Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Sports Talk
Thread started 06 Feb 2012 (Monday) 12:39
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

To level your photos or not

 
groovehouse
Senior Member
287 posts
Joined Mar 2010
Houston, TX
Feb 06, 2012 12:39 |  #1

Can I get some feedback on an issue that I'm struggling with?

Personally, I feel that if you are shooting sports and you can see the baseline, horizon or a fence along the back of the field, you should try to level your shot a little. I mean maybe having the image cranked 20-45 degrees adds an "arty" look (dutch angle) but seriously, sometimes, to me, it's just sloppy.

Am I being too critical? I don't see crazy angles in the shots I see in my local paper or in sports magazines or websites.

What do you think?

For an example of what I'm talking about...

See this slideshow with crooked angles:
http://www.houstonpres​s.com ...at-suns-99-81-36079147/#4external link

Then check out my slideshow:
http://www.houstonpres​s.com ...kets-vs-nola-35971391/#25external link

I feel that about 98% of my shots are level, certainly one or two might get away from me in post processing, but I try my hardest to make sure my shots are level. Once again, am I too critical? Does it even matter?


Flickrexternal link | Blogexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
FlyingPhotog
Cream of the "Prop"
FlyingPhotog's Avatar
57,560 posts
Joined May 2007
Probably Chasing Aircraft
Feb 06, 2012 12:42 |  #2

Being keystoned to sidelines, baselines, foul lines, etc. means they can't always be "level" but verticals should always be vertical!


Jay
Crosswind Imagesexternal link
Facebook Fan Pageexternal link

"If you aren't getting extraordinary images from today's dSLRs, regardless of brand, it's not the camera!" - Bill Fortney, Nikon Corp.

LOG IN TO REPLY
joedlh
Goldmember
joedlh's Avatar
Joined Dec 2007
Long Island, NY, North America, Sol III, Orion Spur of the Milky Way galaxy.
Feb 06, 2012 12:43 |  #3

I agree with you: they should be level. However, it's clear that not all photographers hold this line. I often see crooked pictures in the NY Times, which bills itself as "the paper of record". Is it possible that straightening an image violates a basic tenet against photo-manipulation for journalistic use?


Joe
Gear: Kodak Instamatic, Polaroid Swinger. Oh you meant gear now. :rolleyes:
http://photo.joedlh.ne​texternal link
Editing ok

LOG IN TO REPLY
groovehouse
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
287 posts
Joined Mar 2010
Houston, TX
Feb 06, 2012 12:50 |  #4

joedlh wrote in post #13835226external link
Is it possible that straightening an image violates a basic tenet against photo-manipulation for journalistic use?

That's a good question. Does it? I don't feel it does. I agree that changing the angle of the shot is "manipulating the photo" but I don't feel that it's the same as photoshopping in a ball or player or even erasing something in the image. I think leveling a shot should not fall in that category. But I don't know. I wonder what a professional photo editor thinks?


Flickrexternal link | Blogexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
dankopp
Member
192 posts
Joined Oct 2009
Feb 06, 2012 13:15 |  #5

There is currently a contentious debate going on at SportsShooter.com about modifying photos. Cropping and color correction seem to be universally allowed. I would think leveling is the same as cropping.




LOG IN TO REPLY
MT ­ Stringer
Goldmember
MT Stringer's Avatar
4,650 posts
Joined May 2006
Channelview, Tx
Feb 06, 2012 13:26 |  #6

I would think leveling is the same as cropping.

In Lightroom, the straighten tool is in affect when you have the crop tool activated. So, I say it is OK. I hope so because I have a hard time keeping the camera perfectly level when it is on the monopod.


MaxPreps Profileexternal link

My Gear List

LOG IN TO REPLY
J.Napier
Senior Member
J.Napier's Avatar
886 posts
Joined Aug 2007
Washington State
Feb 06, 2012 14:05 |  #7

Leveling is just like cropping and should be done always IMO in a sports shot,as well as exposer and color correction if its needed.I find myself straitening my other types of work too somtimes to much probebly.


Jeff
Gear List
www.jni-ss.com /external linkBlogexternal link
Sportshooterpageexternal link / Maxprepsexternal link
Facebook external link/

LOG IN TO REPLY
bpalermini
Senior Member
bpalermini's Avatar
Joined Mar 2011
Los Angeles, California
Feb 06, 2012 14:28 as a reply to J.Napier's post |  #8

I always level my shots. I can't stand the slanted ones and I've never liked portraits, etc that are at a diagonal.


Bob Palermini
1DX, 1DIV, 16-35L, 14 Rokinon, 24-70L II, 100L, 70-200 IS 2.8L, 300 IS 2.8L, 400mm 2.8 IS II, 1.4xIII, 2xIII, 580EXII, YN560IV, RRS TVC23 + BH55, LRCC, Fuji X30
My Web Site (external link) | My Sports Portfolio (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
Hannya
Senior Member
Hannya's Avatar
875 posts
Joined Apr 2008
UK
Feb 09, 2012 03:27 |  #9

Hi. Wonky horizons smack of amateur shots as do incorrectly cropped shots. If youre wiring images to the press you are under pressure to get that right in camera but if you can do it in pp then i think its part of you job to present your pics well


“Your first 10,000 photographs are your worst.” ― Henri Cartier-Bresson

Sports Picsexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
john5189
Senior Member
597 posts
Joined Dec 2008
Feb 09, 2012 04:09 |  #10

There is nothing cheating about levelling a shot with PP software.
In the days of the darkroom the shot would have been levelled a the printing stage.
That was never considered cheating. As also dodge and burn under the enlarger was not considered cheating.
There is nothing wrong with the endeavour to try and take the perfect shoot . Though you are manipulating everything around the camera (lights and reflectors everywhere) .


Wedding Photography in Herefordshire.  (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
Drewc2010
Goldmember
Drewc2010's Avatar
1,369 posts
Joined Jan 2011
Greenville, NC
Feb 09, 2012 14:14 |  #11

I agree 100% for leveling your shots. For me I shoot NHL, the Hurricanes in particular, and I can't tell you how much it bugs me that the AP guys and Getty guys don't care about their horizons, when that is one of the main things I look for with my pictures...it shouldn't look like your player is running/skating/jumpin​g up or down hill at all, it's just not naturally what the people there were seeing and thats what sports shooting is all about.


My Gear:
Canon 1D Mark III / Canon 60D / Tokina 12-24 f/4 / Tamron 24-70 f/2.8 VC / Tamron 70-200 f/2.8 VC / Canon 300 f/4L / Canon 50 f/1.8 /
Facebook Page: facebook.com/drewcphot​ographyexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
geoff5093
Senior Member
geoff5093's Avatar
972 posts
Joined Jul 2008
Goffstown, NH
Feb 09, 2012 18:36 |  #12

I always level my sport shots, there are only certain circumstances where I feel that a slightly tilted photo can work.


5D Mark III
Canon 24-70L II | Canon 70-200 2.8L IS II | Tamron 150-600 | Sigma 35 1.4

LOG IN TO REPLY
groovehouse
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
287 posts
Joined Mar 2010
Houston, TX
Feb 10, 2012 11:36 |  #13

Hannya wrote in post #13854158external link
Hi. Wonky horizons smack of amateur shots as do incorrectly cropped shots. If youre wiring images to the press you are under pressure to get that right in camera but if you can do it in pp then i think its part of you job to present your pics well

I agree wholeheartedly.

Drewc2010 wrote in post #13856889external link
I agree 100% for leveling your shots. For me I shoot NHL, the Hurricanes in particular, and I can't tell you how much it bugs me that the AP guys and Getty guys don't care about their horizons, when that is one of the main things I look for with my pictures...it shouldn't look like your player is running/skating/jumpin​g up or down hill at all, it's just not naturally what the people there were seeing and thats what sports shooting is all about.

I couldn't agree more... I like to call them "earthquake shots" -- "What, did we have an earthquake during that shot?" I don't think so...


Flickrexternal link | Blogexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Drewc2010
Goldmember
Drewc2010's Avatar
1,369 posts
Joined Jan 2011
Greenville, NC
Feb 10, 2012 12:54 |  #14

groovehouse wrote in post #13862632external link
I couldn't agree more... I like to call them "earthquake shots" -- "What, did we have an earthquake during that shot?" I don't think so...

Thats usually the excuse I like to use haha the only photo's I don't level are the ones that when I level it, I will cut out something important in the photo such as part of a player or the puck or stick...etc


My Gear:
Canon 1D Mark III / Canon 60D / Tokina 12-24 f/4 / Tamron 24-70 f/2.8 VC / Tamron 70-200 f/2.8 VC / Canon 300 f/4L / Canon 50 f/1.8 /
Facebook Page: facebook.com/drewcphot​ographyexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
13inches
Senior Member
389 posts
Joined Jan 2008
Toronto, Canada
Feb 10, 2012 14:31 |  #15

I like to slant my photos about 13-22 degrees. It gives them a hip, modern look.


Of course, I'm kidding

(or am I?)


.

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

1,564 views & 0 likes for this thread
To level your photos or not
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Sports Talk


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00089 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.03s
Latest registered member is Kenny Lane
966 guests, 721 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 5175, that happened on Jun 16, 2015