LOG IN    OR   REGISTER TO FORUMS


Replacing Canon 55-250

FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Thread started 13 Jan 2012 (Friday) 12:14   
LIST NEARBY THREADS
 
fab123
Member
fab123's Avatar
Joined Jan 2011
84 posts
Texas
[MORE/SHARE]

Definitely recommend the upgrade to the 10-22mm or the 70-200mm L. You'll notice a great difference and improvement from the 55-250mm...

Post #16, Jan 13, 2012 15:46:17 as a reply to post 13699669


Fabio (NOT the I Can't Believe It's Not Butter guy)

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
PhotoGeek
Goldmember
Joined Jan 2006
1,065 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

I would think less about additional range, and think more about getting better quality glass. Since you said you are retiring and traveling, I would look at the 24-105 f4L. When you see the color, contrast and sharpness, you wonder why you waited so long. After that, it's a very slippery slope into L-L-Land.

Post #17, Jan 13, 2012 15:54:03


1DX, 1DIII, lenses, flashes, wires and stuff
http://jimlanter.usexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
watt100
Cream of the Crop
Joined Jun 2008
13,790 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

cfcRebel wrote in post #13699163external link
I agree what others have suggested. Look into the used 10-22mm market since many folks going FF and letting go of some great condition 10-22mm for $600. I love mine on the 7D.
I tested my 55-250 against my 70-200 f2.8L non-IS at comparable FL and aperture. Let's put it this way, the 55-250 has UNBELIEVEABLE value. :D

dfbovey wrote in post #13699592external link
I'd say keep the 55-250 unless you're planning on going full frame. I'd go the route that gives you something you don't already have and get the 10-22.

I agree, unless you want more focal range (400mm) or a larger aperture (f2.8) keep the 55-250IS

Post #18, Jan 13, 2012 16:52:01




LOG IN TO REPLY
RPCrowe
Cream of the Crop
RPCrowe's Avatar
Joined Nov 2005
7,383 posts
San Diego County, California, USA
[MORE/SHARE]

I LOVE MY 70-200mm f/4L IS LENS

The 70-200mm f/4L IS lens is the most wonderful lens I have ever used. Although the 70-200mm f/2.8L IS ii lens is a stop faster, the f/4L IS lens is light enough to carry everywhere and long enough on a 1.6x format to do most of my photography...

I love everything about the f/4L IS... The image quality is exceptional, the auto focus is quick and accurate, the IS allows me not to be a slave to low light levels. It is bult like a tank. I love the constant f/4 aperture and the non rotating front element...

I use my 70-200mm f/4L IS lens 4-5x more often than I could ever use my previous non-IS version because of the ability to hand hold this lens...

I shot a 2 week trip to China exclusively with the 70-200mm f/4L IS and 17-55mm f/2.8 IS lenses. See my China galleries at the smugmug site below...

Post #19, Jan 13, 2012 20:08:26 as a reply to post 13699693


See my images at http://rpcrowe.smugmug​.com/external link
EQUIPMENT: Two Canon 7D cameras plus Canon D60 camera modified for full-time IR; Tokina 12-24mm f/4, 50mm f/1.8 Mark-I, 17-55mm f/2.8 IS, Tamron 90mm f/2.8 Macro, 135mm f/2.8 Soft Focus, 70-200mm f/4L IS, 300mm f/4L IS, and 400mm f/5.6L lenses;

LOG IN TO REPLY
stickpoole
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
Joined Sep 2008
2 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

Thanks to everyone for all the great advice. I like the idea of buying used and being able to get both the UWA and the 70-200. However, I have noticed that, particularly for the Canon 10-22, there is not a major difference in the price of new (Amazon) and used -- $75-125 difference. Significant difference but not necessarily a game changer. How reliable are sources for used lenses such as eBay and and the For Sale forum on this board and others? Your experiences would be very helpful.

Post #20, Jan 16, 2012 08:07:32




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
wayne.robbins
Goldmember
Joined Nov 2010
2,062 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

stickpoole wrote in post #13712427external link
Thanks to everyone for all the great advice. I like the idea of buying used and being able to get both the UWA and the 70-200. However, I have noticed that, particularly for the Canon 10-22, there is not a major difference in the price of new (Amazon) and used -- $75-125 difference. Significant difference but not necessarily a game changer. How reliable are sources for used lenses such as eBay and and the For Sale forum on this board and others? Your experiences would be very helpful.

Buyer beware ? Really though, if you can find someone local that has one such as on Craigslist- I'd think that is a better option. I'm sure that most transactions go without issues- but I'd rather buy new in most cases anyhow.

Post #21, Jan 16, 2012 13:39:55


EOS 5D III, EOS 7D,EOS Rebel T4i, Canon 70-200 f/2.8 IS II, Canon 24-105L, Canon 18-135 IS STM, 1.4x TC III, 2.0x TC III, Σ 50mm f/1.4, Σ 17-50 OS, Σ 70-200 OS, Σ 50-500 OS, Σ 1.4x TC, Σ 2.0x TC, 580EXII(3), Canon SX-40, Canon S100
Fond memories: Rebel T1i, Canon 18-55 IS, Canon 55-250 IS, 18-135 IS (Given to a good home)...

LOG IN TO REPLY
RTPVid
Goldmember
Joined Aug 2010
3,365 posts
MN
[MORE/SHARE]

~$688 from Canon refurb. I know it's not a super bargain, but you can trust the supplier!

Post #22, Jan 16, 2012 13:45:26


Tom

LOG IN TO REPLY
Ronnie ­ H
Goldmember
Joined Feb 2009
1,142 posts
Twining, Michigan USA
[MORE/SHARE]

Here what i did,,and very Happy,,,kept my Canon 55-250IS as a light,,& good lens,,,& got a new Tamron 70-300 VC,,heavy but 300mm is great,VC is very good,,much better than the Canon 70-300 IS i had and SOLD,,sure i would have liked a $2,000 Canon lens but cash did not allow that,,,,,My 2nd Tamron lens & i like them,,28-75 F2.8 is my other lens Ron

Post #23, Jan 16, 2012 13:49:34




LOG IN TO REPLY
Amamba
Goldmember
Amamba's Avatar
Joined Nov 2007
3,516 posts
SE MI
[MORE/SHARE]

I'd get 70-200, it's supposed to be a fantastic multipurpose lens. Your 15-85 should be good for landscapes.

70-300... I'd skip this one. It may be a bit better than 55-250 but twice as expensive, not worth it IMHO.

I'd also keep 55-250, you're not going to get much for it anyway, and it's great for travel.

Post #24, Jan 16, 2012 14:07:49


Ex-Canon shooter. Now Sony Nex.
Life Lessons: KISS. RTFM. Don't sweat the small stuff.
My Gear Listexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
dfbovey
Goldmember
Joined Mar 2011
1,593 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

I bought two used lenses off this forum's sell section and was very happy. My wife has also bought lenses here and we haven't had any issues at all. It's a good way to go.

Post #25, Jan 16, 2012 14:14:44


Flickrexternal link
Canon 1D markIV - Canon 1D markIII - Canon 6D
Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L - Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L - Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L - Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS - Canon EF 400mm f/5.6L - Canon EF 500mm f/4L

LOG IN TO REPLY


LIST NEARBY THREADS
1,613 views & 0 likes for this thread
Replacing Canon 55-250
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses



NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO FORUMS

CHANGE BODY TEXT SIZE FOR ALL THREAD PAGES
POWERED BY AMASS 1.0version 1.0
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net


SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF  |  JUMP TO FORUM...  |  FORUM RULES


Spent 0.00079 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
1162 guests, 801 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014
Latest registered member is rcbarr

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality, we do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browser's data storage methods.