LOG IN    OR   REGISTER TO FORUMS


5D3 owners Unite! Discuss and post Photos!

FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EOS Digital Cameras
Thread started 16 Mar 2012 (Friday) 16:23   
LIST NEARBY THREADS

 
kevindar
Cream of the Crop
kevindar's Avatar
Joined May 2007
5,020 posts
california
[MORE/SHARE]

aximrocks wrote in post #14136181external link
well, I'm wishing for more megapixels and one or two stops more dynamic range at low iso. I think the 5D III are targeted at wedding/event photographers. As a landscape shooter I find the 5D3 features a real disappointment.

In principal I agree with you. of course, we have to wait and see measured tests (such a dxo) to see if the dynamic range has improved at all. Not to say there are not some useful features in the 5d3 for landscape shooters: bit of better weather sealing, much batter bracketing, and the 6fps can be useful when bracketing shots. In addition, it looks like the horizontal banding when shadows are pushed are improved.
As far as in camera HDR goes, no self respecting landscape photographer would ever use that feature. if you are a landscape photographer, the d800e is currently the holly grail. and in any case, the advances in 5d3 may be worth about a few hundred dollars over 5d2, if you are a landscape photographer. its just not the most cost effective tool for that.

Post #796, Mar 22, 2012 21:54:23


My Flickrexternal link
Gear List
http://photography-on-the.net .../showthread.php?t=1​205576

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Saxi
Goldmember
Saxi's Avatar
Joined Mar 2008
2,781 posts
NH, USA
[MORE/SHARE]

kevindar wrote in post #14136450external link
In principal I agree with you. of course, we have to wait and see measured tests (such a dxo) to see if the dynamic range has improved at all. Not to say there are not some useful features in the 5d3 for landscape shooters: bit of better weather sealing, much batter bracketing, and the 6fps can be useful when bracketing shots. In addition, it looks like the horizontal banding when shadows are pushed are improved.
As far as in camera HDR goes, no self respecting landscape photographer would ever use that feature. if you are a landscape photographer, the d800e is currently the holly grail. and in any case, the advances in 5d3 may be worth about a few hundred dollars over 5d2, if you are a landscape photographer. its just not the most cost effective tool for that.

Without derailing the thread, why is megapixel so important to a landscape photographer? I understand the concern about DR, but what makes MP so important to landscape shooters? Sorry, I don't shoot landscapes and I am considering dabbling in it, so it is a serious question.

Post #797, Mar 22, 2012 21:59:44


5D III, 24-105mm f/4 L, 135mm f/2 L, 70-200mm f/4 IS L, 580EX II
Full Gear List
Flickr Photostreamexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
schlagle
Senior Member
schlagle's Avatar
Joined Feb 2012
569 posts
San Francisco Bay Area
[MORE/SHARE]

any shipment notifications from any of the big online retailers yet?

Post #798, Mar 22, 2012 22:04:23 as a reply to post 14136416


5D Mark III | EF 50 ƒ/1.4, EF 24-105L ƒ/4, EF 70-200L ƒ/2.8 IS II, EF 16-35L ƒ/2.8 II, MP-E65, EF 100L ƒ/2.8 IS Macro | 600EX-RT, 320EX, MT-24EX
PixelConceptPhotoexternal link | flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Saxi
Goldmember
Saxi's Avatar
Joined Mar 2008
2,781 posts
NH, USA
[MORE/SHARE]

schlagle wrote in post #14136526external link
any shipment notifications from any of the big online retailers yet?

Adorama & B&H are shipping.
Adorama assured me I would get mine tomorrow as I am in a "one day ship zone", but looking at the tracking number it looks like Monday. I also ended up getting a call this afternoon my local store has it so I think I am just going to get it there.

I've ordered from Adorama before and never got anything one day from them, so I don't know why I believed him but he said he has lots of customers in NH who tell him it is one day.

Anyway, yeah they are shipping.

Post #799, Mar 22, 2012 22:06:37


5D III, 24-105mm f/4 L, 135mm f/2 L, 70-200mm f/4 IS L, 580EX II
Full Gear List
Flickr Photostreamexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
MatthewK
Goldmember
MatthewK's Avatar
Joined Apr 2009
1,260 posts
Burke, VA
[MORE/SHARE]

Ok, messed around all afternoon with the camera and MFA. Things weren't off that bad, with my 50L needing a +7, the others needing ~+2. Then I walked around my photography emporium (lake by my house) for some testing.

What I learned: don't trust the preview screen or DPP. I got the ACR plugin, and things look substantially better!!! I am feeling a lot more optimistic about the camera now, and can't wait until Lightroom has functionality. Here are 2 quick shots, both from my 70-200 f/2.8L IS II:

200mm, f/2.8, 1/200th, ISO 1600:

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://kmansphotos.smu​gmug.com ...2x7F/0/XL/6L9C8114-XL.jpgexternal link
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


200mm, f/2.8, 1/200th, ISO 1600:

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://kmansphotos.smu​gmug.com ...TP4f/0/XL/6L9C8111-XL.jpgexternal link
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


Very slight sharpening applied on the 2nd shot, none on the first. No noise reduction!!! At ISO 1600, I probably didn't need to! The noise quality is remarkable!

Here is a 100% crop... from Photobucket, so not indicative of just how good this looks.

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://i105.photobucke​t.com ...31/dragosanix/100Cr​op.jpgexternal link
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO

Post #800, Mar 22, 2012 22:06:43


flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Fricks
Cream of the Crop
Fricks's Avatar
Joined Jan 2011
22,982 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

wow 1600 looks so usable!!!!!

Post #801, Mar 22, 2012 22:09:39


websiteexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
arentol
Goldmember
Joined Jun 2009
1,305 posts
Seattle WA
[MORE/SHARE]

kevindar wrote in post #14136450external link
As far as in camera HDR goes, no self respecting landscape photographer would ever use that feature.

Yes they would. It gives you an on-screen idea of what your final shot will look like when you HDR the same Raws later on. Useful to make sure you are getting the shot just right while in the field.

Also I honestly don't see why the occasional in-camera result would not be totally acceptable as a final product. As a matter of fact people that really know what they are doing might love to use it for the final product to save processing time so they can spend more time in the field. If you get the shot right, and your final product is a jpeg you give to the client or otherwise upload/sell/etc, then if you nail the shot on sight why not let the camera do the HDR work for you?

Post #802, Mar 22, 2012 22:12:51


5D3 | Rokinon 14 f/2.8 | 16-35L II | TS-E 24L | Tamron 24-70 f/2.8 | Tamron 28-75 f/2.8 | Voigtlander 40 f/2.0 | Σ 50 f/1.4 | MP-E 65 | 70-200 2.8L IS II | Σ 85 f/1.4 | Zeiss 100 f/2 | Σ 120-300 f/2.8 OS | 580 EX II | 430 EX II | Fuji X10 | OM-D E-M5 | http://www.mikehjphoto​.com/external link
*****Lenses For Saleexternal link*****

LOG IN TO REPLY
TooManyShots
Cream of the Crop
TooManyShots's Avatar
Joined Jan 2008
9,045 posts
NYC
[MORE/SHARE]

Fricks wrote in post #14136553external link
wow 1600 looks so usable!!!!!


I mean, even at ISO1600 the 1dmarkIII is very useable too. :)

Post #803, Mar 22, 2012 22:13:26


One Imaging Photographyexternal link and my Flickrexternal link
Facebookexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Fricks
Cream of the Crop
Fricks's Avatar
Joined Jan 2011
22,982 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

TooManyShots wrote in post #14136580external link
I mean, even at ISO1600 the 1dmarkIII is very useable too. :)

i used to my 1D II;)


I'm just in shock:lol:

Post #804, Mar 22, 2012 22:16:18


websiteexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
thedcmule2
Goldmember
Joined Nov 2011
1,125 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

This is one sharp ass camera in the right hands...

Post #805, Mar 22, 2012 22:16:41




LOG IN TO REPLY
kevindar
Cream of the Crop
kevindar's Avatar
Joined May 2007
5,020 posts
california
[MORE/SHARE]

Saxi wrote in post #14136491external link
Without derailing the thread, why is megapixel so important to a landscape photographer? I understand the concern about DR, but what makes MP so important to landscape shooters? Sorry, I don't shoot landscapes and I am considering dabbling in it, so it is a serious question.

Saxi, it primarily matters if you are printing large. its in the reproduction of detail. now to realise that extra detail, one needs to have good dof, excellent technique with a very steady tripod. however under perfect condition, in a detailed scence, at say 30x20, or 36x24 inches print, the 36mp will produce more detailed print than 23 mp.

Post #806, Mar 22, 2012 22:16:52


My Flickrexternal link
Gear List
http://photography-on-the.net .../showthread.php?t=1​205576

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
TooManyShots
Cream of the Crop
TooManyShots's Avatar
Joined Jan 2008
9,045 posts
NYC
[MORE/SHARE]

Fricks wrote in post #14136591external link
i used to my 1D II;)


I'm just in shock:lol:


Oh, no, iso1600 on a 1dmarkII isn't useable at all without some major NR.

Post #807, Mar 22, 2012 22:19:24


One Imaging Photographyexternal link and my Flickrexternal link
Facebookexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Fricks
Cream of the Crop
Fricks's Avatar
Joined Jan 2011
22,982 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

TooManyShots wrote in post #14136609external link
Oh, no, iso1600 on a 1dmarkII isn't useable at all without some major NR.

yeah:lol::lol::lol:

i will be a super happy camper tomorrow

Post #808, Mar 22, 2012 22:20:25


websiteexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
kouasupra
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Joined May 2008
2,607 posts
Fresno/Clovis, CA
[MORE/SHARE]

MatthewK wrote in post #14136534external link
Ok, messed around all afternoon with the camera and MFA. Things weren't off that bad, with my 50L needing a +7, the others needing ~+2. Then I walked around my photography emporium (lake by my house) for some testing.

What I learned: don't trust the preview screen or DPP. I got the ACR plugin, and things look substantially better!!! I am feeling a lot more optimistic about the camera now, and can't wait until Lightroom has functionality. Here are 2 quick shots, both from my 70-200 f/2.8L IS II:

200mm, f/2.8, 1/200th, ISO 1600:

NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://kmansphotos.smu​gmug.com ...2x7F/0/XL/6L9C8114-XL.jpgexternal link
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


200mm, f/2.8, 1/200th, ISO 1600:

NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://kmansphotos.smu​gmug.com ...TP4f/0/XL/6L9C8111-XL.jpgexternal link
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


Very slight sharpening applied on the 2nd shot, none on the first. No noise reduction!!! At ISO 1600, I probably didn't need to! The noise quality is remarkable!

Here is a 100% crop... from Photobucket, so not indicative of just how good this looks.

NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://i105.photobucke​t.com ...31/dragosanix/100Cr​op.jpgexternal link
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO

HOLY SHARPNESS BATMAN!!

Post #809, Mar 22, 2012 22:24:07


1D X | 16-35L II | 24-70L II | 70-200L II | 50L | 85L II | 100L

GEARS

LOG IN TO REPLY
Ricardo222
Cream of the Crop
Ricardo222's Avatar
Joined Mar 2010
15,984 posts
Nelson, New Zealand
[MORE/SHARE]

kevindar wrote in post #14136594external link
Saxi, it primarily matters if you are printing large. its in the reproduction of detail. now to realise that extra detail, one needs to have good dof, excellent technique with a very steady tripod. however under perfect condition, in a detailed scence, at say 30x20, or 36x24 inches print, the 36mp will produce more detailed print than 23 mp.

I have to confess that I have not seen a print from a FF 36mP sensor, but I regularly print over a metre long from my 5D2 and at an ACCEPTABLE VIEWING DISTANCE it's hard to see what would change. There are so many other variables to accept as well, and while the larger pixel count may have an edge in some circumstances, I wonder if the reality is quite as dramatic as it might seem.

Lens quality, ISO ability, vibration...and a whole lot of other stuff can affect quality...I work hard at getting them right and will just have to put up with 22.whatever megapixels!

Post #810, Mar 22, 2012 22:24:19


Growing old disgracefully!

LOG IN TO REPLY


LIST NEARBY THREADS
1,336,470 views & 0 likes for this thread
5D3 owners Unite! Discuss and post Photos!
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EOS Digital Cameras



NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO FORUMS

CHANGE BODY TEXT SIZE FOR ALL THREAD PAGES
POWERED BY AMASS 1.0version 1.0
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net


SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF  |  JUMP TO FORUM...  |  FORUM RULES


Spent 0.00236 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.03s
870 guests, 802 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014
Latest registered member is int3

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality, we do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browser's data storage methods.