![]() |
|
|
#406 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 1,779
|
Very similar in size.
__________________
5D3 | ZE21 | 35L | 70-200LISII | 580EXII | 2xIII OMD EM-5 | 25 | 12-50 |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#407 |
|
Goldmember
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 2,928
|
Higgs,
I'm as big a fan of m4/3 as anybody, but that's just cheating |
|
|
|
|
|
#408 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Asia
Posts: 170
|
5DII 24-70, 550D 18-135, E-M5 12-50
![]() Size comparison by Photos by TDP, on Flickr ![]() Size comparison by Photos by TDP, on Flickr ![]() Size comparison by Photos by TDP, on Flickr ![]() Untitled by Photos by TDP, on Flickr |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#409 | ||
|
Member
|
Quote:
Quote:
I've been trying to get my GF (now wife) into interchangeable-lens photography for a while now. When I got my 7D, I paired my old Rebel XTi/400D with the 15-85IS, and tried to get her to use the combo instead of her Canon P&S w/ 4x zoom. No go. She felt it was way too heavy and too big for her. However, when I got the OM-D E-M5 with the 12-50 (and the Olympus 45/1.8 for shallow DOF, which is her main complaint about P&S compacts, including the S100), she fell in love with the m4/3 system instantly. As tdp_photos said, the OM-D E-M5 combo looks a lot bigger in photos than when you handles it in person. I pre-ordered it thinking it'll be a bit more portable, but when I picked up the combo in store, I was really surprised by how small it really was. Maybe it's the weight, or maybe the small diameter -- the 12-50 uses a 52mm filter, and the entire barrel is about the same width. The 15-85IS uses a 72mm filter, and the barrel is even "fatter".
__________________
Above water: 7D | 400D | 10-22 | 17-55IS | 15-85IS | 85/1.8 | 100L IS | 70-200/4L IS | 70-300IS | 100-400L | 580EX II Underwater: S95 + WP-DC38 + dual dive lights | Olympus OM-D E-M5 (await housing) Need/Want: More time for photography (And some talent would be nice.... |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#410 | |
|
Cream of the Crop
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 11,369
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#411 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 1,779
|
an iphone is pocket size.
an S100 is pocket size. an omd is street photography size. a rebel is tiny hands dslr size. a FF 5D is the size which all others are based upon. (i keed)
__________________
5D3 | ZE21 | 35L | 70-200LISII | 580EXII | 2xIII OMD EM-5 | 25 | 12-50 |
|
|
|
|
|
#412 |
|
Cream of the Crop
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 11,369
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#413 | |
|
Member
|
Quote:
I love your classification system -- succinct but you nailed the most important point right on the head. ![]() For me, I never had any illusions of squeezing any mirrorless into a pocket -- mirrorless is never supposed to compete for pocket-space with an iPhone or something like the S95/S100. It's a new species, ready to carve out its own niche inside serious photographers' camera bags.... Let's face it, as good as the S95/S100 may be, they are still MILES away in terms of IQ when compared to DSLR. Not to mention you are stuck with a fixed lens. Want something wider than 24/28mm FOV? Sorry, can't do. Want something longer than 105/120mm FOV? Forget it. Want portraits with blurred background? Not gonna happen. So, up until now, I've always carried, happily I might add, my 7D with 3-4 lenses whenever I go on trips. However, the weight quickly adds up even with "travel lenses" like the 70-200/4L IS and 10-22 as the lighter-than-average UWA. And the bulk -- there is usually not much room left for non-photography items after I stuff my 7D, 3-4 lenses, and 580EX into a carry-on-compliant backpack. In fact, often I'm forced to leave most lens hoods at home, and use a ghetto tri-fold rubber one instead. But I put up with the weight and the bulk, because there were simply no alternative formats which could offer anything close in terms of IQ. Well, the OM-D E-M5 is a game-changer. As mentioned several times already, it's shockingly lighter than a DSLR system. While the 12-50 is still somewhat long, it's amazingly "thin" -- felt like a salt shaker at first. Then the 45/1.8 is simply tiny compared to my 85/1.8 (which is already one of the smallest/lightest Canon lenses with decent IQ). For those not familiar with m4/3, the Olympus 45/1.8 takes a 37mm filter and weighs only 116 g!! And I haven't even explored the pancakes and folding power-zoom m4/3 lenses out there yet. However, the main reason the OM-D E-M5 is a game changer for me is its IQ. I haven't done my own head-to-head comparison yet, but DPReview already showed the E-M5 has cleaner ISO3200 and more DR than my 7D. That was what sold me on the m4/3.... Going forward, I still see myself keeping the S95/S100 since one just can't beat that pocketability. Nor do I plan to get rid of my DSLR system -- there are still things even the best m4/3 can't quite do yet. However, the E-M5 will definitely see more and more action in the future. Of course, YMMV.
__________________
Above water: 7D | 400D | 10-22 | 17-55IS | 15-85IS | 85/1.8 | 100L IS | 70-200/4L IS | 70-300IS | 100-400L | 580EX II Underwater: S95 + WP-DC38 + dual dive lights | Olympus OM-D E-M5 (await housing) Need/Want: More time for photography (And some talent would be nice.... Last edited by RetroBlader : 30th of May 2012 (Wed) at 20:10. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#414 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: NW MT
Posts: 114
|
I have a OMD all paid for and waiting at the store for me, I just cant seem to get back into the office ( I keep getting shuffled all over PA and NY the last 2 weeks) so I can go pick the damm thing up just chomping at the bit here Ughhhh
|
|
|
|
|
|
#415 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 499
|
Quote:
^^ Nice looking half-case! What brand? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#416 |
|
Tupperware Party Sheep
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,406
|
Mine finally arrived! I got the flash also, so I'm guessing us Aussies get the flash and 4/3 to m4/3 adaptor for free!
Of course a test shot: ![]() 1/30 @f/1.7 IS on handheld.. not too shabby
__________________
Ewan 1N - 5D2 - 15 2.8 - 17-40L- 24LII - 50L - 85 1.8 - 70-200 2.8 O-MD - 20 1.7 - 50 1.8 - 135 3.5 ewantupper.com - facebook fanpage - twitter - 500px |
|
|
|
|
|
#417 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 208
|
Quote:
The lens adaptor is the promo product till 30th June. Pre-ordered customers apparently have a choice of this lens adaptor or bigger flash unit (a much better choices I reckon).
__________________
Canon XTi/400D | Canon 50mm f/1.8 MkII | Sigma 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 OS | Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 | Canon 430EX | Canon PowerShot S2 (broken) | Canon PowerShot A70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#418 | |
|
Tupperware Party Sheep
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,406
|
Quote:
__________________
Ewan 1N - 5D2 - 15 2.8 - 17-40L- 24LII - 50L - 85 1.8 - 70-200 2.8 O-MD - 20 1.7 - 50 1.8 - 135 3.5 ewantupper.com - facebook fanpage - twitter - 500px |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#419 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Asia
Posts: 170
|
I ordered it from an online store here in Taiwan and it was dirt cheap. Got it, a black one, a brown leather wrist strap, battery case and lens case for 60 something US.
Helps a ton with holding the camera, just that added amount. |
|
|
|
|
|
#420 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 1,779
|
I had the option to get a lens adapter but I didn't. I'll never use it plus mail in rebates are annoying. If I was to ever buy a 4/3 lens I would just buy a FF lens instead. They aren't cheap.
__________________
5D3 | ZE21 | 35L | 70-200LISII | 580EXII | 2xIII OMD EM-5 | 25 | 12-50 |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| micro 4 thirds camera... | EOS mE | Camera Rumors and Predictions | 60 | 1st of October 2011 (Sat) 03:46 |