Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Visual Enjoyment Astronomy & Celestial 
Thread started 26 Feb 2012 (Sunday) 00:42
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Clear night, 2nd star capture attempt

 
compudaze
Member
121 posts
Joined Nov 2011
     
Feb 26, 2012 00:42 |  #1

This is my second attempt at trying to capture the stars. I really need to get away from the city to do this. Please don't mind the huge dust spec near the power wire. I can't believe I didn't notice it during previews. I think I was more worried about not being able to feel my hands due to the cold.

I originally planned on taking 15-20 photos after I found my subjects and trying to use DSS, but that series got canned after I seen a much larger smudge on the lens which showed up on the photos. I was really bummed about that.

I think next time if I don't make it out of the city, I'm going to trying zooming in a bit to avoid some of the surrounding light pollution and bumping ISO up to 3200 to make up for the shorter shutter speed. Good idea or no?

Here's the one photo I feel I was able to salvage. I ended up doing a bit of PP to bring out the stars. Hopefully it doesn't look too bad.

IMAGE: http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7209/6930620239_36145464a5_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/compudaze/69306​20239/  (external link)
Star Night #2 (external link) by compudaze (external link), on Flickr

Canon EOS 60D Gripped, Sigma 17-50mm f/2.8, Canon 70-200mm f/4L IS, Canon 55-250mm IS II, Canon 28mm f/1.8, Canon 85mm f/1.8, 2x Canon Speedlite 430EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
x_tan
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,128 posts
Gallery: 137 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 302
Joined Sep 2010
Location: ɐılɐɹʇsnɐ 'ǝuɹnoqlǝɯ
     
Feb 26, 2012 05:25 |  #2

The power-lines are just ruing the photo.
Also, too much light pollution.


Canon 5D3 + Zoom (EF 17-40L, 24-105L & 28-300L, 100-400L II) & Prime (24L II, 85L II, 100L, 135L & 200 f/2.8L II; Zeiss 1,4/35)
Sony α7r + Zeiss 1,8/55 FE
Nikon Coolpix A; Nikon F3 & F100 + Zeiss 1,4/50
Retiring  (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
compudaze
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
121 posts
Joined Nov 2011
     
Feb 27, 2012 12:58 |  #3

I thought about trying to remove the power lines, but there was so much light pollution I didn't bother trying to save it. This is only my second attempt at this. Hopefully soon I'll have time to venture out of the city to get away from most the light pollution and give this a serious attempt.


Canon EOS 60D Gripped, Sigma 17-50mm f/2.8, Canon 70-200mm f/4L IS, Canon 55-250mm IS II, Canon 28mm f/1.8, Canon 85mm f/1.8, 2x Canon Speedlite 430EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Todd ­ Lambert
I don't like titles
Avatar
12,620 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Likes: 115
Joined May 2009
Location: On The Roads Across America
     
Feb 27, 2012 13:01 |  #4

I'll support what x_tan wrote about the power line and the light pollution.... and I'll add that the spot you're referring to is, most likely, flare, and not a dust spot. It's far too big to be a dust spot.


Year of Night - 365 Night Project - check it out! (external link)

Follow me into the night.
Unique Night Photography - twilightscapes.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
compudaze
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
121 posts
Joined Nov 2011
     
Feb 27, 2012 13:24 |  #5

Todd Lambert wrote in post #13976867 (external link)
I'll support what x_tan wrote about the power line and the light pollution.... and I'll add that the spot you're referring to is, most likely, flare, and not a dust spot. It's far too big to be a dust spot.

Ahh. Thanks for the clarification.


Canon EOS 60D Gripped, Sigma 17-50mm f/2.8, Canon 70-200mm f/4L IS, Canon 55-250mm IS II, Canon 28mm f/1.8, Canon 85mm f/1.8, 2x Canon Speedlite 430EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
compudaze
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
121 posts
Joined Nov 2011
     
Feb 28, 2012 23:43 |  #6

I've removed the power lines and attempted to do something about the light pollution. Does this look any better? Does it look over-processed? Just for kicks I've included the unedited version. Thanks for your input.

IMAGE: http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7192/6940325449_1c3d011c80_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/compudaze/69403​25449/  (external link)
Star Night #2 Re-edit (external link) by compudaze (external link), on Flickr

IMAGE NOT FOUND
IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

Canon EOS 60D Gripped, Sigma 17-50mm f/2.8, Canon 70-200mm f/4L IS, Canon 55-250mm IS II, Canon 28mm f/1.8, Canon 85mm f/1.8, 2x Canon Speedlite 430EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SCMatt
Member
Avatar
84 posts
Gallery: 16 photos
Likes: 96
Joined May 2011
Location: Columbia SC
     
Feb 29, 2012 10:22 |  #7

I personally like it, even with powerlines, tree, and light pollution. Not just a picture of the sky, which dare I say, seems boring to me. Not all of us are blessed with dark skies at home or the time/ability to drive out to find them. The flare spot is a bit annoying, but otherwise I like the first image you posted opposed to any of the others especially being first/second attempt.


flickr (external link) | Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rick_reno
Cream of the Crop
44,636 posts
Likes: 123
Joined Dec 2010
     
Feb 29, 2012 12:29 |  #8

nice, i like the one with the lines/light best




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

1,491 views & 0 likes for this thread
Clear night, 2nd star capture attempt
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Visual Enjoyment Astronomy & Celestial 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.0forum software
version 2.0 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is mason.snipes
591 guests, 326 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.