Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Thread started 02 Feb 2012 (Thursday) 16:32
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Tamron 18-270 Di II VC PZD - Is it any Good?

 
huntingskeetman
Member
103 posts
Joined Dec 2008
Olmsted Falls,OH
Feb 02, 2012 16:32 |  #1

I recently picked up a Rebel XSi and want to get a versatile "carry" lens for an Alaskan cruise trip I am taking this spring. A local camera shop is having their annual "demo" sale, and I can get a Tamron 18-270 Di II VC PZD for $429.00. It would be considered a "new" sale and would come with its full 6yr warranty, and there is also a $50.00 rebate going now, which would bring final cost down to $379.00.

I've heard mixed reviews on this lens. Could someone give me some real life personal reviews of this lens if you do in fact own one. Thanks.


GARY

Canon 60D, 15-85IS, 60 macro, 100-400 IS, 430 EX II

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
joeblack2022
Goldmember
2,993 posts
Joined Sep 2011
The Great White North
Feb 02, 2012 16:36 |  #2

Have a look here:

http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=984677


Joel

LOG IN TO REPLY
davidc502
Goldmember
davidc502's Avatar
3,449 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Joined Dec 2010
Tennessee
Feb 02, 2012 16:53 |  #3

It's a very large range for just 1 lens, and that usually means "jack of all trades, master of none". It doesn't man you won't be happy with it. It just means if you're an enthusiast, it may not exactly please you with its performance.

I can tell you this... by the review below, it just isn't going to be sharp wide open.

http://thedigitalpictu​re.com ...omp=0&FLIComp=0&API​Comp=0external link


_
My Gear is ---> Here

LOG IN TO REPLY
huntingskeetman
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
103 posts
Joined Dec 2008
Olmsted Falls,OH
Feb 02, 2012 17:16 |  #4

I think for its intended purpose, its as good as anything else that is comparable, and for the price I can get it for it would be a good value. Portability is a key factor, I don't want to have to carry a big bag and change lenses all the time. If later on I get the "bug" and want to get more serious, then I would probably want to go after specialty lenses.


GARY

Canon 60D, 15-85IS, 60 macro, 100-400 IS, 430 EX II

LOG IN TO REPLY
Snydremark
Myth-informed
17,073 posts
Gallery: 26 photos
Joined Mar 2009
Issaquah, WA USA
Feb 02, 2012 17:25 |  #5

For $379 I'd snap it up; they make great travel lenses. That's what I've kept my 18-270 for, since it packs a lot smaller than all of the big guns.

The trade off is image quality than more specialized focal lengths; but it will work great for something like a cruise.


- Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlife (external link) (7D MkII, Canon 10-22 f/3.5-4.5, Canon 24-105L f/4 IS, Canon 70-200L f/2.8 IS MkII, Canon 100-400L f/4.5-5.6 IS)
"The easiest way to improve your photos is to adjust the loose nut between the shutter release and the ground."

LOG IN TO REPLY
GregoryF
Goldmember
GregoryF's Avatar
2,294 posts
Joined Jul 2010
Magalia, CA
Feb 02, 2012 18:51 |  #6

It is probably the best of the superzooms. You really can't go wrong for that price. If you decide that you don't like it you can easily sell it and get your money back.


6D, 5D, 7D, 50D, 40D, Xsi, PENTAX mx-1, Sony a6000, Sony a3000 too many lenses, flashes and aux. gear to list!:cool:
A simple hobby gone horribily wrong

LOG IN TO REPLY
huntingskeetman
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
103 posts
Joined Dec 2008
Olmsted Falls,OH
Feb 02, 2012 19:09 |  #7

Gregory, that's what I'm thinking also. I'll buy it and try it out before the cruise and if image quality is really that bad I'll dump it and get something else.


GARY

Canon 60D, 15-85IS, 60 macro, 100-400 IS, 430 EX II

LOG IN TO REPLY
firefighter4u
Goldmember
firefighter4u's Avatar
1,142 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Joined Jul 2009
Bradford, Pa
Feb 02, 2012 19:32 as a reply to huntingskeetman's post |  #8

I considered buying this lens just days ago, but because of the price I didn't think it was worth it. Now, if I could have gotten it at the price you listed, I think I would have pulled the trigger... for what its worth.


7D; 450D; Canon 50 1.4; 70-200 2.8L II; Tamron 17-50 2.8; Tamron 18-270 VC; Genesis 200; 430EX; YN 560II
Please support breast cancer research

LOG IN TO REPLY
huntingskeetman
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
103 posts
Joined Dec 2008
Olmsted Falls,OH
Feb 02, 2012 19:43 |  #9

I think you guys have convinced me to get the lens, I know the manager and he has the lens on hold for me. I'll try it out and return it if I'm not happy with it after a few days.


GARY

Canon 60D, 15-85IS, 60 macro, 100-400 IS, 430 EX II

LOG IN TO REPLY
gocolts
Goldmember
1,233 posts
Joined Oct 2010
Feb 02, 2012 20:29 |  #10

My wife has it on her T1i, it's the only lens she takes when we're traveling and plan to do a decent amount of shooting outdoors. It covers about any focal length you could need, it's small, light, and the VC on it is pretty good. As for IQ, I've found plenty of keepers with it in good light, any sharpness/contrast issues have been solved in 30 seconds in Adobe Photoshop for us.

Superzooms get a bad rap sometimes, but sometimes it's fun to just go out and shoot without a bunch of gear, and know what you have with you will cover any need you have. I find the Tamron is good enough for the majority of casual usages, and makes having a camera with you a much easier proposition sometimes.

And for that price, you can always sell it and lose very little if you don't like it.




LOG IN TO REPLY
joeblack2022
Goldmember
2,993 posts
Joined Sep 2011
The Great White North
Feb 03, 2012 09:28 |  #11

Not that you need anymore convincing but the versatility should serve you well - I went on vacation only packing a Nifty Fifty (50mm f/1.8)and I missed out on some good shots. I did this thinking I'd just move my feet and wouldn't need flash for low light.

Sometimes I just couldn't back up far enough and while the night shots looked good on the LCD, there were only a few were keepers in the end.


Joel

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

3,252 views & 0 likes for this thread
Tamron 18-270 Di II VC PZD - Is it any Good?
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.0034 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.04s
Latest registered member is junkyardninja
730 guests, 599 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6106, that happened on Jun 09, 2016