Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Thread started 23 May 2011 (Monday) 06:52
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Canon 18-135 vs 55-250 Image Quality same/different

 
mark2009
Goldmember
mark2009's Avatar
1,785 posts
Joined Dec 2010
Northeast , USA
May 23, 2011 06:52 |  #1

I know the ranges are obviously different, but has anyone had hands on experience with both lenses. I want to know if the 18-135 is equal to, better, worse than the 55-250. I have owned the 55-250, and thought the image Q was very good, and the lens seems to always get very good reviews . The 18-135 on the other hand does not get very good reviews, from some anyway. I bought a 18-135 recently for a walk around when hiking, but here in the northeast I think it has been raining for about 6 months:rolleyes: so I have not had the opportunity to try it out. I would be using this outside mosly, on a 50D...
Would really like to hear from people that actually used both.
Thanks




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Ralph ­ III
Goldmember
1,282 posts
Joined Mar 2009
Alabama
May 23, 2011 09:05 |  #2

I haven't owned the 55-250 but did briefly own an efs 18-135mm(resale) and was quite surprised at the image quality out the box.

I only took about 10 to 12 test shots(resale) but found that it was tack sharp, much sharper than my ef 28-135mm. The colors were good as well and the auto focus was actually faster than expected. It really didn't seem that much slower than the older USM on my 28-135mm.

I think the lens gets an unjustified bad rap for a consumer lens. It has much better glass than most of the consumers (ud + aspherical). That would include the 28-135mm which gets good reviews here.

If they had put USM on it and a seemingly better build, I think the reviews would have been very good instead! Again, I liked my 28-135mm but it was double barrel which tends to wobble and a lens with creep issues. The 18-135 has neither. It just isn't pretty.

The only issue I found was that my copy showed some vignetting in testing. Otherwise, it's the perfect walk around lens IMO.

Good luck


"SOUTHERN and SAVED!"
POTN feedback.........Items For Sale

LOG IN TO REPLY
-Strike-
Member
171 posts
Joined Feb 2011
Ontario, Canada
May 23, 2011 09:09 |  #3

Agreed. My 18-135 is quite capable of producing rather great photos. I'm rather surprised as the reviews weren't that great. Definitely a great walk-around lens.


60D | EF-S 18-135 | Slik Pro 580DX

LOG IN TO REPLY
mark2009
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
mark2009's Avatar
1,785 posts
Joined Dec 2010
Northeast , USA
May 23, 2011 19:09 as a reply to -Strike-'s post |  #4

Any other input???




LOG IN TO REPLY
RHChan84
Goldmember
RHChan84's Avatar
2,282 posts
Joined Apr 2011
Mass
May 23, 2011 19:24 |  #5

Crappy pics but it's pouring out and I don't want to take my stuff out.

18-135mm

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://www.rhchan.com/​pictures/test001.jpg (external link)
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO
18mm no flash
IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://www.rhchan.com/​pictures/test002.jpg (external link)
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO
135mm no flash

55-250mm
IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://www.rhchan.com/​pictures/test003.jpg (external link)
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO
55mm no flash
IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://www.rhchan.com/​pictures/test004.jpg (external link)
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO
250mm no flash

18-135mm
IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://www.rhchan.com/​pictures/test005.jpg (external link)
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO
18mm w/flash
IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://www.rhchan.com/​pictures/test006.jpg (external link)
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO
135mm w/flash

55-250mm
IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://www.rhchan.com/​pictures/test007.jpg (external link)
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO
55mm w/flash
IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://www.rhchan.com/​pictures/test008.jpg (external link)
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO
250mm w/flash

I tend to use the 18-135mm for indoor and 55-250mm for outdoors unless I want a wider angle then I'll slap on the 18-135mm but still not wide enough for me but will do for now.

Canon (60D Gripped | 18-135mm f3.5-5.6 IS | 40mm f2.8 | 50mm f1.8 | 70-200 F4L IS| 430 EXII)
Tamron (17-50 f2.8 VC)
Feedback
Facebookexternal link

flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
mark2009
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
mark2009's Avatar
1,785 posts
Joined Dec 2010
Northeast , USA
May 23, 2011 19:30 as a reply to RHChan84's post |  #6

I just seem to hear people that have it, the 18-135, it is pretty good. Sometimes because of the "hype" in reviews(bad hype), its like I have to spend $1000 to get a good lens. It seems pretty good to me?




LOG IN TO REPLY
RHChan84
Goldmember
RHChan84's Avatar
2,282 posts
Joined Apr 2011
Mass
May 23, 2011 20:27 |  #7

I ave way better shots on my home computer then my work laptop but that is just what I have. I love the 18-135mm.


Canon (60D Gripped | 18-135mm f3.5-5.6 IS | 40mm f2.8 | 50mm f1.8 | 70-200 F4L IS| 430 EXII)
Tamron (17-50 f2.8 VC)
Feedback
Facebookexternal link

flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
amp3dx
Member
49 posts
Joined Mar 2011
May 23, 2011 22:50 |  #8

The 18-135 works good enough for me. I do hate the zoom creep though, which is why I have not used it for a while now. Been using my sigma 30 and new uwa. But it works great as a general walkaround.


60D | Canon 17-55 f/2.8 | Canon 85 f/1.8 | Sigma 50mm f/1.4| Sigma 30mm f/1.4 | Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6 | Canon 55-250mm

LOG IN TO REPLY
ian_socool
Goldmember
ian_socool's Avatar
Joined Dec 2011
Brooklyn NY
Dec 29, 2011 16:57 |  #9

Thank you for these pics. I was considering one of these lenses for my t3. I really like the width of the 18-135, but like the zoom of the 250. Maybe I need to find a 18-250 or 300?


60D, 60D, SL1, Tokina 11-16 F/2.8, Σ30mm 1.4, 40mm 2.8 Pancake Σ70mm 2.8 EX DG Macro, Σ17-50 2.8, Σ50-150mm f/2.8 EX DC OS HSM APO, Σ150-500mm f/5-6.3 APO DG OS HSM, Silk Monopod, 430EX II X's 2, Yongnuo YN-560II X's 2, Cowboy Studio wireless flash triggers X4, YN-422c X3.Ian_socool FlickR (external link) Facebook fanpage (external link) http://ianlynphotograp​hy.com (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
moltengold
Goldmember
4,295 posts
Joined Jul 2011
Dec 29, 2011 17:09 |  #10

Thank you so much RHChan84
Plz
Can you show us the different between the 70-300mm f4-5.6 IS USM
And the 55-250
i want to see the pictures before i buy the 70-300mm f4-5.6 IS USM
Thanks again


| Canon EOS | and some canon lenses

LOG IN TO REPLY
moltengold
Goldmember
4,295 posts
Joined Jul 2011
Dec 29, 2011 17:13 |  #11

and if the 70-300mm f4-5.6 IS USM gives me sharp images i will buy it
If it not
I will stay with my 55-250


| Canon EOS | and some canon lenses

LOG IN TO REPLY
moltengold
Goldmember
4,295 posts
Joined Jul 2011
Dec 29, 2011 17:33 |  #12

in fact i had the 70-300 L
It gives me ultra-high quality images
But it is too heavy
Heavy like a tank
I will sell it and save the mony to buy 3 lenses
That why i ask for the 70-300 non L


| Canon EOS | and some canon lenses

LOG IN TO REPLY
ian_socool
Goldmember
ian_socool's Avatar
Joined Dec 2011
Brooklyn NY
Dec 29, 2011 17:43 |  #13

What is the difference between the 70-300IS and the 75-300 they have in Circuit City for like $200?


60D, 60D, SL1, Tokina 11-16 F/2.8, Σ30mm 1.4, 40mm 2.8 Pancake Σ70mm 2.8 EX DG Macro, Σ17-50 2.8, Σ50-150mm f/2.8 EX DC OS HSM APO, Σ150-500mm f/5-6.3 APO DG OS HSM, Silk Monopod, 430EX II X's 2, Yongnuo YN-560II X's 2, Cowboy Studio wireless flash triggers X4, YN-422c X3.Ian_socool FlickR (external link) Facebook fanpage (external link) http://ianlynphotograp​hy.com (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
Veemac
Goldmember
2,098 posts
Joined Apr 2009
Arizona, USA
Dec 29, 2011 23:58 |  #14

ian_socool wrote in post #13617141external link
What is the difference between the 70-300IS and the 75-300 they have in Circuit City for like $200?

The 75-300 (any version of it) is generally considered as one of the worst Canon lenses ever made. The 70-300 IS is a respectable lens that has actually been referred to as a "hidden L" in reviews (I don't totally agree with this assessment, but it is a very good lens).


Mac
-Stuff I Use-

LOG IN TO REPLY
Veemac
Goldmember
2,098 posts
Joined Apr 2009
Arizona, USA
Dec 30, 2011 00:00 |  #15

moltengold wrote in post #13616968external link
Thank you so much RHChan84
Plz
Can you show us the different between the 70-300mm f4-5.6 IS USM
And the 55-250
i want to see the pictures before i buy the 70-300mm f4-5.6 IS USM
Thanks again

Why not look at this 88-page thread for the 70-300 - plenty of sample images there.


Mac
-Stuff I Use-

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

23,963 views & 0 likes for this thread
Canon 18-135 vs 55-250 Image Quality same/different
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00541 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.04s
Latest registered member is Sebastian73
629 guests, 438 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 5175, that happened on Jun 16, 2015