![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 258
|
__________________
I use a {3+2}D Mark [10-8] and a (23-16)D and a Nikon D(75+75)x2s and a Nikon D(38+2)x |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
|
Yo! Kudos for the website but there are a few things I would change...By no means am I extremely web savvy but my biz partner is a web designer and I've learned a lot through osmosis. With that being said, I think that website may be in flash. The downside with flash is, it's not SEO friendly. (Search engine optimized) Meaning, there aren't a lot of elements and keywords google can pull from to increase your ranking or even web presence.
The design itself is a bit busy and it isn't very user friendly. The more clicks or time the potential client has to spend in navigating through the site will equate into lost interest. I suggest getting a more stable site hosted by wordpress and pick out a theme created specifically for photographers. At most, you'll spend $50 bucks for the theme on top of $10 or so in hosting per month. Check out my portfolio which is hosted by wordpress. www.frshnkphoto.com Simplicity is key when working with a photographic portfolio. Keywording, constant blog updating and backlinking (leaving comments and links to your portfolio on other websites) will increase SEO rankings. I like the use of imagery incorporated into the design but I think it could be laid out better. Also, having Wix's branding on the footer won't do much for your friend...It isn't professional. If you have a professionally laid out website, it's almost like your wardrobe. People judge you by what you wear. If you are decked out in freebie clothing from say a county fair, people think less of you because you didn't invest money into your self image. Yes, it's shallow but that's kind of how the world works nowadays Hopefully I didn't come off harsh but I think having a professionally built website is very important! |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 95
|
I would get away from wix... that site is NOT search engine friendly by any means.
__________________
5dIII, Canon 7D Gripped, 20D 70-200L 2.8 IS MK II, 24-70L 2.8, EF-S 10-22mm, 50mm 1.8, (2) GoPro 1080p, (4) AB 800's... and an assortment of light modifiers |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: SoCal
Posts: 229
|
Large soft images is a no no...IMHO
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 355
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Need a new website? WEBSITE DESIGN HERE!! | Pixel Boy | Classifieds: Services Offered | 1 | 20th of November 2009 (Fri) 11:53 |
| Website Design for your Photography Website | ctribble | RAW, Post Processing and Printing | 18 | 27th of June 2008 (Fri) 15:35 |
| I wish they had a website for Canon Cameras like this website | Master-9 | Canon EOS Digital Cameras | 1 | 1st of September 2007 (Sat) 13:54 |
| My Website | 10Dennis | Weddings and Other Family Events | 4 | 17th of November 2006 (Fri) 19:49 |
| A New Website | OptimizedDucati | Presentation | 1 | 17th of November 2006 (Fri) 08:02 |