
"It doesn't matter how you get there if you don't know where you're going!"

Last edited by ChasP505 : 7th of April 2011 (Thu) at 10:17.
ChasP505 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st of May 2013 (Tue)   #6
Matt M.
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Eastern Washington
Posts: 573
Default Re: X-Rite ColorMunki vs ICC

Quote:
Originally Posted by tvphotog View Post
I have found that for my calibrated monitor, using a Kodak ICC code for their paper on my Canon printer, I was able to reproduce the colors on my monitor exactly. I understand that the printer will print the same each and every time, regardless of whether my monitor is calibrated or not.

I will wait and see how the new ICC codes from each paper company work on each of their papers, using my new Epson printer. I assume that they should reproduce what I see on my calibrated monitor. I'll hold off on the ColorMunki til then.
I'm a bit confused about this. If you have a "calibrated monitor," that would indicate to me that you've used some sort of calibrating device in the recent past. If so, you wouldn't also need the ColorMunki... would you?
__________________
Matt

6d, T3i, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L, 28-80mm, f/2.8-4L, 24-105mm f/4L, 24mm f/2.8, 50mm f/1.8 II, 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS II, 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II, 600EX-RT, etc.
Matt M. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st of May 2013 (Tue)   #7
Mavgirl
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Dallas area
Posts: 647
Default Re: X-Rite ColorMunki vs ICC

Quote:
Originally Posted by tvphotog View Post
I've got a new Epson R3000, for which Ilford, Hahnemuhle and Innova will soon have ICC codes for their various papers.

Are these enough to produce accurate renditions of my Spyder 3 Pro-calibrated monitor colors, or is the ColorMunki better at accuracy?

It's an expensive gadget which I would get only if the ICC codes don't do the job.

I'm asking because I found that with my Canon ip5200 Pixma, the ICC codes for various papers were fine at reproducing the monitor image.
When I spend the extra money for Hahnemuhle paper I want my print to be right on the first try. For me that means ICC profiles AND accurate monitor calibration with a calibration device. That paper is too expensive to waste with a bunch of test strips and off prints.
__________________
6D/50D/350D with too many lenses
Calumet 4x5, Pentax SV 35mm, Canon A-1, Rebel G and many more toys...
Mavgirl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd of May 2013 (Wed)   #8
Mark Vuleta
Goldmember
 
Mark Vuleta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Auckland NZ
Posts: 4,007
Default Re: X-Rite ColorMunki vs ICC

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mavgirl View Post
When I spend the extra money for Hahnemuhle paper I want my print to be right on the first try. For me that means ICC profiles AND accurate monitor calibration with a calibration device. That paper is too expensive to waste with a bunch of test strips and off prints.
You always print with an ICC profile, weather it is the correct one for your printer/ink/paper combination under the lighting conditions expected or a generic profile.

Even the paper supplied profile will generally benefit from a tweak via printer proofing/profiling and this must be done on the paper you want to use, necessitating "waste with a bunch of test strips".

Last edited by Mark Vuleta : 22nd of May 2013 (Wed) at 06:22.
Mark Vuleta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd of May 2013 (Wed)   #9
Mark Vuleta
Goldmember
 
Mark Vuleta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Auckland NZ
Posts: 4,007
Default Re: X-Rite ColorMunki vs ICC

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt M. View Post
I'm a bit confused about this. If you have a "calibrated monitor," that would indicate to me that you've used some sort of calibrating device in the recent past. If so, you wouldn't also need the ColorMunki... would you?
The Spider 3 Pro is a monitor calibration device, a different device is used to proof & profile printed output.
Mark Vuleta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd of May 2013 (Wed)   #10
Mavgirl
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Dallas area
Posts: 647
Default Re: X-Rite ColorMunki vs ICC

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Vuleta View Post
You always print with an ICC profile, weather it is the correct one for your printer/ink/paper combination under the lighting conditions expected or a generic profile.

Even the paper supplied profile will generally benefit from a tweak via printer proofing/profiling and this must be done on the paper you want to use, necessitating "waste with a bunch of test strips".
I should have been more clear. I mean the correct ICC profiles for the paper and having my monitor calibrated as close to my printer output as I can get it. I'm not saying you won't have to make very minor adjustments or run a couple test strips. With the generic ICC profiles and an uncalibrated monitor you can use several pieces of paper up for test strips before you get it right. With the correct ICC profile and a monitor calibrated to your printer you will waste a lot less trying to get it right. And once you get set up for a specific paper on your printer you should get it right on the first try most of the time after that.
__________________
6D/50D/350D with too many lenses
Calumet 4x5, Pentax SV 35mm, Canon A-1, Rebel G and many more toys...
Mavgirl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd of May 2013 (Wed)   #11
Matt M.
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Eastern Washington
Posts: 573
Default Re: X-Rite ColorMunki vs ICC

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Vuleta View Post
The Spider 3 Pro is a monitor calibration device, a different device is used to proof & profile printed output.
If I have a calibrated monitor (via Spyder, Colormunki, etc), and the correct ICC profiles for the printer and paper, I should be able to print photos that are very, very close to the image that I see on my screen, shouldn't I? What other calibration is necessary?
__________________
Matt

6d, T3i, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L, 28-80mm, f/2.8-4L, 24-105mm f/4L, 24mm f/2.8, 50mm f/1.8 II, 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS II, 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II, 600EX-RT, etc.
Matt M. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th of May 2013 (Tue)   #12
tonylong
do I really have to respond?
 
tonylong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
Posts: 53,001
Default Re: X-Rite ColorMunki vs ICC

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt M. View Post
If I have a calibrated monitor (via Spyder, Colormunki, etc), and the correct ICC profiles for the printer and paper, I should be able to print photos that are very, very close to the image that I see on my screen, shouldn't I? What other calibration is necessary?
I suggest running some small test prints and then soft-proofing your images, comparing them soft-proofing with the actual prints and doing any fine-tuning needed, and saving the resulting adjustments as print-specific presets in Lightroom or actions in Photoshop.
__________________
Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase
Wildlife project pics here, Biking Photog shoots here, "Suburbia" project here! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here
tonylong is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wtb: colormunki Presha Classifieds: Buy 0 21st of March 2011 (Mon) 23:19
Need help with the ColorMunki TaDa RAW, Post Processing and Printing 11 5th of April 2010 (Mon) 17:19
X-Rite ColorMunki - new user??? fortisi876 RAW, Post Processing and Printing 2 6th of November 2009 (Fri) 21:17
Colormunki GyRob RAW, Post Processing and Printing 3 19th of March 2009 (Thu) 05:52


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:51.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
This forum is not affiliated with Canon in any way and is run as a free user helpsite by Pekka Saarinen, Helsinki Finland. You will need to register in order to be able to post messages. Cookies are required for registering and posting. HTML in messages is not allowed, plain website addresses are automatically made active by the board.