Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Visual Enjoyment Sports
Thread started 07 May 2012 (Monday) 12:15
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Girls LAX..figuring out the Sigma 70-200 OS

 
namasste
Cream of the Crop
namasste's Avatar
6,776 posts
Joined Jul 2007
NE Ohio
May 07, 2012 12:15 |  #1

I've done all of the focus tests and still couldn't get my new Sigma 70-200 OS dialed in but during this game, I noticed something while chimping (calm down peanut gallery) and made some big adjustments. Things finally started coming in line! All shot with the 1DMkIII/Sigma 70-200 f2.8 OS w/ Canon 1.4x TC (MkII). Comments always welcome!

1. BEFORE I figured out the needed MA...

IMAGE: http://www.sephotos.net/img/s1/v47/p734981981-5.jpg

2.
IMAGE: http://www.sephotos.net/img/s3/v38/p725943665-5.jpg

3. sportrait...
IMAGE: http://www.sephotos.net/img/s1/v49/p1046361446-5.jpg

4.
IMAGE: http://www.sephotos.net/img/s3/v44/p566711199-5.jpg

5.
IMAGE: http://www.sephotos.net/img/s3/v39/p654112026-5.jpg

6. one of my little girl who, typically, is not a really competitive type kid...
IMAGE: http://www.sephotos.net/img/s3/v40/p881882965-5.jpg

7.
IMAGE: http://www.sephotos.net/img/s3/v44/p866707094-5.jpg

8. the one area the Sigma struggles a little (imo)..head on coming at shots...
IMAGE: http://www.sephotos.net/img/s1/v49/p910937428-5.jpg

Scott Evans Photographyexternal link
SportsShooterProfileexternal link l MaxPreps Profileexternal link
Gear List

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
LaxMom
Member
LaxMom's Avatar
203 posts
Joined Feb 2012
Virginia
May 07, 2012 12:26 |  #2

Look good to me! And hey, I chimp all the time! LOL But, I do it during their breaks, or when nothing is going on. The other night it was starting to get darker, and I was snapping away. During a break, I started "chimping" and seeing what my photos were looking like. I realized the lastest ones were looking super blurry and awful, so I changed my settings. Lucky I looked, before I had a whole bunch that were awful! LOL

Too bad the blurry stick is in the way in the second to last one......


Canon Rebel XSi, Canon 70-200 lens
“ I always thought good photos were like good jokes. If you have to explain it, it just isn’t that good." – Anonymous

LOG IN TO REPLY
namasste
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
namasste's Avatar
6,776 posts
Joined Jul 2007
NE Ohio
May 07, 2012 12:33 |  #3

LaxMom wrote in post #14393562external link
Too bad the blurry stick is in the way in the second to last one......

yeah but the interesting part is how the settings worked on that one...there has been much debate over main vs continuous AF and the AF sensitivity. some of the debate has been rather "animated". I used main and moderate slow sensitivity. notice that the focus did not jump to the foreground object when it clearly entered my focus area? I have found main to be more consistent than continuous IF you use slow or moderate slow sensitivity. everyone has their own way of doing things but it might be worth playing with these settings as a starting point if anyone is having AF issues for team field sports.


Scott Evans Photographyexternal link
SportsShooterProfileexternal link l MaxPreps Profileexternal link
Gear List

LOG IN TO REPLY
lugnut45
Senior Member
lugnut45's Avatar
Joined Feb 2009
Ohio's North Coast
May 07, 2012 14:46 |  #4

Nice shots Scott.
I've tried a couple of games recently, and have not yet "nailed" it, either due to my stupidity, or not really dialing the lens with MA. I did encounter the AF sensitivity issues you talk about as well, and have tried to dial down the sensitivity (-1, -2) so it doesn't jmp around so much.
Keep up the nice work.


Smile.....take pictures!
http://photography-on-the.net ...p=14422392&postcoun​t=3147
_______________

LOG IN TO REPLY
namasste
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
namasste's Avatar
6,776 posts
Joined Jul 2007
NE Ohio
May 07, 2012 14:52 |  #5

lugnut45 wrote in post #14394247external link
Nice shots Scott.
I've tried a couple of games recently, and have not yet "nailed" it, either due to my stupidity, or not really dialing the lens with MA. I did encounter the AF sensitivity issues you talk about as well, and have tried to dial down the sensitivity (-1, -2) so it doesn't jmp around so much.
Keep up the nice work.

thanks man! hope to see you around sometime!!


Scott Evans Photographyexternal link
SportsShooterProfileexternal link l MaxPreps Profileexternal link
Gear List

LOG IN TO REPLY
dandai
Senior Member
dandai's Avatar
305 posts
Joined Jan 2012
Newport News
May 07, 2012 19:36 as a reply to namasste's post |  #6

Dumb question : what is chimping? Thanks.


Canon 5D MKII,Canon 7D,BG-E7,Tokina 11-16f2.8, 50 f1.8 MKII, 24-105L, 70-200F4L,100F2.8L,Canon 1.4x EF Extender III,Canon 430EX II

LOG IN TO REPLY
namasste
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
namasste's Avatar
6,776 posts
Joined Jul 2007
NE Ohio
May 07, 2012 21:09 |  #7

dandai wrote in post #14395658external link
Dumb question : what is chimping? Thanks.

http://en.wikipedia.or​g/wiki/Chimpingexternal link


Scott Evans Photographyexternal link
SportsShooterProfileexternal link l MaxPreps Profileexternal link
Gear List

LOG IN TO REPLY
8612images
Senior Member
8612images's Avatar
714 posts
Joined Dec 2010
Texas
May 07, 2012 21:46 |  #8

Nice set of pics. How do you like that lens? I used a friends d700 and Sig 70-200 for a baskeball and it was quick and sharp.


Steve

LOG IN TO REPLY
dandai
Senior Member
dandai's Avatar
305 posts
Joined Jan 2012
Newport News
May 07, 2012 23:20 as a reply to 8612images's post |  #9

namasste,
Thanks for the info.I've learned something new today. :p


Canon 5D MKII,Canon 7D,BG-E7,Tokina 11-16f2.8, 50 f1.8 MKII, 24-105L, 70-200F4L,100F2.8L,Canon 1.4x EF Extender III,Canon 430EX II

LOG IN TO REPLY
Noitca
Senior Member
Joined Feb 2011
Acworth, GA
May 08, 2012 06:03 |  #10

Nice shots.

I also didn't know what "chimping" was. After reading it, I can't believe that some would think it is bad form or make a person a "lesser photographer" if you check your shots.

I can see how a person could do it excessively, but to not do it at all is just not using the tools available to you.


T1i with 18-55, 55-250, 50 1.8

LOG IN TO REPLY
namasste
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
namasste's Avatar
6,776 posts
Joined Jul 2007
NE Ohio
May 08, 2012 08:22 |  #11

8612images wrote in post #14396320external link
Nice set of pics. How do you like that lens? I used a friends d700 and Sig 70-200 for a baskeball and it was quick and sharp.

Prim liking it more and more. The key was getting it micro adjusted correctly as it did require fair amount when used with the tc. The only place I am still it sure is if it's fast enough to catch fast approaching subjects. Seems like it struggles just a bit there (to be fair, not worse than my Canon non-IS or MkI IS). I have a game tomorrow night so I'll really be concentrating on those types of images to see how it does now that I am getting some time with it.


Scott Evans Photographyexternal link
SportsShooterProfileexternal link l MaxPreps Profileexternal link
Gear List

LOG IN TO REPLY
Baseball ­ Nut
Member
Baseball Nut's Avatar
239 posts
Joined Aug 2009
Iowa
May 08, 2012 16:29 |  #12

Nice shots. I'm really liking mine that Santa gave me at Christmas (ok it was my early present to myself). I'm not nearly as experienced as you, but from what I've shot with the lens so far for sports (some basketball & baseball), I've been VERY happy with it. I noticed you said you had a Canon 1.4 TC with it too. Does it still work pretty good with it? I read a couple of places that it wouldn't work real good with a Canon TC, but did fine with a Sigma.


Larry
Psa 118:24
Phil 4:13
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/baseball_nut/external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
CSMFoto
Goldmember
CSMFoto's Avatar
1,171 posts
Joined Dec 2011
May 08, 2012 19:15 |  #13

Not bad captures...not a fan of the sigma 2.8 though. Photos look pretty noisy in the shadows not to mention the girls hair in #6 is strange....seems very noisy


Facebookexternal link | CSM Photographyexternal link | Gear
I got some camera's & lens'.

LOG IN TO REPLY
namasste
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
namasste's Avatar
6,776 posts
Joined Jul 2007
NE Ohio
May 09, 2012 09:36 |  #14

Baseball Nut wrote in post #14400611external link
Nice shots. I'm really liking mine that Santa gave me at Christmas (ok it was my early present to myself). I'm not nearly as experienced as you, but from what I've shot with the lens so far for sports (some basketball & baseball), I've been VERY happy with it. I noticed you said you had a Canon 1.4 TC with it too. Does it still work pretty good with it? I read a couple of places that it wouldn't work real good with a Canon TC, but did fine with a Sigma.

Larry, it seems to be handling the Canon tc pretty well now that I have added -11 MA. I have never used a Sigma tc so really can't comment if it pairs better or not.


Scott Evans Photographyexternal link
SportsShooterProfileexternal link l MaxPreps Profileexternal link
Gear List

LOG IN TO REPLY
namasste
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
namasste's Avatar
6,776 posts
Joined Jul 2007
NE Ohio
May 09, 2012 09:41 |  #15

CSMFoto wrote in post #14401417external link
Not bad captures...not a fan of the sigma 2.8 though. Photos look pretty noisy in the shadows not to mention the girls hair in #6 is strange....seems very noisy

hmmm, I'll give this some thought. I don't see what I'd call extraordinary noise (there is some) for 640-800 ISO, certainly not enough that I'd be concerned for print. Could be something I am doing in post as I used high pass sharpening on most of these which can highlight noise easily. The girl in #6 (my daughter in this case) is a very heavy crop which is why you see more noise there. I wanted to see how the crop would look since a 70-200 (even with a tc) is really short for field sports so heavier cropping becomes a bit of a necessity at times even if you are only shooting half the field at any given point (I never shoot downfield,even with longer glass)


Scott Evans Photographyexternal link
SportsShooterProfileexternal link l MaxPreps Profileexternal link
Gear List

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

4,346 views & 0 likes for this thread
Girls LAX..figuring out the Sigma 70-200 OS
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Visual Enjoyment Sports


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00116 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.03s
Latest registered member is Chris1968
757 guests, 558 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 5577, that happened on Mar 02, 2016