Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
Thread started 24 Feb 2012 (Friday) 15:28
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Auto focus with teleconverter.

 
blakeG!
Goldmember
Avatar
1,405 posts
Joined May 2010
Location: Oklahoma
     
Feb 24, 2012 15:28 |  #1

I'm about to pick up a 100-400 and would like to get a 2x teleconverter to use for longer shots. Do teleconverters support autofocus and IS? If so, which brands do? I have a 7D if that makes any difference.
Thanks in advance!


-Blake
EOS 7D
Canon 100mm F 2.8 Macro, Canon 400mm 5.6L, Tokina 11-16mm 2.8, Canon 28-135,Canon 430exii

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
Snydremark
my very own Lightrules moment
18,139 posts
Gallery: 44 photos
Likes: 1241
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Issaquah, WA USA
     
Feb 24, 2012 15:34 |  #2

IS, yes; you'll lose AF with a 2x on the 100-400, as that will drop your max aperture to f/11.

I had ok results with the 2x MkIII TC + 100-400, when I was testing out the 2x with my 70-200; but the 'Pump' was manual focus only with it. So I couldn't justify keeping it when it didn't work for anything on the 70-200.


- Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlife (external link) (7D MkII/5D IV, Canon 10-22 f/3.5-4.5, Canon 24-105L f/4 IS, Canon 70-200L f/2.8 IS MkII, Canon 100-400L f/4.5-5.6 IS I/II)
"The easiest way to improve your photos is to adjust the loose nut between the shutter release and the ground."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
watt100
Cream of the Crop
14,021 posts
Likes: 29
Joined Jun 2008
     
Feb 24, 2012 15:42 |  #3

blakeG! wrote in post #13960399 (external link)
I'm about to pick up a 100-400 and would like to get a 2x teleconverter to use for longer shots. Do teleconverters support autofocus and IS? If so, which brands do? I have a 7D if that makes any difference.
Thanks in advance!


Do a search, the Kenko Pro 300 DGX 1.4x teleconverter works on the 100-400 with autofocus and IS




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wallace ­ River
" ...a bit of a pervy voyeur "
Avatar
12,377 posts
Gallery: 121 photos
Best ofs: 5
Likes: 2840
Joined Jul 2010
Location: Wallace, Nova Scotia
     
Feb 24, 2012 15:44 |  #4

You will lose autofocus on this lens with any Canon extender, on anything but a 1D camera. A 1.4 will make the f5.6 into f8 and a 2X will be f11. You lose one and two f-stops respectively with the TC's. There is a way to fool the camera and make it try to autofocus by putting scotch tape over certain electrical contacts (I tried it) but it's unreliable and still realllllly slllooowww to focus except in real bright sunlight. Not worth it.


IAN - Living life on the shores of the Wallace River in northern Nova Scotia, Canada :
Canon 1D4, 1D-X, almost enough glass.
My Flickr (external link). http://ianmurray.zenfo​lio.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
blakeG!
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,405 posts
Joined May 2010
Location: Oklahoma
     
Feb 24, 2012 15:50 |  #5

So you lose autofocus with the 2x. if I were to get a 1.4 tele, I would keep autofocus and IS?


-Blake
EOS 7D
Canon 100mm F 2.8 Macro, Canon 400mm 5.6L, Tokina 11-16mm 2.8, Canon 28-135,Canon 430exii

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pol024
Member
166 posts
Joined Sep 2009
     
Feb 24, 2012 15:52 |  #6

on a 7d yes




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Snydremark
my very own Lightrules moment
18,139 posts
Gallery: 44 photos
Likes: 1241
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Issaquah, WA USA
     
Feb 24, 2012 15:54 |  #7

blakeG! wrote in post #13960574 (external link)
So you lose autofocus with the 2x. if I were to get a 1.4 tele, I would keep autofocus and IS?

Maybe. Some of the 1.4s won't report the focal length change to the camera and AF will remain on; however, it still may slow down and/or be inaccurate enough to not be worth it.

All you can do is try and see how you like the results.

[EDIT: PS; don't get the Canon 1.4. The Kenkos tend to give better results in that range of TC]


- Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlife (external link) (7D MkII/5D IV, Canon 10-22 f/3.5-4.5, Canon 24-105L f/4 IS, Canon 70-200L f/2.8 IS MkII, Canon 100-400L f/4.5-5.6 IS I/II)
"The easiest way to improve your photos is to adjust the loose nut between the shutter release and the ground."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
blakeG!
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,405 posts
Joined May 2010
Location: Oklahoma
     
Feb 24, 2012 16:12 |  #8

Snydremark wrote in post #13960598 (external link)
Maybe. Some of the 1.4s won't report the focal length change to the camera and AF will remain on; however, it still may slow down and/or be inaccurate enough to not be worth it.

All you can do is try and see how you like the results.

[EDIT: PS; don't get the Canon 1.4. The Kenkos tend to give better results in that range of TC]

I plan on getting a kenko. Along with kenko extension tubes for my macro work :)


-Blake
EOS 7D
Canon 100mm F 2.8 Macro, Canon 400mm 5.6L, Tokina 11-16mm 2.8, Canon 28-135,Canon 430exii

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
fredrikb81
Member
109 posts
Joined Dec 2010
     
Feb 24, 2012 18:11 as a reply to  @ blakeG!'s post |  #9

Don't bother with the extender on a 100-400 lens unless you plan on using it with manual focus. You will only be disappointed if you expect ANY AF capabilities.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
blakeG!
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,405 posts
Joined May 2010
Location: Oklahoma
     
Feb 25, 2012 02:45 |  #10

fredrikb81 wrote in post #13961333 (external link)
Don't bother with the extender on a 100-400 lens unless you plan on using it with manual focus. You will only be disappointed if you expect ANY AF capabilities.

I will mostly be using it for moon and bird shots. With birds that far away, I should be able to use live view to focus pretty spot on.


-Blake
EOS 7D
Canon 100mm F 2.8 Macro, Canon 400mm 5.6L, Tokina 11-16mm 2.8, Canon 28-135,Canon 430exii

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Invertalon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,494 posts
Likes: 19
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Cleveland, OH
     
Feb 25, 2012 10:12 |  #11

When I used a 1.4x TC with the 400 f/5.6 when I had it (taped pins) AF was terrible. But it still was nice to have the reach, and just pre-set the focus via live-view... For birding and such.


-Steve
Facebook (external link)
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
amfoto1
Cream of the Crop
10,247 posts
Likes: 74
Joined Aug 2007
Location: San Jose, California
     
Feb 25, 2012 11:38 |  #12

Don't expect great image quality with a teleconverter on a zoom. With a few exceptions (such as the Canon 70-200/2.8 IS Mark II with the Canon 2X Mark III), teleconverters work best with prime lenses.

A 1.4X "costs" one stop of light and a 2X "costs" two stops. So an f5.6 lens with a 1.4X added "becomes" an f8 lens. And a 2X on the same lens makes it an f11 lens. Technically, Canon cameras other than the 1D series are not supposed to be able to auto focus with less than f5.6 lens. You might still be able to manually focus, but your viewfinder will be dimmer too.

There are some tricks to try to get the lens to try to auto focus with a teleconverter. Use a third party TC that doesn't "report" to the camera. With TCs that report, you can tape up a couple of the electronic contacts so the camera doesn't know it's there. There are illustrations how to do this here on POTN and elsewhere on the Internet. Do a search if interested. Either way, the EXIF will only show the lens, not the lens + TC focal length.

However, "tricking" the camera will give reduced AF performance. It will be slower and it will hunt more... might fail more in lower light or lower contrast situations.

And adding the optics of a TC always costs some image quality. Less with a weaker TC (1.4X) than with stronger ones (2X). It can be very little loss with more ideal lens/TC combos... or a lot with less ideal combinations. In general, the 100-400 is not a very good zoom to use with teleconverters. But some people make it work adequately for their purposes.

Have you considered simply getting a longer lens, instead? For example, the Sigma 150-500mm lens alone might serve better than a 100-400 with a 1.4X. The Sigma also costs about $500 less.


Alan Myers (external link) "Walk softly and carry a big lens."
5DII, 7DII(x2), 7D(x2) & other cameras. 10-22mm, Tokina 12-24/4, 20/2.8, TS 24/3.5L, 24-70/2.8L, 28/1.8, 28-135 IS (x2), TS 45/2.8, 50/1.4, Tamron 60/2.0, 70-200/4L IS, 70-200/2.8 IS, 85/1.8, Tamron 90/2.5 Macro, 100/2.8 USM, 100-400L II, 135/2L, 180/3.5L, 300/4L IS (x2), 300/2.8L IS, 500/4L IS, EF 1.4X II, EF 2X II. Flashes, studio strobes & various access. - FLICKR (external link) - ZENFOLIO (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
troutfisher
Goldmember
Avatar
1,659 posts
Gallery: 23 photos
Likes: 29
Joined Apr 2007
Location: West Yorkshire UK
     
Feb 25, 2012 11:52 |  #13

Personally having tried the combination of a 7D+100/400+Kenko 1.4TC (with the pins taped ) in good light I would not bother just stick to the lens +camera.
The 7D +100/400 is quite croppable, one of the benefits of 18MP.
This is about 70 yards away from my house and while there is not much feather detail I would not expect it at that distance.

IMAGE: http://merlinphotographics.zenfolio.com/img/s3/v45/p491260951-4.jpg


BTW I tried it with the TC and had to MF hand holding so all the shots were OOF.

if you want to read up on pin taping this http://www.michaelfurt​man.com/taping_the_pin​s.htm (external link) gives lots of info.
Like amfoto1 says if you need longer than 400mm try a longer lens

Chris
" Age and treachery will always defeat youth and enthusiasm"

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Fiddlefingers
Member
Avatar
195 posts
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Scotland
     
Feb 25, 2012 13:08 |  #14

AF will work in LiveView with any combination of lens + extender e.g. 400mm f5.6 plus 2x extender. It's very slow, but useable for stationary or slow moving objects. Best to focus just past the subject as the af always seems to go from far focus to close and back again until it finds focus. Therefore, it takes much less time to lock on if you firstly focus just past the subject.


http://www.tomgilland.​co.uk (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
blakeG!
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,405 posts
Joined May 2010
Location: Oklahoma
     
Feb 25, 2012 13:50 |  #15

Thank you for all the input everyone. Greatly appreciated. I'm guessing a tele would have a lot better IQ with a prime. Such as the 400 5.6. Decisions decisions...


-Blake
EOS 7D
Canon 100mm F 2.8 Macro, Canon 400mm 5.6L, Tokina 11-16mm 2.8, Canon 28-135,Canon 430exii

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

5,980 views & 0 likes for this thread
Auto focus with teleconverter.
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is johnowens
666 guests, 332 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.