![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
|
Noticed there have been a ton for sale lately. What's going on?
__________________
|
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#2 |
|
Goldmember
|
Cause everybody is selling it to fund the 5D Mark III..
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Ventura County, Calif., USA
Posts: 558
|
IMHO the 5DM3 is a little pricey vs 5D2 and D800.
__________________
"Love life and life will love you back. Love people and they will love you back." Arthur Rubinstein. |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#4 |
|
User is banned from forums
|
I had one for about a week and sold it as well
It's a great lens ad all but a lot of people have the 24-70L and sometimes they want something better (like me, I funded for an 85L II instead) |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
|
I love my 17-40 as my wide angle landscape lens.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
|
One of the cheaper "L" lenses. Really I consider it an entry level "L" lens, therefore once a new guy gets the "I want better" it gets sold.
"get it" haha |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: ny
Posts: 1,096
|
probably people that are buying it on crop. i don't think i'll ever sell my 17-40 as long as i have my 5d2 because where else can you buy an UWA with L build quality and get ultra sharp pictures for 6-700$? if you need a UWA and don't necessarily need the 2.8, there's no better decision than this. but if you are buying it to replace a normal zoom on crop, look elsewhere.
__________________
| Andrew | 5D Mark II | Canon 17-40mm f 4 L | Canon 35mm f 1.4 L | Canon 100mm f 2.8 L Macro | Canon 70-200mm f 4 L IS | Speedlite 430EX II| |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: ny
Posts: 1,096
|
Quote:
__________________
| Andrew | 5D Mark II | Canon 17-40mm f 4 L | Canon 35mm f 1.4 L | Canon 100mm f 2.8 L Macro | Canon 70-200mm f 4 L IS | Speedlite 430EX II| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Key word... price. it's an entry level L lens. No different than always seeing a bunch of 70-200 F4 nonIS lenses... it's an entry level L lens. The F4 is entry the 16-35II is the top dog and price reflects it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Senior Member
|
I use mine in the 7D and it's grewt
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Senior Member
|
If I had a FF body, I'd still have my 17-40. As it is, I'm going to be a crop shooter, probably for life, so I sold it and got what I consider a better lens for a crop body, the 17-55 f2.8.
__________________
Rick 60D - EF-S 10-22 f3.5-f4.5 -- EF-S 17-55 f2.8 IS -- EF-S 60mm f2.8 Macro -- EF 100mm f2.8 L IS Macro -- EF 70-200 f4 L IS w/1.4 II TC |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Senior Member
|
Why do you think it's better? What do you use it for?
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: WA
Posts: 1,972
|
I got rid of two of them.
Good for the price, but my 16-35II just kills it in landscapes. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Senior Member
|
The 17-55 is sharper and faster than the 17-40. What else does it need to be? It's my primary lens, stays on my camera more than any other.
__________________
Rick 60D - EF-S 10-22 f3.5-f4.5 -- EF-S 17-55 f2.8 IS -- EF-S 60mm f2.8 Macro -- EF 100mm f2.8 L IS Macro -- EF 70-200 f4 L IS w/1.4 II TC |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: CA
Posts: 1,411
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|