LOG IN    OR   REGISTER TO FORUMS


Nikon D800 tested at DxOMark, gets the #1 spot

FORUMS News & Rumors Photography Industry News
Thread started 23 Mar 2012 (Friday) 10:03   
LIST NEARBY THREADS

 
Shadowblade
Cream of the Crop
Joined Dec 2008
5,340 posts
Melbourne, Australia
[MORE/SHARE]

ejenner wrote in post #14139401external link
I don't take these scores seriously. There are so many inconsistencies and purely from a physics point of view I don't believe the DR of the D800. Compare for instance the DR and ISO scores of the 5DII and S100 - it makes absolutely no physical sense.

Totally what I expected though. 5DIII will come in just above the 5DII, DR no more than 12.5. In reality both will have a useable DR of about 7-8 stops.

Downloading raw files and processing them yourself is the only way to really get a handle on the differences, I certainly wouldn't base a buying decision of DxO scores.

In that case, do you believe the DR of the iQ180 (and other recent Phase One backs)?

Having seen them in action, I certainly do - you can push their shadows a long way to extract detail. You can push D7000 shots just as hard. Try doing the same with a 7D, 5D2 or even 1Ds3, and all you'll get is noise.

Post #31, Mar 23, 2012 13:28:45




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
tgamron
Senior Member
tgamron's Avatar
Joined Dec 2007
302 posts
Shanandoah Valley
[MORE/SHARE]

Colorblinded wrote in post #14139238external link
Anyone who bases all their decisions off what DxO has to say is usually a bit silly.


It's not about vision, it's about the score.

Post #32, Mar 23, 2012 13:30:46


Canon G11
clickexternal link or clickexternal link
http://www.gamron.comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
jwcdds
Cream of the Crop
jwcdds's Avatar
Joined Aug 2004
12,182 posts
Santa Monica, CA
[MORE/SHARE]

Now if you can only convince Nikon to pump out some quality TS lenses to help out the landscape crowd. If they ever do that, then I think the landscapers of the world can finally rejoice.

Post #33, Mar 23, 2012 13:31:02


Julian
Gear/Feedbacks | SmugMugexternal link | Blogexternal link
My Review | "The Mighty One"external link
Founding member and President of the BOGUS Photo Club (Blatantly-Over-Geared & Under-Skilled)

LOG IN TO REPLY
tgamron
Senior Member
tgamron's Avatar
Joined Dec 2007
302 posts
Shanandoah Valley
[MORE/SHARE]

rayman102 wrote in post #14139049external link
Holy Batman! I just canceled my 5DIII and just ordered the D800e. It is going to be long wait but a score of over 14 on DR in Landscape! WOW

I'll give you $400 for the 17-40.

Post #34, Mar 23, 2012 13:32:04


Canon G11
clickexternal link or clickexternal link
http://www.gamron.comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
tgamron
Senior Member
tgamron's Avatar
Joined Dec 2007
302 posts
Shanandoah Valley
[MORE/SHARE]

Shadowblade wrote in post #14140099external link
In that case, do you believe the DR of the iQ180 (and other recent Phase One backs)?

The iQ180 is nice, but costly.

Post #35, Mar 23, 2012 13:33:23


Canon G11
clickexternal link or clickexternal link
http://www.gamron.comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
AngryCorgi
-Bouncing Boy- a POTN peion
AngryCorgi's Avatar
Joined Aug 2005
11,534 posts
Surrounded by bunnies, squirrels and a couple of crazy corgis in NoVA...
[MORE/SHARE]

tkbslc wrote in post #14140061external link
I've always considered DxO severely biased ever since they ranked a Nikon D5100 ahead of Canon 5Dmk2 and D3100 ahead of 7D.

Even though they are using the same criteria as before? To be fair, they actually rate the 5D2's DR HIGHER than most people.

http://www.sensorgen.i​nfo/CanonEOS_5D_MkII.h​tmlexternal link

These guys give it only 11.2EV of DR and give the D7k (no D5100 in their list) 14EV of DR. Are they getting paid by Nikon too? You may not LIKE or AGREE with the applicability of the scores, but they are standardized and use a controlled process to achieve their data.

As far as the D3100 vs 7D bit, they basically say they are equal, not that the D3100 is appreciably better. But they are measuring sensors. The 7D has a TON of capabilities the D3100 lacks, due to their pricing points/placement.

Post #36, Mar 23, 2012 13:38:47


AngryCorgiexternal link (aka Tom) ...Tools...

...Knowledge is knowing that a tomato is a fruit, Wisdom is knowing not to include it in a fruit salad...

LOG IN TO REPLY
bomzai
Senior Member
Joined Apr 2008
524 posts
Bothell WA, US
[MORE/SHARE]

What an earth shattering report!! Sony sensors scoring 2 stops higher than Canon! Wow... just like in any other report for last two years.

*Yawn*, moving on.

Post #37, Mar 23, 2012 13:45:07 as a reply to AngryCorgi's post 6 minutes earlier.


Camera: EOS 5D Mark III, EOS 70D, ™24-70mm f2.8 VC, EF 70-200mm IS f2.8 L II, EF 100mm IS f2.8 L Macro, EF-S 18-135 STM, Σ 12-24 II.
EOS 5D mkII, 20D, S100, EF 24-70mm f2.8 L, EF 24-105mm IS f4.0 L, EF 70-200mm IS f4.0 L, EF-S 18-200mm IS, EF 100mm f2.8 macro
Light: Sun, Speedlite 580EXII, 550EX, 430EX, EL-Skyports, Reflectors, Umbrellas, Diffusers etc.

LOG IN TO REPLY
AngryCorgi
-Bouncing Boy- a POTN peion
AngryCorgi's Avatar
Joined Aug 2005
11,534 posts
Surrounded by bunnies, squirrels and a couple of crazy corgis in NoVA...
[MORE/SHARE]

bomzai wrote in post #14140186external link
What an earth shattering report!! Sony sensors scoring 2 stops higher than Canon! Wow... just like in any other report for last two years.

*Yawn*, moving on.

True. Anyone who didn't see this score coming had to have been asleep for the past 5 years. ;)

Post #38, Mar 23, 2012 13:49:50


AngryCorgiexternal link (aka Tom) ...Tools...

...Knowledge is knowing that a tomato is a fruit, Wisdom is knowing not to include it in a fruit salad...

LOG IN TO REPLY
woos
Goldmember
woos's Avatar
Joined Dec 2008
2,177 posts
a giant bucket
[MORE/SHARE]

I'm a bit curious how they got the DR to over 14 ... anyone have a good explanation for this? lol

Post #39, Mar 23, 2012 15:13:31


amanathia.zenfolio.com

LOG IN TO REPLY
Möntgomery
Senior Member
Möntgomery's Avatar
Joined Mar 2012
114 posts
[MORE/SHARE]
banned

woos wrote in post #14140688external link
I'm a bit curious how they got the DR to over 14 ... anyone have a good explanation for this? lol

The same reason they were able to get the D5100 & D7000 to 13.9
Sony just has better tech...

Post #40, Mar 23, 2012 15:15:41




LOG IN TO REPLY
woos
Goldmember
woos's Avatar
Joined Dec 2008
2,177 posts
a giant bucket
[MORE/SHARE]

Yeah, 13.9 makes sense, but over 14 seems odd cuz it's only 14-bit raw. :P

Post #41, Mar 23, 2012 15:51:42


amanathia.zenfolio.com

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Shadowblade
Cream of the Crop
Joined Dec 2008
5,340 posts
Melbourne, Australia
[MORE/SHARE]

woos wrote in post #14140961external link
Yeah, 13.9 makes sense, but over 14 seems odd cuz it's only 14-bit raw. :P

It makes sense. Dynamic range and bit depth have nothing to do with each other.

Dynamic range is the difference in brightness between the lowest level that can be discerned from background noise, and the highest level the sensor can record. 14.4 bits of DR would mean that the brightest signal recordable is 21619 times brighter than the darkest signal discernable against background noise.

14-bit raw just means that this range is divided up into 16384 discrete luminance levels. You could have a sensor with 18 stops of DR and only 14-bit output - it just means that the 18 stops of DR will be divided up in to 14 bits of discrete luminance values.

Post #42, Mar 23, 2012 15:58:05




LOG IN TO REPLY
rayman102
Senior Member
rayman102's Avatar
Joined Jun 2011
401 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

Darn Shadowblade, you sure knows your landscape Algebra. bw!

Post #43, Mar 23, 2012 17:49:13


Canon 5d Mark II / EF 24mm f/1.4 IIL / EF 70-200mm f/4 ISL / EF 16-35mm f/4 ISL / EF 24-70mm f/2.8 IIL

LOG IN TO REPLY
Ricku
Goldmember
Ricku's Avatar
Joined Jan 2010
1,295 posts
Bangkok
[MORE/SHARE]
banned

Well, this report certainly seals the deal for me.

I would stick with Canon if I knew they had a similar sensor up their sleeves, but I think it is safe to say that they don't. At least not within the next 3 years.

Post #44, Mar 23, 2012 19:09:37 as a reply to rayman102's post 1 hour earlier.


5D II 35L 135L 70-200 2.8L II Flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Jahled
Goldmember
Jahled's Avatar
Joined Jun 2008
1,497 posts
North London
[MORE/SHARE]

Hahaha this thread is mental

Post #45, Mar 23, 2012 19:27:34 as a reply to Ricku's post 17 minutes earlier.


James
Snow Leopards of Leafy London- The magic begins 5th November 20:00 hours on Animal Planet :) | Gear

LOG IN TO REPLY


LIST NEARBY THREADS
19,651 views & 0 likes for this thread
Nikon D800 tested at DxOMark, gets the #1 spot
FORUMS News & Rumors Photography Industry News



NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO FORUMS

CHANGE BODY TEXT SIZE FOR ALL THREAD PAGES
POWERED BY AMASS 1.0version 1.0
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net


SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF  |  JUMP TO FORUM...  |  FORUM RULES


Spent 0.0008 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
1107 guests, 886 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014
Latest registered member is photolazz

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality, we do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browser's data storage methods.