Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing
Thread started 18 Dec 2011 (Sunday) 23:34
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Lightroom export size settings for web, Facebook, Flickr, etc

 
LucidPhoto70
Member
LucidPhoto70's Avatar
206 posts

Joined May 2011
MORE INFO

Lightroom export size settings for web, Facebook, Flickr, etc

I'm trying to find out what the optimum Lightroom export settings are for websites, Facebook, Flickr, etc. I was doing:

-Resize to Fit: Long Edge 1280 pixels
-Sharpen For: Screen / Amount: Standard
-Minimize Embedded Metadata


I used to export at 1024x768 which was a standard resolution for web design years ago but with larger monitors available, I had started doing 1280 width. With so many tablets and netbooks out there now, I think I need to start processing smaller to avoid my images being resized automatically or forcing users to scroll in their browsers to see the image.

So I tried setting my long edge to 1000 pixels. I still think that is too large and am considering dropping down to 960 pixels. I think Facebook's max is 960 pixels wide so I was thinking of adopting that. What do you guys export at?

Speaking of Facebook, I use it a lot for sharing my work since all my friends and family are there. Even if I resized at 960 pixels, it compresses the image so much the pictures are extremely grainy. Are there any optimum settings for Facebook exports to retain image quality?

Dec 18, 2011 23:34

5D3 + L glass = FUN!

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
John ­ Schell
Senior Member
John Schell's Avatar
795 posts

Joined Apr 2010

San Diego, California
MORE INFO

Save and upload as .png

Dec 19, 2011 00:19

Websiteexternal link || Instagramexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
"Amazingly attractive"
tonylong's Avatar
53,414 posts
GALLERY: 19 photos

Joined Sep 2007

Vancouver, WA USA
MORE INFO

I Export and upload to my Web host PBase at the POTN limit, 1024 pixels max.

And then, I recently started using the LR Publish utility to upload to Facebook at 720 pixels max.

It works for me. I don't get farther into the whole mobile app stuff because I figure that at those small resolutions image quality really doesn't matter much!

Dec 19, 2011 01:17

Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBaseexternal link
Wildlife project pics hereexternal link, Biking Photog shoots hereexternal link, "Suburbia" project hereexternal link! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics hereexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Staszek
Goldmember
Staszek's Avatar
3,577 posts

Joined Mar 2010

San Jose, CA
MORE INFO

My social media exports are at 600px at 85%. Flickr is 1000px at 85%. No sharpening to either.

Dec 19, 2011 01:44

SOSKIphotoexternal link | Blogexternal link | Facebookexternal link| Instagramexternal link
5D3's | EF 24L II | EF 35L | EF 50L | EF 100L Macro | EF 135L | EF 70-200L II | EF 300 f/2.8 IS | 600EX-RT's | Quadras

LOG IN TO REPLY
FlyingPhotog
Cream of the "Prop"
FlyingPhotog's Avatar
57,560 posts

Joined May 2007

Probably Chasing Aircraft
MORE INFO

FB - 720X @ 100% + Watermark
FM / POTN 1024X @ 100% + Watermark
Website - 5000X @ 100% (Watermark generated by website host)

All of the above are sRGB JPEG

Dec 19, 2011 02:00

Jay
Crosswind Imagesexternal link
Facebook Fan Pageexternal link

"If you aren't getting extraordinary images from today's dSLRs, regardless of brand, it's not the camera!" - Bill Fortney, Nikon Corp.

LOG IN TO REPLY
nathancarter
Goldmember
4,679 posts
GALLERY: 6 photos

Joined Dec 2010
MORE INFO

For web display, I almost always resize to 1024px on the long edge, and use 90% quality. For web sharing purposes, I publish to my Flickr account, and share from there. Sometimes I use a larger size if I have a specific need, most of the time it's 1024px on the long edge.

For my website, the size depends on the project, but again it's usually 1024px and 90%.

For a long time, Facebook limited files to 720px on the longest side; if you uploaded something larger than that, Facebook would happily resize and compress it for you. Recently, they've allowed larger photos (2048px?) to be uploaded, but I think that size is only for downloading purposes, and (I think) photos are still DISPLAYED at 720px.

So, like Tony, I use LR3's publish-to-Facebook service, and upload at 720px on the long side, and 85% quality. I think FB still compresses them even more, sometimes the compression artifacts are just outright terrible.

Maybe I'll try publishing to Facebook with several different compression percentages, and see which one is optimal. I don't think the compression artifacts I'm seeing in my FB images are from my compression to 85%, so I suspect that FB is compressing it again after upload. And if that's the case, perhaps I should just leave my Lightroom settings at 100% quality, so it's only compressed once by FB, instead of compressed once by LR3 and then compressed a second time by FB.

Some 'sperimentation is in order.

Dec 19, 2011 12:41

http://www.avidchick.c​om (external link) for business stuff
http://www.facebook.co​m/VictorVoyeur (external link) for fun stuff

LOG IN TO REPLY
LucidPhoto70
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
LucidPhoto70's Avatar
206 posts

Joined May 2011
MORE INFO

Thank you so much guys. This has been really informative.

I did a little bit of experimenting on Facebook last night. I uploaded an image at 1280 px, 1024 px, and 960 px on the long edge at 100%. I used a black and white high contrast macro shot with text so I could see the difference easily. The 1280 and 1024 are both compressed and resized down to 960. They look horrible, very grainy and unsharp. I can barely read the text. Almost all the tiny details that make a macro shot so nice to look at are lost in the conversion.

The 960 I uploaded seems to be largely untouched by Facebook. I can't distinguish any loss in quality from the original 960 px image to the displayed 960 px image. I used the High Quality option when uploading it.

So I think I will stick with 960 px for Facebook at this rate. For my website and Flickr, I'm going with 1024 as several of you have recommended.


Jay, I love your work. I have begun watermarking all my photos as well recently. A small unobtrusive one in the corner. Not for copyright but more for exposure. I've read several pros and cons in threads and blogs all over but ultimately decided I would rather have my name out there than potentially ruining the impact of a shot with a watermark. If someone really liked one of my shots and found it displayed somewhere on the web, I'd like them to track it back to me if they needed to. I also recently started adding my website and copyright link to my IPTC metadata using an import pre-set in Lightroom. There is a very good tutorial here on creating one:

http://www.tipsquirrel​.com ...yright-data-in-lightroom/external link

Dec 19, 2011 13:07

5D3 + L glass = FUN!

LOG IN TO REPLY
FlyingPhotog
Cream of the "Prop"
FlyingPhotog's Avatar
57,560 posts

Joined May 2007

Probably Chasing Aircraft
MORE INFO

Thanks very much for the nice feedback...

Dec 19, 2011 13:08

Jay
Crosswind Imagesexternal link
Facebook Fan Pageexternal link

"If you aren't getting extraordinary images from today's dSLRs, regardless of brand, it's not the camera!" - Bill Fortney, Nikon Corp.

LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
"Amazingly attractive"
tonylong's Avatar
53,414 posts
GALLERY: 19 photos

Joined Sep 2007

Vancouver, WA USA
MORE INFO

LucidPhoto70 wrote in post #13568988external link
The 960 I uploaded seems to be largely untouched by Facebook. I can't distinguish any loss in quality from the original 960 px image to the displayed 960 px image. I used the High Quality option when uploading it.

So I think I will stick with 960 px for Facebook at this rate. For my website and Flickr, I'm going with 1024 as several of you have recommended.

I'm curious about this. I'm not a "big" Facebook user but I've been under the impression that even if you upload a bigger pic, the "normal" display will still be 720 pixels at the maximum dimension. Whenever I right-click on an image and look at the Properties (Windows) it always shows 720 pixels or less. So are you saying that there is an option to display larger images, or just to download them?

If you are displaying larger, could post a link?

Dec 19, 2011 13:26

Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBaseexternal link
Wildlife project pics hereexternal link, Biking Photog shoots hereexternal link, "Suburbia" project hereexternal link! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics hereexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
"Amazingly attractive"
tonylong's Avatar
53,414 posts
GALLERY: 19 photos

Joined Sep 2007

Vancouver, WA USA
MORE INFO

OK, my mistake -- I just saw one that is 855 pixels, so I guess the option is there if I ever care enough about Facebook images to post larger ones:)! I've been content with my PBase site being there for those who want to see "bigger":)!

Dec 19, 2011 13:29

Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBaseexternal link
Wildlife project pics hereexternal link, Biking Photog shoots hereexternal link, "Suburbia" project hereexternal link! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics hereexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
LucidPhoto70
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
LucidPhoto70's Avatar
206 posts

Joined May 2011
MORE INFO

Hey Tony, yes Facebook switched from 720px to 960px max display size this past August. When you click the Download link though, you can download the image in whatever resolution you originally uploaded it at.

I don't have a public Facebook but here on Canon's Facebook page, click on the black and white butterfly with the green background. It should display in 960 x 640. When you click Download, the original image is also the same size so the user likely saved it as this resolution. I'll try and find one at a higher res:

http://www.facebook.co​m ...NON/40485103812?sk=​photosexternal link

Dec 19, 2011 14:00

5D3 + L glass = FUN!

LOG IN TO REPLY
LucidPhoto70
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
LucidPhoto70's Avatar
206 posts

Joined May 2011
MORE INFO

Found one, the Foo dog statue on the 5th row at the same link. Here is the direct link to it:

http://www.facebook.co​m ...&set=o.40485103812&​type=3external link

When you click Download, you get the full resolution file at 2048 x 1411.

Dec 19, 2011 14:05

5D3 + L glass = FUN!

LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
"Amazingly attractive"
tonylong's Avatar
53,414 posts
GALLERY: 19 photos

Joined Sep 2007

Vancouver, WA USA
MORE INFO

Got it, thanks!

Dec 19, 2011 14:15

Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBaseexternal link
Wildlife project pics hereexternal link, Biking Photog shoots hereexternal link, "Suburbia" project hereexternal link! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics hereexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
FLiPMaRC
Senior Member
FLiPMaRC's Avatar
966 posts

Joined May 2006

NJ
MORE INFO

When uploading to Facebook, you have a choice between "Standard" or "High Quality". If you keep it at standard, FB will automatically resize your pictures to 960 pixels. If you choose High Quality, it will resize and display the picture at 960 pix, but you will be able to download the original size.

Dec 20, 2011 09:35 as a reply to LucidPhoto70's post 19 hours earlier.

Gear List

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

23,333 views & 0 likes for this thread
Lightroom export size settings for web, Facebook, Flickr, etc
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing

NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO THE FORUMS
Registered members get all the features: search, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, own reviews...




Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality. We do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browsers' data storage methods.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.33version 1.33
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00211 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
Latest registered member is Jack Dempsey
619 guests, 487 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 5175, that happened on Jun 16, 2015