Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS News & Rumors Photography Industry News 
Thread started 23 Mar 2012 (Friday) 10:03
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Nikon D800 tested at DxOMark, gets the #1 spot

 
Shadowblade
Cream of the Crop
5,805 posts
Gallery: 26 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 395
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
     
Mar 23, 2012 13:28 |  #31

ejenner wrote in post #14139401 (external link)
I don't take these scores seriously. There are so many inconsistencies and purely from a physics point of view I don't believe the DR of the D800. Compare for instance the DR and ISO scores of the 5DII and S100 - it makes absolutely no physical sense.

Totally what I expected though. 5DIII will come in just above the 5DII, DR no more than 12.5. In reality both will have a useable DR of about 7-8 stops.

Downloading raw files and processing them yourself is the only way to really get a handle on the differences, I certainly wouldn't base a buying decision of DxO scores.

In that case, do you believe the DR of the iQ180 (and other recent Phase One backs)?

Having seen them in action, I certainly do - you can push their shadows a long way to extract detail. You can push D7000 shots just as hard. Try doing the same with a 7D, 5D2 or even 1Ds3, and all you'll get is noise.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
tgamron
Senior Member
Avatar
304 posts
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Shanandoah Valley
     
Mar 23, 2012 13:30 |  #32

Colorblinded wrote in post #14139238 (external link)
Anyone who bases all their decisions off what DxO has to say is usually a bit silly.


It's not about vision, it's about the score.


Canon G11
click (external link) or click (external link)
http://www.gamron.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jwcdds
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
14,584 posts
Gallery: 1620 photos
Best ofs: 5
Likes: 4357
Joined Aug 2004
Location: Santa Monica, CA
     
Mar 23, 2012 13:31 |  #33

Now if you can only convince Nikon to pump out some quality TS lenses to help out the landscape crowd. If they ever do that, then I think the landscapers of the world can finally rejoice.


Julian
Gear/Feedbacks | SmugMug (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Blog (external link) | Instagram (external link) | YouTube (external link)
My Reviews | "The Mighty One" (external link) | "EF 85mm f/1.4 L IS Review" (external link)
Founding member and President of the BOGUS Photo Club (Blatantly-Over-Geared & Under-Skilled)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tgamron
Senior Member
Avatar
304 posts
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Shanandoah Valley
     
Mar 23, 2012 13:32 |  #34

rayman102 wrote in post #14139049 (external link)
Holy Batman! I just canceled my 5DIII and just ordered the D800e. It is going to be long wait but a score of over 14 on DR in Landscape! WOW

I'll give you $400 for the 17-40.


Canon G11
click (external link) or click (external link)
http://www.gamron.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tgamron
Senior Member
Avatar
304 posts
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Shanandoah Valley
     
Mar 23, 2012 13:33 |  #35

Shadowblade wrote in post #14140099 (external link)
In that case, do you believe the DR of the iQ180 (and other recent Phase One backs)?

The iQ180 is nice, but costly.


Canon G11
click (external link) or click (external link)
http://www.gamron.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AngryCorgi
-Bouncing Boy- a POTN peion
Avatar
11,537 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Surrounded by bunnies, squirrels and a couple of crazy corgis in NoVA...
     
Mar 23, 2012 13:38 |  #36

tkbslc wrote in post #14140061 (external link)
I've always considered DxO severely biased ever since they ranked a Nikon D5100 ahead of Canon 5Dmk2 and D3100 ahead of 7D.

Even though they are using the same criteria as before? To be fair, they actually rate the 5D2's DR HIGHER than most people.

http://www.sensorgen.i​nfo/CanonEOS_5D_MkII.h​tml (external link)

These guys give it only 11.2EV of DR and give the D7k (no D5100 in their list) 14EV of DR. Are they getting paid by Nikon too? You may not LIKE or AGREE with the applicability of the scores, but they are standardized and use a controlled process to achieve their data.

As far as the D3100 vs 7D bit, they basically say they are equal, not that the D3100 is appreciably better. But they are measuring sensors. The 7D has a TON of capabilities the D3100 lacks, due to their pricing points/placement.


AngryCorgi (external link) (aka Tom) ...Tools...

...Knowledge is knowing that a tomato is a fruit, Wisdom is knowing not to include it in a fruit salad...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bomzai
Senior Member
524 posts
Joined Apr 2008
Location: Bothell WA, US
     
Mar 23, 2012 13:45 as a reply to  @ AngryCorgi's post |  #37

What an earth shattering report!! Sony sensors scoring 2 stops higher than Canon! Wow... just like in any other report for last two years.

*Yawn*, moving on.


Camera: EOS 5D Mark III, EOS 70D, ™24-70mm f2.8 VC, EF 70-200mm IS f2.8 L II, EF 100mm IS f2.8 L Macro, EF-S 18-135 STM, Σ 12-24 II.
EOS 5D mkII, 20D, S100, EF 24-70mm f2.8 L, EF 24-105mm IS f4.0 L, EF 70-200mm IS f4.0 L, EF-S 18-200mm IS, EF 100mm f2.8 macro
Light: Sun, Speedlite 580EXII, 550EX, 430EX, EL-Skyports, Reflectors, Umbrellas, Diffusers etc.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AngryCorgi
-Bouncing Boy- a POTN peion
Avatar
11,537 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Surrounded by bunnies, squirrels and a couple of crazy corgis in NoVA...
     
Mar 23, 2012 13:49 |  #38

bomzai wrote in post #14140186 (external link)
What an earth shattering report!! Sony sensors scoring 2 stops higher than Canon! Wow... just like in any other report for last two years.

*Yawn*, moving on.

True. Anyone who didn't see this score coming had to have been asleep for the past 5 years. ;)


AngryCorgi (external link) (aka Tom) ...Tools...

...Knowledge is knowing that a tomato is a fruit, Wisdom is knowing not to include it in a fruit salad...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
woos
Goldmember
Avatar
2,221 posts
Likes: 23
Joined Dec 2008
Location: a giant bucket
     
Mar 23, 2012 15:13 |  #39

I'm a bit curious how they got the DR to over 14 ... anyone have a good explanation for this? lol


amanathia.zenfolio.com

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Möntgomery
Member
Avatar
114 posts
Joined Mar 2012
     
Mar 23, 2012 15:15 |  #40
bannedPermanent ban

woos wrote in post #14140688 (external link)
I'm a bit curious how they got the DR to over 14 ... anyone have a good explanation for this? lol

The same reason they were able to get the D5100 & D7000 to 13.9
Sony just has better tech...




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
woos
Goldmember
Avatar
2,221 posts
Likes: 23
Joined Dec 2008
Location: a giant bucket
     
Mar 23, 2012 15:51 |  #41

Yeah, 13.9 makes sense, but over 14 seems odd cuz it's only 14-bit raw. :P


amanathia.zenfolio.com

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Shadowblade
Cream of the Crop
5,805 posts
Gallery: 26 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 395
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
     
Mar 23, 2012 15:58 |  #42

woos wrote in post #14140961 (external link)
Yeah, 13.9 makes sense, but over 14 seems odd cuz it's only 14-bit raw. :P

It makes sense. Dynamic range and bit depth have nothing to do with each other.

Dynamic range is the difference in brightness between the lowest level that can be discerned from background noise, and the highest level the sensor can record. 14.4 bits of DR would mean that the brightest signal recordable is 21619 times brighter than the darkest signal discernable against background noise.

14-bit raw just means that this range is divided up into 16384 discrete luminance levels. You could have a sensor with 18 stops of DR and only 14-bit output - it just means that the 18 stops of DR will be divided up in to 14 bits of discrete luminance values.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rayman102
Senior Member
Avatar
404 posts
Likes: 23
Joined Jun 2011
     
Mar 23, 2012 17:49 |  #43

Darn Shadowblade, you sure knows your landscape Algebra. bw!


Canon 5d Mark II / EF 24mm f/1.4 IIL / EF 70-200mm f/4 ISL / EF 16-35mm f/4 ISL / EF 24-70mm f/2.8 IIL

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ricku
Goldmember
Avatar
1,295 posts
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Bangkok
     
Mar 23, 2012 19:09 as a reply to  @ rayman102's post |  #44
bannedPermanent ban

Well, this report certainly seals the deal for me.

I would stick with Canon if I knew they had a similar sensor up their sleeves, but I think it is safe to say that they don't. At least not within the next 3 years.


5D II 35L 135L 70-200 2.8L II Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jahled
Goldmember
Avatar
1,498 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jun 2008
Location: North London
     
Mar 23, 2012 19:27 as a reply to  @ Ricku's post |  #45

Hahaha this thread is mental


James
Snow Leopards of Leafy London- The magic begins 5th November 20:00 hours on Animal Planet :) | Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

32,872 views & 0 likes for this thread
Nikon D800 tested at DxOMark, gets the #1 spot
FORUMS News & Rumors Photography Industry News 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is 4bosing
777 guests, 361 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.