Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
Thread started 21 Nov 2011 (Monday) 15:20
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Tamron 200-500mm

 
DianeK
Senior Member
Avatar
603 posts
Joined Feb 2011
Location: Western Canada
     
Nov 21, 2011 15:20 |  #1

Anybody here using this lens and can provide some feedback on its IQ?
Thanks


Diane
7D | 60D | EF 100mm f/2.8 macro | EF 70-300L IS | EFS 15-85 IS | EFS 10-22 | 430 EXII's | Pocket Wizards | Sony RX100

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
Code20photog
Member
Avatar
41 posts
Joined Nov 2011
Location: Los Angeles, CA
     
Nov 21, 2011 15:33 |  #2

I have one, and nowhere near as sharp as the 100-400L. But, you pay more for the 100-400L, so it's a tradeoff.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DianeK
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
603 posts
Joined Feb 2011
Location: Western Canada
     
Nov 21, 2011 16:41 as a reply to  @ Code20photog's post |  #3

Thank you. I'm looking for a bit more reach...I have the 70-300L IS that I am quite happy with except it loses some sharpness at 300. Was considering the 400L (no IS :() then came across a review of the Tamron 200-500 (still no IS :() that was quite positive. But based on your assessment, I will go back to considering the 400L.
Thanks for taking the time.


Diane
7D | 60D | EF 100mm f/2.8 macro | EF 70-300L IS | EFS 15-85 IS | EFS 10-22 | 430 EXII's | Pocket Wizards | Sony RX100

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
muskyhunter
Goldmember
Avatar
1,137 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Nov 2010
Location: Toronto, Canada
     
Nov 21, 2011 16:57 |  #4

Look at the Sigma 50-500mm f/4.5-6.3 DG OS HSM or Sigma 150-500mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HS.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gabebalazs
Bird Whisperer
Avatar
7,571 posts
Gallery: 45 photos
Likes: 1003
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Toledo, OH
     
Nov 21, 2011 17:00 |  #5

Pretty good lens for the money. I got mine way back for around $500 used.
After a couple warranty trips to Tamron (elements realignment) it worked great, and it was realtively sharp. Plus, compared with the Bigmos, it was f/5.6 up to 450mm. It was a bit sharper than my Bigmos at 500mm. But my 100-400L was sharper than both of them.
AF was slow though, not suitable for BIF.
But all in all it was a cheap and lightweight way to reach 500mm


5DIV | 5DIII | 80D | A7RII | Canon 24-70 2.8L II | 70-200 2.8L IS II | 24-105 f/4L IS | 16-35 f/4L IS | 135 f/2L | 85 1.8 | 50 1.8 STM | 18-135 IS STM | SONY FE 28-70 OSS | Tamron 17-50 2.8 | Tamron 150-600 | Ʃ 35 1.4 ART | Rokinon 14 2.8 | Sigma 1.4x | Metabones IV | 2x Canon 600EX-RT
Gabe Balazs Photo (external link)
Nature Shots Portfolio (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Code20photog
Member
Avatar
41 posts
Joined Nov 2011
Location: Los Angeles, CA
     
Nov 21, 2011 18:21 as a reply to  @ gabebalazs's post |  #6

I did forget to mention, mine had to go in to Tamron TWICE for the same issue, it just froze and wouldn't allow the camera to shoot in about the 320-450mm range.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gabebalazs
Bird Whisperer
Avatar
7,571 posts
Gallery: 45 photos
Likes: 1003
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Toledo, OH
     
Nov 21, 2011 18:34 |  #7

Yeah, I had to be quazi nasty with Tamron before they really fixed mine. They just "calibrated" AF instead of realigning the groups/elements, even though I sent them sample photos taken with manual focus through live view and 10x magnification...


5DIV | 5DIII | 80D | A7RII | Canon 24-70 2.8L II | 70-200 2.8L IS II | 24-105 f/4L IS | 16-35 f/4L IS | 135 f/2L | 85 1.8 | 50 1.8 STM | 18-135 IS STM | SONY FE 28-70 OSS | Tamron 17-50 2.8 | Tamron 150-600 | Ʃ 35 1.4 ART | Rokinon 14 2.8 | Sigma 1.4x | Metabones IV | 2x Canon 600EX-RT
Gabe Balazs Photo (external link)
Nature Shots Portfolio (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DianeK
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
603 posts
Joined Feb 2011
Location: Western Canada
     
Nov 21, 2011 19:00 as a reply to  @ gabebalazs's post |  #8

O.K. everyone, you're making the 400L 5.6 looking better and better.


Diane
7D | 60D | EF 100mm f/2.8 macro | EF 70-300L IS | EFS 15-85 IS | EFS 10-22 | 430 EXII's | Pocket Wizards | Sony RX100

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
agv8or
Goldmember
Avatar
2,148 posts
Gallery: 10 photos
Likes: 358
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Midwest
     
Nov 21, 2011 19:01 |  #9

I used one for about 5-6 years but as mentioned the AF is too slow for flying birds so I had to manual focus which was not that great and did not result in a lot of keepers there. For other critters or birds at rest it is functional. It is very light weight and has great optics but with no stabilization and a slow AF it is not something I would personally go back to. I still have mine but will be selling it soon as I have been using the 100-400L for the last few months and prior to that over the past two years I have been using the Sigma 150-500 OS and more recently the 50-500 OS. All 3, although a fair amount heavier, are all better lenses with the winner being the 100-400L which I should have bought years ago. If you need a light weight lens it is a good choice other wise there is better choices although they may cost more. Mine did have to be serviced by Tamron as the power diaphragm needed replaced and then they left a thumb print under the front element.


Rand

Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
V4her
Senior Member
Avatar
484 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 16
Joined Mar 2012
Location: North Carolina
     
Apr 27, 2012 11:23 |  #10

I have only had mine a few months. I chose it over the Canon 100-400mm when I only had the XSi/450D.
With the 7D, I notice the awfully slow AF :(


Canine Sports and Pet Photography:
Flash of Paw (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

1,330 views & 0 likes for this thread
Tamron 200-500mm
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.0forum software
version 2.0 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is mason.snipes
761 guests, 405 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.