LOG IN    OR   REGISTER TO FORUMS


Is the 270ex any good?

FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Macro Talk
Thread started 04 Oct 2011 (Tuesday) 19:07   
LIST NEARBY THREADS
 
dubstylz
Senior Member
dubstylz's Avatar
Joined Jun 2011
488 posts
west sussex, UK
[MORE/SHARE]

Thinking of buying the 270ex(II) as my first flash, is it any good for macro AND general light duties from time to time, i figure itl be light, compact and would be great for mounting on a bracket in pretty much any position i desire, just wondering how all you users find it, it would be used for macro 95% of the time.

(edit) alse how is the HSS and battery life?

Post #1, Oct 04, 2011 19:07:04


Mark

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Larry ­ Weinman
Goldmember
Joined Jul 2006
1,220 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

There are people in the macro forum who use it. It would be best to seek them out and get their opinions. One thing, the 270 EX II has very little power and you will most likely get black backgrounds in all of your photos.

Post #2, Oct 05, 2011 07:52:00


7D Mark II 6D 100mm f 2.8 macro 180mm f 3.5 macro, MP-E-65 300mm f 2.8 500mm f4 Tokina 10-17mm fisheye 10-22mm 17-55mm 24-105mm 70-300mm 70-200 f 2.8 Mk II 100-400mm 1.4 TC 2X TC 580EX 430 EX II MT 24 EX Tamron 150-600

LOG IN TO REPLY
goatydude
Senior Member
Joined Feb 2008
528 posts
Sale, Vic, Australia
[MORE/SHARE]

Cant see why you couldnt use it (with a ttl cord), probably make a really nice lightweight rig. Power shouldnt be an issue if mainly for macro, your only lighting a small close area. May struggle a bit for re-cylce time, but even my 430 does that.

Post #3, Oct 09, 2011 17:52:20


www.gippslandimages.co​m.auexternal link

1dmk4 1dmk2 50d 70-200 2.8L 17-40 f4L 50 2.5 100 2.8 macro, 28 1.8 and the rest.....

LOG IN TO REPLY
Martin ­ G.
Goldmember
Martin G.'s Avatar
Joined May 2009
2,208 posts
Montreal, Qc, Canada
[MORE/SHARE]

I do not know about the II version, but I used briefly the 270 and the recycling time was very frustrating and it chewed through batteries like crazy.

Post #4, Oct 14, 2011 22:32:11 as a reply to goatydude's post 5 days earlier.


6D & 50D
EF 24-105 L, EF 100mm L IS, MP-E 65
Macro Twin Flash MT-24EX, 430 EX II & 270 EX

LOG IN TO REPLY
dubstylz
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
dubstylz's Avatar
Joined Jun 2011
488 posts
west sussex, UK
[MORE/SHARE]

Thanks for the response everyone, im still undecided on this at the mo, my budget is really only about £100, anything better for around that price? i dont mind buying secondhand, any good 3rd party stuff with TTL ?

Post #5, Oct 15, 2011 06:49:54


Mark

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Benighted
Member
Joined Sep 2011
36 posts
Linköping, Sweden
[MORE/SHARE]

I'm not the greatest macro photographer out there, but the 270EX works great for me, I can use any F-number I like on my EF 100mm Macro, when taking macro photos. It works great for the price and weight, the re-cycle time is dealt with using chargeable NiHM batteries instead of Alkalines, works great, fast charging of the flash and the batteries last a lot longer than alkaline batteries.

Post #6, Oct 15, 2011 20:16:12




LOG IN TO REPLY
chrisa
Senior Member
Joined May 2005
813 posts
Effingham, IL
[MORE/SHARE]

This should be at around 100 pounds
http://www.amazon.com ...rd_r=04XYFXKMMQD67B​60SMCRexternal link

Post #7, Oct 15, 2011 21:42:10




LOG IN TO REPLY
shebee
Senior Member
Joined Aug 2011
161 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

Just wanted to make sure you take a look at Yongnuo flashes.

Post #8, Oct 17, 2011 14:43:30


500pxexternal link
Razziexternal link
Please give me some constructive criticism and comments.

LOG IN TO REPLY


LIST NEARBY THREADS
1,613 views & 0 likes for this thread
Is the 270ex any good?
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Macro Talk



NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO FORUMS

CHANGE BODY TEXT SIZE FOR ALL THREAD PAGES
POWERED BY AMASS 1.0version 1.0
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net


SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF  |  JUMP TO FORUM...  |  FORUM RULES


Spent 0.00147 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
1077 guests, 793 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014
Latest registered member is Billzo

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality, we do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browser's data storage methods.