Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Thread started 13 Jan 2012 (Friday) 12:14
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Replacing Canon 55-250

 
stickpoole
Hatchling
2 posts
Joined Sep 2008
Jan 13, 2012 12:14 |  #1

I have the reached the point where I am able to make another lens purchase. I currently have a Canon 50D with Canon lenses 15-85, 50 1.4 and 55-250. A large portion of my shots have been of family events, vacations and grandkids. I am about to retire and we are planning to do some travelling and I hope to be able to spend more time on outdoor and landscape photography. To this end I have just added a travel tripod combo (Feisol 3441T with Markins Q3T. I want to replace the 55-250 lens. The two options that I have considered so far that are within my budget are:

1) Canon 70-200 F4 IS

or

2) Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM (non-L) plus a Canon 10-22 or Tokina 11-16

So the delimna here is better glass, or additional range on the wide angle end?




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
RTPVid
Goldmember
3,365 posts
Joined Aug 2010
MN
Jan 13, 2012 12:28 |  #2

Consider buying used and getting the 70-200 and the 10-22. If you haven't tried UWA landscapes, you're in for a treat, but it does take effort to learn to use UWA for really good images. Since you said you're primarily looking at UWA for landscape shots outside, the reports are the Tokina 11-16 has a difficult time with flare, while the Canon 10-22 is one of the best with flare control.

If you don't want to buy used, I'd suggest expanding your range into UWA and keep the 55-250 for awhile longer. I'm not sure the 70-300 non L is enough of an improvement over the 55-250 to make it worth the upgrade. The 55-250 really is quite good anyway.


Tom

LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
28,850 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Jan 13, 2012 12:35 |  #3

This is more about your priorities than the quality of the glass. I personally would value the upgrade in the longer lens over an ultrawide, but thats me.




LOG IN TO REPLY
RHChan84
Goldmember
RHChan84's Avatar
2,306 posts
Joined Apr 2011
Mass
Jan 13, 2012 12:48 |  #4

Between those two, 70-200f4L IS but if you want something with a bit more reach, the 70-300 non-l isn't bad but the Tamron 70-300 is a tad bit sharper at the 300mm range.


Canon (60D Gripped | 18-135mm f3.5-5.6 IS | 40mm f2.8 | 50mm f1.8 | 70-200 F4L IS| 430 EXII)
Tamron (17-50 f2.8 VC)
Feedback
Facebookexternal link

flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
botw
Goldmember
botw's Avatar
1,145 posts
Joined Feb 2009
Potomac, MD
Jan 13, 2012 12:50 |  #5

I wouldn't get any of the 70-300 (non-L)s to replace the 55-250. There's not enough difference in my opinion. YMMV.

An ultrawide would be a nice addition. You could probably swing one and the Canon 70-200 non-IS (which is great for outdoor/landscape photography).


www.gc5photography.comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
liegelr
Member
66 posts
Joined Jun 2011
Milwaukee, WI
Jan 13, 2012 13:43 |  #6

I'd vote 70-200 f/4L IS; the 70-300 just wouldn't be that exciting of an upgrade if it were me. Your 15-85 is reasonably wide for a non-dedicated wide-angle lens too (although yes, I know that 10mm vs 15mm is a big difference still).

If UWA is the main priority for you, then get one and hold onto the 55-250 a bit longer--it's still a pretty nice lens value.


Canon T3i w/ Canon 17-55 f/2.8 - Canon 18-55 - Canon 55-250 - Canon 50mm f/1.8

LOG IN TO REPLY
cfcRebel
Cream of the Crop
cfcRebel's Avatar
10,252 posts
Joined Feb 2005
Austin, TX
Jan 13, 2012 13:58 |  #7

I agree what others have suggested. Look into the used 10-22mm market since many folks going FF and letting go of some great condition 10-22mm for $600. I love mine on the 7D.
I tested my 55-250 against my 70-200 f2.8L non-IS at comparable FL and aperture. Let's put it this way, the 55-250 has UNBELIEVEABLE value. :D


Fee

Canon | SIGMA | TAMRON | Kenko | Amvona

LOG IN TO REPLY
amfoto1
Cream of the Crop
10,158 posts
Joined Aug 2007
San Jose, California
Jan 13, 2012 14:35 |  #8

The 70-200/4 IS would be a wonderful upgrade to your 55-250. But...

Personally I'd want something wider than 15mm. So I'd likely go with the second choice.

What about buying used? Doesn't have to be a Canon 10-22 (though that's an excellent lens) either. The Tokina 12-24 is excellent (less prone to flare than the Toki 11-16) if 12mm is wide enough. It can be found used for around $400, which is less than the Canon 10-22 typically.


Alan Myers "Walk softly and carry a big lens."
5DII, 7DII(x2), 7D(x2), other cameras. 10-22mm, Tokina 12-24/4, 20/2.8, TS 24/3.5L, 24-70/2.8L, 28/1.8, 28-135 IS (x2), TS 45/2.8, 50/1.4, Tamron 60/2.0, 70-200/4L IS, 70-200/2.8 IS, 85/1.8, Tamron 90/2.5 Macro, 100/2.8 USM, 100-400L II, 135/2L, 180/3.5L, 300/4L IS, 300/2.8L IS, 500/4L IS, EF 1.4X II, EF 2X II. Flashes, studio strobes & various access. - FLICKR (external link) - EXPOSUREMANAGER (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
Attomsk
Member
Attomsk's Avatar
152 posts
Joined Dec 2011
Jan 13, 2012 14:38 |  #9

I skipped the 55-250 and went straight for a used 70-200 F4 IS and so far I love it. It is a superb piece of equipment.

BTW I was able to pick up my mint copy of the 70-200 F4 IS for $800 so if you take the time to find a good deal you might be able to save a couple hundred and possibly fund both lenses.

That being said, if you can only pick one - only you can decide which type of photography you value more - wide landscape (which your 15-85 should do fairly well already) or telephoto. Good luck have fun on your travels.


My flickrexternal link | 600D gripped | Σ17-50 2.8 OS | 50 1.8 | 70-200L f4 IS

LOG IN TO REPLY
ceegee
Goldmember
2,320 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Montreal, Quebec
Jan 13, 2012 14:38 |  #10

I used to own the 70-300 non-L, and I wouldn't recommend it as a replacement for the 55-250. It isn't an upgrade; what you are getting is a bit more reach (the equivalent of a couple of steps backwards), at the expense of the 15 mm on the wide end, which makes the lens much more versatile.

I now own both the 70-200 f4 IS and the 55-250. The 70-200 is a considerable upgrade in terms of focusing speed - which is why I bought it - and build. It also has better contrast and colour rendition, although these can both be corrected easily in post-processing for the 55-250. If you photograph a lot of moving subjects or sports, the 70-200 is a worthy upgrade from the 55-250. Having said that, the 55-250 gives tremendous value for money: I kept mine even after buying the 70-200, as my vacation/hiking lens, when I don't want to carry the heavier and more expensive 70-200. It never lets me down and has produced many of my favourite images over the years.

As for the wide angle: your current lens is already fairly wide (15 mm). While an UWA would give you more scope, you might find you don't actually use it that much.

I'd suggest a third option to consider: a fast prime or a macro lens. Your existing lenses are both fairly good, and a prime or macro would significantly increase your creative possibilities for outdoor photography. I absolutely love my 60 macro. It offers constant f2.8, plus close-focusing capability and incredible sharpness. It does a terrific job on portraits, landscapes, close-ups, long exposures ... you name it, this lens can do it. It's tailor-made for crop cameras, and a lot of fun to use. However, there are a lot of other very nice prime lenses out there. Just a suggestion!


Gear: Canon 7D, Tokina 12-24 f/4, Canon 24-105L f4, Canon 70-300L, Canon 60 macro f/2.8, Speedlite 580 EXII, 2x AB800

Websiteexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
jrbdmb
Goldmember
jrbdmb's Avatar
1,282 posts
Joined May 2011
Jan 13, 2012 15:15 |  #11

Considering that you already have 15mm covered, you may want to think about the Sigma 8-16mm. Seems to be very highly regarded, and the widest zoom out there. (Nothing wrong with the Canon 10-22 either, of course.) The 70-200 f4L IS is also a great choice.

Which to go for first depend on what focal lengths you are using currently. I can only say that I had the 55-250 and 70-300 IS for a while, upgraded to a used 70-200 f4L IS, and now consider that my best lens.


Tools: 70D, 10-22, Tamron 24-70 VC, 70-300L, 135 f2L

LOG IN TO REPLY
dfbovey
Goldmember
1,602 posts
Joined Mar 2011
Jan 13, 2012 15:24 |  #12

I'd say keep the 55-250 unless you're planning on going full frame. I'd go the route that gives you something you don't already have and get the 10-22.


Flickrexternal link
Canon 1D markIV - Canon 1D markIII - Canon 6D
Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L - Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L - Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L - Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS - Canon EF 400mm f/5.6L - Canon EF 500mm f/4L

LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
I have been itching the new mellow Chet
gjl711's Avatar
50,090 posts
Joined Aug 2006
Deep in the heart of Texas
Jan 13, 2012 15:27 |  #13

When you look at all the pics you have taken with the 55-250, where are you mostly living. If it's at the 250 end nearly all the time, then the missing range is gonna be noticed. You might look a little more into the 70-300L. It's a surprisingly decent lens.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

LOG IN TO REPLY
mike_311
Checking squirrels nuts
Joined Mar 2011
Jan 13, 2012 15:39 |  #14

i just picked up an UWA and wow. i didnt know what i was missing.


Canon 5d mkii | Tamron 24-70/2.8 | Canon 85/1.8 | Canon 135/2L
www.michaelalestraphot​ography.com (external link)
Flickr (external link) | 500px (external link) | About me

LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
28,850 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Jan 13, 2012 15:45 |  #15

mike_311 wrote in post #13699669external link
i just picked up an UWA and wow. i didnt know what i was missing.

Just be aware that the novelty can wear off pretty quick. Dont get me wrong they have some uses, but the initial wow factor fades.




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

1,818 views & 0 likes for this thread
Replacing Canon 55-250
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00167 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.03s
Latest registered member is Emma mac
746 guests, 434 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 5577, that happened on Mar 02, 2016