LOG IN    OR   REGISTER TO FORUMS


15-85 or 24-105 for crop

FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Thread started 12 Sep 2011 (Monday) 21:52   
LIST NEARBY THREADS
 
harikris
Hatchling
Joined May 2011
7 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

Hi all,

I am confused between these two lenses for general purpose/walkaround lens.
I already have 10-22 so not concerned about the wide end. Which one do you think will be better for image quality alone on 550D?

thanks

Post #1, Sep 12, 2011 21:52:31




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
x_tan
Cream of the Crop
x_tan's Avatar
Joined Sep 2010
7,835 posts
ɐılɐɹʇsnɐ 'ǝuɹnoqlǝɯ
[MORE/SHARE]

Welcome to POTN.

People usual choice between EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM Lens or EF 24-105 f/4L ;)

I had EF-S 15-85mm f/3.5-5.6 IS few years back, which is more general purpose / walk-around lens on the wider end than 24-105L on a crop camera.

But if you want more telephoto power, then 24-105L will be 'better'.

Post #2, Sep 12, 2011 22:04:56


Canon 5D3 + Zoom (EF 17-40L, 24-105L & 28-300L) & Prime (24L II, 85L II, 100L, 135L & 200 f/2.8L II; Zeiss 1,4/35)
Sony α7r + Zeiss 1,8/55 FE
Nikon Coolpix A; Nikon F3 & F100 + Zeiss 1,4/50
Retiring external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
harikris
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
Joined May 2011
7 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

Welcome to POTN.

Thanks. I've been a lurker for some time ;)

People usual choice between EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM Lens or EF 24-105 f/4L

I considered 17-55, but then decided to get a prime like Sigma30 f/1.4 and one of the above lenses. You are confusing me more ;)

Post #3, Sep 12, 2011 22:23:37 as a reply to x_tan's post 18 minutes earlier.




LOG IN TO REPLY
pitabread
Senior Member
pitabread's Avatar
Joined Nov 2005
834 posts
Great White North
[MORE/SHARE]

nm.

Post #4, Sep 12, 2011 22:28:22


Bodies: EOS 7D, Rebel XT/350D
Lenses: 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5, 15-85mm f/3.5-5.6 IS, 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6, 24-70mm f/2.8L, 50mm f/1.4, 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS
Accessories: Speedlite 580EX II, Gitzo 1541T tripod, Markins Q3 Traveler ballhead

LOG IN TO REPLY
x_tan
Cream of the Crop
x_tan's Avatar
Joined Sep 2010
7,835 posts
ɐılɐɹʇsnɐ 'ǝuɹnoqlǝɯ
[MORE/SHARE]

I'm using 17-40L & 24-105L for my two crop bodies.

Ok, cheaper 'wider' walk-around 15-85; more telephoto power (more expensive) - 24-105L.

Post #5, Sep 12, 2011 22:34:04


Canon 5D3 + Zoom (EF 17-40L, 24-105L & 28-300L) & Prime (24L II, 85L II, 100L, 135L & 200 f/2.8L II; Zeiss 1,4/35)
Sony α7r + Zeiss 1,8/55 FE
Nikon Coolpix A; Nikon F3 & F100 + Zeiss 1,4/50
Retiring external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
duane0524
Goldmember
duane0524's Avatar
Joined Aug 2008
4,839 posts
South of Boston, MA
[MORE/SHARE]

i was trying to pick between the same two lens a few months ago and settled on the 24-105mm. I have not regretted it since then and am very pleased with the lens.

Post #6, Sep 12, 2011 22:34:33


Canon 50D | Canon 17-55 | Sigma 30 1.4 | Canon 70-200 2.8 IS II| Canon 85 1.8 | 430EXII| 580EX ll | ST-E2 | Canon TC 1.4x II | Benro Travel Angel C1682TB0

LOG IN TO REPLY
harikris
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
Joined May 2011
7 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

Ok, cheaper 'wider' walk-around 15-85; more telephoto power (more expensive) - 24-105L.

The price of 15-85 (in India) is about $1100 (expensive compared to the US :( ) and 24-105 is $1170 (kit lens from 5dmk2 kit, with only body sold). That is why I am concerned about IQ only ;)

i was trying to pick between the same two lens a few months ago and settled on the 24-105mm. I have not regretted it since then and am very pleased with the lens.

Thanks. Glad to hear that.

Post #7, Sep 12, 2011 22:42:03 as a reply to duane0524's post 7 minutes earlier.




LOG IN TO REPLY
Elvin
Senior Member
Joined Jul 2010
203 posts
New Yor[HK]
[MORE/SHARE]

Since you already have a 10-22mm, I think 24-105mm will compliment that UWA really well. In terms of image quality, both lens can produce very sharp images but the fixed aperture and L build of the 24-105mm is more attractive than the 15-85mm.

Post #8, Sep 12, 2011 22:46:40


Canon Camera
Canon Lenses
Gear List

LOG IN TO REPLY
x_tan
Cream of the Crop
x_tan's Avatar
Joined Sep 2010
7,835 posts
ɐılɐɹʇsnɐ 'ǝuɹnoqlǝɯ
[MORE/SHARE]

harikris wrote in post #13093865external link
The price of 15-85 (in India) is about $1100 (expensive compared to the US :( ) and 24-105 is $1170 (kit lens from 5dmk2 kit, with only body sold). That is why I am concerned about IQ only ;)

For only $70 difference, you should get 24-105L for sure.

Post #9, Sep 12, 2011 22:53:49


Canon 5D3 + Zoom (EF 17-40L, 24-105L & 28-300L) & Prime (24L II, 85L II, 100L, 135L & 200 f/2.8L II; Zeiss 1,4/35)
Sony α7r + Zeiss 1,8/55 FE
Nikon Coolpix A; Nikon F3 & F100 + Zeiss 1,4/50
Retiring external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
GregoryF
Goldmember
GregoryF's Avatar
Joined Jul 2010
2,245 posts
Magalia, CA
[MORE/SHARE]

Can't go wrong with the 24-105L. My favorite lens on crop and full frame.

Post #10, Sep 12, 2011 22:57:53


6D, 5D Classic Gripped, 50D Gripped, 40D Gripped, Panasonic G1 and adapters, PENTAX mx-1, Sigma 10-20, Sigma 15-30mm, Tamron 17-50, Tamron 17-35mm,Canon 17-85,Sigma 18-200 OS,Canon 24-105 L , Sigma 24-60mm 2.8, 28-105, 28-135, Tamron 70-200mm 2.8, Tamron 70-300 USD VC, Sigma 150-500 OS, 28mm, 35mm, 40mm (pancake), 50mm,85mm 1.8, 105mm Macro, lot's of legacy glass 550EX, 2 420 EX's, 3 540 EZ's, Yn rf602's,:cool:
A simple hobby gone horribily wrong

LOG IN TO REPLY
phreeky
Goldmember
Joined Oct 2007
3,471 posts
Australia
[MORE/SHARE]

Define what you consider "general purpose/walkaround".

If I were carrying it around a lot I'd pick something lighter/smaller. You might also consider a 24-70 F/2.8 (or Tamron/Sigma variant) for a faster lens.

Post #11, Sep 12, 2011 22:58:18




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
harikris
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
Joined May 2011
7 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

Thank you all, seems 24-105L is the way to go.

Define what you consider "general purpose/walkaround".

If I were carrying it around a lot I'd pick something lighter/smaller. You might also consider a 24-70 F/2.8 (or Tamron/Sigma variant) for a faster lens.

I intend to shoot outdoors while traveling. I like 10-22, but sometimes need more range.

Sigma/Tamron lenses are hard to get serviced here in India, so not an option. Besides, the resale value is less compared to Canon/Nikon.

Post #12, Sep 12, 2011 23:23:51 as a reply to phreeky's post 25 minutes earlier.




LOG IN TO REPLY
Pink ­ Avocado
Member
Joined Sep 2011
77 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

phreeky wrote in post #13093991external link
Define what you consider "general purpose/walkaround".

If I were carrying it around a lot I'd pick something lighter/smaller. You might also consider a 24-70 F/2.8 (or Tamron/Sigma variant) for a faster lens.



70-200mm IS2

:)

Post #13, Sep 12, 2011 23:52:21


Only shoot wide open.

LOG IN TO REPLY
Sirrith
Cream of the Crop
Joined Nov 2010
10,448 posts
Hong Kong
[MORE/SHARE]

As a general purpose/walkaround lens, I'd never limit myself to 24mm. The 15-85 would be the obvious choice for me between the 2, because I am not obsessed with red rings, and 15mm on the wide end means so much more than 105mm on the long end. It doesn't matter that you have a 10-22 already, because the whole point of having a walkaround lens is that you only carry that one lens, so why would you care what the other lenses sitting at home have in common with your walkaround lens? You can't use them anyway.

Post #14, Sep 13, 2011 02:35:40


-Tom
Flickr
F-Stop Guru review | RRS BH-40 review

LOG IN TO REPLY
Nick5
Goldmember
Nick5's Avatar
Joined Mar 2007
2,359 posts
Philadelphia Suburbs
[MORE/SHARE]

Love the 24-105 f/4 L IS on my 7D. Love the extra reach it provides. Sure it's not as wide as the 15-85. But then again the 15-85 is not as wide as the 10-22...........
The build quality and weather sealing of the "L" series is assuring.

Post #15, Sep 13, 2011 07:49:29


Canon 5D Mark III, BG-E11 Grip, 7D (x2) BG-E7 Grips, Canon Lenses 10-22, 17-40 f/4 L, 17-55 f/2.8 IS, 24-105 f/4 L IS, 70-200 f/2.8 L IS II, 70-200 f/4 L IS, 100-400 f/4.5-5.6 L IS, TS-E 24 f/3.5 L II, 50 f/1.4, 85 f/1.8, 100 f/2.8 L Macro IS, Canon 1.4 Extender III, 4 Canon 600 EX-RT, 2 Canon ST-E3 Transmitters, Canon Pixma PRO-10 Printer

LOG IN TO REPLY


LIST NEARBY THREADS
5,170 views & 0 likes for this thread
15-85 or 24-105 for crop
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses



NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO FORUMS

CHANGE BODY TEXT SIZE FOR ALL THREAD PAGES
POWERED BY AMASS 1.0version 1.0
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net


SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF  |  JUMP TO FORUM...  |  FORUM RULES


Spent 0.00349 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
892 guests, 843 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014
Latest registered member is JSPvita

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality, we do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browser's data storage methods.