LOG IN    OR   REGISTER TO FORUMS


Thinking of selling Sigma 105-500 for Canon 100-400l...

FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Thread started 29 Apr 2012 (Sunday) 14:41   
LIST NEARBY THREADS
 
EtherealZee
Senior Member
EtherealZee's Avatar
Joined Aug 2009
364 posts
Sydney, Aus
[MORE/SHARE]

My 100-400 was tack sharp at 100% crop @ 400mm. I still shed a little tear every time I remember that I had to sell it...

For the record, push/pull was a fantastic feature...

Z...

Post #16, May 02, 2012 06:56:13




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
slwx
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Joined May 2011
597 posts
Essex, UK
[MORE/SHARE]

Thanks everyone for the feedback. I've decided I'm going to hang on to it a little longer :D

Post #17, May 21, 2012 05:19:44 as a reply to EtherealZee's post 18 days earlier.


--- 5∞pxexternal link *-* Flickrexternal link *-* Facebookexternal link ---

LOG IN TO REPLY
modchild
Goldmember
modchild's Avatar
Joined Jul 2011
1,469 posts
Lincoln, Uk
[MORE/SHARE]

I had the Sigma 150-500 OS and the Canon 100-400 IS L and decided to sell one as I only had 1 body to use at the time. After a lot of testing I decided to keep the Sigma as it was the best of the 2 IMO. The IQ is very similar at the full extension, the OS/IS of the Sigma is much much better and the AF speed is very similar. I found the Sigma to be very sharp wide open and it seemed to handle failing light better than the Canon too. Maybe I got a good Sigma and a bad Canon but at f8 there was virtually no difference in quality.
I got this with a Canon 5DMkIII and Sigma 150-500 OS, taken at 1/800, ISO 1000 wide open at f6.3 @ 500mm, at a distance of around 35 feet. It's a Jpeg SOOC taken in April and just heavily cropped. No other PP at all.

IMAGE: http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7109/7132819465_b1cfa8db91_c.jpg
[IMAGE'S LINK: http://www.flickr.com .../67765667@N08/71328​19465/]external link
C01c0473external link by modchildexternal link, on Flickr

Post #18, May 21, 2012 07:32:06


EOS 5D MkIII, EOS 70D, EOS 650D, EOS M, Canon 24-70 f2.8L MkII, Canon 70-200 f2.8L IS MkII, Canon 100 f2.8L Macro, Canon 17-40 f4L IS, Canon 24-105 f4L IS, Canon 300 f4L IS, Canon 85 f1.8, Canon 50 f1.4, Canon 40 f2.8 STM, Canon 35 f2, Sigma 150-500 OS, Tamron 18-270 PZD, Tamron 28-300 VC, 580EX II Flash, Nissin Di866 MkII Flash, Sigma EM 140 Macro Flash and other bits.

LOG IN TO REPLY
DC ­ Fan
Cream of the Crop
DC Fan's Avatar
Joined Oct 2005
5,732 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

From having extensively used the Sigma 150-500mm OS lens, there are no complaints from here.

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE

Focal Length: 229.0mm
Aperture: f/7.1
Exposure Time: 0.0025 s (1/400)
ISO equiv: 100
Exposure Bias: none
IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


Aperture: f/10.0
Exposure Time: 0.0016 s (1/640)
ISO equiv: 320
Exposure Bias: none
Metering Mode: Matrix
Exposure: program (Auto)
White Balance: Auto
Flash Fired: No (enforced)
Orientation: Normal
Color Space: sRGB

Of course, different people have different needs from equipment and a different lens may be more useful for birding than for the comparatively-larger and slower subjects shown here.

slwx wrote in post #14348829external link
Was just wondering, lately I've been using my Sigma


150-500 OS a LOT. I often take it out with me to shoot wild birds, as well as garden birds. I've also got a Sigma 1.4x extender.

I was wondering, would it be worth selling these, sacrificing the 100mm and buying the Canon EF 100-400mm f4.5-5.6L IS USM?

Post #19, May 21, 2012 07:40:27




LOG IN TO REPLY
tomj
Senior Member
Joined May 2010
579 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

I can't speak for the 100-400, but one of the first things I did when I bought my 100/5.6 was print out a lens test chart and do some sharpness comparisons with my Sigma 150-500.
I shot with the Sigma at 500mm - of course the Sigma images were larger than those from the 400, but even when cropped and printed the same size, the shots from the 400 were significantly sharper.

Post #20, May 21, 2012 08:36:39 as a reply to EtherealZee's post 19 days earlier.


Flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
watt100
Cream of the Crop
Joined Jun 2008
13,790 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

DC Fan wrote in post #14462509external link
From having extensively used the Sigma 150-500mm OS lens, there are no complaints from here.


NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
| Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


Aperture: f/10.0
Exposure Time: 0.0016 s (1/640)
ISO equiv: 320
Exposure Bias: none
Metering Mode: Matrix
Exposure: program (Auto)
White Balance: Auto
Flash Fired: No (enforced)
Orientation: Normal
Color Space: sRGB

Of course, different people have different needs from equipment and a different lens may be more useful for birding than for the comparatively-larger and slower subjects shown here.



all very true, one of the reasons I choose the 100-400 over the sigmas was for sports, people, events, etc. (not birds) and looking in the sports section the 100-400 pics just looked better on comparable bodies.
( Your pics not withstanding! )

Or perhaps I've fallen in the L trap myth and I can't get up
or I'm seeing stuff that's not there


a random pic with the 100-400 and XSi (450D)
250mm f5.0 (cropped)


IMAGE: http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7268/6931518192_26e222fe2a_b.jpg

Post #21, May 21, 2012 09:15:24




LOG IN TO REPLY


LIST NEARBY THREADS
2,646 views & 0 likes for this thread
Thinking of selling Sigma 105-500 for Canon 100-400l...
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses



NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO FORUMS

CHANGE BODY TEXT SIZE FOR ALL THREAD PAGES
POWERED BY AMASS 1.0version 1.0
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net


SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF  |  JUMP TO FORUM...  |  FORUM RULES


Spent 0.00073 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
1045 guests, 819 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014
Latest registered member is cjcibe

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality, we do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browser's data storage methods.