Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 08 May 2012 (Tuesday) 12:57
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

X-Rite ColorMunki vs. Datacolor Spyder4Pro

 
mclaren777
Goldmember
Avatar
1,479 posts
Likes: 79
Joined May 2012
Location: Olympia, WA
     
May 08, 2012 12:57 |  #1

Both are colorimeters and both are $169. I'd like to buy one of them to calibrate my monitor, but I can't decide which to get. Any feedback you could give me would be greatly appreciated.

ColorMunki on B&H (external link)
Spyder4Pro on B&H (external link)

ColorMunki review (external link)
Spyder4Pro review (external link)

IMAGE: http://i.minus.com/iqmsft0AXEWdj.jpg
IMAGE: http://i.minus.com/iVUM9YOHQP9wj.jpg

A simple comparison of sensor technology: Nikon vs. Canon (external link)
A technical comparison of sensor technology: Exposure Latitude (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,636 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 513
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
May 08, 2012 16:00 |  #2

Well, they both have good reputations, so either one should suffice. I'd say the most important "pieces" are your monitor and graphics card -- people occasionally report problems when calibrating, there are various "chunks" at play. A Colormunki or Spyder device could have a problem and that comes up once in a while, but typically something else is at the "root cause". So getting a decent device and software is the beginning of the "journey"!


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pbelarge
Goldmember
Avatar
2,835 posts
Joined Jun 2010
Location: Westchester County, NY
     
May 08, 2012 16:39 as a reply to  @ tonylong's post |  #3

If it helps, I just purchased the color munki. I also purchased an IPS screen.
I plan to calibrate by the weekend.
If you have not purchased by then, I will let you know what I think.


just a few of my thoughts...
Pierre

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,636 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 513
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
May 08, 2012 17:14 |  #4

pbelarge wrote in post #14400673 (external link)
If it helps, I just purchased the color munki. I also purchased an IPS screen.
I plan to calibrate by the weekend.
If you have not purchased by then, I will let you know what I think.

The part in bold can be pretty important to get across to the OP -- if the OP is using an inexpensive/cheap/cons​umer monitor then there are other considerations besides basic calibration!


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mclaren777
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,479 posts
Likes: 79
Joined May 2012
Location: Olympia, WA
     
May 13, 2012 18:44 |  #5

I do have a non-IPS screen, but I see no reason why color calibration is any less relevant for my monitor.


A simple comparison of sensor technology: Nikon vs. Canon (external link)
A technical comparison of sensor technology: Exposure Latitude (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,636 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 513
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
May 13, 2012 18:48 |  #6

mclaren777 wrote in post #14426465 (external link)
I do have a non-IPS screen, but I see no reason why color calibration is any less relevant for my monitor.

It's not a question of whether calibration can be a help, yes it can whether you have an IPS monitor or not.


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mclaren777
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,479 posts
Likes: 79
Joined May 2012
Location: Olympia, WA
     
May 16, 2012 12:52 |  #7

No, I do not have an IPS screen, nor do I plan to buy one any time soon.


A simple comparison of sensor technology: Nikon vs. Canon (external link)
A technical comparison of sensor technology: Exposure Latitude (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nightstalker
Goldmember
1,666 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Feb 2007
Location: North West UK
     
May 17, 2012 01:45 |  #8

Calibration can obviously help a non-IPS screen BUT you are still left with the fact that you will get significant colour shifts depending on your viewing angle.

You may well still experience dissapointment that your prints don't match the screen for this reason.


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kjhart0133
Member
Avatar
79 posts
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Jesup, Iowa
     
May 17, 2012 09:47 as a reply to  @ Nightstalker's post |  #9

FWIW, I have the Spyder 3 Pro and am using it with my Mac Mini and an NEC LCD 24" Monitor. I have calibrated several times and never a bit of difficulty. Images on my monitor look fantastic: websites, photos, videos all look great. Calibration is pretty easy using their software.

Good luck,


Canon 30D
Canon 40D
Canon 70D
Canon 10-18 f/3.5, Canon 18-135 f/3.5
Sigma 28-70, f/2.8, Canon 100-400mm L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Todd ­ Lambert
I don't like titles
Avatar
12,620 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Likes: 115
Joined May 2009
Location: On The Roads Across America
     
May 17, 2012 10:13 |  #10

I've had pretty good success with my Spyder 3 Pro as well.

Be prepared for your screen to possibly look much darker than you're used to. A lot of people have the brightness on their monitors way too high.


Year of Night - 365 Night Project - check it out! (external link)

Follow me into the night.
Unique Night Photography - twilightscapes.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pearlallica
Goldmember
Avatar
1,302 posts
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Great White North
     
May 18, 2012 13:06 |  #11

Weird. I thought I priced out the colormunki at +$400 some time back. I just recently picked up the i1Display Pro because I thought I was saving money. Looks like I spent MORE. huh.

Anyhow, I'm fairly happy with my purchase. I calibrated my three screens and side-by-side one of the monitors appears warm and the other cool. Strange because the stock settings, it was reverse (cool vs warm, the other way around). The important thing is that my luminosity is way down from how I had it. It's a real eye opener, although, looking at my massive assortment of prints from over the years it seems that I was never really off track in the first place.

It's nice to know when you add a touch of warmth or if I bump my mid-tones up, that adjustment will actually reflect in my prints. Some prints suffered in the mid-tones to shadows area and so I'm hoping having an officially calibrated monitor will help in this area. Otherwise I may have wasted 250 bucks.


jonathan @ tlcphoto.com (external link) - pro wedding and portrait photog
5d2 5d3 24L 50L 85L 16-35 70-200 ElinchromRX600 580EX 600EX VIV285

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mclaren777
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,479 posts
Likes: 79
Joined May 2012
Location: Olympia, WA
     
May 19, 2012 18:27 |  #12

kjhart0133 wrote in post #14445450 (external link)
FWIW, I have the Spyder 3 Pro and am using it with my Mac Mini and an NEC LCD 24" Monitor.

Is it safe to assume that your monitor doesn't have an IPS screen?


A simple comparison of sensor technology: Nikon vs. Canon (external link)
A technical comparison of sensor technology: Exposure Latitude (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mclaren777
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,479 posts
Likes: 79
Joined May 2012
Location: Olympia, WA
     
Aug 22, 2012 02:41 |  #13

Now that some time has passed, does anybody have experience with either/both of these colorimeters?


A simple comparison of sensor technology: Nikon vs. Canon (external link)
A technical comparison of sensor technology: Exposure Latitude (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
doidinho
Goldmember
Avatar
3,352 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Kenmore, Washington
     
Aug 22, 2012 18:11 |  #14

I had a spyder 3 express and it worked well for my CRT until it stopped working after about a year. I picked up a spyder 4 and ended up returning it because it gave my CRT a green color cast. Apparently they got rid of the contrast adjustment with the 4 which was somewhat of a disappointment.

I have an ISP now and am using a free program called calibrize which is good enough for me right now.

If I were to invest in a calibration device right now it deffinately wouldn't be a spyder.


Robert McCadden
My Flickr (external link)
MM (external link)
5DMKII, Rebel xti, 24-105 f/4L, Canon 70-200 f/4L, Canon 17-40.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tmwag
Brown Noser has crush on Suzyview
Avatar
2,641 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 9
Joined Feb 2009
Location: Kansas City
     
Aug 22, 2012 18:56 |  #15

doidinho wrote in post #14893680 (external link)
I have an ISP now and am using a free program called calibrize which is good enough for me right now.

Since you have ISP, I can't argue ;)...




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

46,310 views & 0 likes for this thread
X-Rite ColorMunki vs. Datacolor Spyder4Pro
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.0forum software
version 2.0 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is insurfr
739 guests, 379 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.