LOG IN    OR   REGISTER TO FORUMS


Best Lens for church

FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Weddings & Other Family Events Talk
Thread started 20 Dec 2011 (Tuesday) 09:44   
LIST NEARBY THREADS
 
Kirill
Senior Member
Joined Jul 2009
724 posts
Chicago Burbs, IL
[MORE/SHARE]

This weekend I took pictures of baptism. I think i did Ok, didn't get any masterpieces, just some decent photos. I wasn't a paying gig, it was just helping a friend of a friend, and getting some experience for me - so i think it's fair outcome.
It was my first time shooting in the church. It truned out very easy going church. Although church was dark - Flash was allowed, I also was allowed to move whenever I wanted, We were the only one family at the church at the time - so i wasn't bothering anybody else.

I came prepared for "the worst" (7d + 70-200 2.8 is II), Now in hindsight - It may not been the best lens to use - i was expecting "stay here, no flash", what I got is "be anywhere and flash is OK"

So knowing what I know now - I want to use that as learning experience, so next time I can get better results.

I think 70-200 on crop was too long for the situation i was in - where i was able to move freely, and 580exII flash with stofen diffusor may not been very effective on long side

Question 1:
Probably can get away with putting couple slave flashes to light up the church - is a good approach next time ?

The main question - what would be the best lens to use next time ?
24-70 2.8 ? I think IS on 70-200 helped a lot - cause i had to shoot wide open, ISO 800-1600 and was getting shutter speed in 100-200 range to bring in ambient.
24-105 4 IS - may not be the best cause f/4 is may be too slow for the dark church ? But if I light it up with 2 more remote flashes ?

Post #1, Dec 20, 2011 09:44:22




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
bpalermini
Senior Member
bpalermini's Avatar
Joined Mar 2011
653 posts
Los Angeles, California
[MORE/SHARE]

I's stick with the 70-200, fast sharp and even though there are no restrictions you can stay a bit away from the participants so as to not distract them. To me photographing in church is a lot about not distracting or bringing attention to myself.

As for flash I'd say if you need it use it if not don't. I rather like available light if it is good.

Here's what I shot at our church last weekend with my 70-200. You'll see in the second one, the light falls off quite a bit as you get to the side of the stage. The guitar player is in the light while the singer is in the fringe.

IMAGE: http://www.palermini.com/CAPhotos/Christmas-Celebration-2011/i-T4CzR5z/0/M/NSR-9-M.jpg

IMAGE: http://www.palermini.com/CAPhotos/Christmas-Celebration-2011/i-F2LQfNd/0/M/NSR-12-M.jpg

IMAGE: http://www.palermini.com/CAPhotos/Christmas-Celebration-2011/i-xMVqbFq/0/M/NSR-13-M.jpg

Post #2, Dec 20, 2011 09:56:32


Bob Palermini
1DX, 1DIV, 50D, 16-35L, 24-70L II, 100L, 24-105L, 70-200 IS 2.8L, 300 IS 2.8L, 400mm 2.8 IS II, 1.4xII, 2xII, 580EXII, YN565EX, RRS TVC23 + BH55, LR5, Fuji X30
My Web Siteexternal link | My Sports Portfolioexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
nicksan
Man I Like to Fart
nicksan's Avatar
Joined Oct 2006
24,585 posts
NYC
[MORE/SHARE]

Kirill wrote in post #13573436external link
Although church was dark - Flash was allowed, I also was allowed to move whenever I wanted, We were the only one family at the church at the time - so i wasn't bothering anybody else.

Is your question about the same church or would you be shooting in different churches? I ask, because different churches have different policies with regards to photography and flash.

When I am shooting a wedding ceremony, even if flash was allowed, I try my best not to use it. If it's really dark and flash is allowed, I will use it. That's about the only scenario I would use flash though.

Kirill wrote in post #13573436external link
Question 1:
Probably can get away with putting couple slave flashes to light up the church - is a good approach next time ?

Again, this depends on the church's policy. Are you going to be shooting in the same church, or is this a more general question? As mentioned before, personally I would try to avoid using flash at churches.

Kirill wrote in post #13573436external link
The main question - what would be the best lens to use next time ?
24-70 2.8 ? I think IS on 70-200 helped a lot - cause i had to shoot wide open, ISO 800-1600 and was getting shutter speed in 100-200 range to bring in ambient.
24-105 4 IS - may not be the best cause f/4 is may be too slow for the dark church ? But if I light it up with 2 more remote flashes ?

Those are typical settings that I use to shoot wedding ceremonies. f2.8 1/120-1/160 ISO1600 - 3200. I have no issues with those settings. I use the 70-200 f2.8 IS MKII quite a lot at ceremonies.

Post #3, Dec 20, 2011 10:06:51


NYC Wedding Photographerexternal link | Blogexternal link | facebookexternal link | Flickrexternal link | Gear

LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
tim's Avatar
Joined Nov 2004
49,515 posts
Wellington, New Zealand
[MORE/SHARE]

I generally use a 24-70, or a 16-35 F4 VR if it's really dark, along with a 70-200 F2.8 VR II on full frame. In 120 weddings i've only had to use flash in a church once.

Post #4, Dec 20, 2011 14:40:18


NZIPP Qualified Professional wedding photographer.
Wellington Wedding Photographerexternal link ~ Camera and Lens Reviewsexternal link ~ Photographers Tech Supportexternal link
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

LOG IN TO REPLY
Red ­ Tie ­ Photography
Goldmember
Red Tie Photography's Avatar
Joined Nov 2009
3,571 posts
San Diego
[MORE/SHARE]

Since you are shooting on a 7d, why not look into the 17-55 IS. Better range on a crop and has IS.

Post #5, Dec 20, 2011 15:37:19


Bryan
Gear Listexternal link
San Diego Wedding Photography - Red Tie Photographyexternal link
Red Tie Photography Blogexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
tim
Light Bringer
tim's Avatar
Joined Nov 2004
49,515 posts
Wellington, New Zealand
[MORE/SHARE]

Red Tie Photography wrote in post #13575145external link
Since you are shooting on a 7d, why not look into the 17-55 IS. Better range on a crop and has IS.

Just don't drop that lens. I dropped two or three over the course of a few years, they generally can't be repaired.

My 24-70 and D700 fell off the roof of my car onto rocks at my last wedding - not a moving car, I just put it there for a second while I was unloading. It still works perfectly, it just has a few scratches on the lens hood. Pro equipment win.

Post #6, Dec 20, 2011 15:45:29


NZIPP Qualified Professional wedding photographer.
Wellington Wedding Photographerexternal link ~ Camera and Lens Reviewsexternal link ~ Photographers Tech Supportexternal link
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

LOG IN TO REPLY
Kirill
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Joined Jul 2009
724 posts
Chicago Burbs, IL
[MORE/SHARE]

bpalermini wrote in post #13573503external link
I's stick with the 70-200, fast sharp and even though there are no restrictions you can stay a bit away from the participants so as to not distract them. To me photographing in church is a lot about not distracting or bringing attention to myself.

As for flash I'd say if you need it use it if not don't. I rather like available light if it is good.

Here's what I shot at our church last weekend with my 70-200. You'll see in the second one, the light falls off quite a bit as you get to the side of the stage. The guitar player is in the light while the singer is in the fringe.

QUOTED IMAGE

QUOTED IMAGE

QUOTED IMAGE

This is similar to the results I got - it just doesn't have eye bleeding sharpness.

Post #7, Dec 20, 2011 21:17:56




LOG IN TO REPLY
Kirill
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Joined Jul 2009
724 posts
Chicago Burbs, IL
[MORE/SHARE]

nicksan wrote in post #13573558external link
Is your question about the same church or would you be shooting in different churches? I ask, because different churches have different policies with regards to photography and flash.


Those are typical settings that I use to shoot wedding ceremonies. f2.8 1/120-1/160 ISO1600 - 3200. I have no issues with those settings. I use the 70-200 f2.8 IS MKII quite a lot at ceremonies.

Very good question - I guess High Iso + 70-200 2.8 IS will cover almost all churches. What I need is something for photographer friendly churches.

Post #8, Dec 20, 2011 21:19:54




LOG IN TO REPLY
Kirill
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Joined Jul 2009
724 posts
Chicago Burbs, IL
[MORE/SHARE]

Red Tie Photography wrote in post #13575145external link
Since you are shooting on a 7d, why not look into the 17-55 IS. Better range on a crop and has IS.

I think it's a good one, but 55 may not be enough for the shots like priest pouring holy water.

Post #9, Dec 20, 2011 21:21:32




LOG IN TO REPLY
scorpio_e
Cream of the Crop
Joined Aug 2007
6,557 posts
Pa
[MORE/SHARE]

This was shot with a 30 1.4 if I used a 50 I would be shooting really tight.

IMAGE: http://steelcityphotography.zenfolio.com/img/s11/v29/p578506081-4.jpg

Post #10, Dec 21, 2011 06:44:26


http://steelcityphotog​raphy.zenfolio.com/external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
nicksan
Man I Like to Fart
nicksan's Avatar
Joined Oct 2006
24,585 posts
NYC
[MORE/SHARE]

Kirill wrote in post #13576709external link
Very good question - I guess High Iso + 70-200 2.8 IS will cover almost all churches. What I need is something for photographer friendly churches.

And what I was saying was photographer friendly or not, I usually don't use flash during the ceremony. Only when the light is too low will I ever use flash, provided I am allowed to use flash to begin with.

Post #11, Dec 21, 2011 09:40:10


NYC Wedding Photographerexternal link | Blogexternal link | facebookexternal link | Flickrexternal link | Gear

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Red ­ Tie ­ Photography
Goldmember
Red Tie Photography's Avatar
Joined Nov 2009
3,571 posts
San Diego
[MORE/SHARE]

Kirill wrote in post #13576721external link
I think it's a good one, but 55 may not be enough for the shots like priest pouring holy water.

That is why you have the 70-200. If you are worried about missing the 55-70mm focal length, just crop in on the image from the 17-55. It is much easier to cover that focal length with the 17-55 and the 70-200, it is really hard to get 17-24 if you are using the 24-70.

Post #12, Dec 21, 2011 12:43:03


Bryan
Gear Listexternal link
San Diego Wedding Photography - Red Tie Photographyexternal link
Red Tie Photography Blogexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Kirill
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Joined Jul 2009
724 posts
Chicago Burbs, IL
[MORE/SHARE]

Red Tie Photography wrote in post #13579642external link
That is why you have the 70-200. If you are worried about missing the 55-70mm focal length, just crop in on the image from the 17-55. It is much easier to cover that focal length with the 17-55 and the 70-200, it is really hard to get 17-24 if you are using the 24-70.

I think the answer is two bodies. Crop with 17-55, Full Frame with 70-200

Post #13, Dec 28, 2011 19:22:25




LOG IN TO REPLY
bigarchi
Senior Member
bigarchi's Avatar
Joined Mar 2008
962 posts
upstate ny
[MORE/SHARE]

Kirill wrote in post #13612252external link
I think the answer is two bodies. Crop with 17-55, Full Frame with 70-200

my favorite church zoom combo!

Post #14, Dec 29, 2011 07:57:14


~Mitch

my gear and feedback

LOG IN TO REPLY
SchwettyLens
Senior Member
Joined Sep 2010
197 posts
Golden, Colorado
[MORE/SHARE]

35L or 24L
No flash

Post #15, Dec 29, 2011 12:55:39


http://usagani.comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY


LIST NEARBY THREADS
4,590 views & 0 likes for this thread
Best Lens for church
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Weddings & Other Family Events Talk



NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO FORUMS

CHANGE BODY TEXT SIZE FOR ALL THREAD PAGES
POWERED BY AMASS 1.0version 1.0
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net


SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF  |  JUMP TO FORUM...  |  FORUM RULES


Spent 0.00085 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
1035 guests, 814 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014
Latest registered member is aaazzz0514

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality, we do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browser's data storage methods.