Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Thread started 02 Mar 2012 (Friday) 09:55
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Sigma 70-200 f2.8 OS vs Canon 70-200 f2.8 IS MK 1

 
koppite
Junior Member
27 posts
Joined Jan 2011
Mar 02, 2012 09:55 |  #1

Hi guys, I am about to press the "buy" button for the Sigma 70-200mm OS HSM. Will I regret this choice? I can't afford the Canon Mk 2. I managed to find the Mark 1 at US$1450 used, in fact 2 of them and their lens codes are UT and UU. Then one retailer popped up with a brand new Sigma OS at US$1200.

I am gonna go for the Sigma. Does that makes good sense? I am on 5D btw...Thanks guys!




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Tarzanman
Senior Member
548 posts
Joined Feb 2009
Mar 02, 2012 10:03 |  #2

Look for one used instead. I have the older version of the Sigma 70-200 f/2.8 HSM. I paid $500, and in my opinion it isn't worth much more than that.

Occasional focus issues, poor IQ at the long end, soft and warm at f/2.8. For a $200 difference (16%), I would go with the lens that is known to perform better.




LOG IN TO REPLY
koppite
THREAD ­ STARTER
Junior Member
27 posts
Joined Jan 2011
Mar 02, 2012 10:13 |  #3

Tarzanman wrote in post #14006814external link
Occasional focus issues, poor IQ at the long end, soft and warm at f/2.8. For a $200 difference (16%), I would go with the lens that is known to perform better.

Does that occurs with the latest OS version as well? :(




LOG IN TO REPLY
gabebalazs
Bird Whisperer
gabebalazs's Avatar
Joined Nov 2008
Toledo, OH
Mar 02, 2012 10:24 |  #4

The new OS version is not just simply an old version with OS. It's a new optical design too. It is much better than the old one AND unanimously considered a little better than the Canon 70-200 2.8 IS I.
So in my opinion the Sigma 70-200 OS, especially new, is a better buy than the old Canon. The Mark II Canon betters both of them, but the price is outrageous too compared to them.

Here is quick BIF shot I took yesterday, with the Sigma 70-200 OS PLUS a Canon 2x III TC, AI Servo, ISO 1600, 400mm, f/6.3 under very gray sky. So, far from ideal conditions...

IMAGE: http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7038/6800538410_fc22fcc2aa_b.jpg
[IMAGE'S LINK: http://www.flickr.com .../29108710@N04/68005​38410/] (external link)
Canada Goose in Flight (external link) by gabebalazs (external link), on Flickr

5DIV | 5DIII | 6D | 80D | A7RII | Canon 24-70 2.8L II | 70-200 2.8L IS II | 24-105 f/4L IS | 16-35 f/4L IS | 135 f/2L | 85 1.8 | 50 1.8 STM | 18-135 IS STM | SONY FE 28-70 OSS | Tamron 17-50 2.8 | Tamron 150-600 | Ʃ 35 1.4 ART | Rokinon 14 2.8 | Sigma 1.4x | Metabones IV | 2x Canon 600EX-RT
Gabe Balazs Photo (external link)
Nature Shots Portfolio (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
Sirrith
Cream of the Crop
10,545 posts
Gallery: 50 photos
Joined Nov 2010
Hong Kong
Mar 02, 2012 10:27 |  #5

Tarzanman wrote in post #14006814external link
Occasional focus issues, poor IQ at the long end, soft and warm at f/2.8. For a $200 difference (16%), I would go with the lens that is known to perform better.

The sigma OS version is the one known to perform better in this case. Completely different beast to the older non-OS versions.


-Tom
Flickr
F-Stop Guru review | RRS BH-40 review

LOG IN TO REPLY
koppite
THREAD ­ STARTER
Junior Member
27 posts
Joined Jan 2011
Mar 02, 2012 10:42 |  #6

gabebalazs wrote in post #14006951 (external link)
The new OS version is not just simply an old version with OS. It's a new optical design too. It is much better than the old one AND unanimously considered a little better than the Canon 70-200 2.8 IS I.
So in my opinion the Sigma 70-200 OS, especially new, is a better buy than the old Canon. The Mark II Canon betters both of them, but the price is outrageous too compared to them.

Here is quick BIF shot I took yesterday, with the Sigma 70-200 OS PLUS a Canon 2x III TC, AI Servo, ISO 1600, 400mm, f/6.3 under very gray sky. So, far from ideal conditions...

QUOTED IMAGE
[IMAGE'S LINK: http://www.flickr.com .../29108710@N04/68005​38410/] (external link)
Canada Goose in Flight (external link) by gabebalazs (external link), on Flickr

Wow that's a great shot given the condition you were in. I already have a Kenko 2x, so this will be very much what I will do also.

U just gave me some added assurance with that picture :)




LOG IN TO REPLY
gremlin75
Goldmember
gremlin75's Avatar
Joined Feb 2011
Detroit, MI
Mar 02, 2012 12:16 |  #7

koppite wrote in post #14006756external link
Hi guys, I am about to press the "buy" button for the Sigma 70-200mm OS HSM. Will I regret this choice??

No you won't. I got the sigma 70-200 OS and it is a great lens. As gabebalazs said, the sigma OS is considered better then the canon mark 1.

The sigma is not as sharp at f2.8 as the canon mark 2 but it also doesn't have the insane price tag. It is however just as sharp at f4 as the canon f4L IS (which is considered one of canons sharpest lenses)

It's an amazing lens and one that you won't regret getting.




LOG IN TO REPLY
modchild
Goldmember
modchild's Avatar
1,469 posts
Joined Jul 2011
Lincoln, Uk
Mar 02, 2012 12:28 |  #8

I was in the same boat last month and I went for the Canon and certainly don't regret it. I had the 70-200 f4 L, which was pin sharp, and sold it to get the 2.8 MkI which is also pin sharp from 2.8 on my 7D and better than my f4 wide open on my 5D2.


EOS 5D MkIII, EOS 70D, EOS 650D, EOS M, Canon 24-70 f2.8L MkII, Canon 70-200 f2.8L IS MkII, Canon 100 f2.8L Macro, Canon 17-40 f4L IS, Canon 24-105 f4L IS, Canon 300 f4L IS, Canon 85 f1.8, Canon 50 f1.4, Canon 40 f2.8 STM, Canon 35 f2, Sigma 150-500 OS, Tamron 18-270 PZD, Tamron 28-300 VC, 580EX II Flash, Nissin Di866 MkII Flash, Sigma EM 140 Macro Flash and other bits.

LOG IN TO REPLY
gabebalazs
Bird Whisperer
gabebalazs's Avatar
Joined Nov 2008
Toledo, OH
Mar 02, 2012 13:10 |  #9

Another advantage IMHO of going with the Sigma is the 4-year warranty and the fact that you can send it back if you don't like it after initial inspection (as long as you get it from a reputable dealer.)
If your used Canon turns out to be defective, or soft, etc., it may be difficult to return it or costly to have it repaired by Canon (only 1-year warranty on those).
For many, including myself, that is also an important factor in the decision making process.


5DIV | 5DIII | 6D | 80D | A7RII | Canon 24-70 2.8L II | 70-200 2.8L IS II | 24-105 f/4L IS | 16-35 f/4L IS | 135 f/2L | 85 1.8 | 50 1.8 STM | 18-135 IS STM | SONY FE 28-70 OSS | Tamron 17-50 2.8 | Tamron 150-600 | Ʃ 35 1.4 ART | Rokinon 14 2.8 | Sigma 1.4x | Metabones IV | 2x Canon 600EX-RT
Gabe Balazs Photo (external link)
Nature Shots Portfolio (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
giCe
Member
61 posts
Joined Nov 2010
Mar 02, 2012 15:25 |  #10

gabebalazs wrote in post #14008066external link
Another advantage IMHO of going with the Sigma is the 4-year warranty and the fact that you can send it back if you don't like it after initial inspection (as long as you get it from a reputable dealer.)
If your used Canon turns out to be defective, or soft, etc., it may be difficult to return it or costly to have it repaired by Canon (only 1-year warranty on those).
For many, including myself, that is also an important factor in the decision making process.

10 yrs warranty in Canada :D. One of the main reason why I opt for the sigma over MkI.
the only thing that deterred me from the sigma when I was deciding the two was the weather sealing. But honestly unless you're planning to brave the extreme weather the sigma holds up very well.

I used it in the snow up in the slopes last week and everything was fine and dandy


Flickrexternal link
Current Gear

LOG IN TO REPLY
Tarzanman
Senior Member
548 posts
Joined Feb 2009
Mar 10, 2012 09:47 |  #11

Just for clarification, I pulled out the lens to figure out which version I own (maybe someone can chime in). This is what it says on the side:

Sigma APO DG 70-200mm 1:2.8 II Macro HSM

It also has the EX Sigma badge




LOG IN TO REPLY
cdo221
Senior Member
559 posts
Joined Jan 2010
Mar 10, 2012 11:32 |  #12

Which retailer has it for 1200 new? I'm interested in picking one up as well


Feedback and Gear

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

6,508 views & 0 likes for this thread
Sigma 70-200 f2.8 OS vs Canon 70-200 f2.8 IS MK 1
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00149 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
Latest registered member is tdickey
1108 guests, 551 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6106, that happened on Jun 09, 2016