Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Nature & Landscapes Talk 
Thread started 03 May 2012 (Thursday) 18:34
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

How to create a natural HDR?

 
kaitlyn2004
Goldmember
1,589 posts
Likes: 149
Joined Oct 2009
     
May 03, 2012 18:34 |  #1

I'm looking to use my -3, 0, +3 exposure shots to help bring out some of the shadows and highlights in a few of my shots...

The problem is when I bring it into Photoshop's HDR Pro or Photomatrix, it looks super "fake". How can I get the more natural look, just being able to bring out some of the details?


New Zealand Travel Photography (external link)
My Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
MCAsan
Goldmember
Avatar
3,704 posts
Likes: 32
Joined Jun 2010
Location: Atlanta
     
May 03, 2012 20:03 |  #2

Isn't"natural HDR" an oxymoron? LOL

I tried CS5 HDR and hated it. I use Nik HDR plugin to LR. You can adjust the tone compression and strength plus several other variables. You can go from deep grunge....to an image you would swear has not been touched. I highly recommend the Nik Suite.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hikin ­ Mike
Walkin' Like a Penguin Now!
Avatar
6,339 posts
Gallery: 16 photos
Likes: 321
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Atwater, CA
     
May 03, 2012 20:37 |  #3

kaitlyn2004 wrote in post #14375405 (external link)
I'm looking to use my -3, 0, +3 exposure shots to help bring out some of the shadows and highlights in a few of my shots...

The problem is when I bring it into Photoshop's HDR Pro or Photomatrix, it looks super "fake". How can I get the more natural look, just being able to bring out some of the details?

Hand-blending. I have a short article in my sig below...


Images in the Backcountry (external link) | Facebook (external link) | Google+ (external link) | Twitter (external link)
SEO for the Photographer (external link) | Creating HDRs Using Layer Masks (external link)
Canon 5D 17-40 Ճ/4L 300 Ճ/4L IS 70-200 Ճ/4L 50 Ճ/1.8 1.4x TC Օ Kenko Ext. Tubes

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
imjason
Goldmember
1,667 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Nov 2010
Location: Bay Area, CA
     
May 03, 2012 20:39 |  #4

check out the natural hdr thread

http://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?t=1142065


Canon gear: EOS M, Canonet QL17, SX230HS, S95, SD1200IS
Non-Canon gear: D600, D5000, D70, XG-2, U20
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PixelMagic
Cream of the Crop
5,546 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Racine, WI
     
May 03, 2012 21:06 |  #5

You can use luminosity masks in Photoshop to blend several exposures together and increase dynamic range (however, exposure blending is not the same as HDR).

Most of the time though I just use Lightroom with the LR/Enfuse plugin to give really natural looking results with minimal effort: http://www.photographe​rs-toolbox.com/products/l​renfuse.php (external link)

kaitlyn2004 wrote in post #14375405 (external link)
I'm looking to use my -3, 0, +3 exposure shots to help bring out some of the shadows and highlights in a few of my shots...

The problem is when I bring it into Photoshop's HDR Pro or Photomatrix, it looks super "fake". How can I get the more natural look, just being able to bring out some of the details?


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
IslandCrow
Senior Member
Avatar
589 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2008
Location: Rapid City, SD
     
May 04, 2012 14:40 |  #6

I actually like Photoshop CS5 for more natural looking HDRs. It definitely takes some practice (of which I certainly need more). But this was an HDR composite done with Photoshop where I think I achieved a pretty natural look, so it is possible. . .

PHOTOBUCKET EMBEDDING IS DISABLED BY THIS MEMBER.
Photobucket sends ads instead of embedding photos from their free galleries.
Click the link (if available) below to see the image in a gallery page.

http://i51.photobucket​.com …341_1703100_827​0777_n.jpg (external link)



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pophoto
Senior Member
580 posts
Joined Aug 2009
     
May 04, 2012 15:08 |  #7

I've had a lot of success using just ONE (1) RAW image in Photomatix to create a realistic looking HDR. A little more processing in CS5 - Nik Color Efex Pro adds an element of pop to the images.


Canon 5D Mark II - 24-105mm, 100mm macro, 70-200mm 2.8L
www.dancphotography.co​m (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
socalrailfan
Goldmember
Avatar
1,475 posts
Likes: 25
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Riverside, CA
     
May 05, 2012 09:06 |  #8

Oloneo does a great job, check out my Flickr photos for examples.


Dave - Riverside, CA PhotographersNature.co​m (external link)
Canon 60D & 40D. Canon 24-105 L, 10-22, 100mmL 50mm 1.4 and 70-300 L lenses.
My photos on Flickr (external link), my Google Earth/Panoramio photos (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
IslandCrow
Senior Member
Avatar
589 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2008
Location: Rapid City, SD
     
May 08, 2012 17:23 |  #9

pophoto wrote in post #14380009 (external link)
I've had a lot of success using just ONE (1) RAW image in Photomatix to create a realistic looking HDR. A little more processing in CS5 - Nik Color Efex Pro adds an element of pop to the images.

Perhaps I'm misunderstanding what you're saying, but if you're just using one image to do an HDR, and you want it to have a natural look, then what's the point? The way I see it, there are two reasons to do HDR. First is to expand your dynamic range. Second (and this is really tone mapping, not HDR) is to get that "HDR" look. Otherwise, wouldn't you just use the original picture and skip the HDR software entirely? Can't get much more natural than that.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
socalrailfan
Goldmember
Avatar
1,475 posts
Likes: 25
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Riverside, CA
     
May 08, 2012 18:15 |  #10

To me using one image is not producing an HDR image. I have used Oloeno and then Topaz Labs to take one image and make it look like an HDR, but it's still not an HDR to me.


Dave - Riverside, CA PhotographersNature.co​m (external link)
Canon 60D & 40D. Canon 24-105 L, 10-22, 100mmL 50mm 1.4 and 70-300 L lenses.
My photos on Flickr (external link), my Google Earth/Panoramio photos (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kaitlyn2004
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,589 posts
Likes: 149
Joined Oct 2009
     
May 08, 2012 20:53 |  #11

If I layer my exposures in photoshop and then mask away, won't it NOT blend properly? When I have the -3 and +3 sometimes those may not be "properly" exposed for the lowlights and highlights - so I guess I would have to adjust those to retain some of the detail and then mask accordingly?

I find I rarely have the luxury of determining exactly what the +/- range is for a given scene and being able to truly bracket easily for that. 99% of the time its -3/0/+3... :(


New Zealand Travel Photography (external link)
My Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Numenorean
Cream of the Crop
5,013 posts
Likes: 27
Joined Feb 2011
     
May 09, 2012 09:52 |  #12

Use filters and just take one shot ;)


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gremlin75
Goldmember
Avatar
2,660 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 155
Joined Feb 2011
Location: Detroit, MI
     
May 09, 2012 13:18 |  #13

MCAsan wrote in post #14375805 (external link)
I highly recommend the Nik Suite.

Same here. Nik HDR is simple to use and gives you lots of control over the image or you can just chose from one of their presets.

All the Nik plug-in's are amazing.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
IslandCrow
Senior Member
Avatar
589 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2008
Location: Rapid City, SD
     
May 10, 2012 12:56 |  #14

Numenorean wrote in post #14404479 (external link)
Use filters and just take one shot ;)

What about a picture inside a building with sunlight streaming through the windows and deep shadows in other areas, or a backlit scene in a forest. . .there are plenty of times a GND simply won't allow you to take a single photo that is properly exposed in all areas. HDR programs can be very useful tools. When used correctly, they can accomplish in minutes what would otherwise take hours with manual blending. When used incorrectly, it looks like something out of a cheesy sci-fi movie.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ee_guy
Junior Member
26 posts
Joined Mar 2012
     
May 18, 2012 12:59 |  #15

I have two sets of defaults i use in photomatix that i think give more natural looking photos. The settings depend on the level of exposure difference and how i feel about them.
My first one:
Exposure Fusion, method: adjust
Accentuation -1.9
Blending point 6.8
Shadows 6.2
Sharpness 5
Color saturation 2.5
White clip 10
black clip 10
midtone -7.2

My second:
Tone Mapping, Details Enhancer
Strength 100
Color Saturation 42
Luminosity 0
Detail contrast 0
Light adjustments -0.9
Smooth highlights 0
White point 0.746%
Black point 0.25%
Gamma 1
Temperature 0

Bear in mind these settings will change slightly with each set of bracketed photos depending on whats going on in the scene. Try these and then play with the sliders, find a nice range and then save off some presets to start from for future photos. If you take a look at my last 5 uploads to flickr you'll see these settings in action. Also bear in mind that no HDR is going to be perfect out of photomatix. You need to trade off close enough to real and then fix the other non-real parts in photoshop. This is often ghosting if things were moving, dark or dirty skys if the sky was relatively white. Blown out areas that will need to be blended away with a stack of the originals. These are just a few of the things that may or may not need to be fixed. Again they are always changing so youll need to decide at what level the photomatix is good enough and fix the rest in post.


Chris
Canon 7D | Canon EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM | Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II | Tamron AF 70-300mm f/4.0-5.6 SP Di VC USD XLD | Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

5,228 views & 0 likes for this thread
How to create a natural HDR?
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Nature & Landscapes Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.0forum software
version 2.0 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is theposeph
753 guests, 451 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.