Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing
Thread started 19 Sep 2011 (Monday) 18:30
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

"Cinematic" colors/hues and edits

 
N.O.R.E.
Senior Member
757 posts
Joined Aug 2011
Canada
Sep 19, 2011 18:30 |  #1

Is anyone here into the "cinematic" style of street photos? Typically a 2.5 to 1 format and usually green/purple/blue hue made to look like it's from a movie. If so what are you doing edit wise in Lightroom/Photoshop?

I have been increasing contrast by overlaying a B/W image at about 30% opacity and then a blue/green and yellow gradient also overlayed at about 10% opacity.

Samples of some edits I did:

IMAGE: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3033/5825076071_956ce37214_b.jpg

IMAGE: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3248/5822131455_9a7ed69395_b.jpg

IMAGE: http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5200/5873162939_97e485a5f0_b.jpg

IMAGE: http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6020/5951094144_34b765f15b_b.jpg

IMAGE: http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6026/5951786708_3bb600b31b_b.jpg

Not excatly super "cinematic" but it's a start. What's your technique?

FlickR
external link
blog: www.tompiprek.comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Eric ­ Xu
Senior Member
Eric Xu's Avatar
688 posts
Joined Aug 2010
Santa Clara, California
Sep 19, 2011 18:39 |  #2

It's certainly interesting, but for the Cinescope shots you should go a little wider.

Since I'm a filmmaker, very early on in photography I experimented with framing my shots like I would when DPing a film shoot, and the emotions were certainly very different. I would recommend adjusting your framing a bit, and using the color correction methods films often use, which is a teal push in the shadows, warming the highlights, and making sure the skin tones are a comfortable hue. The contrast looks very nice in your shots.


My Flickr.external link My Gear

LOG IN TO REPLY
stsva
Cream of the Crop
stsva's Avatar
Joined Mar 2009
Northern Virginia
Sep 19, 2011 20:09 |  #3

Very interesting look. Eric Xu sounds like he knows what he's talking about to tweak the look.


Some Canon stuff and a little bit of Yongnuo.
http://www.pbase.com/s​tsva/profileexternal link
Member of the GIYF
Club and
HAMSTTR
٩ Breeders Club http://photography-on-the.net ...=744235&highlight=h​amsttr Join today!
Image Editing OK

LOG IN TO REPLY
N.O.R.E.
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
757 posts
Joined Aug 2011
Canada
Sep 19, 2011 20:32 |  #4

Eric Xu wrote in post #13129598external link
It's certainly interesting, but for the Cinescope shots you should go a little wider.

Since I'm a filmmaker, very early on in photography I experimented with framing my shots like I would when DPing a film shoot, and the emotions were certainly very different. I would recommend adjusting your framing a bit, and using the color correction methods films often use, which is a teal push in the shadows, warming the highlights, and making sure the skin tones are a comfortable hue. The contrast looks very nice in your shots.

awesome information. thanks! is there correct ratio 2.5 to 1 then? the examples i posted were 16x9 and 16x6 (not counting the black borders).


FlickR
external link
blog: www.tompiprek.comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
mikewinburn
Goldmember
mikewinburn's Avatar
1,608 posts
Joined Jan 2010
NYC
Sep 19, 2011 20:49 |  #5

Cinemascope is usually 2.55:1 or something like that... most widescreen (anamorphic - so called) presentations are 2.35:1 (there about). 16x9 is really just for your TV 1.85:1 is just about filling a 16x9 display.

#1 and #3 look close to correct to my (untrained) eye.

very lovely work.

Eric, I'd love to see some of your work.


Gear: The Official Gear List / Market Feedback / Sig thread #2468
flickr (external link)
WinburnCreations (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
Eric ­ Xu
Senior Member
Eric Xu's Avatar
688 posts
Joined Aug 2010
Santa Clara, California
Sep 19, 2011 21:59 |  #6

Either 2.39:1 or 2.35:1 is considered CinemaScope, which is my favorite aspect ratio.

I can show you guys my first film, which is a little rough and not my best work, but it shows what I'm talking about regarding framing and color correction. It's called iRelationship (external link). You have a lot less room to grade with HDV, which is what that was shot on (Canon XH A1). Raw files have so much more flexibility, plus stills are compressed much better than H.264. So the result is photographs will be much crisper and look nicer!

Quick example from a random shot on the Great Wall:

IMAGE: http://i55.tinypic.com/sbq54z.jpg

My Flickr.external link My Gear

LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
"Amazingly attractive"
tonylong's Avatar
53,826 posts
Gallery: 22 photos
Joined Sep 2007
Vancouver, WA USA
Sep 19, 2011 22:54 |  #7

Psst! You'll need to size that a bit smaller, 1024 pixels at the widest!


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBaseexternal link
Wildlife project pics hereexternal link, Biking Photog shoots hereexternal link, "Suburbia" project hereexternal link! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics hereexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Eric ­ Xu
Senior Member
Eric Xu's Avatar
688 posts
Joined Aug 2010
Santa Clara, California
Sep 20, 2011 00:15 |  #8

That's odd, I thought I set it at 1024 in Photoshop. I'll export again, thanks! :)


My Flickr.external link My Gear

LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
"Amazingly attractive"
tonylong's Avatar
53,826 posts
Gallery: 22 photos
Joined Sep 2007
Vancouver, WA USA
Sep 20, 2011 00:31 |  #9

Cool, now the mods won't jump all over you:)!


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBaseexternal link
Wildlife project pics hereexternal link, Biking Photog shoots hereexternal link, "Suburbia" project hereexternal link! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics hereexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
kiss-o-matic
Goldmember
kiss-o-matic's Avatar
1,738 posts
Joined Nov 2007
Tokyo
Sep 20, 2011 00:48 |  #10

I have been increasing contrast by overlaying a B/W image at about 30% opacity and then a blue/green and yellow gradient also overlayed at about 10% opacity.

Gradient, or gradient map? The shots look very nice.




LOG IN TO REPLY
N.O.R.E.
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
757 posts
Joined Aug 2011
Canada
Sep 20, 2011 01:02 |  #11

kiss-o-matic wrote in post #13131518external link
Gradient, or gradient map? The shots look very nice.

i meant gradient map.


FlickR
external link
blog: www.tompiprek.comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Jaynez
Senior Member
Jaynez's Avatar
771 posts
Joined Jul 2010
Sep 20, 2011 01:22 |  #12

Just made one for fun, i do like this effect =)

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://farm7.static.fl​ickr.com ...64992455_bebc5451f7​_z.jpg (external link)
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

IMG_1861 (external link) by JaynezL. (external link), on Flickr

5D Mark II | 6D
24-70mm F2.8L | 17-40mm F4L | Canon 85mm F1.8 USM | Elinchrom D-Lite 4 IT

Flickexternal link | Facebookexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
ProwlingTiger
Senior Member
427 posts
Joined Feb 2009
Sep 20, 2011 15:31 |  #13

So if I understand this properly, it's layered as such: Blue, green, & yellow gradient map (10%, overlay mode), black and white version (30% overlay, mode), and then the image?


 Mac | 7D - 40D - 10D - Speedlites - L Glass | DVS Photoexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
N.O.R.E.
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
757 posts
Joined Aug 2011
Canada
Sep 20, 2011 17:05 |  #14

ProwlingTiger wrote in post #13134985external link
So if I understand this properly, it's layered as such: Blue, green, & yellow gradient map (10%, overlay mode), black and white version (30% overlay, mode), and then the image?

more or less. I just play around with the opacity until I start to like the look. I also do some dodging/burning depending on image. What I would like to find out is how you get this type of edit:

http://www.flickr.com ...s/l/in/faves-9359643@N04/external link

Does anyone know?


FlickR
external link
blog: www.tompiprek.comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Eric ­ Xu
Senior Member
Eric Xu's Avatar
688 posts
Joined Aug 2010
Santa Clara, California
Sep 20, 2011 17:55 |  #15

I see high local contrast, a fine grain structure, understated flesh tones and the same teal push in the shadows and warm highlights I talked about before.

It's not just processing, but has a lot to do with lighting the scene. The film look is in a large part created on set.


My Flickr.external link My Gear

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

301,346 views & 36 likes for this thread
"Cinematic" colors/hues and edits
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00161 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.04s
Latest registered member is jkaving
584 guests, 524 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 5577, that happened on Mar 02, 2016