![]() |
|
|
#16 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 84
|
Definitely recommend the upgrade to the 10-22mm or the 70-200mm L. You'll notice a great difference and improvement from the 55-250mm...
__________________
Fabio (NOT the I Can't Believe It's Not Butter guy) |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#17 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 714
|
I would think less about additional range, and think more about getting better quality glass. Since you said you are retiring and traveling, I would look at the 24-105 f4L. When you see the color, contrast and sharpness, you wonder why you waited so long. After that, it's a very slippery slope into L-L-Land.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Cream of the Crop
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 11,386
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#19 |
|
Cream of the Crop
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: San Diego County, California, USA
Posts: 7,113
|
The 70-200mm f/4L IS lens is the most wonderful lens I have ever used. Although the 70-200mm f/2.8L IS ii lens is a stop faster, the f/4L IS lens is light enough to carry everywhere and long enough on a 1.6x format to do most of my photography...
I love everything about the f/4L IS... The image quality is exceptional, the auto focus is quick and accurate, the IS allows me not to be a slave to low light levels. It is bult like a tank. I love the constant f/4 aperture and the non rotating front element... I use my 70-200mm f/4L IS lens 4-5x more often than I could ever use my previous non-IS version because of the ability to hand hold this lens... I shot a 2 week trip to China exclusively with the 70-200mm f/4L IS and 17-55mm f/2.8 IS lenses. See my China galleries at the smugmug site below...
__________________
See my images at http://rpcrowe.smugmug.com/ EQUIPMENT: Two Canon 7D cameras plus Canon D60 camera modified for full-time IR; Tokina 12-24mm f/4, 50mm f/1.8 Mark-I, 17-55mm f/2.8 IS, Tamron 90mm f/2.8 Macro, 135mm f/2.8 Soft Focus, 70-200mm f/4L IS, 300mm f/4L IS, and 400mm f/5.6L lenses; Last edited by RPCrowe : 13th of January 2012 (Fri) at 20:10. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2
|
Thanks to everyone for all the great advice. I like the idea of buying used and being able to get both the UWA and the 70-200. However, I have noticed that, particularly for the Canon 10-22, there is not a major difference in the price of new (Amazon) and used -- $75-125 difference. Significant difference but not necessarily a game changer. How reliable are sources for used lenses such as eBay and and the For Sale forum on this board and others? Your experiences would be very helpful.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
Goldmember
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 2,062
|
Quote:
__________________
EOS 5D III, EOS 7D,EOS Rebel T4i, Canon 70-200 f/2.8 IS II, Canon 24-105L, Canon 18-135 IS STM, 1.4x TC III, 2.0x TC III, Σ 50mm f/1.4, Σ 17-50 OS, Σ 70-200 OS, Σ 50-500 OS, Σ 1.4x TC, Σ 2.0x TC, 580EXII(3), Canon SX-40, Canon S100 Fond memories: Rebel T1i, Canon 18-55 IS, Canon 55-250 IS, 18-135 IS (Given to a good home)... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Goldmember
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: MN
Posts: 2,999
|
~$688 from Canon refurb. I know it's not a super bargain, but you can trust the supplier!
__________________
Tom |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Twining, Michigan USA
Posts: 746
|
Here what i did,,and very Happy,,,kept my Canon 55-250IS as a light,,& good lens,,,& got a new Tamron 70-300 VC,,heavy but 300mm is great,VC is very good,,much better than the Canon 70-300 IS i had and SOLD,,sure i would have liked a $2,000 Canon lens but cash did not allow that,,,,,My 2nd Tamron lens & i like them,,28-75 F2.8 is my other lens Ron
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Goldmember
|
I'd get 70-200, it's supposed to be a fantastic multipurpose lens. Your 15-85 should be good for landscapes.
70-300... I'd skip this one. It may be a bit better than 55-250 but twice as expensive, not worth it IMHO. I'd also keep 55-250, you're not going to get much for it anyway, and it's great for travel.
__________________
ex-Canon shooter (deserted) Life Lessons: KISS. RTFM. Don't sweat the small stuff. |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,279
|
I bought two used lenses off this forum's sell section and was very happy. My wife has also bought lenses here and we haven't had any issues at all. It's a good way to go.
__________________
Canon 1D markIV Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L - Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L - Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L - Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS - Canon EF 400mm f/5.6L |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Replacing my stolen DSLR : is Canon G12 is the best out there? | fe1ixs | Canon G-series Digital Cameras | 17 | 16th of February 2011 (Wed) 08:19 |
| Replacing Canon 17-85 with Sigma 17-70, but is it misfocusing? | pythagpython | Canon EF and EF-S Lenses | 52 | 8th of August 2008 (Fri) 02:55 |
| Replacing my Canon 17-85... taking a poll | acorean | Canon EF and EF-S Lenses | 45 | 7th of April 2007 (Sat) 17:43 |
| Replacing 17-50 2.8 Tamron with 24-70 L or 24-105 L Canon | mangkukhayun | Canon EF and EF-S Lenses | 13 | 30th of November 2006 (Thu) 07:31 |
| just read on another forum that canon is replacing the 20D | DeannaH | Camera Rumors and Predictions | 4 | 18th of February 2006 (Sat) 12:21 |