Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre General Photography Talk 
Thread started 14 Mar 2012 (Wednesday) 19:19
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

5D3 VS D800: Comparison of high ISO RAW

 
Tonyz
Member
Avatar
223 posts
Joined Oct 2011
     
Mar 14, 2012 19:19 |  #1
bannedPermanent ban

Thanks to the newly released RAW files from Imaging Resource, we can now do direct comparisons between the 5D3 and D800.

Here is a quick and straightforward test:

  • These came from ISO 25600 RAW files, taken from http://www.imaging-resource.com/ (external link)

  • Used dcraw to convert to 16-bit TIFF before JPEG.

  • No sharpening, No NR.

  • Downsized both to 8 megapixels (PS Bicubic).

  • 5D3 exposure is much longer than D800. We will ignore because testers admitted that light source changes between tests.

  • The 100% Crops of 8 megapixels.



IMAGE: http://i42.tinypic.com/34xhtfm.jpg


IMAGE: http://i41.tinypic.com/34oam21.jpg


IMAGE: http://i39.tinypic.com/2hplu6d.jpg


IMAGE: http://i42.tinypic.com/2ezh8w1.jpg


So to summarize:

  • D800 has 63% more pixels

  • D800 has at least 2 stops more dynamic range at ISO 100

  • D800 looks equal or better than the 5D3 at ISO 25600

Sooo... exactly what did Canon gain by staying at 22 megapixels?



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
Ricku
Goldmember
Avatar
1,295 posts
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Bangkok
     
Mar 14, 2012 19:21 |  #2
bannedPermanent ban

Interesting and just as expected. Its not that the 5D3 is a bad camera. Its just that the D800 is a monster camera!

Well played Nikon. Well played.

Tonyz wrote in post #14087675 (external link)
The Test:
Sooo... exactly what did Canon gain by staying at 22 megapixels?

Speed.

And don't forget, Canon also has the upper hand when it comes to rate button. ;) Don't underestimate the rate button!


5D II 35L 135L 70-200 2.8L II Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ivann
Member
244 posts
Joined Jul 2011
     
Mar 14, 2012 19:24 |  #3
bannedPermanent ban

No surprise here. This is what I have been saying all along. Only difference now is that we have more proof. More will come.

Nikon has a winner.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
grahamwynnephoto
Member
56 posts
Joined Dec 2010
     
Mar 14, 2012 19:29 |  #4

OK so are you all gonna get on with it and switch now?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tonyz
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
223 posts
Joined Oct 2011
     
Mar 14, 2012 19:29 |  #5
bannedPermanent ban

Ricku wrote in post #14087685 (external link)
And don't forget, Canon also has the upper hand when it comes to rate button. ;) Don't underestimate the rate button!

Point. But let's try to keep this thread civilized. No need for sarcasm.

Feel free to discuss, but keep cool.

grahamwynnephoto wrote in post #14087721 (external link)
OK so are you all gonna get on with it and switch now?

No, not really. I'm not interested in buying a new cam right now. Switching is far too expensive, and I'm more than happy with my 5D2.

Just wanted to deliver these test results because I find them interesting, and I know that many others feel the same way.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EmaginePixel
Goldmember
Avatar
1,943 posts
Likes: 41
Joined Sep 2008
Location: So Cal
     
Mar 14, 2012 19:29 |  #6

Interesting results, thanks for sharing. Nikon doesn't have the banding issue either. However, I'd like to see the ISO 100 dynamic range difference.


"Yesterday is history. Tomorrow is a mystery. Today is a gift. That’s why its called the present” - Kung Fu Panda
EmaginePixel.com website (external link) ----- SportsShooter profile (external link) ----- Facebook page (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Invertalon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,494 posts
Likes: 19
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Cleveland, OH
     
Mar 14, 2012 19:30 |  #7

How about we just wait and see for final production cameras with proper testing, yes?

Even if the D800 is superior, nothing is preventing anybody from using it. People complain about what Canon is offering like they are stuck in a world where they can't change systems if the other looks better. If Nikon offered a camera I wanted more, I would go for it. Not sure why people get so defensive or against company 1 or company 2 just because of what they are offering that the company they currently use didn't do. You have to weigh the pro/con of each system and chose instead of sitting on a forum and complaining about them.

This will turn into another fun thread, I can feel it already :p


-Steve
Facebook (external link)
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rayman102
Senior Member
Avatar
404 posts
Likes: 23
Joined Jun 2011
     
Mar 14, 2012 19:31 |  #8

What a pointless post. Nice work again Tony. I see your Google search "D800 better than 5DIII" is working for you. Keep it up. :rolleyes:


Canon 5d Mark II / EF 24mm f/1.4 IIL / EF 70-200mm f/4 ISL / EF 16-35mm f/4 ISL / EF 24-70mm f/2.8 IIL

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Saxi
Goldmember
Avatar
2,781 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: NH, USA
     
Mar 14, 2012 19:31 |  #9

I found the 6400 ISO samples in 5D III favor, I didn't look through all the ISO's, but even in this one I'd say it is really close but I think the 5D III bottle looks like there is more detail although the lighting is very different. The 5D III has a lot more color noise in the bowl image.


5D III, 24-105mm f/4 L, 135mm f/2 L, 70-200mm f/4 IS L, 580EX II
Full Gear List
Flickr Photostream (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
x_tan
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,130 posts
Gallery: 137 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 320
Joined Sep 2010
Location: ɐılɐɹʇsnɐ 'ǝuɹnoqlǝɯ
     
Mar 14, 2012 19:34 |  #10

Congratulation Nikon for this round,
But Nikon needs to do LOTS more before I even consider to go back.


Canon 5D3 + Zoom (EF 17-40L, 24-105L & 28-300L, 100-400L II) & Prime (24L II, 85L II, 100L, 135L & 200 f/2.8L II; Zeiss 1,4/35)
Sony α7r + Zeiss 1,8/55 FE
Nikon Coolpix A; Nikon F3 & F100 + Zeiss 1,4/50
Retiring  (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ricku
Goldmember
Avatar
1,295 posts
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Bangkok
     
Mar 14, 2012 19:34 |  #11
bannedPermanent ban

Invertalon wrote in post #14087728 (external link)
This will turn into another fun thread, I can feel it already :p

It doesn't have to turn ugly at all. What if the results had been different and Canon was the "winner"? Then the reactions would be all "oooh and aaah".

People are too much in love with their brands. Everything is being taken so personally.


5D II 35L 135L 70-200 2.8L II Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
grahamwynnephoto
Member
56 posts
Joined Dec 2010
     
Mar 14, 2012 19:34 |  #12

Even if this is accurate, it doesn't really change anything for me. Both cameras are very very good at high ISO. I see no real incentive for me to switch. And the 6 FPS would sometimes be useful to me. It remains to be seen which is better for video which is something I am interested in.

I do think Canon should get their pricing more in line with the D800 though.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Saxi
Goldmember
Avatar
2,781 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: NH, USA
     
Mar 14, 2012 19:35 |  #13

grahamwynnephoto wrote in post #14087756 (external link)
I do think Canon should get their pricing more in line with the D800 though.

Agreed, I think the biggest reason for the negative comments is because the price is so much higher.


5D III, 24-105mm f/4 L, 135mm f/2 L, 70-200mm f/4 IS L, 580EX II
Full Gear List
Flickr Photostream (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rayman102
Senior Member
Avatar
404 posts
Likes: 23
Joined Jun 2011
     
Mar 14, 2012 19:36 |  #14

:lol:Shadowblade should be here any minute. Should be fun


Canon 5d Mark II / EF 24mm f/1.4 IIL / EF 70-200mm f/4 ISL / EF 16-35mm f/4 ISL / EF 24-70mm f/2.8 IIL

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ivann
Member
244 posts
Joined Jul 2011
     
Mar 14, 2012 19:39 |  #15
bannedPermanent ban

Tonyz wrote in post #14087722 (external link)
Point. But let's try to keep this thread civilized. No need for sarcasm.

Feel free to discuss, but keep cool.

Nice try, but I don't think the "Canon defence force" will agree with you. First they will go into a state of complete denial, until they believe that the results are somehow "fixed", and then they will flame this thread to oblivion. :lol:




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

19,226 views & 0 likes for this thread
5D3 VS D800: Comparison of high ISO RAW
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is AndieLosAngeles
830 guests, 432 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.