Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Bird Talk 
Thread started 02 May 2012 (Wednesday) 23:53
Search threadPrev/next
POLL: "Best Bird Lens For Around $2000"
EF 100-400mm f/4-5.6L IS USM
32
34.8%
EF 300mm f/4 IS USM + 1.4x EF Extender III
8
8.7%
EF 400mm f/5.6L USM
47
51.1%
Other
5
5.4%

92 voters, 92 votes given (1 choice only choices can be voted per member)). VOTING IS FOR MEMBERS ONLY.
BROWSE ALL POLLS
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Budget Minded Bird Lens

 
Hogger69
Member
67 posts
Joined Apr 2012
Location: Hornepayne On. Canada
     
May 02, 2012 23:53 |  #1

I am in the market for a new lens, up to now I have been using my EF 70-300mm IS for bird and nature photography. I am on a budget and would like to stay some where around the $2000 range. I have been reading and researching and have tentatively narrowed it down to 3 possible choices.

EF 100-400mm f/4-5.6L IS USM
EF 300mm f/4L IS USM + 1.4x EF Extender III
Ef 400mm f/5.6L USM

The criteria I most concerned about are

1 Image Quality
2 Image Quality
3 Speed of the lens
4 Autofocus Speed

Anyone who has any experience or opinions with these lenses or another lens I should be considering please post.


Tim
EOS 7D | EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM | EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
Duane ­ N
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,021 posts
Gallery: 166 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 1834
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Chesapeake, VA USA
     
May 03, 2012 03:57 |  #2

Sticking with your criteria ONLY the lens would have to be the 400mm f/5.6L. I've never used the 300mm f/4L so don't know how fast that lens focuses...adding an extender to any lens will slow it down somewhat. The 400mm prime focuses faster than my 500mm f/4L so much so when I first bought my 500mm I thought something was wrong with it.


www.3rdicreations.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Joe52
Goldmember
Avatar
3,131 posts
Gallery: 151 photos
Likes: 1082
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Dorset, UK
     
May 03, 2012 04:12 |  #3

Duane N wrote in post #14371328 (external link)
The 400mm prime focuses faster than my 500mm f/4L so much so when I first bought my 500mm I thought something was wrong with it.

Very interesting Duane, this is the first time I have read a comparison between the 400 & 500mm focusing speed.

I have had the 300mm + 1.4, & now have the 400mm 5.6, the only thing I miss about the 300mm is the closer focusing distance, the 400mm is top notch in IQ & focus speed, perfect for BIF.


My 500px (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Duane ­ N
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,021 posts
Gallery: 166 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 1834
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Chesapeake, VA USA
     
May 03, 2012 04:25 as a reply to  @ Joe52's post |  #4

This topic will go astray because there are so many variables to consider when purchasing a lens....

To help the OP out and seeing how you've owned the 300mm f/4L and used an extender with it how does it compare as far as focus speed to the 400mm prime?


www.3rdicreations.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Joe52
Goldmember
Avatar
3,131 posts
Gallery: 151 photos
Likes: 1082
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Dorset, UK
     
May 03, 2012 04:37 |  #5

The 400mm beats the 300mm hands down for focusing speed, lock on is pretty much instant, the 300mm would miss on some smaller birds in flight & would hunt a lot more with the 1.4 attached.


My 500px (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
racketman
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,726 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Likes: 402
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Richmond Surrey
     
May 03, 2012 12:28 |  #6

300mm f4L is not a fast focusing lens for sure. Lovely IQ though.


Toby
6D, 80D, 100D & Olympus EM-1 MKII
Flickr collections (external link)
Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hogger69
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
67 posts
Joined Apr 2012
Location: Hornepayne On. Canada
     
May 03, 2012 20:42 |  #7

Just the kind of input I am looking for so far keep it coming. Please anybody that is voting or has voted for the other category could you please post to the thread the lens you had in mind.
Thanks


Tim
EOS 7D | EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM | EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mileslong24
Senior Member
508 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Jun 2011
     
May 03, 2012 21:31 as a reply to  @ Hogger69's post |  #8

I voted for the 400 because I've been racking my brain same as you and after reading virtually every thread ever created comparing these lenses, I went with the 400. I've rented it before and its a great lens. Easily hand holdable, locks on focus instantly, and as long as you keep your shutter speed up the lack of IS isn't that big of deal. I almost went with the 300 and extender but slowing it down plus the nearly 500 difference in price made my decision for me. Good luck with whatever you go with!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hogger69
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
67 posts
Joined Apr 2012
Location: Hornepayne On. Canada
     
May 03, 2012 22:24 |  #9

Thanks miles, good info, appreciated.


Tim
EOS 7D | EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM | EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Muteki
Member
200 posts
Likes: 67
Joined Jul 2009
     
May 04, 2012 15:51 |  #10

400/5.6L gets my vote as well. It's sharp and focuses faster than the 300/2.8L IS MK1. The only downside is no IS on the 400. If you get blurry photo at slower shutterspeed, it's operator issue, not the lens.


Raymond

Gears| (external link)Flickr |  (external link)5∞px (external link)|  (external link)Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jhayesvw
Cream of the Crop
7,201 posts
Gallery: 159 photos
Likes: 198
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Tucson AZ
     
May 04, 2012 20:54 as a reply to  @ Muteki's post |  #11

with you criteria there is only 1 choice.
400 5.6.

I own a 100-400 and love it but the 400 is faster focusing and provides a very slight advantage in IQ. very slight.



My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Naturalist
Adrift on a lonely vast sea
Avatar
5,108 posts
Gallery: 37 photos
Likes: 304
Joined May 2007
Location: Tallgrass prairies of northwest Minnesota
     
May 04, 2012 21:10 |  #12

After shooting 200 and 300mm and desiring more I finally sprung for the 400mm prime and have no regrets.


Doug
My Gear List
http://www.douglasbrow​nsr.com (external link)
Entered: 2-16-84 Passed: 5-22-84 Raised: 6-19-84

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hogger69
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
67 posts
Joined Apr 2012
Location: Hornepayne On. Canada
     
May 05, 2012 22:45 |  #13

Thanks for the info, appreciated.


Tim
EOS 7D | EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM | EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
S.Horton
I'm having size issues, does this get worse with age?
Avatar
18,041 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 99
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Royersford, PA
     
May 05, 2012 22:53 |  #14

100-400 for IS


Sam - TF Says Ishmael
http://midnightblue.sm​ugmug.com (external link) 
Want your title changed?Dream On! (external link)

:cool:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chubri777
Goldmember
Avatar
1,533 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Cameron Park, Ca.
     
May 08, 2012 11:40 |  #15

Let's analyze.
The 300 + the 1.4x gives you 420mm f/5.6 with IS (sharper stopped down a bit)
The 1-4 is 400(questionable)mm f/5.6 With IS (sharper stopped down a bit)
The 400 is obviously 400mm f/5.6 without IS (very sharp wide open)
The 1-4 is the most versatile followed by the 300 + TC. The 400 is the quickest focusing of the bunch and probably the best IQ but not by a lot and better at f/5.6 than the others. None of these are low light specialists by any means.
Most people complain about an IQ fall off with teleconverters but that may no longer be the case with the TC IIIs. Your mileage may vary.
I think it comes down to the money vs. the versatility.
If it was me, I'd eat only ramen for a few months and save my nickles and look for a used 500....but that's just me.


Regards,
Chuck

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

8,623 views & 0 likes for this thread
Budget Minded Bird Lens
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Bird Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.0forum software
version 2.0 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Angester
681 guests, 304 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.