Index  •   • New Posts  •   • RTAT  •   • "Best Of"  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New Posts  •   • RTAT  •   • "Best Of"  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Thread started 27 Jun 2011 (Monday) 07:27
PREV/NEXT

7D+100-400+2xlll Extender

 
jiimybelll
Hatchling
1 post
Joined Dec 2007
MORE INFO

Trouble with AF, 100-400 lens listed to work with the 2x,
any help would be greatly appreciated,
Jim

Jun 27, 2011 07:27



LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
1Tanker
Goldmember
1Tanker's Avatar
4,470 posts

Joined Jan 2011

Swaying to the Symphony of Destruction
MORE INFO

What's your trouble.. won't auto-focus? The 100-400 won't AF on any camera with a 2x extender, and only on 1-series bodies with a 1.4x(unless you tape the contacts).

Jun 27, 2011 07:49

Kel
Gear

LOG IN TO REPLY
phreeky
Goldmember
3,471 posts
Joined Oct 2007

Australia
MORE INFO

What he said ^^^

Except it should AF in liveview, if you really need it. But in my experience the results in liveview aren't consistent if you can't stop the wobble (i.e. on very steady support).

Jun 27, 2011 08:05



LOG IN TO REPLY
Silverfox1
Goldmember
Silverfox1's Avatar
3,180 posts

Joined Aug 2009

South Texas
MORE INFO

AF definitely wont work but MF will with & without support as depicted below.

5D MKII + 400L prime + Kenko 2x MC4 DGX at 800mm/f11.0 + monopod :

http://photography-on-the.net ...p=12549321&postcoun​t=1850

7D + 100-400L + Kenko 2x MC4 DGX at 800mm/f11.0 + handheld :

http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=983021

I primarily limit my personal use to the 1.4 TC and tape the pins on any fixed f5.6 lens but it can be fun to play around with the 2X extenders when ambient lighting conditions are favorable to achieve some success using MF.

Regards, ;)

Jun 27, 2011 11:32 as a reply to phreeky's post 3 hours earlier.

Silverfox1 POTN Feedback / TC Extender Tests / Gear List

LOG IN TO REPLY
bpark42
Senior Member
307 posts
Joined Jul 2009
MORE INFO

jiimybelll wrote in post #12664085external link
Trouble with AF, 100-400 lens listed to work with the 2x,
any help would be greatly appreciated,
Jim

First, I would stay away from using a 2x converter on the 100-400. The image quality will suffer significantly, especially on the 7D.

Anyhow, the 7D will not autofocus if the max f-stop of the attached lens is higher (smaller aperture) than f5.6. With a 2x TC on the 100-400 your f-stop is effectively f11 so you are out of luck. Even with a 1.4x you would be at f8 and still out of luck.

Your only option is to tape the pins to prevent the converter from reporting itself to the camera. If you do this the camera will attempt AF but it may not work very well since not enough light is getting to AF sensors.

Oh, and the fact that the converter is listed as "compatible" with the 100-400 simply means that it fits and can be used. It does not mean AF will work.

Jun 27, 2011 11:56



LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Jim ­ K
Senior Member
449 posts
Joined Sep 2008

Rockledge, FL
MORE INFO

I don't think that was Canon that said the 2x converter would work on the 100-400, at least without saying it won't autofocus.

Jun 27, 2011 15:33 as a reply to bpark42's post 3 hours earlier.

Canon: 7D (2, 1 gripped), 50D gripped, 500 f/4L IS, 100-400 L IS, 70-200 f/4L IS, 28-135 IS, 10-22, 15-85 IS, 1.4x II, 580EX
5D3, 24-105 f/4L IS, 17-40 f/4L IS, TS-E 24 f/3.5L II. S100 p&s
Gitzo GT3530LS, Wimberley ver. II. Manfrottto: tripod 055XPROB legs, 448RC2 head; monopod 679B, 234RC tilt head

LOG IN TO REPLY
phreeky
Goldmember
3,471 posts
Joined Oct 2007

Australia
MORE INFO

bpark42 wrote in post #12665334external link
If you do this the camera will attempt AF but it may not work very well since not enough light is getting to AF sensors.

It's rarely the amount of light that is the problem, it's the aperture being too small and the way phase detection works that is the real problem.

Jun 27, 2011 18:07



LOG IN TO REPLY
cc10d
Senior Member
cc10d's Avatar
805 posts

Joined Jan 2004

Oregon, USA
MORE INFO

I love my 100-400, but I do not use telextenders with it. Too much hassle for poor performance. I just crop the native lens and feel it works as good as or better than the poor performance with a converter, especially the 2x. Now the 400 f2.8L may take a 2x ok, but then one needs a tripod and a large first cost,, so I just get what I can without converters and realize it is still the best performing lens in its class. :)

Jun 27, 2011 23:10

cc

LOG IN TO REPLY

1,254 views & 0 likes for this thread
7D+100-400+2xlll Extender
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses

NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO THE FORUMS
Registered members get all the features: search, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, own reviews...




SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF    •   JUMP TO FORUM    •   FORUM RULES    •   Index    •   New Posts    •   RTAT    •   "Best Of"    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality. We do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browsers' data storage methods.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.1version 1.1
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00295 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.01s
Latest registered member is LauraShort
884 guests, 808 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014