LOG IN    OR   REGISTER TO FORUMS


Engagement Shoot?

FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Thread started 30 Apr 2012 (Monday) 11:18   
LIST NEARBY THREADS
 
jdlemmons
Hatchling
Joined Mar 2012
5 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

I am doing an engagement shoot for my sister in June and am trying to figure out which lenses would work best for the shoot. This is my first engagement shoot (I've done lots of family/little kiddos) so I was hoping maybe you guys could help me out a little bit.

We'll be going to a few locations which include a pier/lake (lakeside not actually in the lake), a field, and then we're taking her fiance's 1970 Cadillac for some photos. I plan on renting a few lenses for this so feel free to recommend anything. I shoot on a crop sensor, and currently have a 50mm 1.8, which works wonders. A few weeks ago I rented an 85mm and I LOVED the tack sharp photos I got from it... much better than the 50mm I currently have.

I'm looking to rent maybe the 70-200 2.8, a 24-70 or 17-55, and then I'll probably buy the 85mm. Do you think I need the 50mm over the 85 or vice versa? or bring both?

Thanks!

Post #1, Apr 30, 2012 11:18:48




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
fotojennik
Senior Member
fotojennik's Avatar
Joined Aug 2011
213 posts
Pittsburgh
[MORE/SHARE]

I would seriously considering either buying or renting a flash or two and learning how to use it/them properly. Then maybe just rent 1 good lens. I know I can do an entire engagement shoot with my 35L and 135L (full-frame).

Post #2, Apr 30, 2012 11:30:48


Pittsburgh Wedding Photographerexternal link | Flickrexternal link | Gear List

LOG IN TO REPLY
ZachOly
Goldmember
ZachOly's Avatar
Joined Nov 2010
1,031 posts
Canada
[MORE/SHARE]

135L or 70-200 @ 200

Everyone loves and looks good with compression

Post #3, Apr 30, 2012 12:40:50


5D3 / 5D2 / 24-70 2.8 II / 35L / 50 1.4 / 70-200 2.8 IS II | Flickrexternal link | www.zachwheeler.caexternal link | Facebookexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
jra
Cream of the Crop
jra's Avatar
Joined Oct 2005
6,441 posts
Ohio
[MORE/SHARE]

IMO, the 24-70 is a great all 'round lens that you could easily do the entire shoot with.

Post #4, Apr 30, 2012 12:57:10


Jason
www.secondglimpse.comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
jdlemmons
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
Joined Mar 2012
5 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

I had planned on bringing my flash with me and probably my reflector as well.

So, it sounds like I would be good with the 24-70 and the 70-200... That makes it easier on my camera bag (and on me) only bringing 2 lenses :)

Thanks for your help!

Post #5, Apr 30, 2012 13:11:51




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
rick_reno
Cream of the Crop
Joined Dec 2010
44,430 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

Hmmm...crop body. 15-85 has great IQ. That and the v2 70-200 2.8 is great

Post #6, Apr 30, 2012 15:25:53




LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
Cream of the Crop
Joined Dec 2006
26,357 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

It might help if you envisioned the shots you wanted in your head beforehand. As has been mentioned above an engagement session can consist of lots of different shots. I agree that for portrait stuff, longer is generally better. But there might be a shot in there where you can make wide angle perspective distortion work for you.

Post #7, Apr 30, 2012 15:28:40




LOG IN TO REPLY
SMP_Homer
Cream of the Crop
SMP_Homer's Avatar
Joined Mar 2008
5,354 posts
London, Ontario
[MORE/SHARE]

my last e-shoot was 24-70 and 70-200
sometimes I'll take the 35 instead of the 24-70
and we're doing something indoor, then 35 and 85

Post #8, Apr 30, 2012 15:41:40


5D3 x2 / 5D2 / 1D IV / 6D
Sig85 /35L/100L/135L/16-35L II/70-200L II/100-400L
B400 x2 / B800 x2 / ABR800 / VML x2
600EX x3 / 430EXII x2
TT5 x8 /
PW TT1 / AC3 x3 / AC9 x4

LOG IN TO REPLY
jdlemmons
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
Joined Mar 2012
5 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

Gonzo- i have most of the shots already envisioned. We've been talking about this for a while and just set the date for it so now I'm getting into the gear part of it. I'm already positive I want something that will give me a wider angle, which is why I was leaning towards the 17-55 or the 24-70. I usually use my 50mm or the 85mm when I take photos of kiddos and my niece, and I know I can use either of those and be fine. I've heard the 70-200mm was better so I thought I'd ask and see if my train of thinking was on the right path. :)

Post #9, Apr 30, 2012 17:24:27 as a reply to SMP_Homer's post 1 hour earlier.




LOG IN TO REPLY
jdlemmons
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
Joined Mar 2012
5 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

I cut myself off before I was finished. ha! sorry.

Since we're going to be on a lake, I wanted the wider angle so I can capture the whole scene around them... same with the field photos. I tend to like the negative space photos to get a feeling of being in a secluded place... feels a little 'romantic' to me :) I'm thinking the 70-200 would allow me to get away and let them kind of do their thing without realizing they're being photographed... but I can still get the photos that look like I was right there. I also assume the 70-200 would be okay for taking detail photos. I'd like some up close photos as well... I usually use my 50 or 85 for that, but if I can get the same shot with either of these lenses, then I won't worry about those. I'll probably bring my 50 with me just in case...

Post #10, Apr 30, 2012 17:29:27




LOG IN TO REPLY
frugivore
Goldmember
frugivore's Avatar
Joined Aug 2010
2,592 posts
Toronto, Canada
[MORE/SHARE]

On your crop, the 17-55 would be nice. Or since you have an 50 or 85 available, you can try the 10-22mm for even more dramatic scenic shots.

Post #11, Apr 30, 2012 17:40:55


Chris
Photography is communication. Art is the quality of that communication.

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
xchupacabrax
Senior Member
xchupacabrax's Avatar
Joined Jan 2008
121 posts
California
[MORE/SHARE]

95% of my engagement shots come from the 85L @ 1.2 so I'm bias for the 85L. =)

IMAGE: http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8016/6984777122_4bda930ec6_c.jpg

IMAGE: http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7109/6984777060_488e7a6a6c_c.jpg

IMAGE: http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7203/7130861955_c380ebecce_c.jpg

Post #12, May 01, 2012 01:05:02


www.olieng.netexternal link
5D / 35
L f1.4 / 135L f2 / 50mm 1.4 / 85mm 1.8 / 580EX II

LOG IN TO REPLY
wunhang
Senior Member
Joined Nov 2009
471 posts
SoCal
[MORE/SHARE]

I would actually suggest maybe also throwing in a second body into the mix for that second lens if that's economically feasible. I know that when I did it for a friend, there were definitely a few candid shots that I missed while doing a lens change (in retrospect, I should have just actually used my friend's rebel which we had there for emergency back-up). It'll also cut down/out lens changes (depending on how many you end up with).

Post #13, May 01, 2012 01:22:38


Canon 5D II | Canon XSI (IR) | EOS M | 35mm L f/1.4 | 17-40mm L f/4.0 | 24-105mm L f/4.0 IS | 70-200mm L f/4.0 IS | Zeiss 100mm MP | C/Y 50mm f/1.7 | C/Y 28mm f/2.8 | EF-M 22mm f/2.0 | EF-M 18-55mm
::SmugMugexternal link::

LOG IN TO REPLY
kin2son
Goldmember
Joined May 2011
4,546 posts
Sydney, Australia
[MORE/SHARE]
banned

17-55 for those wide angle and environmental shot, coupled with a 70-200 2.8 for tight portrait.

You can swap the 70-200 with a mid-long prime such as a 85f1.8 or 135L.

Post #14, May 01, 2012 02:10:56


5D3 Gripped / 17-40L / Σ35 / 40 Pancake / Zeiss 50 MP / Σ85 / 100L Macro / 70-200 f2.8L II IS / 430 EX II / 580 EX II / Canon 2xIII TC / Kenko Ext. Tubes
EOS M / EF-M 18-55 / EF-M 22f2 / Ricoh GR aka Ultimate street camera :p
Flickrexternal link | My Images on Getty®‎external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
jdlemmons
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
Joined Mar 2012
5 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

Those are BEAUTIFUL photos!

I do have accessibility to another camera, so it's definitely a possibility. I know my last family shoot I spent a lot of time switching lenses. If my husband is there with me, it's pretty easy since he just hands me what I need but a 2nd camera might be easier... great suggestion! Thank you!

I LOVE the 85... it was SO sharp and I got some REALLY beautiful blurred backgrounds and tack sharp eyes from it. I've never shot with the 70-200 so that will be a new one to me. I'll probably rent it prior to the shoot so I can get a feel for it so it's not a learning process while I'm shooting.

Post #15, May 01, 2012 11:36:42 as a reply to xchupacabrax's post 10 hours earlier.




LOG IN TO REPLY


LIST NEARBY THREADS
1,256 views & 0 likes for this thread
Engagement Shoot?
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses



NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO FORUMS

CHANGE BODY TEXT SIZE FOR ALL THREAD PAGES
POWERED BY AMASS 1.0version 1.0
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net


SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF  |  JUMP TO FORUM...  |  FORUM RULES


Spent 0.00216 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
819 guests, 597 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014
Latest registered member is N4Ld3

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality, we do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browser's data storage methods.