![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Junior Member
|
What does everyone suggest on the AF points does everyone use all 8 points?I shoot with
a Mark 5 II. I am using for shooting family of 4 shots mainly. Looking for lots of suggestions.It seems like when i have it set o all of the pints sometimes it doenst light all of the me up anyways and some of the picture if want in focus is out of focus, i use av mode. |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#2 |
|
Cream of the Crop
|
Very, very few people on this site use all points (at one time). The problem with selecting all the points to be active is that you are leaving it up to the camera to decide what it is you want in focus. It doesn't know what your subject is, so will pick the focus point that it thinks is over your subject and use that. The problem is, it will generally pick the nearest thing in the scene with good contrast, that may not be your subject. The camera doesn't know you are photographing auntie Maud on the sofa and not the book on the coffee table in front of her, so may decide that, as the book is closer, it is more likely to be the subject and focus on that.
That explains why you are getting shots that aren't focused in areas where you want. As to why they don't all light up, well, the one(s) that light up should be the one it is using to focus on and it is telling you where it is focusing. If more than one lights up, then they are covering objects at roughly the same distance, so it is telling you that both points will be covered. Most people on here will just use a single point to focus with, and place that point over the subject to focus. You can either select a focus point, and shoot with that over your subject, or (if in one-shot focus mode) focus on the subject with the chosen focus point and then, whilst holding the shutter button at the half way mark, recompose your shot and push the release the rest of the way. That gives you control over what is in focus, rather than letting the camera choose. Av mode won't affect focus in any way, other than the aperture you select will change the depth of field, so a wide aperture will mean the focus only covers a shallower area, a small aperture (larger number) will give an increased depth as to what is in acceptable focus. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Junior Member
|
Quote:
would be out of focus i will keep trying thank. |
|
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#4 |
|
Cream of the Crop
|
When you say "part of the picture" would be out of focus, do you mean the part you focused on, or just some other part? If the subject you focused on is OK but another bit you want in focus isn't, you need to increase your depth of field by using a smaller aperture. Adding more focus points won't let the camera focus on other parts of the picture as well, it can only focus on one exact distance. Anything nearer or further away than that distance will become less sharp the more you move away from the plane of focus (the distance you focused on). If you are using a wide aperture (small number) then the falloff in sharpness will happen much closer to the focus plane than when you use a small aperture.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Junior Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
....winded
|
From the duplicate thread:
Quote:
__________________
Tony Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro) Tony Long Photos on PBase Wildlife project pics here, Biking Photog shoots here, "Suburbia" project here! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Goldmember
|
Quote:
__________________
nathantpham.com | My Flickr | Boston POTN Flickr 5D3 | 7D | 16-35 II | Σ 50 | 70-200 IS 2.8 For Sale Click Here | 430 EX | 580 EX II |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
|
Thanks for that point, did not know that.
__________________
-JasonMK on Flickr 650D | EF-S 18~135 STM | EF 50mm 1.4 | EF 100mm 2.8 USM Macro | Tamron 70~300mm 4.0-5.6 Di VC USD XLD | 430 EX II | Lowepro SlingShot 100 AW | EF 25 II | CS5 | LR4 Last edited by JasonMK : 19th of April 2012 (Thu) at 08:44. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Junior Member
|
thanks so much for all the tips.I am going to work with turning some of them of and see how that
does. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
....winded
|
Quote:
With the 5D2, you can either select "All points" or just select a "Single point". For "general" photography we here typically advise the single "Manual AF point selection" (check the index of your manual). If you select the Center point you get the most accurate and responsive AF, and it works reasonably well in lower light. In better light, you can select one of the outer points, minimizing your need to "focus and recompose" to get the desired framing. However, AI Servo AF has some different challenges as well as capabilities. If you select "Automatic AF point selection" (again, check your manual index) then the 5D has "invisible assist AF points" surrounding the center AF point that get turned on. With the 5D AI Servo AF with the "Automatic" functioning starts with the center point, then if the subject moves off-center it can use one of the invisible points to pick it up. Then, if the subject moves farther, ideally (good lighting conditions) one of the outer points can pick it up. Again, read your manual -- this stuff is covered in the "AI Servo AF" section. I, however, in practice never turn on the "Automatic point selection" feature -- I stick to using the center point AF with AI Servo.
__________________
Tony Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro) Tony Long Photos on PBase Wildlife project pics here, Biking Photog shoots here, "Suburbia" project here! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 5D Focus Points vs 5d Mark II focus points | loydall | Canon EOS Digital Cameras | 0 | 1st of July 2010 (Thu) 17:36 |
| Clarifying a couple of points from the book "Understanding Exposure" | Dredd123 | General Photography Talk | 25 | 17th of January 2009 (Sat) 06:50 |
| understanding "understanding exposure" | windoze | General Photography Talk | 8 | 13th of March 2007 (Tue) 21:29 |