Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS News & Rumors Photography Industry News
Thread started 23 Mar 2012 (Friday) 10:03
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Nikon D800 tested at DxOMark, gets the #1 spot

 
this thread is locked
Shadowblade
Cream of the Crop
Joined Dec 2008
Melbourne, Australia
Mar 23, 2012 13:28 |  #31

ejenner wrote in post #14139401external link
I don't take these scores seriously. There are so many inconsistencies and purely from a physics point of view I don't believe the DR of the D800. Compare for instance the DR and ISO scores of the 5DII and S100 - it makes absolutely no physical sense.

Totally what I expected though. 5DIII will come in just above the 5DII, DR no more than 12.5. In reality both will have a useable DR of about 7-8 stops.

Downloading raw files and processing them yourself is the only way to really get a handle on the differences, I certainly wouldn't base a buying decision of DxO scores.

In that case, do you believe the DR of the iQ180 (and other recent Phase One backs)?

Having seen them in action, I certainly do - you can push their shadows a long way to extract detail. You can push D7000 shots just as hard. Try doing the same with a 7D, 5D2 or even 1Ds3, and all you'll get is noise.




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
tgamron
Senior Member
tgamron's Avatar
303 posts
Joined Dec 2007
Shanandoah Valley
Mar 23, 2012 13:30 |  #32

Colorblinded wrote in post #14139238external link
Anyone who bases all their decisions off what DxO has to say is usually a bit silly.


It's not about vision, it's about the score.


Canon G11
clickexternal link or clickexternal link
http://www.gamron.comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
jwcdds
Cream of the Crop
jwcdds's Avatar
Joined Aug 2004
Santa Monica, CA
Mar 23, 2012 13:31 |  #33

Now if you can only convince Nikon to pump out some quality TS lenses to help out the landscape crowd. If they ever do that, then I think the landscapers of the world can finally rejoice.


Julian
Gear/Feedbacks | SmugMug (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Blog (external link) | instagram (external link)
My Review | "The Mighty One" (external link)
Founding member and President of the BOGUS Photo Club (Blatantly-Over-Geared & Under-Skilled)

LOG IN TO REPLY
tgamron
Senior Member
tgamron's Avatar
303 posts
Joined Dec 2007
Shanandoah Valley
Mar 23, 2012 13:32 |  #34

rayman102 wrote in post #14139049external link
Holy Batman! I just canceled my 5DIII and just ordered the D800e. It is going to be long wait but a score of over 14 on DR in Landscape! WOW

I'll give you $400 for the 17-40.


Canon G11
clickexternal link or clickexternal link
http://www.gamron.comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
tgamron
Senior Member
tgamron's Avatar
303 posts
Joined Dec 2007
Shanandoah Valley
Mar 23, 2012 13:33 |  #35

Shadowblade wrote in post #14140099external link
In that case, do you believe the DR of the iQ180 (and other recent Phase One backs)?

The iQ180 is nice, but costly.


Canon G11
clickexternal link or clickexternal link
http://www.gamron.comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
AngryCorgi
-Bouncing Boy- a POTN peion
AngryCorgi's Avatar
11,537 posts
Joined Aug 2005
Surrounded by bunnies, squirrels and a couple of crazy corgis in NoVA...
Mar 23, 2012 13:38 |  #36

tkbslc wrote in post #14140061external link
I've always considered DxO severely biased ever since they ranked a Nikon D5100 ahead of Canon 5Dmk2 and D3100 ahead of 7D.

Even though they are using the same criteria as before? To be fair, they actually rate the 5D2's DR HIGHER than most people.

http://www.sensorgen.i​nfo/CanonEOS_5D_MkII.h​tmlexternal link

These guys give it only 11.2EV of DR and give the D7k (no D5100 in their list) 14EV of DR. Are they getting paid by Nikon too? You may not LIKE or AGREE with the applicability of the scores, but they are standardized and use a controlled process to achieve their data.

As far as the D3100 vs 7D bit, they basically say they are equal, not that the D3100 is appreciably better. But they are measuring sensors. The 7D has a TON of capabilities the D3100 lacks, due to their pricing points/placement.


AngryCorgiexternal link (aka Tom) ...Tools...

...Knowledge is knowing that a tomato is a fruit, Wisdom is knowing not to include it in a fruit salad...

LOG IN TO REPLY
bomzai
Senior Member
524 posts
Joined Apr 2008
Bothell WA, US
Mar 23, 2012 13:45 as a reply to AngryCorgi's post |  #37

What an earth shattering report!! Sony sensors scoring 2 stops higher than Canon! Wow... just like in any other report for last two years.

*Yawn*, moving on.


Camera: EOS 5D Mark III, EOS 70D, ™24-70mm f2.8 VC, EF 70-200mm IS f2.8 L II, EF 100mm IS f2.8 L Macro, EF-S 18-135 STM, Σ 12-24 II.
EOS 5D mkII, 20D, S100, EF 24-70mm f2.8 L, EF 24-105mm IS f4.0 L, EF 70-200mm IS f4.0 L, EF-S 18-200mm IS, EF 100mm f2.8 macro
Light: Sun, Speedlite 580EXII, 550EX, 430EX, EL-Skyports, Reflectors, Umbrellas, Diffusers etc.

LOG IN TO REPLY
AngryCorgi
-Bouncing Boy- a POTN peion
AngryCorgi's Avatar
11,537 posts
Joined Aug 2005
Surrounded by bunnies, squirrels and a couple of crazy corgis in NoVA...
Mar 23, 2012 13:49 |  #38

bomzai wrote in post #14140186external link
What an earth shattering report!! Sony sensors scoring 2 stops higher than Canon! Wow... just like in any other report for last two years.

*Yawn*, moving on.

True. Anyone who didn't see this score coming had to have been asleep for the past 5 years. ;)


AngryCorgiexternal link (aka Tom) ...Tools...

...Knowledge is knowing that a tomato is a fruit, Wisdom is knowing not to include it in a fruit salad...

LOG IN TO REPLY
woos
Goldmember
woos's Avatar
2,214 posts
Joined Dec 2008
a giant bucket
Mar 23, 2012 15:13 |  #39

I'm a bit curious how they got the DR to over 14 ... anyone have a good explanation for this? lol


amanathia.zenfolio.com

LOG IN TO REPLY
Möntgomery
Member
Möntgomery's Avatar
114 posts
Joined Mar 2012
Mar 23, 2012 15:15 |  #40
banned

woos wrote in post #14140688external link
I'm a bit curious how they got the DR to over 14 ... anyone have a good explanation for this? lol

The same reason they were able to get the D5100 & D7000 to 13.9
Sony just has better tech...




LOG IN TO REPLY
woos
Goldmember
woos's Avatar
2,214 posts
Joined Dec 2008
a giant bucket
Mar 23, 2012 15:51 |  #41

Yeah, 13.9 makes sense, but over 14 seems odd cuz it's only 14-bit raw. :P


amanathia.zenfolio.com

LOG IN TO REPLY
Shadowblade
Cream of the Crop
Joined Dec 2008
Melbourne, Australia
Mar 23, 2012 15:58 |  #42

woos wrote in post #14140961external link
Yeah, 13.9 makes sense, but over 14 seems odd cuz it's only 14-bit raw. :P

It makes sense. Dynamic range and bit depth have nothing to do with each other.

Dynamic range is the difference in brightness between the lowest level that can be discerned from background noise, and the highest level the sensor can record. 14.4 bits of DR would mean that the brightest signal recordable is 21619 times brighter than the darkest signal discernable against background noise.

14-bit raw just means that this range is divided up into 16384 discrete luminance levels. You could have a sensor with 18 stops of DR and only 14-bit output - it just means that the 18 stops of DR will be divided up in to 14 bits of discrete luminance values.




LOG IN TO REPLY
rayman102
Senior Member
rayman102's Avatar
404 posts
Joined Jun 2011
Mar 23, 2012 17:49 |  #43

Darn Shadowblade, you sure knows your landscape Algebra. bw!


Canon 5d Mark II / EF 24mm f/1.4 IIL / EF 70-200mm f/4 ISL / EF 16-35mm f/4 ISL / EF 24-70mm f/2.8 IIL

LOG IN TO REPLY
Ricku
Goldmember
Ricku's Avatar
1,295 posts
Joined Jan 2010
Bangkok
Mar 23, 2012 19:09 as a reply to rayman102's post |  #44
banned

Well, this report certainly seals the deal for me.

I would stick with Canon if I knew they had a similar sensor up their sleeves, but I think it is safe to say that they don't. At least not within the next 3 years.


5D II 35L 135L 70-200 2.8L II Flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Jahled
Goldmember
Jahled's Avatar
1,497 posts
Joined Jun 2008
North London
Mar 23, 2012 19:27 as a reply to Ricku's post |  #45

Hahaha this thread is mental


James
Snow Leopards of Leafy London- The magic begins 5th November 20:00 hours on Animal Planet :) | Gear

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

26,786 views & 0 likes for this thread
Nikon D800 tested at DxOMark, gets the #1 spot
FORUMS News & Rumors Photography Industry News


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00303 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.03s
Latest registered member is frankjackson1982
725 guests, 511 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6106, that happened on Jun 09, 2016