LOG IN    OR   REGISTER TO FORUMS


HDR Expose

FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos HDR Creation
Thread started 13 Dec 2011 (Tuesday) 08:52   
LIST NEARBY THREADS
 
bunyarra
Senior Member
Joined Feb 2006
417 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

Hmm ... as someone who seems to collect HDR software, I actually bought the HDR Expose and 32/float from Unified Color (http://unifiedcolor.co​mexternal link) a year and a half ago.

Since then, no updates to the product, no minor improvements and no apparent development. They are now punting V2 of the products and will be charging for the privilege. While I applaud all developers that continue to add significant features, I really do want them to also support their s/w by doing minor updates that improve speed, quality etc. issues before asking for upgrades. It would not have been so bad if the original release was usable but it was terribly slow and the results mediocre to say the least. Really not feeling like punting for a new version.

To add insult to injury, support tickets raised 12 months ago are still unanswered.

Anyone else tried the s/w ?

Post #1, Dec 13, 2011 08:52:38


-------------
Michael Gove
http://photosignals.sm​ugmug.comexternal link
Google+ Profileexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
gjl711
human (barely) and bribable
gjl711's Avatar
Joined Aug 2006
48,213 posts
Deep in the heart of Texas
[MORE/SHARE]

Sounds like it's time to give someone else a shot. Poor software coupled with poor support = frustration and at least for me a lost customer.

Post #2, Dec 13, 2011 08:56:58


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I wondered why the baseball was getting bigger, then it hit me
.
::Flickr::external link
::Gear::

LOG IN TO REPLY
J ­ Bruja
Senior Member
J Bruja's Avatar
Joined Sep 2009
144 posts
North Palm Beach, Florida
[MORE/SHARE]

Here's a link to a freeware HDR program that's worth the money. Actually it's not too bad. This is the only freeware I've found that doesn't hang up or shut itself down - so far-.

http://www.hdrlabs.com​/picturenaut/external link

Post #3, Dec 13, 2011 17:39:43




LOG IN TO REPLY
kirkt
Goldmember
Joined Feb 2008
4,320 posts
Philadelphia, PA USA
[MORE/SHARE]

First let me say I am a big fan of Picturenaut and Marc and Blochi's development of it. I've used HDRExpose since before it was HDRExpose and was HDR PhotoStudio. It is an excellent piece of software and does a great job at merging and toning. THat said, if you have had technical problems that have gone unanswered, that is a shame. From what I just got finished watching on the promo video for v2, it looks like a ton of changes have been made to workflow and performance. THere are 30 day free trials of HDRExpose and Float32, give them a try. If they still are plagued with the same problems you have had, time to find a new HDR application. THere are plenty to chose from, here's a list:

http://www.hdrlabs.com​/tools/links.htmlexternal link

good luck.

kirk

EDIT: Of particular note, the core of Picturenaut, the executable mkhdri is available for OSX at the hdrlabs website. I've used it to automate HDR capture and assembly using SmartShooter for remote, automated image capture, mkhdri for automated merge and psfviewgl for automated previewing of tone mapping on Mac.

Post #4, Dec 13, 2011 17:47:54


Kirk
---
images: http://kirkt.smugmug.c​omexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
J ­ Bruja
Senior Member
J Bruja's Avatar
Joined Sep 2009
144 posts
North Palm Beach, Florida
[MORE/SHARE]

kirkt wrote in post #13540154external link
First let me say I am a big fan of Picturenaut and Marc and Blochi's development of it. I've used HDRExpose since before it was HDRExpose and was HDR PhotoStudio. It is an excellent piece of software and does a great job at merging and toning. THat said, if you have had technical problems that have gone unanswered, that is a shame. From what I just got finished watching on the promo video for v2, it looks like a ton of changes have been made to workflow and performance. THere are 30 day free trials of HDRExpose and Float32, give them a try. If they still are plagued with the same problems you have had, time to find a new HDR application. THere are plenty to chose from, here's a list:

http://www.hdrlabs.com​/tools/links.htmlexternal link

good luck.

kirk

EDIT: Of particular note, the core of Picturenaut, the executable mkhdri is available for OSX at the hdrlabs website. I've used it to automate HDR capture and assembly using SmartShooter for remote, automated image capture, mkhdri for automated merge and psfviewgl for automated previewing of tone mapping on Mac.

Tnx for the link. I'm new to Picturenaut, and as such, am conservative in my appraisal of it. HOWEVER I'm impressed with the work that has gone into it.

Post #5, Dec 13, 2011 20:10:02




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
kirkt
Goldmember
Joined Feb 2008
4,320 posts
Philadelphia, PA USA
[MORE/SHARE]

I'm a mac user and have used it with WinXP under Parallels and VMWare Fusion - it is still very responsive even in the virtual machine environment. I am excited to see the mac version on the horizon....

The merge process is much more user informative than most, and permits control that most apps do not.

kirk

Post #6, Dec 13, 2011 20:33:22


Kirk
---
images: http://kirkt.smugmug.c​omexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
bunyarra
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Joined Feb 2006
417 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

kirkt wrote in post #13540154external link
THere are 30 day free trials of HDRExpose and Float32, give them a try. If they still are plagued with the same problems you have had, time to find a new HDR application. THere are plenty to chose from, here's a list:.

I long since moved to a combination of Oloneo (excellent s/w), SNS-HDR (recovers highlight like no other), LR/Enfuse (best batch enfusing app) and Photomatix (good auto-deghosting).

Depending on the situation, some perform far better than others. If I am struggling with internals like lace curtains with a garden behind, then I will always resort to SNS. If I just want to batch loads of basic 5 shot-blends and am not too worried by recoving vast DR then LR/Enfuse is good.

Oloneo promises to be an application that relieve much of the post-processing needed for many fusion-HDR images. If the next release has better deghosting (Antoine is working hard on it) and tweaked LR import, it will probably be my default HDR app.

Many of these still suffer from the white-wall dirt problem. If you are shooting internals where a light coloured wall borders a lighter or darker region, the edge of the wall will often turn slightly grey. This is a real give-away for many that use HDR s/w. Oloneo can be tweaked to reduce this significantly and SNS-HDR will often not exhibit the problem at all. When processing 50 sets of 5-9 exposures for a client - the less post-processing the better. I just wish all apps had the same level of Lightroom integration that LR/Enfuse has.

Sadly, HDR Expose is slow, has rotten alignment and just seems to about a year too late. More costly than Oloneo it offers less control and far worse results.

While I seem addicted to buying HDR s/w, this is one I will not be upgrading to.

Post #7, Dec 14, 2011 08:11:43


-------------
Michael Gove
http://photosignals.sm​ugmug.comexternal link
Google+ Profileexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
kirkt
Goldmember
Joined Feb 2008
4,320 posts
Philadelphia, PA USA
[MORE/SHARE]

I have tried the trials of HDRExpose v2 and Float32 v2 - they are excruciatingly slow on my 3 year-old MacBook Pro Core2Duo. It is painful.

Oloneo and SNS seem to give very pleasing results but are not worth firing up a virtual PC machine on my mac. That is not a criticism of those applications, but a testament to my laziness and the wealth of options for HDR on a mac.

One of the major decisions in the post-processing chain that often gets overlooked, especially when one has a bunch of different tools for the job (I have collected many HDR apps as well) is the decision to use a 32bit workflow or not. This is really important but often not considered a priority. In everyday terms, one question to ask yourself is:

Do I really need the 32bit file to make the image I am trying to make, or can I stay LDR file format the whole way?

Put another way:

Do I need to merge to HDR or can I use exposure blending?

This should really be the starting point because it alleviates a lot of issues regarding image quality and artifacting. Further, things like local contrast enhancement can be done in LDR outside of enfuse, so simply thinking that one needs to use the full HDR workflow to get that "look" is time consuming and probably not necessary. And, once you get a nice blend, you can always run that file through your favorite tone mapper and get an output image that has that local contrast you want, and layer than into the final image in post.

I really liked HDRExpose when it came out and lived with its quirkiness thinking that it would be refined over time - however, the performance of the new version leaves a lot to be desired. The new approach appears to have built on HDRExpress in that there is a lot of automatic processing that takes place to generate the default preset image - I suppose you could make the default "no processing" but the processing that takes place in each step you perform manually is still clunky. I have yet to really put it through its paces, but I get the impression that the toning has improved with halo reduction being an important aspect of this, but I have not tested this yet.

kirk

Post #8, Dec 14, 2011 09:22:58


Kirk
---
images: http://kirkt.smugmug.c​omexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY


LIST NEARBY THREADS
818 views & 0 likes for this thread
HDR Expose
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos HDR Creation



NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO FORUMS

CHANGE BODY TEXT SIZE FOR ALL THREAD PAGES
POWERED BY AMASS 1.0version 1.0
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net


SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF  |  JUMP TO FORUM...  |  FORUM RULES


Spent 0.00082 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
846 guests, 775 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014
Latest registered member is gar612

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality, we do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browser's data storage methods.