Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography 
Thread started 01 May 2012 (Tuesday) 09:49
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

350 Employees??

 
willspective
Senior Member
Avatar
599 posts
Likes: 100
Joined Mar 2011
Location: Miami, FL
     
May 01, 2012 09:49 |  #1

So I was offered the opportunity to do a photoshoot for a company that has 350 employees. They want basic headshots/portraits of each employee, on a standard backdrop that they will provide. It will span over two days and they only need the photos digitally (via a password protected gallery).

They will be used on their website, Microsoft outlook as well as their security badges. The photos are to be no larger than 50 kb in size so as to not distort the images when importing them onto the designated locations.

I'm supposed to submit a proposal to them, but I'm not sure at all how much to charge. I'm thinking of submitting the proposal for $10 a person. Thoughts, anyone?


will (external link) | web (external link) | gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
CMfromIL
Senior Member
Avatar
623 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Joined Oct 2011
Location: Folsom CA
     
May 01, 2012 10:03 |  #2

Quite honestly, if they are asking for basic shots, no post production work, and the files I think that $3500 is going to be on the high side of what they want to pay.

I work for an organization with 2500 employees and HR does this all the time (takes the pictures). Granted it's not a stunner of a photography job but for a badge it's perfect.

For 2 days work, if it's simply going to entail you to say "Sit here, smile, click, NEXT" I'd do a real hard look at your time and expenses and see if you could trim it down a bit.

$2000 sure would be good for 2 days work, versus proposing $3500 and not gettting it.

Why were you asked? Had you done work for them before? What is your 'in' on this? Have they given you a budget they are expecting to pay?


Like me on facebook! http://www.facebook.co​m/CollinMcKahinPhotogr​aphy (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
willspective
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
599 posts
Likes: 100
Joined Mar 2011
Location: Miami, FL
     
May 01, 2012 10:21 |  #3

CMfromIL wrote in post #14359981 (external link)
Quite honestly, if they are asking for basic shots, no post production work, and the files I think that $3500 is going to be on the high side of what they want to pay.

I work for an organization with 2500 employees and HR does this all the time (takes the pictures). Granted it's not a stunner of a photography job but for a badge it's perfect.

For 2 days work, if it's simply going to entail you to say "Sit here, smile, click, NEXT" I'd do a real hard look at your time and expenses and see if you could trim it down a bit.

$2000 sure would be good for 2 days work, versus proposing $3500 and not gettting it.

Why were you asked? Had you done work for them before? What is your 'in' on this? Have they given you a budget they are expecting to pay?

They didn't give me a budget. My "in" on this is that a high school friend is the second-in-charge of this project, and she approached me about it. There may be a little bit of editing involved, I'm not sure.

I was thinking of submitting the $3,500 proposal and adding that if it is out of their budget that some negotiation may be possible. The thing is, they don't just want like a "sit here, smile, click," they're trying to make it fun for their employees. A DJ, etc. I'm going to suggest maybe doing one "fun" pose and then one serious one.

They're also interested in having a monitor on set for employees to see their pictures, which I think is pretty simple to set up, but it's also a little extra tidbit. My friend told me specifically that HR usually does that type of work, but they want a higher quality product. It's a cruise company so, they are not as business-oriented in the sense that their pictures don't have to be extremely professional.

Thoughts with this further information?


will (external link) | web (external link) | gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CMfromIL
Senior Member
Avatar
623 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Joined Oct 2011
Location: Folsom CA
     
May 01, 2012 11:11 |  #4

willspective wrote in post #14360124 (external link)
They didn't give me a budget. My "in" on this is that a high school friend is the second-in-charge of this project, and she approached me about it. There may be a little bit of editing involved, I'm not sure.

I was thinking of submitting the $3,500 proposal and adding that if it is out of their budget that some negotiation may be possible. The thing is, they don't just want like a "sit here, smile, click," they're trying to make it fun for their employees. A DJ, etc. I'm going to suggest maybe doing one "fun" pose and then one serious one.

They're also interested in having a monitor on set for employees to see their pictures, which I think is pretty simple to set up, but it's also a little extra tidbit. My friend told me specifically that HR usually does that type of work, but they want a higher quality product. It's a cruise company so, they are not as business-oriented in the sense that their pictures don't have to be extremely professional.

Thoughts with this further information?

First, I've highlighted a section in bold. If you include that, they would be foolish NOT to negotiate your pricing. I know if I were on the receiving end of the table, and that clause were included my first comment would be "how much lower can you go" before even reading it.

Secondly, based on your additional information your pricing may not be out of line. Sounds like there may be more work than will be anticipated. Particularly if they are allowing employees the 'luxury' of viewing their photo on the spot. Without a doubt there will be plenty of reshoots.

Good luck, sounds like a fun project. Hope you get it.


Like me on facebook! http://www.facebook.co​m/CollinMcKahinPhotogr​aphy (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Gameface
Senior Member
Avatar
672 posts
Joined Mar 2011
Location: Boston
     
May 01, 2012 11:15 |  #5
bannedPermanent ban

If the person is your friend, be honest and ask them what the budget they had set aside for the project was. Shoot for that.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
willspective
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
599 posts
Likes: 100
Joined Mar 2011
Location: Miami, FL
     
May 01, 2012 11:20 |  #6

CMfromIL wrote in post #14360360 (external link)
First, I've highlighted a section in bold. If you include that, they would be foolish NOT to negotiate your pricing. I know if I were on the receiving end of the table, and that clause were included my first comment would be "how much lower can you go" before even reading it.

Secondly, based on your additional information your pricing may not be out of line. Sounds like there may be more work than will be anticipated. Particularly if they are allowing employees the 'luxury' of viewing their photo on the spot. Without a doubt there will be plenty of reshoots.

Good luck, sounds like a fun project. Hope you get it.

Haha, thanks a lot. Yeah, see, I thought initially it may be a little too high, and that's fine with me. I'd settle for a slightly lower price, which is why I overshot a little to meet in the middle. Everybody wins!


will (external link) | web (external link) | gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
willspective
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
599 posts
Likes: 100
Joined Mar 2011
Location: Miami, FL
     
May 01, 2012 11:28 |  #7

Gameface wrote in post #14360392 (external link)
If the person is your friend, be honest and ask them what the budget they had set aside for the project was. Shoot for that.

I asked her! She wasn't given the specific budget numbers because it has to go through the project manager no matter what, so she couldn't tell me accurately if my number was too high or not, which is why I turned to the great folks on POTN.


will (external link) | web (external link) | gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CMfromIL
Senior Member
Avatar
623 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Joined Oct 2011
Location: Folsom CA
     
May 01, 2012 11:29 |  #8

Now that I'm thinking about this, I'm wondering how the heck are you going to do 350 shots in 2 days?

Thats 175 people in a day. Figure a 12 hour shoot, that's nearly 15 people an hour. 1 every 4 minutes?

How many people will be shooting with you? This job could kill you. Literally!


Like me on facebook! http://www.facebook.co​m/CollinMcKahinPhotogr​aphy (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
willspective
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
599 posts
Likes: 100
Joined Mar 2011
Location: Miami, FL
     
May 01, 2012 11:37 |  #9

CMfromIL wrote in post #14360495 (external link)
Now that I'm thinking about this, I'm wondering how the heck are you going to do 350 shots in 2 days?

Thats 175 people in a day. Figure a 12 hour shoot, that's nearly 15 people an hour. 1 every 4 minutes?

How many people will be shooting with you? This job could kill you. Literally!

At least one other person will be shooting with me, I think..ahh, I'll cross that bridge when I get to it, IF I get to it.


will (external link) | web (external link) | gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jra
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,526 posts
Likes: 18
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Ohio
     
May 01, 2012 12:09 |  #10

CMfromIL wrote in post #14360495 (external link)
Thats 175 people in a day. Figure a 12 hour shoot, that's nearly 15 people an hour. 1 every 4 minutes?

4 minutes for each person should be more than enough time.....In fact, if the set up is done properly and well thought out, he should be able to do it in half of that time. Shooting youth sports, I can average a child about every 60-90 seconds (sometimes closer to 2 minutes with the younger ones)....and it's not rushed at all. The only problem would be if he's allowing a viewing session and then trying to do re-shoots, etc.... Then time may be an issue.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CMfromIL
Senior Member
Avatar
623 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Joined Oct 2011
Location: Folsom CA
     
May 01, 2012 12:24 |  #11

I'm just thinking about the live DJ, different poses (one fun!) etc. It just sounds like he'll either be rushed or trying to do too much in a short time. If he has another shooter that of course would be a big help.


Like me on facebook! http://www.facebook.co​m/CollinMcKahinPhotogr​aphy (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
willspective
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
599 posts
Likes: 100
Joined Mar 2011
Location: Miami, FL
     
May 01, 2012 12:28 |  #12

jra wrote in post #14360692 (external link)
4 minutes for each person should be more than enough time.....In fact, if the set up is done properly and well thought out, he should be able to do it in half of that time. Shooting youth sports, I can average a child about every 60-90 seconds (sometimes closer to 2 minutes with the younger ones)....and it's not rushed at all. The only problem would be if he's allowing a viewing session and then trying to do re-shoots, etc.... Then time may be an issue.

CMfromIL wrote in post #14360793 (external link)
I'm just thinking about the live DJ, different poses (one fun!) etc. It just sounds like he'll either be rushed or trying to do too much in a short time. If he has another shooter that of course would be a big help.

I don't necessarily think the screen-viewing is to decide whether to do a re-shoot or not, it's more to see their image right after it was taken, a-la a rollercoaster shot? I don't think it's unreasonable, but hey, there's only one way I can find out, right?


will (external link) | web (external link) | gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nathancarter
Cream of the Crop
5,461 posts
Gallery: 32 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 580
Joined Dec 2010
     
May 01, 2012 15:54 |  #13

Your camera has a burst rate of 5fps, you should be able to get 'em done in a little more than a minute. Let's call it two minutes, that way you get to take a 45-second break in the middle to have a cigarette and a Coke.

In a little more seriousness:
If someone else is managing the line - ideally, someone provided by the company, who knows the employees and can keep them organized - four minutes per person isn't unreasonable. If you have to herd people and manage the line yourself, it's going to take a lot longer.

Tether into Lightroom or Canon's software so they can see the photos as you take them (per request), expect some re-shoots, but don't let any individual hog your setup for more than two or three minutes. Take a ten-minutes break to catch your breath and back up your files after every department (or so).

If it were me, I'd shoot it tethered into Lightroom. That would make it the fastest and simplest, I think. You can set up your white balance in advance, shoot a couple of test shots of yourself or a helper, then set your develop settings (contrast, sharpening, etc) on the test shots. Then, while shooting tethered, Lightroom can automatically apply those develop settings to each file as they come in. Have your company-provided helper move the line, keep track of names, etc. After shooting a few takes of each person, immediately mark your keeper(s) with a flag or star-rating. Then once the last person is done, just filter to those keepers, and export 'em. Shoot, burn, get paid.


http://www.avidchick.c​om (external link) for business stuff
http://www.facebook.co​m/VictorVoyeur (external link) for fun stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Talley
Talley Whacker
Avatar
10,536 posts
Gallery: 40 photos
Likes: 2289
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Houston
     
May 01, 2012 16:00 |  #14

nathancarter wrote in post #14362017 (external link)
Your camera has a burst rate of 5fps, you should be able to get 'em done in a little more than a minute. Let's call it two minutes, that way you get to take a 45-second break in the middle to have a cigarette and a Coke.

In a little more seriousness:
If someone else is managing the line - ideally, someone provided by the company, who knows the employees and can keep them organized - four minutes per person isn't unreasonable. If you have to herd people and manage the line yourself, it's going to take a lot longer.

Tether into Lightroom or Canon's software so they can see the photos as you take them (per request), expect some re-shoots, but don't let any individual hog your setup for more than two or three minutes. Take a ten-minutes break to catch your breath and back up your files after every department (or so).

If it were me, I'd shoot it tethered into Lightroom. That would make it the fastest and simplest, I think. You can set up your white balance in advance, shoot a couple of test shots of yourself or a helper, then set your develop settings (contrast, sharpening, etc) on the test shots. Then, while shooting tethered, Lightroom can automatically apply those develop settings to each file as they come in. Have your company-provided helper move the line, keep track of names, etc. After shooting a few takes of each person, immediately mark your keeper(s) with a flag or star-rating. Then once the last person is done, just filter to those keepers, and export 'em. Shoot, burn, get paid.

Sounds like you done this before.


My entire hobby of gear lust has temporarily been shifted into overload. Please be patient while my mind tries to get back onto the road to recovery. We do apologize for any inconvenience this may cause....
My Gear Archive

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
willspective
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
599 posts
Likes: 100
Joined Mar 2011
Location: Miami, FL
     
May 01, 2012 17:55 |  #15

nathancarter wrote in post #14362017 (external link)
Your camera has a burst rate of 5fps, you should be able to get 'em done in a little more than a minute. Let's call it two minutes, that way you get to take a 45-second break in the middle to have a cigarette and a Coke.

In a little more seriousness:
If someone else is managing the line - ideally, someone provided by the company, who knows the employees and can keep them organized - four minutes per person isn't unreasonable. If you have to herd people and manage the line yourself, it's going to take a lot longer.

Tether into Lightroom or Canon's software so they can see the photos as you take them (per request), expect some re-shoots, but don't let any individual hog your setup for more than two or three minutes. Take a ten-minutes break to catch your breath and back up your files after every department (or so).

If it were me, I'd shoot it tethered into Lightroom. That would make it the fastest and simplest, I think. You can set up your white balance in advance, shoot a couple of test shots of yourself or a helper, then set your develop settings (contrast, sharpening, etc) on the test shots. Then, while shooting tethered, Lightroom can automatically apply those develop settings to each file as they come in. Have your company-provided helper move the line, keep track of names, etc. After shooting a few takes of each person, immediately mark your keeper(s) with a flag or star-rating. Then once the last person is done, just filter to those keepers, and export 'em. Shoot, burn, get paid.

Excuse me while I print this and put it up on my wall. That was awesome! Thank you very much!


will (external link) | web (external link) | gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

2,768 views & 0 likes for this thread
350 Employees??
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is livingHi
716 guests, 264 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.