LOG IN    OR   REGISTER TO FORUMS


I'm going crazy, and can't decide ????

FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EOS Digital Cameras
Thread started 23 May 2012 (Wednesday) 09:36   
LIST NEARBY THREADS
 
watson76
Member
Joined Jan 2012
55 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

Oh, what a pain in the ass gear can be. So I have an XSI and I love the output, but the screen sucks for checking focus, buffering is quite slow (shooting RAW + JPG) and focus is hit or miss.

I typically only take pictures of my twin girls who while only 10 months old move enough that nailing focus on the XSI requires burst shooting to hopefully get a sharp picture. Checking focus on the XSI lcd (which I do quite a bit) is difficult (the lcd color/contrast is poor and the detail always looks soft). I also shoot indoors quite a bit and prefer natural light to flash whenever possible and XSI images fall apart above ISO 400.

I want the very best picture quality and I want a camera that can handle the focusing performance requirement of moving kids ( I shoot candids of people as well).

I have pondered the 5D Mark II and as a former Nikon shooter I have also looked at the D700 considering both price points are fine. Staying crop I have also looked at the Nikon D7000 and the Canon 7D.

I would move back to Nikon, but my biggest concern is Nikon colors which I feel always looked a bit artificial (I just love Canon skin tones), on the other hand I like the dynamic range of Nikon's sensor which seems to be lacking on Canon sensors.

While I do shoot JPEG + RAW, I find myself using the XSI JPEGs 99% of the time because out of the camera they are a close match for the RAW files so I do perfer a body which can deliver a solid OOC JPEG.

Thoughts ????

Post #1, May 23, 2012 09:36:12




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
davidc502
Goldmember
davidc502's Avatar
Joined Dec 2010
3,405 posts
Tennessee
[MORE/SHARE]

No that I'm anyone in the photography business, but I shoot .jpg 99% of the time. I simply like the mentality of letting the camera do the work, and since I have dialed in the picture style, I usually don't have to post processs anymore except for maybe a final sharpening.

As for what camera to get from the XSI, well the 5d2 is a fine camera, and I'm sure you would enjoy owning one. It would probably fit what you shoot most of the time.

Post #2, May 23, 2012 09:45:08


_
My Gear is ---> Here

LOG IN TO REPLY
joeblack2022
Goldmember
Joined Sep 2011
2,946 posts
The Great White North
[MORE/SHARE]

How are you focusing exactly? Are you defining a focus point and what mode are you in?

What lens are you using with the XSi?

Post #3, May 23, 2012 09:46:36


Joel

LOG IN TO REPLY
FerozeK
Senior Member
FerozeK's Avatar
Joined Apr 2012
177 posts
JHB, South Africa
[MORE/SHARE]

A 1Ds maybe....

Capturing a fast moving subject is dependent on shutter speed as well as technique, not so much which camera you have, the body you have is capable of good photo's, have you tried a 50mm F1.4 for low light?

Post #4, May 23, 2012 09:47:13


Canon 5D | Canon 24-70L IS, 70-200L/4 | Canon Speedlite 600EX-RT

LOG IN TO REPLY
watt100
Cream of the Crop
Joined Jun 2008
13,790 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

watson76 wrote in post #14473193external link
Oh, what a pain in the ass gear can be. So I have an XSI and I love the output, but the screen sucks for checking focus, buffering is quite slow (shooting RAW + JPG) and focus is hit or miss.

I typically only take pictures of my twin girls who while only 10 months old move enough that nailing focus on the XSI requires burst shooting to hopefully get a sharp picture. Checking focus on the XSI lcd (which I do quite a bit) is difficult (the lcd color/contrast is poor and the detail always looks soft). I also shoot indoors quite a bit and prefer natural light to flash whenever possible and XSI images fall apart above ISO 400.

I want the very best picture quality and I want a camera that can handle the focusing performance requirement of moving kids ( I shoot candids of people as well).

I have pondered the 5D Mark II and as a former Nikon shooter I have also looked at the D700 considering both price points are fine. Staying crop I have also looked at the Nikon D7000 and the Canon 7D.

I would move back to Nikon, but my biggest concern is Nikon colors which I feel always looked a bit artificial (I just love Canon skin tones), on the other hand I like the dynamic range of Nikon's sensor which seems to be lacking on Canon sensors.

While I do shoot JPEG + RAW, I find myself using the XSI JPEGs 99% of the time because out of the camera they are a close match for the RAW files so I do perfer a body which can deliver a solid OOC JPEG.

Thoughts ????

jpeg may be a close match but you can do a lot more with the RAW file. and shooting RAW and jpeg will slow down the buffering.

Sounds like you are hankering for a full frame model and good large aperture lens but I will say something is wrong if your XSi images "fall apart" after ISO 400. I regular shoot at much higher ISO levels with the XSi (450D) and get what I think are good results.

e.g
XSi (450D)
ISO 1600
no noise reduction, pretty much SOOC but I shoot in RAW and sharpen with adjustments before converting to jpg


IMAGE: http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8154/7235060074_fbf44e39e7_b.jpg

Post #5, May 23, 2012 09:54:54




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
watson76
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Joined Jan 2012
55 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

joeblack2022 wrote in post #14473244external link
How are you focusing exactly? Are you defining a focus point and what mode are you in?

What lens are you using with the XSi?

I am using the 50 1.4. Focus is fast, just not accurate. If I shoot 10 or so frames in a row, typically 1 or 2 are keepers. I have rented other lenses (including L) and have had the same problem. I always use Center Point focus. Been shooting for quite a long time and used to do paid work, so I believe it's not user error, but hell it could be me.

Post #6, May 23, 2012 10:02:23




LOG IN TO REPLY
watson76
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Joined Jan 2012
55 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

Watt, higher ISO on the XSI isn't bad, but I did use a Nikon D5100 for a couple of days and was blown away by how good images were. I could shoot at ISO 6400 and images still retained detail, color and tonality. I didn't care for the 5100s white balance. Nikon's focusing was also accurate under the same conditions, but I still feel like there is a special look from Canon's sensors that I don't get from the Nikon. Nikon images 'feel' flat, whereas Canon images have a natural 3D look that is hard to describe.

Post #7, May 23, 2012 10:04:41 as a reply to watt100's post 9 minutes earlier.




LOG IN TO REPLY
joeblack2022
Goldmember
Joined Sep 2011
2,946 posts
The Great White North
[MORE/SHARE]

watson76 wrote in post #14473314external link
I am using the 50 1.4. Focus is fast, just not accurate.

There are reports of focusing issues with that lens, but you mentioned issues with L lenses as well...

http://photography-on-the.net .../showthread.php?t=1​032353

Post #8, May 23, 2012 10:10:14


Joel

LOG IN TO REPLY
watson76
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Joined Jan 2012
55 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

FerozeK wrote in post #14473247external link
A 1Ds maybe....

Capturing a fast moving subject is dependent on shutter speed as well as technique, not so much which camera you have, the body you have is capable of good photo's, have you tried a 50mm F1.4 for low light?

I don't think I need a sports/wildlife camera to get the job done. Moving kids are always a challege. I think the problem is with the XSI focusing accuracy. Seems to back/front focus and shooting a 3 fps in burst corrects the problem as a little movement on my part puts the subject in focus (more or less luck). Focusing was my only gripe when moving from Nikon. I never had an OOF shot with my Nikon bodies that wasn't user error, that being said everything else about Canon is better.

Post #9, May 23, 2012 10:13:32




LOG IN TO REPLY
ct1co2
Goldmember
ct1co2's Avatar
Joined Feb 2009
1,917 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

What settings are you shooting with? Using center focus, what aperture, etc? Do you have an example you can post?

Post #10, May 23, 2012 10:15:40 as a reply to watson76's post 2 minutes earlier.


70D | 10-22 | 15-85is | 50-135 2.8 | 70-300L | 430ex | S100 |

LOG IN TO REPLY
watt100
Cream of the Crop
Joined Jun 2008
13,790 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

watson76 wrote in post #14473326external link
Watt, higher ISO on the XSI isn't bad, but I did use a Nikon D5100 for a couple of days and was blown away by how good images were. I could shoot at ISO 6400 and images still retained detail, color and tonality. I didn't care for the 5100s white balance. Nikon's focusing was also accurate under the same conditions, but I still feel like there is a special look from Canon's sensors that I don't get from the Nikon. Nikon images 'feel' flat, whereas Canon images have a natural 3D look that is hard to describe.

I belong to a local photo club and we shoot with the same subject with different cameras - Canon, Nikon, Sony, etc. I've never been "blown away" by how good the Nikon images looked but if that's what you think then maybe going back to Nikon is for you. No doubt focusing on the 60D, 7D. etc. will be better than the XSi and undoubtedly full frame will look better with better lens. I don't shoot moving kids indoors but I shoot outdoor sports with the XSi and have no problems, except like you mentioned the limited FPS rate and buffer will slow down
good luck

Post #11, May 23, 2012 10:16:40




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
watson76
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Joined Jan 2012
55 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

watt100 wrote in post #14473391external link
I belong to a local photo club and we shoot with the same subject with different cameras - Canon, Nikon, Sony, etc. I've never been "blown away" by how good the Nikon images looked but if that's what you think then maybe going back to Nikon is for you. No doubt focusing on the 60D, 7D. etc. will be better than the XSi and undoubtedly full frame will look better with better lens. I don't shoot moving kids indoors but I shoot outdoor sports with the XSi and have no problems, except like you mentioned the limited FPS rate and buffer will slow down
good luck

Watt, what lenses do you shoot with ? I don't think I could move back to Nikon, I find IQ, menus, buttons, design, better.

Post #12, May 23, 2012 10:22:43




LOG IN TO REPLY
watt100
Cream of the Crop
Joined Jun 2008
13,790 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

watson76 wrote in post #14473418external link
Watt, what lenses do you shoot with ? I don't think I could move back to Nikon, I find IQ, menus, buttons, design, better.

that pic above was with the Tamron 17-50 2.8 non-vc, I shoot sports with the Canon 100-400. But if I was shooting kids indoors I would use a bounced flash and a large aperture prime. All the models (550D, 60D, etc.) past the XSi have better usable ISO performance but if you want squeaky clean ISO 6400 no-noise reduction jpeg only pics you may not be satisfied with any of the Canon 1.6 crop models!
maybe a used 1d is in your future

Post #13, May 23, 2012 10:35:42




LOG IN TO REPLY
FerozeK
Senior Member
FerozeK's Avatar
Joined Apr 2012
177 posts
JHB, South Africa
[MORE/SHARE]

watson76 wrote in post #14473375external link
I don't think I need a sports/wildlife camera to get the job done. Moving kids are always a challege. I think the problem is with the XSI focusing accuracy. Seems to back/front focus and shooting a 3 fps in burst corrects the problem as a little movement on my part puts the subject in focus (more or less luck). Focusing was my only gripe when moving from Nikon. I never had an OOF shot with my Nikon bodies that wasn't user error, that being said everything else about Canon is better.

There's other reasons for getting a good used 1d besides the speed, it might be an older model but the IQ is definitely still there. The focusing ability is well above the XSI so it might just do the trick. Before you jump onto a new body maybe rent or borrow a body and see if it helps.

Post #14, May 23, 2012 11:39:34


Canon 5D | Canon 24-70L IS, 70-200L/4 | Canon Speedlite 600EX-RT

LOG IN TO REPLY
David ­ Arbogast
Cream of the Crop
David Arbogast's Avatar
Joined Aug 2010
5,435 posts
Lee's Summit, Missouri
[MORE/SHARE]

watson76 wrote in post #14473193external link
Oh, what a pain in the ass gear can be. So I have an XSI and I love the output, but the screen sucks for checking focus, buffering is quite slow (shooting RAW + JPG) and focus is hit or miss.

I typically only take pictures of my twin girls who while only 10 months old move enough that nailing focus on the XSI requires burst shooting to hopefully get a sharp picture. Checking focus on the XSI lcd (which I do quite a bit) is difficult (the lcd color/contrast is poor and the detail always looks soft). I also shoot indoors quite a bit and prefer natural light to flash whenever possible and XSI images fall apart above ISO 400.

I want the very best picture quality and I want a camera that can handle the focusing performance requirement of moving kids ( I shoot candids of people as well).

I have pondered the 5D Mark II and as a former Nikon shooter I have also looked at the D700 considering both price points are fine. Staying crop I have also looked at the Nikon D7000 and the Canon 7D.

I would move back to Nikon, but my biggest concern is Nikon colors which I feel always looked a bit artificial (I just love Canon skin tones), on the other hand I like the dynamic range of Nikon's sensor which seems to be lacking on Canon sensors.

While I do shoot JPEG + RAW, I find myself using the XSI JPEGs 99% of the time because out of the camera they are a close match for the RAW files so I do perfer a body which can deliver a solid OOC JPEG.

Thoughts ????

I'll second watt100's recommendation. I went from an xti to a 5D II and absolutely loved it. Was a huge difference-maker for me.

Regarding raw vs jpg I think you're reasoning isn't the best (imo) and I'm going to respond to that particularly because you mentioned an interest in having a better dynamic range. If you're just comparing jpeg to raw right out of the camera, the jpegs should actually have a better appearance because the camera is doing some significant processing for you (sharpening, contrast, saturation, etc.). I'm not keen on letting the camera automatically do the processing for me...I want total control, which is why I shoot 100% raw. And that's especially important if you're really concerned with dynamic range. An 8 bit jpeg file gives you no ability to recover blown highlights or clipped shadow details, but the 14 bit raw file often does.

But, I'm not trying to convince you to shoot only raw, just saying the desire for greater dynamic range is somewhat out of concert with a jpeg shooting style.

Post #15, May 23, 2012 13:13:00


David | Flickrexternal link
Camera: [Canon 5D III] [Sony a7R]
Lens: [Canon TS-E 17mm, TS-E 24mm II, 70-200mm II] [Zeiss (ZE): Otus 55mm] [Nikon 14-24mm]

LOG IN TO REPLY


LIST NEARBY THREADS
1,773 views & 0 likes for this thread
I'm going crazy, and can't decide ????
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EOS Digital Cameras



NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO FORUMS

CHANGE BODY TEXT SIZE FOR ALL THREAD PAGES
POWERED BY AMASS 1.0version 1.0
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net


SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF  |  JUMP TO FORUM...  |  FORUM RULES


Spent 0.00105 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
1012 guests, 715 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014
Latest registered member is hockeydude35

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality, we do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browser's data storage methods.