Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Thread started 30 Apr 2012 (Monday) 11:18
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Engagement Shoot?

 
jdlemmons
Hatchling
5 posts
Joined Mar 2012
MORE INFO

I am doing an engagement shoot for my sister in June and am trying to figure out which lenses would work best for the shoot. This is my first engagement shoot (I've done lots of family/little kiddos) so I was hoping maybe you guys could help me out a little bit.

We'll be going to a few locations which include a pier/lake (lakeside not actually in the lake), a field, and then we're taking her fiance's 1970 Cadillac for some photos. I plan on renting a few lenses for this so feel free to recommend anything. I shoot on a crop sensor, and currently have a 50mm 1.8, which works wonders. A few weeks ago I rented an 85mm and I LOVED the tack sharp photos I got from it... much better than the 50mm I currently have.

I'm looking to rent maybe the 70-200 2.8, a 24-70 or 17-55, and then I'll probably buy the 85mm. Do you think I need the 50mm over the 85 or vice versa? or bring both?

Thanks!

Apr 30, 2012 11:18



LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
fotojennik
Member
fotojennik's Avatar
213 posts

Joined Aug 2011

Pittsburgh
MORE INFO

I would seriously considering either buying or renting a flash or two and learning how to use it/them properly. Then maybe just rent 1 good lens. I know I can do an entire engagement shoot with my 35L and 135L (full-frame).

Apr 30, 2012 11:30

Pittsburgh Wedding Photographerexternal link | Flickrexternal link | Gear List

LOG IN TO REPLY
ZachOly
Goldmember
ZachOly's Avatar
1,034 posts

Joined Nov 2010

Canada
MORE INFO

135L or 70-200 @ 200

Everyone loves and looks good with compression

Apr 30, 2012 12:40

5D3 / 5D2 / 16-35 4 IS / 24-70 2.8 II / 50 1.4 / 100L / 70-200 2.8 IS II | Flickr (external link) | www.zachwheeler.ca (external link) | Facebook (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
jra
Cream of the Crop
jra's Avatar
6,451 posts

Joined Oct 2005

Ohio
MORE INFO

IMO, the 24-70 is a great all 'round lens that you could easily do the entire shoot with.

Apr 30, 2012 12:57

Jason
www.secondglimpse.comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
jdlemmons
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
5 posts
Joined Mar 2012
MORE INFO

I had planned on bringing my flash with me and probably my reflector as well.

So, it sounds like I would be good with the 24-70 and the 70-200... That makes it easier on my camera bag (and on me) only bringing 2 lenses :)

Thanks for your help!

Apr 30, 2012 13:11



LOG IN TO REPLY
rick_reno
Cream of the Crop
44,444 posts
Joined Dec 2010
MORE INFO

Hmmm...crop body. 15-85 has great IQ. That and the v2 70-200 2.8 is great

Apr 30, 2012 15:25



LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
27,213 posts
Joined Dec 2006
MORE INFO

It might help if you envisioned the shots you wanted in your head beforehand. As has been mentioned above an engagement session can consist of lots of different shots. I agree that for portrait stuff, longer is generally better. But there might be a shot in there where you can make wide angle perspective distortion work for you.

Apr 30, 2012 15:28



LOG IN TO REPLY
SMP_Homer
Cream of the Crop
SMP_Homer's Avatar
5,363 posts

Joined Mar 2008

London, Ontario
MORE INFO

my last e-shoot was 24-70 and 70-200
sometimes I'll take the 35 instead of the 24-70
and we're doing something indoor, then 35 and 85

Apr 30, 2012 15:41

5D3 x2 / 5D2 / 1D IV / 6D
Sig85 /35L/100L/135L/16-35L II/70-200L II/100-400L
B400 x2 / B800 x2 / ABR800 / VML x2
600EX x3 / 430EXII x2
TT5 x8 /
PW TT1 / AC3 x3 / AC9 x4

LOG IN TO REPLY
jdlemmons
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
5 posts
Joined Mar 2012
MORE INFO

Gonzo- i have most of the shots already envisioned. We've been talking about this for a while and just set the date for it so now I'm getting into the gear part of it. I'm already positive I want something that will give me a wider angle, which is why I was leaning towards the 17-55 or the 24-70. I usually use my 50mm or the 85mm when I take photos of kiddos and my niece, and I know I can use either of those and be fine. I've heard the 70-200mm was better so I thought I'd ask and see if my train of thinking was on the right path. :)

Apr 30, 2012 17:24 as a reply to SMP_Homer's post 1 hour earlier.



LOG IN TO REPLY
jdlemmons
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
5 posts
Joined Mar 2012
MORE INFO

I cut myself off before I was finished. ha! sorry.

Since we're going to be on a lake, I wanted the wider angle so I can capture the whole scene around them... same with the field photos. I tend to like the negative space photos to get a feeling of being in a secluded place... feels a little 'romantic' to me :) I'm thinking the 70-200 would allow me to get away and let them kind of do their thing without realizing they're being photographed... but I can still get the photos that look like I was right there. I also assume the 70-200 would be okay for taking detail photos. I'd like some up close photos as well... I usually use my 50 or 85 for that, but if I can get the same shot with either of these lenses, then I won't worry about those. I'll probably bring my 50 with me just in case...

Apr 30, 2012 17:29



LOG IN TO REPLY
frugivore
Goldmember
frugivore's Avatar
2,662 posts
GALLERY: 1 photo

Joined Aug 2010

Toronto, Canada
MORE INFO

On your crop, the 17-55 would be nice. Or since you have an 50 or 85 available, you can try the 10-22mm for even more dramatic scenic shots.

Apr 30, 2012 17:40

Chris
Photography is communication. Art is the quality of that communication.

LOG IN TO REPLY
xchupacabrax
Member
xchupacabrax's Avatar
121 posts

Joined Jan 2008

California
MORE INFO

95% of my engagement shots come from the 85L @ 1.2 so I'm bias for the 85L. =)

IMAGE: http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8016/6984777122_4bda930ec6_c.jpg

IMAGE: http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7109/6984777060_488e7a6a6c_c.jpg

IMAGE: http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7203/7130861955_c380ebecce_c.jpg
May 01, 2012 01:05

www.olieng.netexternal link
5D / 35
L f1.4 / 135L f2 / 50mm 1.4 / 85mm 1.8 / 580EX II

LOG IN TO REPLY
wunhang
Senior Member
474 posts
Joined Nov 2009

SoCal
MORE INFO

I would actually suggest maybe also throwing in a second body into the mix for that second lens if that's economically feasible. I know that when I did it for a friend, there were definitely a few candid shots that I missed while doing a lens change (in retrospect, I should have just actually used my friend's rebel which we had there for emergency back-up). It'll also cut down/out lens changes (depending on how many you end up with).

May 01, 2012 01:22

Canon 5D II | Canon XSI (IR) | SL1 | 35mm L f/1.4 | 17-40mm L f/4.0 | 24-105mm L f/4.0 IS | 70-200mm L f/4.0 IS | Zeiss 100mm MP | C/Y 50mm f/1.7 | C/Y 28mm f/2.8 | EF-S 24mm f/2.8 | EF 40mm f/2.8
::SmugMugexternal link::

LOG IN TO REPLY
kin2son
Goldmember
4,546 posts
Joined May 2011

Sydney, Australia
MORE INFO
banned

17-55 for those wide angle and environmental shot, coupled with a 70-200 2.8 for tight portrait.

You can swap the 70-200 with a mid-long prime such as a 85f1.8 or 135L.

May 01, 2012 02:10

5D3 Gripped / 17-40L / Σ35 / 40 Pancake / Zeiss 50 MP / Σ85 / 100L Macro / 70-200 f2.8L II IS / 430 EX II / 580 EX II / Canon 2xIII TC / Kenko Ext. Tubes
EOS M / EF-M 18-55 / EF-M 22f2 / Ricoh GR aka Ultimate street camera :p
Flickrexternal link | My Images on Getty®‎external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
jdlemmons
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
5 posts
Joined Mar 2012
MORE INFO

Those are BEAUTIFUL photos!

I do have accessibility to another camera, so it's definitely a possibility. I know my last family shoot I spent a lot of time switching lenses. If my husband is there with me, it's pretty easy since he just hands me what I need but a 2nd camera might be easier... great suggestion! Thank you!

I LOVE the 85... it was SO sharp and I got some REALLY beautiful blurred backgrounds and tack sharp eyes from it. I've never shot with the 70-200 so that will be a new one to me. I'll probably rent it prior to the shoot so I can get a feel for it so it's not a learning process while I'm shooting.

May 01, 2012 11:36 as a reply to xchupacabrax's post 10 hours earlier.



LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

1,377 views & 0 likes for this thread
Engagement Shoot?
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses

NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO THE FORUMS
Registered members get all the features: search, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, own reviews...




Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality. We do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browsers' data storage methods.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.33version 1.33
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.0014 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.03s
Latest registered member is JanineR
606 guests, 492 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 5175, that happened on Jun 16, 2015