Canon Digital Photography Forums  

P.O.T.N. SUPPORT SHOP IS OPEN, check it out now!

Go Back   Canon Digital Photography Forums > 'Sharing Knowhow' section > Talk About Photography > Weddings and Other Family Events Talk
Register Rules FAQ Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 15th of April 2011 (Fri)   #1
cameraperson
Member
 
cameraperson's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Atlanta, GA.
Posts: 751
Default Is the Tamron 28-75 2.8 a bad choice for weddings?

Could it be used professionally?
cameraperson is offline   Reply With Quote
This ad block will go away when you log in as member
Old 15th of April 2011 (Fri)   #2
form
"inadequately equipped"
 
form's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Henderson, NV
Posts: 4,896
Default Re: Is the Tamron 28-75 2.8 a bad choice for weddings?

Slow and inconsistent AF makes it unusable for moving subjects, but the optics are good.
__________________
Las Vegas Wedding Photographer: http://www.joeyallenphoto.com
form is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th of April 2011 (Fri)   #3
jcolman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,673
Default Re: Is the Tamron 28-75 2.8 a bad choice for weddings?

I had one. Sold it and bought a 24-70. I wasn't impressed with the sharpness of the 24-70 so I sold it and bought another 28-75. I use this lens quite a bit for commercial shoots but not too much for weddings as I have other lenses that I like better. Like form said, the AF is slow but I've never had an issue with inconsistent focusing. But the lens is sharp.
__________________
www.jimcolmanphotography.com
jcolman is offline   Reply With Quote
This ad block will go away when you log in as member
Old 15th of April 2011 (Fri)   #4
rweav72
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Ky
Posts: 137
Default Re: Is the Tamron 28-75 2.8 a bad choice for weddings?

I've used it again and again. Autofocus isn't superfast but but this isn't sports or wildlife. Works for me.
__________________
Ron Weaver

Canon 7D, 50D, 1D classic, Sigma 50 1.4, Canon 85 1.8, Tamron 17-50 2.8, 28-75 2.8, Canon 70-200L 2.8 non IS
Nissan 622, Vivitar 383, Yongnuo 560 (3)
rweav72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th of April 2011 (Fri)   #5
tim
Light Bringer
 
tim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Posts: 47,935
Default Re: Is the Tamron 28-75 2.8 a bad choice for weddings?

I had one for my 20D, but I ditched it for the 17-55, which gave me better focus at the time. The 7D + 17-55 didn't focus as well as my 20D + 28-75 though.

A 28-75 on a crop body is too long, you need a wide lens on another body at the same time, and maybe a 70-200 on another body. Just because of that a 17-55 might be a better choice.
tim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th of April 2011 (Wed)   #6
JasonGambino
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Houston
Posts: 48
Default Re: Is the Tamron 28-75 2.8 a bad choice for weddings?

I had this same question as I just purchased this lens for an upcoming wedding. Based on the suggestions of the forum, I rented the 17-55 IS for the ceremony. I'm not sure how wide I will need to go for the reception but if it's not too bad I may switch to the 28-75 as my walk around and first dance lens.
__________________
canon 40d | canon digital rebel | tamron 90 2.8 | tamron 24-75 2.8 | canon 50 1.8 ii | canon 580ex | peanut butter sandwich
JasonGambino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th of April 2011 (Wed)   #7
jblaschke
Senior Member
 
jblaschke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: New Braunfels, Texas
Posts: 1,422
Default Re: Is the Tamron 28-75 2.8 a bad choice for weddings?

This Tammy, along with Canon's 70-200 2.8 IS L, are The Wife's go-to lenses for weddings. Focus concerns are generally overblown in our experience--we use AF assist with the 580EXII and never miss a shot. The optics are very, very good (the L is better, though). The one real complaint is that it vignettes on a full-frame body, like the 5DII, but since these are wedding shots, The Wife would be adding vignetting anyway in post, so no blood, no foul.

Now, she does plan to get the 24-70L eventually, but the Tammy's such a consistent performer that this upgrade isn't anywhere near a priority.
__________________
Canon 7D | Canon 50D IR modified | Canon EF 70-200mm 2.8 IS L | Canon FD 500mm 8.0 Reflex | Canon EF 85mm 1.8 | Canon EF 50mm 1.8 mk I | Canon EF-S 10-22mm | Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 | Meade 645 (762mm f/5)
Model Mayhem
| DeviantArt | Lisa On Location: New Braunfels Photography
jblaschke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th of April 2011 (Wed)   #8
pcj
Senior Member
 
pcj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Templeton, MA
Posts: 1,001
Default Re: Is the Tamron 28-75 2.8 a bad choice for weddings?

It's AF isn't particularly fast, and my copy is a little too soft at f2.8 - but none of that should eliminate it from your setup - just be aware of it's limitations, work within them, and you'll be happy. It's a great lens, overall.
__________________
7D (gripped) | GoPro Hero HD | Canon 70-200mm f/4 L | Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 | 40mm f/2.8 | 85mm f/1.8 | 28mm f/1.8 | 3 * 600EX-RT - All gear

http://www.rt2photo.com
http://www.facebook.com/rt2photo
pcj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th of April 2011 (Wed)   #9
SMP_Homer
Cream of the Crop
 
SMP_Homer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 5,052
Default Re: Is the Tamron 28-75 2.8 a bad choice for weddings?

I don't generally like any lenses that make noise for big events like that... a dslr can make enough noise on its own when things are quiet, don't need to add to it!
__________________
5D3 x2 / 5D2
Sig85 /35L/50L/100L/135L/16-35L II/70-200L II/100-400L
B400 x2 / B800 x2 / ABR800 / VML x2 / 600EX / 430EXII x3 / TT5 x8 / PW TT1 x3 / AC3 x3 / AC9 x4

SMP_Homer is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tamron 17-50 for weddings laydros Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 13 25th of April 2009 (Sat) 23:35
For Weddings: Sigma 70-200 f/2.8 II or Tamron 70-200 f/2.8? McLarenTeam Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 36 19th of February 2009 (Thu) 13:18
Anyone used the Tamron 17-55 f2.8 for Weddings rollsman Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 4 25th of April 2008 (Fri) 08:10
Anyone using the Tamron 17-50mm f2.8 for Weddings? jesusdelallata Weddings and Other Family Events 6 8th of October 2006 (Sun) 22:57
Sigma or Tamron F2.8 for Weddings RebelXT Weddings and Other Family Events 28 8th of March 2006 (Wed) 10:56


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:21.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
This forum is not affiliated with Canon in any way and is run as a free user helpsite by Pekka Saarinen, Helsinki Finland. You will need to register in order to be able to post messages. Cookies are required for registering and posting. HTML in messages is not allowed, plain website addresses are automatically made active by the board.