Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EOS Digital Cameras
Thread started 18 Oct 2011 (Tuesday) 00:12
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

OFFICIAL: Canon 1D X announced

 
tonylong
"Amazingly attractive"
tonylong's Avatar
53,772 posts
Gallery: 22 photos
Joined Sep 2007
Vancouver, WA USA
Feb 07, 2012 18:59 |  #3061

Guys, I checked out those shots on the Canon page, and the only one I thought was "off" was the second one (002.jpg), the ISO 1600 shot -- it was very slightly OOF to my eye, and I don't believe there was any shapening or NR applied to that shot (or the other 001 portrait).

So, compare the two, 100% zooming at the eyes, and there is a whole better view with #1, both in the eyelashes/eyebrows and in the skin texture.

As to why the one missed focus, I don't know, but if I were the photographer, I certainly wouldn't have submitted that photo! But the 001 photo is certainly more representative of the IQ of the camera itself.


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBaseexternal link
Wildlife project pics hereexternal link, Biking Photog shoots hereexternal link, "Suburbia" project hereexternal link! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics hereexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Alex_Venom
Goldmember
Alex_Venom's Avatar
1,624 posts
Joined Nov 2008
Feb 07, 2012 19:44 |  #3062

I really think it's funny how people think Canon should PP those images (like the Nikon ones) for them to look better.
The camera is not even out yet! And people are judging everything based on 5 or 6 first photos. Like the camera is a big failure just because those 5 or 6 photos does not look as good as the 5 or 6 PPd ones from the other brand.
I'll just wait for some real world testing before making my mind.
And as for the PP goes, I see no texture on the D800 skins, and I see every single pore on the Canon's.
If having a Photoshop Master PPing your pictures make a camera better, then you should probably go for that D800. Or perhaps a T3i :D

And the Nikon photos were taken wi the D800 according to the text, not the D800E, so I assume those had the Anti-Aliasing filter, but were sharpened in post. Oviously at this point we can all just guess...


Photography is about GEAR and not talent or practice. Practice won't make you a better photographer. Expensive equipment will. =D
"Nobody can buy a scalpel and become a doctor, but anyone can buy a camera and become a photographer."

LOG IN TO REPLY
RobDickinson
Goldmember
Joined Apr 2010
New Zealand
Feb 07, 2012 19:51 |  #3063

We all know canon put out poor example photos.

But we should also know they will be examined very closely, these are the first full sized files we have seen from the 1Dx, if they arnt typical examples then canon shouldnt show them.


www.rjd.co.nzexternal link www.zarphag.comexternal link
5d2,6D,14mmf2.8,16-35 f4 L IS,17-40L,24mm tse,70-200/2.8L,50/1.4,90/2.8​,400/5.6L,gigapan epic pro, lee filters, feisol tripod, markins q3t

LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
"Amazingly attractive"
tonylong's Avatar
53,772 posts
Gallery: 22 photos
Joined Sep 2007
Vancouver, WA USA
Feb 07, 2012 20:17 |  #3064

RobDickinson wrote in post #13845401external link
We all know canon put out poor example photos.

But we should also know they will be examined very closely, these are the first full sized files we have seen from the 1Dx, if they arnt typical examples then canon shouldnt show them.

There were two portraits and then several sports shots. I thought that the sports shots came out fine. The one portrait shot was soft, yeah, the other to me looked fine.

I just noticed something -- the two portrait shots were both shot on 12/10/2011 -- three months ago!


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBaseexternal link
Wildlife project pics hereexternal link, Biking Photog shoots hereexternal link, "Suburbia" project hereexternal link! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics hereexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
"Amazingly attractive"
tonylong's Avatar
53,772 posts
Gallery: 22 photos
Joined Sep 2007
Vancouver, WA USA
Feb 07, 2012 20:27 |  #3065

Someone was asking to see images from the D800E?

http://imaging.nikon.c​om/lineup/dslr/d800/sa​mple02.htmexternal link


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBaseexternal link
Wildlife project pics hereexternal link, Biking Photog shoots hereexternal link, "Suburbia" project hereexternal link! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics hereexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Alex_Venom
Goldmember
Alex_Venom's Avatar
1,624 posts
Joined Nov 2008
Feb 08, 2012 05:54 |  #3066

tonylong wrote in post #13845579external link
Someone was asking to see images from the D800E?

http://imaging.nikon.c​om/lineup/dslr/d800/sa​mple02.htmexternal link

Now, that's quite impressive!
I expected to see a lot of Moiré on the japanese temple roof and on the fabrics of the Japanese woman, but I see none. This is going to be a great little camera!


Photography is about GEAR and not talent or practice. Practice won't make you a better photographer. Expensive equipment will. =D
"Nobody can buy a scalpel and become a doctor, but anyone can buy a camera and become a photographer."

LOG IN TO REPLY
Rai33
Goldmember
Rai33's Avatar
1,838 posts
Joined Jan 2009
Sydney
Feb 08, 2012 06:02 |  #3067

Alex_Venom wrote in post #13847636external link
Now, that's quite impressive!
I expected to see a lot of Moiré on the japanese temple roof and on the fabrics of the Japanese woman, but I see none. This is going to be a great little camera!

Still looks like its from a smaller sensor DSLR... got to love Nikons 'medium format rival' marketing hype : )


Portfolio - Fashion/Beautyexternal link
Portfolio - Kidsexternal link
Model Mayhemexternal link
Flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Trixster!
Senior Member
Trixster!'s Avatar
716 posts
Joined Mar 2009
York
Feb 08, 2012 06:04 |  #3068

Alex_Venom wrote in post #13847636external link
Now, that's quite impressive!
I expected to see a lot of Moiré on the japanese temple roof and on the fabrics of the Japanese woman, but I see none. This is going to be a great little camera!

Really? Those images don't look any better than anything the current cameras can produce.


5D Mark II | EF 24-70 f/2.8 L | EF 70-200 f/4 L IS | EF 17-40 f/4 L | EF 50 f/1.8 | EF 1.4x II | Nissin Di866 II | flickriverexternal link | Portfolioexternal link | flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Double ­ Negative
*sniffles*
Double Negative's Avatar
10,520 posts
Joined Mar 2006
New York, USA
Feb 08, 2012 06:40 |  #3069

Well, let's just keep in mind that neither the 1Dx or D800/D800E are out yet - so any pictures out there are on pre-production units with beta software at best. So I wouldn't draw any conclusions just yet.

On paper at least, the lack of AA on the D800E and the large MP count should be quite a treat. In any event, I'm looking forward to seeing more from it.


La Vida Leica!external linkLitPixel Galleriesexternal link -- 1v-HS/1d Mk IIn w/E-1 & Op/Tech straps
15mm f/2.8, 14mm f/2.8L, 24mm f/1.4L II, 35mm f/1.4L, 50mm f/1.2L, 85mm f/1.2L II, 135mm f/2.0L
16-35mm f/2.8L, 24-70mm f/2.8L, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS, Extender EF 1.4x II & 2x II

LOG IN TO REPLY
AzzKicker
Goldmember
AzzKicker's Avatar
1,057 posts
Joined Jul 2003
Rio Grande Valley, Texas
Feb 08, 2012 10:02 |  #3070

I thought I'd never say this but I'm actually considering a D800. It even has Dual Card slots :) What I like is it seems to be a PRO body in a smaller package unlike Canon's NON "1D" series cams that obviously lack in pro features.


Ruben D. Zamora
www.rubenzamora.comexternal link
Canon 1D Mark IV, 5D, 50mm 1.2L, 24-105 F4 L, 580EX II, Genesis 200 Strobe

LOG IN TO REPLY
Double ­ Negative
*sniffles*
Double Negative's Avatar
10,520 posts
Joined Mar 2006
New York, USA
Feb 08, 2012 10:06 |  #3071

What strikes me about the D800/D800E is that they're what the 5D (or "3D") should be. The 5D/II are too "dumbed down" from the 1D if you ask me. Unlike Canon, Nikon didn't rip all the more pro-level stuff out just to make a consumer/prosumer body. Important stuff like AF and exposure, etc.

I shoot a 1D (Mark IIn) and I'm sorry, once you use 45 AF points, trying to use a 5D is downright archaic.


La Vida Leica!external linkLitPixel Galleriesexternal link -- 1v-HS/1d Mk IIn w/E-1 & Op/Tech straps
15mm f/2.8, 14mm f/2.8L, 24mm f/1.4L II, 35mm f/1.4L, 50mm f/1.2L, 85mm f/1.2L II, 135mm f/2.0L
16-35mm f/2.8L, 24-70mm f/2.8L, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS, Extender EF 1.4x II & 2x II

LOG IN TO REPLY
jwcdds
Cream of the Crop
jwcdds's Avatar
Joined Aug 2004
Santa Monica, CA
Feb 08, 2012 10:17 |  #3072

Double Negative wrote in post #13848703external link
I shoot a 1D (Mark IIn) and I'm sorry, once you use 45 AF points, trying to use a 5D is downright archaic.

Yet the 5D still works for many (and a good portion of those are shooting "pros"). The question here is whether the tool itself will work for you. And if your livelihood depends on it, find the best tool for the job and go with it.

While it does stink that Canon can't seem to understand that there's a big market here for small-body camera with pro features... thankfully Nikon does understand it. If enough people start leaving Canon for their competitor... maybe Canon will eventually pull its head out of its own rear end and realize maybe they should give what the people want.

So if you've gotta switch, you gotta switch. Though if your current gear has worked well enough for you up until now... I'm curious why it wouldn't continue to work well enough now that the D800 is announced.


Julian
Gear/Feedbacks | SmugMug (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Blog (external link) | instagram (external link)
My Review | "The Mighty One" (external link)
Founding member and President of the BOGUS Photo Club (Blatantly-Over-Geared & Under-Skilled)

LOG IN TO REPLY
AzzKicker
Goldmember
AzzKicker's Avatar
1,057 posts
Joined Jul 2003
Rio Grande Valley, Texas
Feb 08, 2012 10:21 |  #3073

jwcdds wrote in post #13848757external link
I'm curious why it wouldn't continue to work well enough now that the D800 is announced.

Well for example, I have a 5D and a 1DIV. I love the 5D, but its AF much like the 5DII just lacks. I have to leave the 5D for the IV because the IV has better AF and even then the IV's AF is not as good as NIKON's from what i hear. Can I make it all work yes but its more of a hassle. Selling the IV and 5D with cash I could buy 2 D800's and have a GREAT combo with great AF and a better FLASH system than Canon.


Ruben D. Zamora
www.rubenzamora.comexternal link
Canon 1D Mark IV, 5D, 50mm 1.2L, 24-105 F4 L, 580EX II, Genesis 200 Strobe

LOG IN TO REPLY
RTPVid
Goldmember
3,365 posts
Joined Aug 2010
MN
Feb 08, 2012 10:26 |  #3074

Alex_Venom wrote in post #13847636external link
Now, that's quite impressive!
I expected to see a lot of Moiré on the japanese temple roof and on the fabrics of the Japanese woman, but I see none. This is going to be a great little camera!

There IS a lot of moiré on the Japanese temple roof. And, it looks like moiré in the black parts of the woman's costume, too, but it is hard to tell if that is just the black-on-black pattern of the fabric.


Tom

LOG IN TO REPLY
jwcdds
Cream of the Crop
jwcdds's Avatar
Joined Aug 2004
Santa Monica, CA
Feb 08, 2012 10:27 |  #3075

AzzKicker wrote in post #13848783external link
Well for example, I have a 5D and a 1DIV. I love the 5D, but its AF much like the 5DII just lacks. I have to leave the 5D for the IV because the IV has better AF and even then the IV's AF is not as good as NIKON's from what i hear. Can I make it all work yes but its more of a hassle. Selling the IV and 5D with cash I could buy 2 D800's and have a GREAT combo with great AF and a better FLASH system than Canon.

You don't have to convince me. Sounds like it's the best thing to do. Make it happen. (And no, I'm not typing this with the, "GTFO and switch already" attitude.) If 2x D800 works + better flash, sounds like a no-brainer decision to me. :)


Julian
Gear/Feedbacks | SmugMug (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Blog (external link) | instagram (external link)
My Review | "The Mighty One" (external link)
Founding member and President of the BOGUS Photo Club (Blatantly-Over-Geared & Under-Skilled)

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

363,870 views & 0 likes for this thread
OFFICIAL: Canon 1D X announced
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EOS Digital Cameras


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.01279 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.03s
Latest registered member is bennettmatt
579 guests, 470 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 5577, that happened on Mar 02, 2016