LOG IN    OR   REGISTER TO FORUMS


Budget Minded Bird Lens

FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Bird Talk
Thread started 02 May 2012 (Wednesday) 23:53   
LIST NEARBY THREADS
Poll"Best Bird Lens For Around $2000"

EF 100-400mm f/4-5.6L IS USM
32
34.8%
EF 300mm f/4 IS USM + 1.4x EF Extender III
8
8.7%
EF 400mm f/5.6L USM
47
51.1%
Other
5
5.4%

92 voters, 92 votes given (1 choice only choices can be voted per member)). VOTING IS FOR MEMBERS ONLY.
BROWSE ALL POLLS
 
Hogger69
Member
Joined Apr 2012
67 posts
Hornepayne On. Canada
[MORE/SHARE]

I am in the market for a new lens, up to now I have been using my EF 70-300mm IS for bird and nature photography. I am on a budget and would like to stay some where around the $2000 range. I have been reading and researching and have tentatively narrowed it down to 3 possible choices.

EF 100-400mm f/4-5.6L IS USM
EF 300mm f/4L IS USM + 1.4x EF Extender III
Ef 400mm f/5.6L USM

The criteria I most concerned about are

1 Image Quality
2 Image Quality
3 Speed of the lens
4 Autofocus Speed

Anyone who has any experience or opinions with these lenses or another lens I should be considering please post.

Post #1, May 02, 2012 23:53:48


Tim
EOS 7D | EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM | EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Duane ­ N
Cream of the Crop
Duane N's Avatar
Joined Nov 2007
8,512 posts
Chesapeake, VA USA
[MORE/SHARE]

Sticking with your criteria ONLY the lens would have to be the 400mm f/5.6L. I've never used the 300mm f/4L so don't know how fast that lens focuses...adding an extender to any lens will slow it down somewhat. The 400mm prime focuses faster than my 500mm f/4L so much so when I first bought my 500mm I thought something was wrong with it.

Post #2, May 03, 2012 03:57:06


www.3rdicreations.comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Joe52
Goldmember
Joe52's Avatar
Joined Jan 2011
2,770 posts
Dorset, UK
[MORE/SHARE]

Duane N wrote in post #14371328external link
The 400mm prime focuses faster than my 500mm f/4L so much so when I first bought my 500mm I thought something was wrong with it.

Very interesting Duane, this is the first time I have read a comparison between the 400 & 500mm focusing speed.

I have had the 300mm + 1.4, & now have the 400mm 5.6, the only thing I miss about the 300mm is the closer focusing distance, the 400mm is top notch in IQ & focus speed, perfect for BIF.

Post #3, May 03, 2012 04:12:33


My 500pxexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Duane ­ N
Cream of the Crop
Duane N's Avatar
Joined Nov 2007
8,512 posts
Chesapeake, VA USA
[MORE/SHARE]

This topic will go astray because there are so many variables to consider when purchasing a lens....

To help the OP out and seeing how you've owned the 300mm f/4L and used an extender with it how does it compare as far as focus speed to the 400mm prime?

Post #4, May 03, 2012 04:25:58 as a reply to Joe52's post 13 minutes earlier.


www.3rdicreations.comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Joe52
Goldmember
Joe52's Avatar
Joined Jan 2011
2,770 posts
Dorset, UK
[MORE/SHARE]

The 400mm beats the 300mm hands down for focusing speed, lock on is pretty much instant, the 300mm would miss on some smaller birds in flight & would hunt a lot more with the 1.4 attached.

Post #5, May 03, 2012 04:37:56


My 500pxexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
racketman
Cream of the Crop
racketman's Avatar
Joined Oct 2005
19,667 posts
Richmond Surrey
[MORE/SHARE]

300mm f4L is not a fast focusing lens for sure. Lovely IQ though.

Post #6, May 03, 2012 12:28:41


Toby
Flickr collectionsexternal link
ipernity galleryexternal link
Gear

LOG IN TO REPLY
Hogger69
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Joined Apr 2012
67 posts
Hornepayne On. Canada
[MORE/SHARE]

Just the kind of input I am looking for so far keep it coming. Please anybody that is voting or has voted for the other category could you please post to the thread the lens you had in mind.
Thanks

Post #7, May 03, 2012 20:42:32


Tim
EOS 7D | EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM | EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM

LOG IN TO REPLY
mileslong24
Senior Member
Joined Jun 2011
450 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

I voted for the 400 because I've been racking my brain same as you and after reading virtually every thread ever created comparing these lenses, I went with the 400. I've rented it before and its a great lens. Easily hand holdable, locks on focus instantly, and as long as you keep your shutter speed up the lack of IS isn't that big of deal. I almost went with the 300 and extender but slowing it down plus the nearly 500 difference in price made my decision for me. Good luck with whatever you go with!

Post #8, May 03, 2012 21:31:23 as a reply to Hogger69's post 48 minutes earlier.




LOG IN TO REPLY
Hogger69
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Joined Apr 2012
67 posts
Hornepayne On. Canada
[MORE/SHARE]

Thanks miles, good info, appreciated.

Post #9, May 03, 2012 22:24:55


Tim
EOS 7D | EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM | EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM

LOG IN TO REPLY
Muteki
Senior Member
Joined Jul 2009
198 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

400/5.6L gets my vote as well. It's sharp and focuses faster than the 300/2.8L IS MK1. The only downside is no IS on the 400. If you get blurry photo at slower shutterspeed, it's operator issue, not the lens.

Post #10, May 04, 2012 15:51:38


Raymond

Gears|external linkFlickr | external link5∞pxexternal link| external linkFacebookexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
jhayesvw
Cream of the Crop
Joined Jan 2011
6,385 posts
Tucson AZ
[MORE/SHARE]

with you criteria there is only 1 choice.
400 5.6.

I own a 100-400 and love it but the 400 is faster focusing and provides a very slight advantage in IQ. very slight.

Post #11, May 04, 2012 20:54:59 as a reply to Muteki's post 5 hours earlier.


Jeremy
7d, 50mm 1.8, 17-55 2.8 IS, 18-55 IS, 100-400L,430 exII
My Flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Naturalist
Adrift on a lonely vast sea
Naturalist's Avatar
Joined May 2007
4,776 posts
Minnesota Northwoods
[MORE/SHARE]

After shooting 200 and 300mm and desiring more I finally sprung for the 400mm prime and have no regrets.

Post #12, May 04, 2012 21:10:44


Doug
My Gear List http://www.flickr.com/​photos/n8trshtr/external link
Entered: 2-16-84 Passed: 5-22-84 Raised: 6-19-84

LOG IN TO REPLY
Hogger69
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Joined Apr 2012
67 posts
Hornepayne On. Canada
[MORE/SHARE]

Thanks for the info, appreciated.

Post #13, May 05, 2012 22:45:10


Tim
EOS 7D | EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM | EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM

LOG IN TO REPLY
S.Horton
dǝǝɥs ɐ ʎq pǝʞuɐds
S.Horton's Avatar
Joined Dec 2006
17,808 posts
Lehigh Valley, PA
[MORE/SHARE]

100-400 for IS

Post #14, May 05, 2012 22:53:51


Sam - TF Says Ishmael
http://midnightblue.sm​ugmug.comexternal link
Want your title changed?Dream On!external link
[SIZE=2]:cool:

LOG IN TO REPLY
chubri777
Goldmember
chubri777's Avatar
Joined Apr 2007
1,514 posts
Cameron Park, Ca.
[MORE/SHARE]

Let's analyze.
The 300 + the 1.4x gives you 420mm f/5.6 with IS (sharper stopped down a bit)
The 1-4 is 400(questionable)mm f/5.6 With IS (sharper stopped down a bit)
The 400 is obviously 400mm f/5.6 without IS (very sharp wide open)
The 1-4 is the most versatile followed by the 300 + TC. The 400 is the quickest focusing of the bunch and probably the best IQ but not by a lot and better at f/5.6 than the others. None of these are low light specialists by any means.
Most people complain about an IQ fall off with teleconverters but that may no longer be the case with the TC IIIs. Your mileage may vary.
I think it comes down to the money vs. the versatility.
If it was me, I'd eat only ramen for a few months and save my nickles and look for a used 500....but that's just me.

Post #15, May 08, 2012 11:40:54


Regards,
Chuck
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/17627582@N08/external link

LOG IN TO REPLY


LIST NEARBY THREADS
5,905 views & 0 likes for this thread
Budget Minded Bird Lens
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Bird Talk



NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO FORUMS

CHANGE BODY TEXT SIZE FOR ALL THREAD PAGES
POWERED BY AMASS 1.0version 1.0
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net


SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF  |  JUMP TO FORUM...  |  FORUM RULES


Spent 0.00112 for 5 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
991 guests, 816 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014
Latest registered member is alexgr

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality, we do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browser's data storage methods.