Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos HDR Creation 
Thread started 13 Dec 2011 (Tuesday) 08:52
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

HDR Expose

 
bunyarra
Senior Member
429 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 32
Joined Feb 2006
     
Dec 13, 2011 08:52 |  #1

Hmm ... as someone who seems to collect HDR software, I actually bought the HDR Expose and 32/float from Unified Color (http://unifiedcolor.co​m (external link)) a year and a half ago.

Since then, no updates to the product, no minor improvements and no apparent development. They are now punting V2 of the products and will be charging for the privilege. While I applaud all developers that continue to add significant features, I really do want them to also support their s/w by doing minor updates that improve speed, quality etc. issues before asking for upgrades. It would not have been so bad if the original release was usable but it was terribly slow and the results mediocre to say the least. Really not feeling like punting for a new version.

To add insult to injury, support tickets raised 12 months ago are still unanswered.

Anyone else tried the s/w ?


-------------
Michael Gove
http://photosignals.sm​ugmug.com (external link)
Google+ Profile (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
gjl711
They have pills for that now you know.
Avatar
53,857 posts
Likes: 1479
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Dec 13, 2011 08:56 |  #2

Sounds like it's time to give someone else a shot. Poor software coupled with poor support = frustration and at least for me a lost customer.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
J ­ Bruja
Member
Avatar
169 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 7
Joined Sep 2009
Location: North Palm Beach, Florida
     
Dec 13, 2011 17:39 |  #3

Here's a link to a freeware HDR program that's worth the money. Actually it's not too bad. This is the only freeware I've found that doesn't hang up or shut itself down - so far-.

http://www.hdrlabs.com​/picturenaut/ (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kirkt
Cream of the Crop
5,495 posts
Likes: 460
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA USA
     
Dec 13, 2011 17:47 |  #4

First let me say I am a big fan of Picturenaut and Marc and Blochi's development of it. I've used HDRExpose since before it was HDRExpose and was HDR PhotoStudio. It is an excellent piece of software and does a great job at merging and toning. THat said, if you have had technical problems that have gone unanswered, that is a shame. From what I just got finished watching on the promo video for v2, it looks like a ton of changes have been made to workflow and performance. THere are 30 day free trials of HDRExpose and Float32, give them a try. If they still are plagued with the same problems you have had, time to find a new HDR application. THere are plenty to chose from, here's a list:

http://www.hdrlabs.com​/tools/links.html (external link)

good luck.

kirk

EDIT: Of particular note, the core of Picturenaut, the executable mkhdri is available for OSX at the hdrlabs website. I've used it to automate HDR capture and assembly using SmartShooter for remote, automated image capture, mkhdri for automated merge and psfviewgl for automated previewing of tone mapping on Mac.


Kirk
---
images: http://kirkt.smugmug.c​om (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
J ­ Bruja
Member
Avatar
169 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 7
Joined Sep 2009
Location: North Palm Beach, Florida
     
Dec 13, 2011 20:10 |  #5

kirkt wrote in post #13540154 (external link)
First let me say I am a big fan of Picturenaut and Marc and Blochi's development of it. I've used HDRExpose since before it was HDRExpose and was HDR PhotoStudio. It is an excellent piece of software and does a great job at merging and toning. THat said, if you have had technical problems that have gone unanswered, that is a shame. From what I just got finished watching on the promo video for v2, it looks like a ton of changes have been made to workflow and performance. THere are 30 day free trials of HDRExpose and Float32, give them a try. If they still are plagued with the same problems you have had, time to find a new HDR application. THere are plenty to chose from, here's a list:

http://www.hdrlabs.com​/tools/links.html (external link)

good luck.

kirk

EDIT: Of particular note, the core of Picturenaut, the executable mkhdri is available for OSX at the hdrlabs website. I've used it to automate HDR capture and assembly using SmartShooter for remote, automated image capture, mkhdri for automated merge and psfviewgl for automated previewing of tone mapping on Mac.

Tnx for the link. I'm new to Picturenaut, and as such, am conservative in my appraisal of it. HOWEVER I'm impressed with the work that has gone into it.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kirkt
Cream of the Crop
5,495 posts
Likes: 460
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA USA
     
Dec 13, 2011 20:33 |  #6

I'm a mac user and have used it with WinXP under Parallels and VMWare Fusion - it is still very responsive even in the virtual machine environment. I am excited to see the mac version on the horizon....

The merge process is much more user informative than most, and permits control that most apps do not.

kirk


Kirk
---
images: http://kirkt.smugmug.c​om (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bunyarra
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
429 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 32
Joined Feb 2006
     
Dec 14, 2011 08:11 |  #7

kirkt wrote in post #13540154 (external link)
THere are 30 day free trials of HDRExpose and Float32, give them a try. If they still are plagued with the same problems you have had, time to find a new HDR application. THere are plenty to chose from, here's a list:.

I long since moved to a combination of Oloneo (excellent s/w), SNS-HDR (recovers highlight like no other), LR/Enfuse (best batch enfusing app) and Photomatix (good auto-deghosting).

Depending on the situation, some perform far better than others. If I am struggling with internals like lace curtains with a garden behind, then I will always resort to SNS. If I just want to batch loads of basic 5 shot-blends and am not too worried by recoving vast DR then LR/Enfuse is good.

Oloneo promises to be an application that relieve much of the post-processing needed for many fusion-HDR images. If the next release has better deghosting (Antoine is working hard on it) and tweaked LR import, it will probably be my default HDR app.

Many of these still suffer from the white-wall dirt problem. If you are shooting internals where a light coloured wall borders a lighter or darker region, the edge of the wall will often turn slightly grey. This is a real give-away for many that use HDR s/w. Oloneo can be tweaked to reduce this significantly and SNS-HDR will often not exhibit the problem at all. When processing 50 sets of 5-9 exposures for a client - the less post-processing the better. I just wish all apps had the same level of Lightroom integration that LR/Enfuse has.

Sadly, HDR Expose is slow, has rotten alignment and just seems to about a year too late. More costly than Oloneo it offers less control and far worse results.

While I seem addicted to buying HDR s/w, this is one I will not be upgrading to.


-------------
Michael Gove
http://photosignals.sm​ugmug.com (external link)
Google+ Profile (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kirkt
Cream of the Crop
5,495 posts
Likes: 460
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA USA
     
Dec 14, 2011 09:22 |  #8

I have tried the trials of HDRExpose v2 and Float32 v2 - they are excruciatingly slow on my 3 year-old MacBook Pro Core2Duo. It is painful.

Oloneo and SNS seem to give very pleasing results but are not worth firing up a virtual PC machine on my mac. That is not a criticism of those applications, but a testament to my laziness and the wealth of options for HDR on a mac.

One of the major decisions in the post-processing chain that often gets overlooked, especially when one has a bunch of different tools for the job (I have collected many HDR apps as well) is the decision to use a 32bit workflow or not. This is really important but often not considered a priority. In everyday terms, one question to ask yourself is:

Do I really need the 32bit file to make the image I am trying to make, or can I stay LDR file format the whole way?

Put another way:

Do I need to merge to HDR or can I use exposure blending?

This should really be the starting point because it alleviates a lot of issues regarding image quality and artifacting. Further, things like local contrast enhancement can be done in LDR outside of enfuse, so simply thinking that one needs to use the full HDR workflow to get that "look" is time consuming and probably not necessary. And, once you get a nice blend, you can always run that file through your favorite tone mapper and get an output image that has that local contrast you want, and layer than into the final image in post.

I really liked HDRExpose when it came out and lived with its quirkiness thinking that it would be refined over time - however, the performance of the new version leaves a lot to be desired. The new approach appears to have built on HDRExpress in that there is a lot of automatic processing that takes place to generate the default preset image - I suppose you could make the default "no processing" but the processing that takes place in each step you perform manually is still clunky. I have yet to really put it through its paces, but I get the impression that the toning has improved with halo reduction being an important aspect of this, but I have not tested this yet.

kirk


Kirk
---
images: http://kirkt.smugmug.c​om (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

1,639 views & 0 likes for this thread
HDR Expose
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos HDR Creation 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.0forum software
version 2.0 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is insurfr
719 guests, 377 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.