LOG IN    OR   REGISTER TO FORUMS


"minimum" DSLR to get metal body

FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EOS Digital Cameras
Thread started 17 Jul 2011 (Sunday) 21:50   
LIST NEARBY THREADS
 
John ­ from ­ PA
Cream of the Crop
Joined May 2003
5,298 posts
Southeast Pennsylvania
[MORE/SHARE]

I'm turned off by the quality of many Canon DSLR models because of the plastic body. The other night I was with someone that had a T2i with about 14000 exposures and the lens actually wobbled on the body. Admittedly the owner was a semi-pro who does a lot of landscape work and is constanty changing lenses.

In the Canon line, and preferably with current models or one generation back, what is the minimum model that will get me a metal body? I have a considerable number of EF lenses from 35 mm film days that I understand are also useable with most of the Canon line.

Thanks for the help,

John from PA

Post #1, Jul 17, 2011 21:50:49




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
ahendarman
Senior Member
ahendarman's Avatar
Joined Sep 2008
851 posts
SoCal
[MORE/SHARE]

In the current line up, that would be a 7D. If you're willing to go one generation back then the 50D has a metal body.
If you are doing a lot of landscape work, consider the older 5D classic which also has a metal body.

Post #2, Jul 17, 2011 21:56:13


Gear | Smugmugexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
TeamSpeed's Avatar
Joined May 2002
26,012 posts
NW Indiana
[MORE/SHARE]

You may be disappointed to know that many of the metal bodies will have wobbly or loose lenses when mounted too. But if we look at the $400 or less price range, you would be looking at the 1D classic, and the 20D, 30D, and possibly a few 40Ds.

Post #3, Jul 17, 2011 22:01:49


Past Equipment | My Galleryexternal link
Resources For Sale: High ISO Denoiser Actionexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
crn3371
Cream of the Crop
crn3371's Avatar
Joined Mar 2005
7,198 posts
SoCal, USA
[MORE/SHARE]

My L lens wobbles on my metal body.

Post #4, Jul 17, 2011 22:16:32




LOG IN TO REPLY
wfarrell4
Goldmember
wfarrell4's Avatar
Joined Jun 2011
2,551 posts
NJ
[MORE/SHARE]
banned

You guys mean theres movement at the actual mounting location??

Post #5, Jul 17, 2011 22:18:07


Will: flickrexternal link
Canon EOS

Merry Christmas

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
[Cerberus]
Member
Joined Jan 2011
67 posts
Southern Maine
[MORE/SHARE]

What do you guys consider "wobble" ? My 50D is tight with a 24-105 mounted. The only movement is a very slight rotation due to operational tolerances.

You are either very picky, or put higher then average wear on your gear.

Post #6, Jul 17, 2011 22:21:42




LOG IN TO REPLY
crn3371
Cream of the Crop
crn3371's Avatar
Joined Mar 2005
7,198 posts
SoCal, USA
[MORE/SHARE]

It's pretty much an accepted fact that some lens/ body combos produce a slightly less than snug fit. Some of my lenses are quite tight, while others have a slight amount of play.

Post #7, Jul 17, 2011 22:33:44




LOG IN TO REPLY
KVN ­ Photo
Goldmember
KVN Photo's Avatar
Joined Jun 2010
1,940 posts
Jakarta, Indonesia
[MORE/SHARE]

50D, 7D, 5Dc, and 1D series body...
Maybe the cheapest alternative is a used 1D II.
But my L lenses do just fine on 500D

Post #8, Jul 17, 2011 22:47:12


X-Pro1 + 18-55 f/2.8-4 OIS + 55-200 f/3.8-4.5 OIS
TS-E 24 f/3.5L II + XF 35 f/1.4 + XF 56 f/1.2
Sony RX100 II + G12
Travel the world!

LOG IN TO REPLY
phreeky
Goldmember
Joined Oct 2007
3,471 posts
Australia
[MORE/SHARE]

The only normal play is a little bit of rotational play. Of all the lenses I've owned, including some plastic-mount lenses, a few Canon metal-mount lenses, some Tamron and some Sigma lenses, as well as old primes using cheap ebay adapters, plus a few TCs and extension tubes, none have had anything other than some rotational play (and that's only noticeable on the larger lenses).

That includes my 7D as well as the bodies I used to own (300D and 20D). And the 20D had well over 50,000 actuations when I sold it and I changed lenses a lot, 300D about 20,000 actuations.

None of the camera mounts are plastic. I have no doubt you could swap lenses a lot and shoot a couple hundred thousand shots on a Rebel body and have no issues with the mount.

Post #9, Jul 17, 2011 23:06:39




LOG IN TO REPLY
booja
Goldmember
booja's Avatar
Joined Jan 2008
1,603 posts
houston, tx
[MORE/SHARE]

any body thats not the rebel line feels pretty sturdy... even the 60d feels solid even though its not metal/magnesium

as far as the wobbly lens... it seems if you grab the lens and twist it side to side it moves slightly. i feel it a lot when a large lens is mounted to it

Post #10, Jul 18, 2011 00:29:17


MayDayGarage.com

LOG IN TO REPLY
casaaviocar
Senior Member
casaaviocar's Avatar
Joined Jun 2006
885 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

What do you mean by wobbles? Do you mean radial play or axial play? Every Canon body I've owned has had some radial play (rotational at the mount) in varying amounts.

I think a lot of those that say they have tight lenses would be surprised to discover this same play if the lens was held tightly in the tripod and they moved the body. The reason most never feel this play is that when the body is mounted in a tripod the lens is never moved. There is no reason to place the force required to feel this play in normal use.

The whole game changes when you mount the body to a rigidly tripod mounted lens. You grab the body to change the framing and that's when you'll feel the play there. It's slight, but on every lens/body I've owed from Canon there is play there. I just grabbed my 24-105 mounted on a nearly new 7D (with a metal body) at the base below the focus ring and then twisted, sure enough, slight play. When you mount a short lens (in other words, you mount the lens to the body) after you mount it there is no rotational force placed there. The body controls the whole shebang, you never feel the movement, but mount a long lens on a tripod and mount the body to it...

The 60D/Rebel series are not the first composite camera bodies that Canon has used. The EOS 3, a highly regarded, semi pro body; way more body than a 5D or 5D II, was a composite body. It is sturdy and tough as any body. The EOS 3 is a great camera body, with an incredible eye controlled, 45 point auto focus system. This system premiered in the EOS 3 and was subsequently placed in the EOS 1V and 1D bodies (though without the eye controlled focus which proved to be somewhat problematic).

So what I am saying is don't listen to the whining about the "plastic" body on the 60D. It's just that, people are upset that somehow their XXD camera bodies are devalued by Canon's choices on the 60D. The XXD upgrade path is now to the XD camera bodies. The name the body is called means nothing. Buy a camera, use it to take great photographs, display the great photos, if they are great, and inspire, does anyone really care what body they were taken with?

Post #11, Jul 18, 2011 01:28:38


Rule books are paper they will not cushion a sudden meeting of stone and metal -ekg-

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
nikesupremedunk
Goldmember
nikesupremedunk's Avatar
Joined Feb 2011
1,131 posts
ny
[MORE/SHARE]

i recently acquired a 40d and i was surprised at how robust the body was. the size and feel is very similar to my 5d2 and the rubber grip feels a lot sturdier like actual leather. my old t2i was packed with more features than the 40d, but for some reason, i love this 40d way more. the rubber was losing texture on the t2i after like 4 months.

Post #12, Jul 18, 2011 01:39:20


| Andrew | 5D Mark II | EOS-M | Canon 17-40mm f 4 L | Canon 35mm f 1.4 L | Canon 100mm f 2.8 L Macro | Canon 70-200mm f 4 L IS | Canon EF-M 22mm f 2.0 | Speedlite 430EX II|

LOG IN TO REPLY
DC ­ Fan
Cream of the Crop
DC Fan's Avatar
Joined Oct 2005
5,732 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

John from PA wrote in post #12776033external link
I'm turned off by the quality of many Canon DSLR models because of the plastic body. The other night I was with someone that had a T2i with about 14000 exposures and the lens actually wobbled on the body.

You'll be dissatisfied with nearly every SLR and DSLR that Canon has manufactured for the last 35 years.

Similar "plastic body" complaints were raised in the mid-1970's, when Canon started using composite metal look-alike parts in the AE-1 seriesexternal link of FD-mount 35mm SLR's. It's easy to find an AE-1 that looks like new.

The first DSLR that Canon manufactured, the D30 from the year 2000,external link had a plastic body over a steel frame. That's the same construction technique used for the T2iexternal link and most Canon DSLR's: metal underneath a plastic shell.

Also, writing as the owner of a T2i that has been in heavy use for more than a year and has seen several lenses mounted over and over again on a daily basis, from 18mm to 500mm, none of those lenses wobble on the camera mount.

Post #13, Jul 18, 2011 02:08:18




LOG IN TO REPLY
jwcdds
Cream of the Crop
jwcdds's Avatar
Joined Aug 2004
12,181 posts
Santa Monica, CA
[MORE/SHARE]

Of all my lenses, only the 100-400 wobbles. But then again, it is also an "L". ;)

Yep.. at times, there may be some play and it's within "tolerance". Better get used to it.

Post #14, Jul 18, 2011 02:21:22


Julian
Gear/Feedbacks | SmugMugexternal link | Blogexternal link
My Review | "The Mighty One"external link
Founding member and President of the BOGUS Photo Club (Blatantly-Over-Geared & Under-Skilled)

LOG IN TO REPLY
Keyan
Cream of the Crop
Keyan's Avatar
Joined Mar 2011
5,100 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

All Canon's have a metal chassis that ties into the lens mount and key structural points within the body to provide stiffness and support... While the entire body is not metal, the part that actually holds the lens is pretty much the same on all of them. With my 60 all of my lenses fit securely. Taking an experience with a single camera that you don't own and may have been dropped, etc, and making a generalization about all "plastic" Canon cameras isn't a very fair evaluation.

Post #15, Jul 18, 2011 07:37:04


Cameras: 7D2, 70D, S100
Lenses: 17-55 f/2.8 IS USM, 18-55 STM, 18-135 STM, 50 f/1.4 USM, 55-250 IS, 2x 430 EX II, 70-300L IS USM
Other Stuff: Luma Labs Cinch and Loop 3, CamRanger, Lowepro Fastpack 350 & Pro Messenger 200 AW

LOG IN TO REPLY


LIST NEARBY THREADS
4,463 views & 0 likes for this thread
"minimum" DSLR to get metal body
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EOS Digital Cameras



NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO FORUMS

CHANGE BODY TEXT SIZE FOR ALL THREAD PAGES
POWERED BY AMASS 1.0version 1.0
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net


SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF  |  JUMP TO FORUM...  |  FORUM RULES


Spent 0.00086 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
1142 guests, 831 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014
Latest registered member is davemcg

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality, we do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browser's data storage methods.