Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Weddings & Other Family Events Talk 
Thread started 20 Dec 2011 (Tuesday) 09:44
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Best Lens for church

 
Kirill
Senior Member
728 posts
Joined Jul 2009
Location: Chicago Burbs, IL
     
Dec 20, 2011 09:44 |  #1

This weekend I took pictures of baptism. I think i did Ok, didn't get any masterpieces, just some decent photos. I wasn't a paying gig, it was just helping a friend of a friend, and getting some experience for me - so i think it's fair outcome.
It was my first time shooting in the church. It truned out very easy going church. Although church was dark - Flash was allowed, I also was allowed to move whenever I wanted, We were the only one family at the church at the time - so i wasn't bothering anybody else.

I came prepared for "the worst" (7d + 70-200 2.8 is II), Now in hindsight - It may not been the best lens to use - i was expecting "stay here, no flash", what I got is "be anywhere and flash is OK"

So knowing what I know now - I want to use that as learning experience, so next time I can get better results.

I think 70-200 on crop was too long for the situation i was in - where i was able to move freely, and 580exII flash with stofen diffusor may not been very effective on long side

Question 1:
Probably can get away with putting couple slave flashes to light up the church - is a good approach next time ?

The main question - what would be the best lens to use next time ?
24-70 2.8 ? I think IS on 70-200 helped a lot - cause i had to shoot wide open, ISO 800-1600 and was getting shutter speed in 100-200 range to bring in ambient.
24-105 4 IS - may not be the best cause f/4 is may be too slow for the dark church ? But if I light it up with 2 more remote flashes ?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
bpalermini
Goldmember
Avatar
1,209 posts
Gallery: 67 photos
Likes: 483
Joined Mar 2011
Location: Ashland, Oregon
     
Dec 20, 2011 09:56 |  #2

I's stick with the 70-200, fast sharp and even though there are no restrictions you can stay a bit away from the participants so as to not distract them. To me photographing in church is a lot about not distracting or bringing attention to myself.

As for flash I'd say if you need it use it if not don't. I rather like available light if it is good.

Here's what I shot at our church last weekend with my 70-200. You'll see in the second one, the light falls off quite a bit as you get to the side of the stage. The guitar player is in the light while the singer is in the fringe.

IMAGE: http://www.palermini.com/CAPhotos/Christmas-Celebration-2011/i-T4CzR5z/0/M/NSR-9-M.jpg

IMAGE: http://www.palermini.com/CAPhotos/Christmas-Celebration-2011/i-F2LQfNd/0/M/NSR-12-M.jpg

IMAGE: http://www.palermini.com/CAPhotos/Christmas-Celebration-2011/i-xMVqbFq/0/M/NSR-13-M.jpg

Bob Palermini
1DX, 5DIV, 14 Rokinon, 16-35L II, 24-70L II, 100L, 70-200 IS 2.8L, 100-400L II, 400mm 2.8 IS II, 1.4xIII, 2xIII, 580EXII, YN560IV, RRS TVC23 + BH55, LRCC, Fuji X-E2, Fuji X30
My Web Site (external link) | My Sports Portfolio (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nicksan
Man I Like to Fart
Avatar
24,727 posts
Likes: 39
Joined Oct 2006
Location: NYC
     
Dec 20, 2011 10:06 |  #3

Kirill wrote in post #13573436 (external link)
Although church was dark - Flash was allowed, I also was allowed to move whenever I wanted, We were the only one family at the church at the time - so i wasn't bothering anybody else.

Is your question about the same church or would you be shooting in different churches? I ask, because different churches have different policies with regards to photography and flash.

When I am shooting a wedding ceremony, even if flash was allowed, I try my best not to use it. If it's really dark and flash is allowed, I will use it. That's about the only scenario I would use flash though.

Kirill wrote in post #13573436 (external link)
Question 1:
Probably can get away with putting couple slave flashes to light up the church - is a good approach next time ?

Again, this depends on the church's policy. Are you going to be shooting in the same church, or is this a more general question? As mentioned before, personally I would try to avoid using flash at churches.

Kirill wrote in post #13573436 (external link)
The main question - what would be the best lens to use next time ?
24-70 2.8 ? I think IS on 70-200 helped a lot - cause i had to shoot wide open, ISO 800-1600 and was getting shutter speed in 100-200 range to bring in ambient.
24-105 4 IS - may not be the best cause f/4 is may be too slow for the dark church ? But if I light it up with 2 more remote flashes ?

Those are typical settings that I use to shoot wedding ceremonies. f2.8 1/120-1/160 ISO1600 - 3200. I have no issues with those settings. I use the 70-200 f2.8 IS MKII quite a lot at ceremonies.


NYC Wedding Photographer (external link) | Blog (external link) | facebook (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
50,916 posts
Likes: 330
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Dec 20, 2011 14:40 |  #4

I generally use a 24-70, or a 16-35 F4 VR if it's really dark, along with a 70-200 F2.8 VR II on full frame. In 120 weddings i've only had to use flash in a church once.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Red ­ Tie ­ Photography
Goldmember
Avatar
3,575 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2009
Location: San Diego
     
Dec 20, 2011 15:37 |  #5

Since you are shooting on a 7d, why not look into the 17-55 IS. Better range on a crop and has IS.


Bryan
Gear List (external link)
San Diego Wedding Photography - Red Tie Photography (external link)
Red Tie Photography Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
50,916 posts
Likes: 330
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Dec 20, 2011 15:45 |  #6

Red Tie Photography wrote in post #13575145 (external link)
Since you are shooting on a 7d, why not look into the 17-55 IS. Better range on a crop and has IS.

Just don't drop that lens. I dropped two or three over the course of a few years, they generally can't be repaired.

My 24-70 and D700 fell off the roof of my car onto rocks at my last wedding - not a moving car, I just put it there for a second while I was unloading. It still works perfectly, it just has a few scratches on the lens hood. Pro equipment win.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Kirill
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
728 posts
Joined Jul 2009
Location: Chicago Burbs, IL
     
Dec 20, 2011 21:17 |  #7

bpalermini wrote in post #13573503 (external link)
I's stick with the 70-200, fast sharp and even though there are no restrictions you can stay a bit away from the participants so as to not distract them. To me photographing in church is a lot about not distracting or bringing attention to myself.

As for flash I'd say if you need it use it if not don't. I rather like available light if it is good.

Here's what I shot at our church last weekend with my 70-200. You'll see in the second one, the light falls off quite a bit as you get to the side of the stage. The guitar player is in the light while the singer is in the fringe.

QUOTED IMAGE

QUOTED IMAGE

QUOTED IMAGE

This is similar to the results I got - it just doesn't have eye bleeding sharpness.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Kirill
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
728 posts
Joined Jul 2009
Location: Chicago Burbs, IL
     
Dec 20, 2011 21:19 |  #8

nicksan wrote in post #13573558 (external link)
Is your question about the same church or would you be shooting in different churches? I ask, because different churches have different policies with regards to photography and flash.


Those are typical settings that I use to shoot wedding ceremonies. f2.8 1/120-1/160 ISO1600 - 3200. I have no issues with those settings. I use the 70-200 f2.8 IS MKII quite a lot at ceremonies.

Very good question - I guess High Iso + 70-200 2.8 IS will cover almost all churches. What I need is something for photographer friendly churches.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Kirill
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
728 posts
Joined Jul 2009
Location: Chicago Burbs, IL
     
Dec 20, 2011 21:21 |  #9

Red Tie Photography wrote in post #13575145 (external link)
Since you are shooting on a 7d, why not look into the 17-55 IS. Better range on a crop and has IS.

I think it's a good one, but 55 may not be enough for the shots like priest pouring holy water.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
scorpio_e
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,371 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 243
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Pa
     
Dec 21, 2011 06:44 |  #10

This was shot with a 30 1.4 if I used a 50 I would be shooting really tight.

IMAGE: http://steelcityphotography.zenfolio.com/img/s11/v29/p578506081-4.jpg

www.steelcityphotograp​hy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nicksan
Man I Like to Fart
Avatar
24,727 posts
Likes: 39
Joined Oct 2006
Location: NYC
     
Dec 21, 2011 09:40 |  #11

Kirill wrote in post #13576709 (external link)
Very good question - I guess High Iso + 70-200 2.8 IS will cover almost all churches. What I need is something for photographer friendly churches.

And what I was saying was photographer friendly or not, I usually don't use flash during the ceremony. Only when the light is too low will I ever use flash, provided I am allowed to use flash to begin with.


NYC Wedding Photographer (external link) | Blog (external link) | facebook (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Red ­ Tie ­ Photography
Goldmember
Avatar
3,575 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2009
Location: San Diego
     
Dec 21, 2011 12:43 |  #12

Kirill wrote in post #13576721 (external link)
I think it's a good one, but 55 may not be enough for the shots like priest pouring holy water.

That is why you have the 70-200. If you are worried about missing the 55-70mm focal length, just crop in on the image from the 17-55. It is much easier to cover that focal length with the 17-55 and the 70-200, it is really hard to get 17-24 if you are using the 24-70.


Bryan
Gear List (external link)
San Diego Wedding Photography - Red Tie Photography (external link)
Red Tie Photography Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Kirill
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
728 posts
Joined Jul 2009
Location: Chicago Burbs, IL
     
Dec 28, 2011 19:22 |  #13

Red Tie Photography wrote in post #13579642 (external link)
That is why you have the 70-200. If you are worried about missing the 55-70mm focal length, just crop in on the image from the 17-55. It is much easier to cover that focal length with the 17-55 and the 70-200, it is really hard to get 17-24 if you are using the 24-70.

I think the answer is two bodies. Crop with 17-55, Full Frame with 70-200




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bigarchi
Senior Member
Avatar
962 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: upstate ny
     
Dec 29, 2011 07:57 |  #14

Kirill wrote in post #13612252 (external link)
I think the answer is two bodies. Crop with 17-55, Full Frame with 70-200

my favorite church zoom combo!


~Mitch

my gear and feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SchwettyLens
Member
197 posts
Joined Sep 2010
Location: Golden, Colorado
     
Dec 29, 2011 12:55 |  #15

35L or 24L
No flash


http://usagani.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

10,223 views & 0 likes for this thread
Best Lens for church
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Weddings & Other Family Events Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.0forum software
version 2.0 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is MsDeen
751 guests, 388 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.